One of the hardest decisions to make as a car enthusiast exactly how to fill your garage with the precise vehicle you need and want. A pickup truck is insanely practical; a convertible would be the perfect summer vehicle; and a sporty coupe would make a thrilling daily. How do you choose just one? What if you didn’t have to? BMW once teamed up with coachbuilder Karmann to create a wild three-in-one concept that could have met all three of those needs. The 1998 BMW K2 started life as a 3 Series E36, but somehow became a pickup truck, a convertible, and a coupe all at the same time.
We were tipped off to the existence of this vehicle by Lee Harry on X, who jokingly calls the K2 “the original Cybertruck.” The idea of a car with a hidden truck bed long predates this creation of the late-1990s. However, when a vehicle like this comes up, I’m more likely to think about a Studebaker Wagonaire or a Frazer Vagabond/Kaiser Traveler long before the Germans ever enter my stream of thought.
If you asked me about more modern examples, I’d quickly tell you about the GMC Envoy XUV and its trick roof or how the concept for the original Toyota RAV4 had an interior that converted into a bed for a dirt bike. Far more obscure is this late-1990s concept with which BMW achieved similar versatility, but with a far smaller 3 Series.
Almost A Secret
As our readers know, I love diving deep into every vehicle I find. Forgotten grails, magnificent motorcycles, dream diesels, trick trikes … every machine has a story, and sometimes that story is even more compelling than the vehicle itself.
So, you can imagine my frustration when I couldn’t find much information on this very special car. BMW makes no mention of the K2 whatsoever on its company websites. Wilhelm Karmann GmbH has been defunct since 2010 and its website has been archived, the only mention of the K2 that I could find was this tiny blurb:
1998 BMW K2
Also in 1998, BMW had Karmann develop the body for an “all-rounder”: the multifunctional BMW K2 based on the BMW 3 Series E36 Compact combines several body variants: it is a coupe, pick-up and convertible all at the same time.
I even took a dive through the German Internet, where I didn’t get much further than what you’re seeing here. Why did BMW ask for this little monster? If you have some spare time today, click this link. It’ll bring you to Karmann’s history page where you’ll be able to take in nearly a century of properly wacky cars built by the company.
At least we know about the car the concept is built on.
The E36 Goes Compact
The BMW E36 3 Series was an ambitious project. It had to follow up the E30, which had already attained legend status before the final example left the production line in 1994. Its successor, the E36, began production in 1990 and as BMW explains, a theme of the E36 was to do things differently:
The best approach is to do everything differently, thought the new car’s designer; Pinky Lai was born in Hong Kong and had worked for Ford in Cologne prior to moving to BMW and then on to Porsche. The E36 was bigger and came with four doors as standard. The headlights were placed behind glass. A standalone Coupe version was added to the product line-up. On the Touring, the tailgate opened full-width. The Convertible was, naturally, based on the stylish Coupe. Occupants benefited from improved aerodynamics and automatically extending roll-over protection. The E36 even came in a hatchback body style. This was reminiscent of the 2002 Touring and known as the “Compact.” The people behind it were bold and had vision. Another unusual design was the Convertible Sedan by Stuttgart-based Baur. This was based on the four-door Sedan and was bigger than any 3 Series that had gone before.
There would be no compromises in terms of suspension or performance, that went without saying. The 3 Series needed to be agile and surefooted, its engines free-revving and the gearshift crisp. It was a BMW, after all. The new car delivered the poise, assurance and driving enjoyment to which aficionados had become accustomed, and which they now expected. This was particularly true with one of the sumptuous six-cylinder engines on board, but the four-cylinders also had a taste for revs. And the diesel units, too, were now long established. Reinterpreting the pleasure of its predecessors for the modern age, the new 3 Series’ horsepower ranged from 100 to 321. Only an all-wheel drive version was missing from the cast, although this did return with the successor generation.
The Compact was a big deal at the time. BMW realized that it needed a volume model and a way to attract younger buyers who might not have the cash for a typical BMW of the time. The stubby Compact is the same as an E36 sedan up front but wears a unique hatch body in back, and BMW saved some cash by equipping the car with the rear semi-trailing arm suspension from the E30. The end result was a car that was 7.9 inches shorter than a regular 3 Series, but rode on the same wheelbase. Most engines for the Compact were four-cylinder mills or underpowered diesels. The largest engine and only choice with more than four cylinders was the 2.5-liter M52 straight-six.
The Compact’s entry price was a good chunk lower than a base 3 Series, though it did cost BMW in the ballpark of $500 million to develop. Here in America, we got the Compact as the 318ti, which had a 1.8-liter four and later a 1.9-liter four, but not the 2.5-liter six. Just like the European version, the American BMW 318ti was the cheapest way to get a roundel with four wheels.
The K2
Mentioning the Compact is important here because Karmann says it built the K2 concept car out of the Compact.
That part does get a bit weird when you look at the photos. The vehicle appears to have similar fenders, interior, quarter panels, and windows to the E36 coupe. But it does also have the rear-end style of the Compact. Unfortunately, given Karmann’s current disposition, we don’t know if this is a highly modified coupe or Compact, but that doesn’t matter that much.
What is pretty neat is what Karmann did with everything behind the front seats. The wild bits start with the roof. There’s a large glass panel plus a steel roof panel with a third brake light that spans the whole panel. In the closed position, the vehicle just looks like a goofy 3 Series Compact. However, the roof panel can also move back to the rear of the vehicle. The glass stores inside of the roof to help create a funky convertible.
Oh, but Karmann didn’t stop there. The roof can also go back to its forward position over the front seats, taking the glass with it. This function reveals a truck bed! What looks like a hatch is also really a tailgate, turning the K2 into a real car-based truck. I even like how there’s a divider window for the interior while the K2 is in truck mode. The bed also doesn’t look like an afterthought. It has runners and what appears to be tie-down points for hauling stuff.
Bimmer Life notes that the concept had some other smaller changes including mirrors and wheels from the M3. Reportedly the powerplant under the hood is the 1.9-liter M44 four making 138 HP and 133 lb-ft of torque.
The trail goes cold here. There are no pictures of the concept hauling things and again, we have nothing on why BMW commissioned Karmann to build this in the first place. If I could make a guess, maybe BMW was trying to appeal to the active lifestyles of the younger buyers it was trying to attract, but that’s all I have.
It’s a shame that only one of these was built and there doesn’t seem to be much out there on it. The K2 sounds like one of those vehicles that would be so fun. It’s a coupe, convertible, and a truck in one! How cool would it be to carve some corners with an old BMW airhead motorcycle strapped into the back?
The funny thing is, this isn’t even the first time BMW has fooled around with car-based trucks. BMW also once built a shop truck out of an E30 M3, and in 2011 turned an M3 into a truck. Oh those silly Germans
I’d love, no I need to know more about the BMW K2. If you have any additional information, send me an email at mercedes@theautopian.com.
(Images: BMW/Karmann)
I’m sorry, it won’t carry my eight children on the daily 1,000 mile commute across the Rocky mountains towing my 1/20th scale replica of the Titanic, carrying six sheets of drywall, and a half ton of cinderblocks, so it simply won’t do. Also, since it’s not body-on-frame, stick-axle, leafspring-sprung, seven feet tall and eight feet wide, it’s not a Proper Truck, so is clearly useless anyway.
In all seriousnessness tho, it’s more like the mega evolution of a hatchback and I love it. The world needs two-door station wagons and 3-door hatches with big rear space again.
Also, it took me too long to parse that it wasn’t from the Bishop, Adrian or Torch, but an actual thing.
Cool, but Studebaker did it first with the Lark Wagonaire wagon in 1960.
See Kaiser Vagabond (link in article).
I love this. I would buy this right now.
Hear me out here… I’m seeing something really similar to the GM wagons’ clamshell tailgate, with a longer glass at a shallower angle. If only BMW could have made the tailgate drop into the floor.
Looks like the AMC Marlin from the 60s.
Here I was thinking I would buy one of these, then a Marlin reference, now I can’t unsee it! Nice call. My brother had a ’68 Marlin for a short time, I couldn’t drive then, but thought it was so cool, until I saw a Javelin. And then an AMX.
i am looking at this and all i can see is an ancestor to the X6, which doesn’t really bother me at all.
This is the coolest thing I have seen in a while. The young, single version of me would be all over it. I’m not convinced by the convertible mode though… if there are pillars overhead, that’s not a pure open-air experience.
Too bad BMW never made an M3 Compact 🙁
Looks Saabish
Just based on the couple of photos shown here, I really like the way it looks. It wouldn’t haul as much as a regular pickup, but it does give you a decent amount of hauling space while looking really nice.
That is incredible. The want is strong with this one.
The perfect truck does exist!
Somehow, it reminds me a little of the later Rover TCV concept, which was for a smallish hatchback but with a pickup style tailgate and durable bed in the cargo area. That was shown in 2002, barely two years after they sold the company. BMW retained all the work done on new models during their ownership, but it was still most of the same people hanging around at MG Rover
What does pulling that glass forward do to headroom?
Would…
I always applaud ideas like this just in case somebody actually brings one to production some day. Car people need these diversions.
It is very clearly not based on the Compact, although it does have the Compact’s rear end.
I think you’re right. Big tip-off is the location of the fuel filler door, which is ahead of the rear wheel arch on the Compact.
The greenhouse is different to that of the Coupe, so I would bet on a Cabriolet as a base.
Yeah, I’m still wondering about all of that. Karmann’s official word is that it’s based on a Compact, but I just don’t see it unless they really went nuts and grafted on a coupe or cabriolet…but that would be crazy!
I don’t know why, but of all the BMWs the Ti always spoke to me. I always give them a second look. This, this I haven’t decided on, I think seeing it IRL would either make it a solid “yes” or a “hell no”..
“…maybe BMW was trying to appeal to the active lifestyles of the younger buyers it was trying to attract, but that’s all I have.”
Yup, it was the continuation of the OEM’s Lifestyle Vehicle marketing strategy that started in the 90s.
I’m sitting here wondering how hard it would be to do this to a WRX sedan…
Easier than changing the spark plugs in a BRZ.
As far as I’m concerned, those are just one of those things “they put in at the factory”. I’m not trying to change them out any time soon.
I got a replacement engine @38k miles on mine. I assume they changed them then.
I can’t speak to the BRZ, but I never really had issues with the spark plugs on the WRX. I mean my dad had a Cologne V6 Mustang 2
Weirdly enough, the plugs in the M44 engine used in the car in the article are stupid-simple to change. You can swap ’em with the…
… well, in every other E36, there’s a toolkit in the lid of the trunk that has a metal pole and spark plug socket (put those things together, you have a T-wrench with the proper clearance to get all 4 plugs easily), but not sure if that was offered in this one.
The M44 engine was easy to work on, is what I’m saying.
The Smyth Ute has entered the chat.
This looks like something Rinspeed would come up with.
Way less cool than carving those same corners on the airhead (or on a K1) 😉
Ah, you got me! 🙂 But what if you, the bike, and the car all need to get somewhere else all at the same time?
I’m not going! You can’t make me!
This is cool, but I don’t think it adds any real functionality over a wagon or even a mid-sized SUV as far as hauling stuff. I feel like my old outback that I use as a pickup offers more cargo space behind the front seats – and I have a long enough roof rack to keep sheet goods from flopping over if I need to strap them there.
A lot of my projects don’t require full sheets. Home Depot will cut your sheet goods down for you. If it’s drywall, just do it yourself in the parking lot with a t-square and utility knife.
Some cars are best appreciated when not compared to anything else.
Maybe you want to haul a bunch of tall potted plants? Or a washing machine? Maybe a smaller fridge?
Side window form the tall plants (or carefully lay them down for the ride home).
I don’t think a boxed washing machine or fridge is making in the back of the bmw. Sometimes it’s OK to just have the store deliver things.
Pinky Lai is an awesome name. For a car designer, a gumshoe, a stuntman, for anything.
Hong Kongers have the wildest English names.
Yes. I love coupes, small trucks and convertibles. Give me all of it as one terrible chimera. I still want a Dodge Dakota convertible, or a Skoda Felicia Fun in a bad way, or maybe a Rampage if they made it with T-tops.
I presume your daily driver is a Suzuki X-90
Not my daily, but I do have a Samurai!
You’d love Brazil, they have several tiny utes, between the VW Saveiro, Chevy Montana, Peugeot Hoggar, Ford Courier, Fiat Strada, and I’m sure more that I’m forgetting. They’re all dirt-cheap and FWD, though perhaps not as weird as you’d hope.