Home » An Argument About A Top Shot Caused Me To Make A Joke So Obscure I Think I Pulled Something : Tales From The Slack

An Argument About A Top Shot Caused Me To Make A Joke So Obscure I Think I Pulled Something : Tales From The Slack

Slack Te Top
ADVERTISEMENT

If you really, absolutely have to know what the post is about you can become a member and get access to this and many other wonderful posts. Membership helps us keep this site alive and, even better, comes with a ton of perks!

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
45 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Punkcat
Punkcat
29 days ago

I started laughing out loud at Jason’s Palazzo del Té description for David, and Mr. Punkcat wanted in on the joke. He had the exact reaction Jason’s friend did.

beachbumberry
beachbumberry
1 month ago

But I am a member!

Totally not a robot
Totally not a robot
1 month ago

I feel like this whole website is already inside baseball on its own.

Chump Change
Chump Change
1 month ago

I really have to see The Man with Two Brains again.
You know how there are movies where a line or two just stick in your head? Well for me there are many movies like that, but amongst the most obscure, The man with To Brains is right near the top. Whenever I have to do something that is unpleasant or probably going to be messy, undoubtedly, I’ll mumble under my breath, “into the mud, scum queen”.
I return you back to our regular site about car stuff…

Obnoxious 986 Peasant
Obnoxious 986 Peasant
1 month ago

Goddamn, you Half-Japanese execs do it to me every time

AlterId
AlterId
1 month ago

I’m a little disappointed that you didn’t send this out as a member email and further encourage David to believe that everybody knows all about the Palazzo de Te.

Coelacanth
Coelacanth
1 month ago

The more of these we see, the more I realize that the Jason Torchinsky that writes e.g. Cold Start isn’t a character he’s playing for the site, but what he’s actually like all the time. Marvelous. Never change. May your path be lit eternally by glorious taillights.

Otter
Otter
1 month ago

I always thought the Weezer cover was just a nod to the cover of the Feelies’ Crazy Rhythms.
https://www.bar-none.com/store/the-feelies-crazy-rhythms

Last edited 1 month ago by Otter
Chally_Sheedy
Chally_Sheedy
28 days ago
Reply to  Otter

I don’t know about all that. Just here to say Crazy Rhythms is a stone cold jam and thanks.

notoriousDUG
notoriousDUG
1 month ago

So, did everyone just agree to pretend that DT’s use of the word ‘wack’ isn’t weird and out of date?

Big, ‘How do you do, fellow kids?” vibes there.

Last edited 1 month ago by notoriousDUG
MATTinMKE
MATTinMKE
1 month ago
Reply to  notoriousDUG

Out of date for the world at large is fresh & new for DT!

Chally_Sheedy
Chally_Sheedy
28 days ago
Reply to  notoriousDUG

Yeah it’s 2024, man. We say ‘wiggidy wiggidy wack’ now.

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
1 month ago

To the mannerism born?

Vicente Perez
Vicente Perez
1 month ago

So it is not about a snobby Starbucks wannabe?

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
1 month ago

That Palazzo reference sounds like something from a Dennis Miller routine.

Andrea Petersen
Andrea Petersen
1 month ago

I never thought I’d be reading about the Palazzo Del Te on The Autopian, but I’m glad this snippet of esoteric knowledge buried in my brain has finally been used.

Rob Schneider
Rob Schneider
1 month ago

Given that I strongly suspect all of those Monty Python references were going over David’s head the other day, and I’m sure this reference flew by everybody, this is absolute gold. And exactly why I subscribe.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
1 month ago
Reply to  Rob Schneider

Help! Help! I’m being repressed!

Taco Shackleford
Taco Shackleford
1 month ago

This is just like that time on the bus with that kid Grayson.

OrigamiSensei
OrigamiSensei
1 month ago

I got the topshot joke without difficulty. The whole bit about the Palazzo, though, that took more doing and the farther I dove into the absurdity of the whole thing the funnier it got. David’s obvious confusion put it over the top. This is why I love you loons!

Outofstep
Outofstep
1 month ago

This is exactly what I pay a membership for. I believe that Sam the Eagle said it best, “You are all weirdos!” and I love you guys the more for it. Haha

Oldhusky
Oldhusky
1 month ago

I actually noticed that top shot even in its amended form for the very same reason–that it completely obstructed all the banner verbiage. I didn’t really have a verbalized thought about it, but to the extent that i did, it was something about how the site was really pushing its offbeat visual style. It definitely didn’t occur to me that it was a sort of self-deprecating visual joke. Also, i love how outside baseball-y these posts are. I find listening to interesting people talk about interesting doings even if i can only partially follow endlessly fascinating.

10001010
10001010
1 month ago

I remember that top shot, I remember barely being able to make out the TMD banner, and I clicked on the article anyways.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
1 month ago
Reply to  10001010

I’m so firmly entrenched in the cult of TMD, I didn’t even notice it was covered.

Brandon Forbes
Brandon Forbes
1 month ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

Same.

A. Barth
A. Barth
1 month ago

This is supposed to be funny, see, because if it was really happening, everything would be on the verge of collapse, but it’s not, so you know, big laffs.

I can chuckle sensibly about the triglyphs because, thankfully, the trapezoidal nature of the bottom bit guarantees there will be no further downward slippage. Whew!

FWIW I took the topshot as satire for the reasons you stated (obscuring parts of the banner, taken to absurdity) without understanding the historical and artistic underpinnings, so it may well have worked anyway.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 month ago

What I’ve always wondered about the top shots is:

Do you maintain a selfie library? Does Matt ever request people refill it with fresh ones, and if so, does he specify who and of what sort?”

“Take a picture of you hitting your head against the wall. We have a lot of EV articles coming up.”

Mercedes Streeter
Mercedes Streeter
1 month ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

Do you maintain a selfie library? Does Matt ever request people refill it with fresh ones, and if so, does he specify who and of what sort?”

We don’t have a selfie library, but Matt has requested we make reaction selfies that could be used at later dates. I always overdo it. 🙂

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 month ago

But who has to be told to ham it up more? It’s Adrian, isn’t it?

Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
1 month ago

Having to explain a joke is usually not funny, but this joke is so arcane it just wrapped around and made the explanation (and the need for an explanation) funny.

The Man With Two Brains is brilliant. Steve Martin as Dr Hfuhruhurr and David Warner (RIP) as Dr Necessiter are amazing. Get that cat out of here!

10001010
10001010
1 month ago

Counterpoint, the funniest jokes are the ones you need to explain, and even more funnier if they don’t need explaining, but you explain them anyways!

Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
1 month ago
Reply to  10001010

Explaining obvious jokes is 3D chess. People are on tenterhooks waiting for you to reveal something they must have missed, and then bam, they didn’t miss anything.

Brandon Forbes
Brandon Forbes
1 month ago

Crap like this is why we love y’all. I love how often y’all are messing about and David is like the mom who doesn’t get the joke and is trying to get the hooligans to behave for 5 seconds.

Drew
Drew
1 month ago

I find it extremely funny, but I find joking with David by starting the statement with “you know how most readers understand” even funnier. Take from that what you will.

Last edited 1 month ago by Drew
AssMatt
AssMatt
1 month ago

I appreciate hearing that the obscuring of the text in the topshots is deliberate, and I realllllly appreciate Tales From the Slack, as it reminds me that whatever looks to us like an error has already been debated to within an inch of its life.

Oldhusky
Oldhusky
1 month ago
Reply to  AssMatt

With the exception of the copy edit errors which always bug me. It’s not because i’m the grammar police, but because, as someone else mentioned in the comments one day, it undermines the professionalism and polish that the site otherwise exudes.

Alexk98
Alexk98
1 month ago
Reply to  Oldhusky

I also think there’s something to be said for what they often say about being perpetually 10% understaffed or so, that some small errors will slip in, and with enough going on behind the scenes to try to make the site financially viable long term, I can forgive a few typos here and there, but they can be frustrating.

AssMatt
AssMatt
1 month ago
Reply to  Oldhusky

…Especially given the general dumbing-down of the world at large thanks to people thumb-typing on their phones; it bugs me that we are expected to accept that as a sign of modernity, especially in a publication that aims for legitimacy. Too bad they can’t let us pedants edit copy–lord knows we’d do it for free!

Brandon Forbes
Brandon Forbes
1 month ago
Reply to  AssMatt

Oh yes, but man we would have far too much fun with it haha. It would not have positive results. Sort of like when people get mad at someone on wikipedia and start editing their page to indicate they are a beta male

AssMatt
AssMatt
1 month ago
Reply to  Brandon Forbes

I bet there’s a way to edit the editors. Like Track Changes, and all they’d have to do would be to review the revisions. Although I guess if they wanted to crowdsource it, they would have already. Like I said, they’ve probably had this very conversation more than once. Oh well, it’s better than some sites.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
1 month ago
Reply to  Oldhusky

It undermines the what now?

Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
1 month ago
Reply to  Oldhusky

^^ Thsi

45
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x