If you’ve flown economy at any point in the past decade or so I’m sure I don’t need to tell you how hilariously awful it can be. You get a sliver of space in an uncomfortable seat for however long it takes you to get to your destination. If you’re especially unlucky, you’re flying on an airline like Spirit where you have to pay for every possible thing. Well, if Airbus and a designer have their way, flying could get even more bizarre. This is the Chaise Longue, a double-decker economy class seat concept for single-deck aircraft.
The Chaise Longue Economy Seat concept has been floating around the Internet since 2021. Its inventor and designer is Chaise Longue CEO Alejandro Núñez Vicente, who thinks this could be an improvement on the economy flying experience. Alejandro says that by filling planes with double-decker rows of economy seats, the people sitting on the lower level will benefit from greater legroom while the people on the higher level can get more recline.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a95e3/a95e3e8a1588f8a61f742300c91e8bf3503600ef" alt="Vidframe Min Top"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03f84/03f84c33fdf7d1fa2515609fa05d43d2a4c65084" alt="Vidframe Min Bottom"
At the same time, Alejandro admits that the concept could help pad the profitability of an airline by helping that airline pack planes with even more seats than they do now. But is this something that the airline industry actually needs? Chaise Longue and Airbus intend to find out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62674/6267446aa2cf8a5ad0d9b729f2e04d835377972c" alt="1655728090711"
It’s pretty well-known by now that few travelers find economy-class seats on an aircraft satisfying. As I write this, there are groups and advocates attempting to push airlines towards bigger, more comfortable seats for all, not just for the passengers paying more.
Some folks complain that the current crop of economy seats just don’t work for people with long legs while others allege that the tiny seats on aircraft now might be bad for your health. The Federal Aviation Administration has launched an investigation into the sizes of airline seats, but even it has been quick to note that this research is only into the safety of these seats, not their comfort. As far as the FAA appears to be concerned, passengers can be plopped down into park benches so long as they meet regulations and permit an emergency evacuation within 90 seconds.
The Chaise Longue is the concept of Alejandro Núñez Vicente. In 2021, Alejandro was a 21-year-old student attending TU Delft University in the Netherlands. At the time, the seats were called the Chaise Longue Economy Seat Project and it made the shortlist for Judges’ Choice for that year’s Crystal Cabin Awards.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac90a/ac90a9fc2bd5fac293467471ea13e341123e1006" alt="Chaise Longue Image 3 Landscape"
According to CNN, Alejandro used to travel around the world and one thing stuck out as being particularly painful. He hated how the seats of today lacked legroom. He figured that if only the seats in front of them were higher up, he could actually spread his legs out.
So that’s what he did. Alejandro drew up the Chaise Longue, a double-decker airline seat design made for any medium to large aircraft.
Here’s how the Chaise Longue works. An aircraft being outfitted with Chaise Longue seating would delete all overhead bins near the seats. Doing so will allow Chaise Longues to fit. Then, passengers will have to choose seats based on what they’re looking for. If they want maximum recline, they’ll have to climb up into the upper rows. If they want to relax and stretch their legs out with maximum legroom, you choose the lower seats. Both levels have better recline than planes have now, but those on the upper level have the greatest recline of the two choices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beaa8/beaa86b0197aac52f9a1951cef73528bf4dc6a69" alt="Rtyuhjk"
In terms of baggage, your personal items should fit in the included storage, but you’ll have to check your carry-on. Alejandro also pitched the idea as being pandemic-safe, as he believed placing people at different levels would be “more suitable for flights in pandemic times.”
After that CNN story, the Internet erupted and nobody was quite sure what to make of the creation. As CNN wrote, some thought it was genius while others thought it was a total nightmare for people with claustrophobia or limited mobility. Others pointed out that it’s just another way for airlines to make flying worse by packing even more people into a plane and trying to package it as a good thing.
Either way, the reaction was so strong that Alejandro stopped pursuing his master’s degree and began working on this project full-time. He now has a business under the name Chaise Longue and a fancy website showing what a plane would look like with the chairs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9840f/9840f35c634150559f898bf58ff3f4c4b1d10e02" alt="Ratio4x3 960"
Perhaps more importantly, his team built some prototypes. CNN tested out the prototypes in 2022 and here’s what CNN’s Francesca Street reported:
First up, the top level. Núñez Vicente’s designed the prototype with two ladder-like steps for travelers to use to access the top level. It’s a little precarious, but once I’m up there, the seat feels roomy and comfortable, and there’s plenty of room for stretching out my legs. The prototype seats don’t move, but they’re each set up in a different positions to indicate how they could recline.
Núñez Vicente reckons there would be about 1.5 meters separating the seated passenger from the top of the plane. He argues that while a traveler couldn’t stand upright in that space, many already can’t stand upright in regular economy rows – although, presumably, these taller travelers will be even more squished by this design.
Next up, trying the bottom row of seats. Núñez Vicente’s frustration with a lack of legroom was the original impetus for the design, and by not having a seat on the same level in front of me, it does allow me to stretch out my legs, and there’s a foot rest for added comfort. Still, because the other level of seats are directly above me and in my eyeline, it feels pretty claustrophobic. But if you don’t mind tight spaces, and you’re planning simply to sleep all flight, it could be an effective solution.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/261e9/261e9db97a429f719f6331f78272b91e48ee10ef" alt="Telemmglpict000349392095 1694777"
Thankfully, the Chaise Longue team went back to the drawing board. Their next iteration that showed up in 2023 (above) was more open, shaved off weight, increased legroom, and now allowed people in wheelchairs to at least access the lower row. CNN had some nicer things to say this time around:
The new design keeps the same basic double-level concept, with a few minor changes. The precarious ladder-like steps that previously got you up to the top level have been switched out for a sturdier version. Luggage on the bottom level is now designed to go under the seat in front of you. Rather than built-in screens, the idea is passengers could use personal devices for inflight entertainment. Núñez Vicente says he’s also improved leg room on the top level, and I find it is pretty spacious. Plus, because there’s no one directly behind you on the same level, you can recline the seat pretty far back, which is a definite plus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f30c/6f30c742fb800a0ce3560378a6e7612127b8c338" alt="1695298565341"
Now the Chaise Longue is back again for 2025. This time, Alejandro does not have a new version to show us. But he does say that his startup Chaise Longue company is now partnering with Airbus to continue exploring the project. Allegedly, Chaise Longue has airlines interested in the double-decker seats and now Airbus wants to help the project get to the finish line, especially for Airbus aircraft.
The startup company has acknowledged that there has been tons of backlash on social media. Lots of folks have pointed out that these seats are inherently claustrophobic in nature, specifically for the bottom rows. Others note that the current iteration would allow an upper-row passenger to prop their legs up onto the upper partition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b782b/b782b31288d611be066f630e9546c3a19a38fcea" alt="1686655323026"
Chaise Longue has also received criticism because the real benefit to airlines won’t be giving you legroom, but being able to multiply the number of seats an aircraft has. In talking to CNN, Alejandro insists the Chaise Longue wasn’t designed for that purpose, but he doesn’t shy away from the idea as a selling point, from CNN:
The fact that this concept could also “give the airline a new revenue stream or a new way to make more money out of those passengers or put more seats in” — as Núñez Vicente put it at the Aviation Interiors Expo in 2024 — is merely an added bonus, he insists.
There’s the other problem with what happens to your luggage. Chaise Longue says that both levels have their own storage areas, but all imagery shows them to be no bigger than the personal item space on existing aircraft. Thus, anyone in a Chaise Longue would have to check any carry-on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19a62/19a626bc11b714cbac9a9045d0b0b0256e78f465" alt="Screenshot (1500)"
There’s also one more sort of hilarious problem. The current concept places the faces of the people in the lower row directly behind the butts of the people in the upper row. I suppose they might get the delight of smelling what the upper row had for lunch or dinner. Amusingly, Alejandro does have a response to this, from USA Today:
“The idea is that there will be some kind of restraint here,” he said, pointing to the partition behind the upper level of seats. If a passenger passed gas “it wouldn’t go straight through,” unless it were especially forceful.
I have some concerns of my own. Aircraft are supposed to be able to be evacuated in 90 seconds. People evacuating from the Chaise Longue seats would have to jump down or crawl out of their holes in an emergency situation.
Even worse, the FAA has regulations to prevent head injuries in case of emergency aircraft maneuvers and other intense situations. There’s a whole equation involved here:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30bd6/30bd6d745ffbe1bf36a1637107815bad558cf7eb" alt="Itsthelaw"
There’s a potential that Alejandro’s current design, which places the heads of the bottom row passengers close to the seats in front of them, would not pass this sniff test.
That aside, there are additional concerns. Legally, airliners have to carry enough cabin crew for the number of people onboard. Likewise, the aircraft will need facilities and food stores to support them. If Frontier or Spirit did an all Chaise Longue configuration those airlines might be required to have more crew onboard, which might remove the incentive for an airline in the first place. At this time nobody even knows how airlines would react to passengers being forced to check carry-ons due to seat design. As it is, a number of airlines automatically gate-check some carry-ons due to the design of the overhead bins in some aircraft.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/918bb/918bbca77d48c0a63c40b85df824f43ecf880a45" alt="Screenshot (1504)"
All of this is assuming that the seats come down to a weight that airlines would be willing to accept. Remember that airlines try to keep planes as lightweight as possible to save on fuel.
I’m left feeling conflicted. On one hand, more legroom and more seat recline are both great. On the other hand, you would likely have to check your carry-on and deboarding would take substantially longer. I’m not claustrophobic, but I could see my mom causing a ruckus if I told her to get into a cocoon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf6d2/bf6d281076df45984ef38a01a3a52cfbb927d8b2" alt="Screenshot (1499)"
I also don’t like the idea of someone (especially a child) missing a step trying to come down from the upper Chaise Longue and potentially busting their head open.
It also appears that the Chaise Longue, which is shown in the middle row of a widebody but can be installed on the sides, doesn’t have a ton of consideration for lavatory use. If the window seat passenger on the upper level has to use the restroom, do all other occupants up there have to climb down and then climb back up? At least to me, there seem to be too many question marks at this stage of the game.
Because of these factors and so much more, Chaise Longue and Airbus readily admit that you’re not going to be flying in double-stacked seats anytime soon. The seats are still in development and then they’d still have to go through certification. Still, Alejandro and Airbus see their new collaboration as a huge step forward to seeing this project through.
That being said, I do hope designers keep trying to find solutions to how terrible it is to fly economy. Maybe stacking people like flesh Legos might not be the answer, but I’m glad some folks are trying to make things better.
The bright side of this is that it might finally motivate Americans to support high-speed rail service.
Until they put these on the trains, too.
Anyone approving such a move will be shot, buried, dug up in a week, shot again, incinerated, and have their ashes stuffed in the seat cushion of JD Vance’s couch.
Dang. That didn’t sound too bad until you got to the last part.
The punishment needs to fit the crime.
Talk about being subject to endless farts. The man basically is a greasy fart any good or decent person would get up to test-wipe after, just in case, but no, not this guy.
I was actually alluding more to the rumors…
J.D. Vance and the Couch Sex Rumors, Explained
Sigh sigh sigh.
You know what else? Let me solve this problem for you. Make the seats bigger. Put fewer people per plane. There is no other way to magically fit more and more bodies into a smaller space without.crowding.people.closer.and.closer. We aren’t tetris pieces.
*screams into pillow*
You can do that *today*. It’s called the premium cabins. Premium Economy, Business Class, First Class. You very much get what you pay for. Want more room? PAY FOR IT.
People think that airlines are some massively profitable enterprise – they are NOT. Over time, they are MASSIVELY money-losing hugely capital-intensive/low margin operations (very much like the auto industry, actually). They can make some money when times are good, then lose MASSIVE amounts when times are not good. Old saying that is still incredibly apt – “how do you make a small fortune in the airline industry?” “Start with a large one!”
So the only way seats are getting bigger and fewer people on a plane is to make those seats cost a LOT more.
Just to add to what Rhodes said:
Back when ticket prices were regulated, airlines competed on conveniences, such as flights per day. More flights per day meant fewer people per planeThis caused profitability to crash. The airlines then convinced the US government to deregulate fares, which allowed them to lower them and increase passengersThis worked more-or-less fine for decades, but then online price comparisons came aroundWith Kayak, Priceline, Travelocity et al giving people more options, airlines discovered what grocery stores and gas stations already knew: people are bad with numbers. You will sell a lot more stuff priced at $9.99 than you will at $10.00. People will choose whichever is the smallest number, all else (relatively) equalAirlines started dividing the total ticket price into a base fare, fees, and taxes, all to chase that all-important “Low Number in Large Font”Congress passed a law that said that all airfares had to be listed as the total ticket price. While budget airlines had already been doing the optional extras like choosing seats, carry-ons, checked bags, et cetera, this encouraged the major airlines to do the sameThroughout all of this, airlines never faced any backlash to these practices. It didn’t matter how loudly people complained, they still paid.
Now, with regards to how much it costs to operate an airline: In 2023, American Airlines’ operating expenses were $49.75 BILLION.
That same year, their total revenue was ~$53.1 billion, of which I calculated that $5.2 billion was from their credit card programs.
Current ticket prices are so low that fares and optional fees are not enough to profitably operate an airline
*https://news.aa.com/news/news-details/2024/American-Airlines-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2023-financial-results-CORP-FI-01/default.aspx
*https://news.aa.com/news/news-details/2025/American-Airlines-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-financial-results-CORP-FI-01/default.aspx
This is absolutely correct – at this point, the Big Three US airlines lose money flying airplanes but make it up and more by selling FF miles to credit card companies.
As one who has been flying around for a living for nearly 30 years, the change in prices (for the better) has been a LOT more dramatic than the change in service (hasn’t actually changed much). The seats aren’t actually smaller, Americans are fatter. And whinier and more entitled. I can usually fly domestic first for what coach without the obligatory “Saturday night stay” to separate the tourist from the business traveler once cost. In current dollars. Adjusted for inflation it’s wildly cheaper.
There is also the not-so-minor fact that despite the recent crashes, flying is a HELL of a lot safer today than it was 25 years ago. I was in *three* aircraft accidents bad enough to warrant NTSB in the 90s, but all that has happened in the new century is one popped door seal resulting in the masks coming down a few years ago. And I get on well over 100 airplanes a year. Typing this from the airport, actually. RSW-DCA-SYR today, home Friday.
We’re both EP on American, IIRC. I’ve wondered if we’ve ended up next to each other without realizing it
This is the dumbest fucking thing. Please show me a video of someone entering or exiting these seats. How does the window seat in the bottom row get out to go to the bathroom? Slink to the floor and wriggle away like a snake? How does your average (cough cough overweight or obese) American get up and down from the top seat? Is there a lift? Where is that stored?
I swear to god, the fact that someone even thought of this stupid ass idea just makes me want to rocket myself into the fucking sun.
The only place I could see this being tolerated is on all the high-density, short-hop flights like some of the ones within China, Japan, and India. Picture the need to take 500 people on an hour-long flight with no good rail or road options. They’re out there, but for 95% of people this would be a hard no (on top of all the concerns I outlined below)
Unfortunately the planes this fits on are used on the big over ocean or transcontinental flights. You can have someone fart in your face for 13 hours.
Respectfully, that’s solving the wrong problem. YOU are not the person pitching this galactically terrible idea.
The person(s) who suggest this sort of thing should be the one(s) sent into the sun. Normally I would advocate against putting that burden on the sun but in this case I think Sol can take one for the team.
Remember that scene in Terminator 2 where John Conner dropped the original Terminator’s chip into the molten steel? That’s how I choose to imagine sending someone into the sun would be, complete with satisfying and brief *tsst* sound. Problem gone.
haha, I definitely heard the *tsst* when I read it. Very satisfying.
Nope, nope, nope. I’ll drive to Europe before I fly like this.
Just don’t ask me how.
World’s longest ferry ride. It’ll take you 3 weeks to get there, but you’ll be a hell of a lot more comfortable.
Watch out for icebergs!
You can take the RMS Queen Mary 2 across the pond. Takes 6-8 days, IIRC, and pretty much the lap of luxury. Best hope for smooth seas though, and there’s not much hope of that more than half the year. Price for a cheap cabin is not THAT much more than flying, up to luxury suites that cost a large fortune.
And of course, the real cost is the time it takes – that’s a big chunk out of a vacation.
All good, but can I bring my bigass Buick with me? Then I could pretend to be Otto from A Fish Called Wanda.
Sadly, a quick Google says that unlike the Queen Elizabeth 2, the QM2 has no provisions for loading and unloading cars as cargo.
Awww that sucks. What am I supposed to do, to rent a Skoda?
LOL – I would kill to be able to rent a Skoda Superb. They are, er, superb cars. Make mine a wagon.
Fun fact: you can actually “reserve” a private cabin on some freighter ships. I looked into it once. Sure, it takes a long time and the chances that you get stuck at sea waiting for a port slot for unloading is high, but if you felt like it, you could.
Oh, I know. I have friends who are mariners. It’s not cheap or fast, and you had best be good at entertaining yourself as there is not a whole lot to do on a cargo ship.
I guess if you needed some time away to write the next Great American Novel or something?
Yeah, I’m not sure the exact use case, but I found out about it because I was (still am) planning a trip to S. Africa for an extended stay, and I was curious if it could be done any way other than flying. Turns out that it takes about a month b/c you gotta stop in all sorts of places like the Med(?), Egypt, and go through those real-deal pirate waters.
One ship I saw had a big rec room with pool tables and arcade games etc., plus a full-time “chef” to feed the rotating shifts. The cabin was pretty nice, with a balcony and a nice private bathroom w/full shower. Now, with Starlink and all that, I guess it wouldn’t feel like a total prison sentence to do, lol.
I’m sure the day-to-day would get old, but overall, I’d make for a fucking bananas travel story, though.
I think it would be really cool! But that is a whole lot of time staring at a very empty ocean.
That’s what the Starlink is for. Hell, you could even learn Turkish or Mandarin or whatever the heck the crew speaks during that time for funsies!
Random stranger: How long did it take you to get fluent in Lebanese?
You: About 3 weeks aboard the Kota Pusaka.
RS: Uhhh, who ARE you?
I refuse to personally give any money to anything related to Elon Musk on principle. Bad enough he gets a chunk of my tax dollars.
You do you, my man.
In my opinion, one isn’t giving anything remotely measurable to him. If anything, a purchase is helping to support the employees. I find that notion that any one person is “supporting” Elon a bit silly, really. But, that’s me being me.
My life isn’t going to last long enough to block fun ideas from happening when possible. 🙂
Are you sure this isn’t a joke from the show Silicon Valley?
Does this mean I might one day get asked if I’m an ass man in a professional capacity?
The only images that shows any overhead bins has the double decker seats in the middle section only. But no bins above them. That would mean half the bins but with more seats.
Finally!
The one common complaint about air travel is the distance the passenger in front’s fart must travel to the passenger behind’s face.
It seems like it was specifically poorly designed so that a final version would seem reasonable.
I feel like “big tech” helped dreamed this up as a way to finally sell some VR headsets.
It speaks volumes that literally the first thing the human brain goes to when viewing this seating configuration is ‘but… FARTS!”
I went right to projectile vomit waterfall raining down on some poor suckers head/Tito’s and soda.
I readily admit I’m not going to be flying in a double-stacked seat anytime ever.
Just put a pad in the overhead bin, and let me crawl in there and lay down for the flight…
A nice crate in the hold will do.
I’ve heard of “Looking up old friends”, but this is ridiculous! 😉
Ah yes, the further enshitification of something in the pursuit of profits. Stock price has to go brrrrr.
“What if thing was worse AND more expensive?!”
*the shareholders and board break out in manic pandemonium*
No “crash positions” option, only a place for your head to crack open if/when there is a crash.
The heads and the cracks have literally never been closer. 😉
As someone who doesn’t really mind economy (just the stupid extra fees everywhere now) — even though I’m 6’2″ with long legs and broad-ish shoulders — I just see the flight as fun itself. It’s also a means to an end for my destination.
That said, a few concerns (having never seen these before…):
The other design where everyone is semi-upright almost makes more sense than this for almost all of the above. Passenger comfort be damned 🙂
I’m sure the crew could vaguely wave a handheld vacuum at these just like the regular seats.
NO!
I am 6’3″ and would love more leg room, but I am never going to willingly enter one of those fart chambers.
The inventor needs to take the next logical step an pair this monstrosity with some bug based refreshments. If we are going to treat passengers as cargo, why splurge on biscotti and pretzels?
Challenge accepted.
…Taco Bell has entered the chat…
You know some weirdos are going to book those bottom seats on purpose.
They’ll tear the fart barriers right out of every seat in the first three months.
A modicum of additional padding and just a couple inches more legroom is really all it would take to make economy seats noticeably more comfortable. This stacking thing just seems like a way for airlines to add an additional tier to the economy class for people who don’t mind having someone stacked on top of them if it meant additional legroom.
On the chaise lounge, on the chaise lounge, on the chaise lounge, all day long on the chaise lounge
With that out of the way, imagine the farts. People like to rip ass on planes since it’s too loud to pinpoint where they’re coming from, and people often get gassy as a result of the pressurization/travel GI on top of it. I can’t imagine that that’s ever going to change so sitting face level with a rando’s booty is going to be a hard pass for me.
Is your muffin buttered? Would you like us to assign someone to butter your muffin?
Is your mother worried? Would you like us to assign someone to worry your mother?
Oof, I actually realized another lyric from the song is more appropriate.. “Hey you, over there, on the chaise longue in your underwear”. Welcome to the brave new world of air travel!
Excuse me? What?
Wow, I haven’t heard that since Weird Science.
Mean Girls I think, about 20 years later?
In any case, you’re missing out on a great song.
No, I meant when Chet asks Lisa if he can “butter her muffin”. RIP Bill Paxton.
Oh right, yeah, I think that expression was kinda outmoded even then.
Yeah, in 1985 Chet was a dufus. 40 years later, he’s the cat’s meow.
Wet Leg really needs to sue Alejandro Núñez Vicente for defamation.
I require some context
Wet Leg has a song called “Chaise Lounge,” whose lyrics are referenced in other comments to this post.
I know, I posted the lyrics! I’m more confused by the defamation comment
I’m just riffing on the linkage between the song and the seating concept. If I were Wet Leg, I’d be so embarrassed to be even associated by name with this idea, I would sue for having my good name (and song) ruined by it.
The guy who invented this nonsense, as it states in the article. Clearly I have incredible reading comprehension.
Ever seen one of those diagrams that show how they packed as many people as possible into the cargo holds of slave ships? This reminds me of that.
I’m glad I wasn’t the only one.
“Passenger boarding may begin just as soon as we unload the remaining sugar cane”
Yeah, face level farts are gonna be a no from me, dawg.
Airline announcements will include new guidance for “Bottom row travellers must keep their oxigen masks on at all times”
Great, now an upcharge for the seat not smelling farts the whole flight!