Home » A Little Rusty, But Still Trusty: 2000 Toyota Corolla vs 2008 Chevy Malibu

A Little Rusty, But Still Trusty: 2000 Toyota Corolla vs 2008 Chevy Malibu

Sbsd 1 28 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

Welcome to day two of our week-long search for some actually reasonable used cars! Today we’re dropping even further down the price range, and looking at a couple of cars for sale in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. They’re a little crispy around the edges, but they’re cheap and they run fine.

I was a little bit surprised by yesterday‘s results, not because I didn’t expect the Accord to win, but because I didn’t guess that the Buick would still carry such an old-man stigma. Yeah, it was probably someone’s grandpa’s car ten years ago, but who cares? Now it’s a reliable, comfy car that’s dirt-cheap to insure and is maybe halfway through its service life.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Don’t get me wrong; I really like that Accord too. And in fact, this is one of those comparisons where I think it would come down to a test drive and an inspection. Whichever one felt more honest in person would get the nod. That’s a difficult proposition, because they’re on opposite coasts, however.

Screenshot From 2025 01 27 16 10 55

Today’s cars are easier to cross-shop, because they’re both in the Twin Cities, a place that measures annual snowfall in feet, often drops below zero for days at a time, and uses a ton of salt to keep road ice at bay. It’s hard on cars. Any cheap cars you find there – and many expensive cars, come to that – are going to have some rust on them. Mechanical reliability is more important; I can tell you from experience how much it sucks to have some old clunker refuse to start when it’s nine below out and you’re already late for work. These two are both nice and solid mechanically, and it sounds like they’ve been well cared for. Let’s check them out.

ADVERTISEMENT

2000 Toyota Corolla CE – $2,000

00j0j 3o9q55ebtlg 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 1.8-liter dual overhead cam inline 4, four-speed automatic, FWD

Location: Minneapolis, MN

Odometer reading: 143,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

ADVERTISEMENT

If ever there was a “default reliable car for non-car-people,” it’s the Toyota Corolla. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve recommended a Corolla to someone, and no one who has taken that advice has regretted it. I’ve even owned a couple of Corollas myself over the years. You can’t call them exciting, but they do the job of being a car better than just about anything. And even better, unlike its big brother the Camry, a used Corolla can usually be had for cheap; the “Toyota tax” doesn’t seem to hit them as hard.

00t0t Kxyv0kfriqg 0ci0t2 1200x900

This generation of Corolla is powered by a 1ZZ-FE four-cylinder engine. This engine has a very un-Toyota-like tendency to burn oil, but it is still plenty reliable. This one is coupled to a four-speed automatic, but I can tell you from experience that a manual transmission doesn’t really make this car any more interesting; it just gives you more to do. It’s still young at 143,000 miles, and it’s been owned by the same family its whole life.

00p0p Iwwv86iornh 0ci0t2 1200x900

The word “sturdy” comes to mind when discussing the interior of a Corolla. “Dreary” as well. There’s nothing wrong with it, but it’s not going to inspire anyone to do anything more than go from one place to another. This one is in good condition, except for the air conditioning. It conked out not long ago, and the seller elected not to have it repaired.

ADVERTISEMENT

00f0f Gsf3elkg7sh 0ci0t2 1200x900

It’s not all that rusty, really; the passenger’s side looks all right, and the driver’s side doesn’t have any gaping holes. It’s not uncommon for cars to rust more on the driver’s side. That side gets crud from oncoming traffic as well as passing cars when it’s parked. Obviously it’s not worth fixing, but it will be years before it becomes a problem.

2008 Chevrolet Malibu LT – $2,000

00n0n 7dywd7dl7n7 0cf0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 2.4-liter dual overhead cam inline 4, four-speed (?) automatic, FWD

Location: Farmington, MN

ADVERTISEMENT

Odometer reading: 162,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

The Malibu nameplate has a long history, stretching all the way back to 1964 when it was introduced as a trim level on the new mid-sized Chevelle. In 1978, the Chevelle name was dropped, and the Malibu became its own model. As famous as the name was, it was replaced after 1983, ironically by a car called the Celebrity. Celebrity became Lumina, or Corsica depending on which one you considered the middle of the range, and then in 1997 Chevy came to its senses and brought back the Malibu name. Last year, the Malibu fell victim to the crossover takeover and went out of production again – this time without a replacement.

00i0i Ghrimtgvwdo 0cf0t2 1200x900

The base engine in this era of Malibu is a 2.4-liter Ecotec four, putting out 169 horsepower to the front wheels. It’s an automatic, of course – no car with a Malibu badge has had a manual transmission since 1983 – but I can’t tell you for sure how many gears it has. Both a four- and a six-speed automatic were available. Whichever it is, it’s in good condition, and the seller says it runs and drives well.

ADVERTISEMENT

00f0f 3bwmvtiaqez 0lo0t2 1200x900

Inside, it’s got more plastic parts than an AMT model kit, but it’s serviceable. It looks like it could use a good cleaning, but it’s not torn up or anything. The traction control and airbag warning lights are on, which may or may not be a big deal depending on your feelings about those particular systems. But everything else works, the seller says.

00j0j 72xwup6sixu 0cf0t2 1200x900

It’s pretty rusty outside, and it’s probably worth looking underneath to make sure there’s nothing more serious than what you can see. If it’s still structurally sound, then it should serve someone well until it isn’t.

Keep in mind, we’re talking about cars that cost two grand here. You might not have any need for such basic transportation, but try to put yourself in the mind of someone who does. These should both last someone a couple of years, for the same price as a handful of payments on something newer. They’d also make good first cars for someone’s kid, especially if that kid is paying their own way. So, in short, be a good sport and pick one.

ADVERTISEMENT

(Image credits: sellers)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
67 Oldsmobile
67 Oldsmobile
7 hours ago

Bullshit, Corollas are crap. I had an E11 that lasted all of three months before it shat itself with some kind of engine management/electrical issue.
It was surprisingly comfortable to drive though and it revved up to 7500,but the Toyota tax is really overrated.

Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
12 hours ago

Corolla is better value for money here, and should consume less fuel.

The 2008 Malibu had some issues especially with Chevrolet going bankrupt.

Cyko9
Cyko9
23 hours ago

If the Malibu were in better shape, it might have had a chance. This Corolla is pretty good for the price.

Dodd Lives
Dodd Lives
1 day ago

Easy win for the Corolla. Those things are automotive cockroaches – nothing short of a nuclear holocaust will stop them, and even then…

Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
12 hours ago
Reply to  Dodd Lives

Not all generations of the Corolla. Some years were real horrors…

Next up is the 3800 V6.

Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
1 day ago

Corolla for me. The Corolla is solid, reliable low cost transportation.

And that Chevy, even though it’s 8 years newer seems to have more rust.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
1 day ago

When I first got down to the Chevy, I thought Wow! it even has a sunroof! But the TC and airbag lights scared me away.

(And I also thought how happy I am to live in an area where they don’t use salt.)

It seems like Corollas are as hard to kill as Top Gears Hilux.

Stephen Reed
Stephen Reed
1 day ago

Corolla for me. The Malibu looks rougher and coupled with the airbag light, I have a hard time trusting it.

Acd
Acd
1 day ago

My vote is for the Malibu because compared to a Corolla it looks and drives like an Audi RS7.

Kidneystone
Kidneystone
1 day ago

*Brian from RCR voice*
TOYOTA. COROLLA.

JimmyTheKid
JimmyTheKid
1 day ago

I am fond of the Malibu having previously owned a 2008 V6 LT myself, but too many flags compared to the Corolla.

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
1 day ago

Corolla, brought to you by beige corduroy jacket, pants and desert boots. Fine invisible car. I chose the Honda yesterday because I could haul things slowly with it.

JunkCarJunky
JunkCarJunky
1 day ago

These are both so boring but for choices they’re still ok. Thought about going Malibu for a second, but went Corolla due to lower miles and that it’s been owned by the same family its whole life. These are both good beaters w/ a heater

Baja_Engineer
Baja_Engineer
1 day ago

that Malibu is far too gone. And the traction control light could probably be an ABS wheel sensor or something else. Not an expensive part and if you have an OBDII with ABS module diagnostics and are handy you could tackle it yourself. The airbag light might be more expensive and time consuming, though.
All in it’s not worth getting those fixed so run as it is, but I don’t see myself getting into such trouble.
PS. this one has a 4 spd as noted in the shift indicator (6 slots P-R-N-D-I-L while the 6 spd only has 5 slots P-R-N-D-M).

The Corolla is my pick today. Needless to say some of these still used a 3 spd like my HS friend’s and it was such a dog. This one has the O/D button and A245E sticker on the VIN sticker so yeah a 4spd indeed.

Mattio
Mattio
1 day ago
Reply to  Baja_Engineer

Agree on the ABS light. Does anyone who knows this particular model know if the tone ring or the abs sensor tends to go first in the rust belt?

Still not a fan of the airbag light. The bumper and fenders look a little funny, wonder if there was an accident at some point.

Baja_Engineer
Baja_Engineer
10 hours ago
Reply to  Mattio

my guess is one of the wiring harnesses under the front seats. Those pigtails can go loose with time

Camp Fire
Camp Fire
1 day ago

Let’s see here…

A 1-owner Corolla with lower miles and fairly standard rust patterns
-vs-
an Ecotec with higher miles, large holes in multiple quarter panels, and duct-tape marks on the bumper cover (possibly covering a fender bender?). The holes worry me as they’re not quite in the normal places. Deeper rust is likely hiding underneath.

Either one would get the job done, they’re well matched. But I’d take the Corolla. Especially if “consistent and regular maintenance servicing” means the car comes with records. Knowing a car’s history adds significantly to its value (to me).

Just be sure to add oil regularly!

Last edited 1 day ago by Camp Fire
Dumb Shadetree
Dumb Shadetree
1 day ago

Easy Malibu for me. This specific year of the 1ZZ-FE didn’t just burn oil. It developed a bad main seal and ran through obscene amounts of oil at relatively low (say, 100k) miles. Every car has bad years and this was a bad year for the Corolla.

Bruno Ealo
Bruno Ealo
1 day ago

Corolla!!!!I bought a used 1999 Prizm that was a year old from a rental lot and drove for 9 years,160k miles and it never left me stranded.The odd thing about that car was when it dropped below 10F that car did not want to start.I would always have to crank it a few times before it started in that cold weather.

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 day ago

Easily the Corolla for me. These aren’t fun cars: they’re beaters, and my experience tells me the Toyota will take a beating longer—and more cheerfully—than that GM

Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
12 hours ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

There are exceptions. The Buick 3800 V6 can take severe abuse. The 6.0L L96 HD can take tons of abuse. But that is a truck engine, so….

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
12 hours ago

I should also qualify that I tend to gravitate towards smaller cars when possible because I spend more time on rural mountain roads & trails than highways

Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
12 hours ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

If you are navigating small places, sure.

59
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x