Let’s face it, right now isn’t the greatest time to be into passenger cars. The crossover utility vehicle is the dominant automotive form of the era, the sedanocalypse keeps claiming victims, and it seems that wagons – especially fast ones – are primarily the dreams of extremely online car people. Well, at least some of these digital-realm wagon enthusiasts must’ve come into money recently, because a recent report claims that BMW seriously underestimated just how many people would want an M5 Touring.
According to BMW Blog, the Bavarian automaker originally planned to split M5 production as two-thirds sedans and one-third wagons. However, demand hasn’t quite broken along those lines. As Sylvia Neubauer, Vice President of Customer, Brand, and Sales at BMW M, told the outlet, “We now see that there’s more demand for the sedan, so we’ve increased production there. But there’s even more demand for the Touring. So the increase on the Touring is much higher.” Right now, the body style split is reportedly even, and it’s easy to see why.


Yes, the new M5 weighs more than an F-150, and it trails the outgoing M5 Competition from zero-to-60 mph by a hair, but that just means it makes a whole lot more sense as a wagon than as a sedan. Let’s start with the curious fact that in certain jurisdictions where tax rates are hugely advantageous for plug-in hybrids, it’s actually one of the more affordable M models.

Take France for example. Because the BMW M3 Touring emits 233 grams of CO2 per kilometer, it’s subject to €70,000 in what France calls its malus tax, or roughly $76,280 at current conversion rates. What’s more, it weighs 1,865 kilograms, so it’s also subject to an extra €2,975 of weight tax, or about $3,242.56 at current conversion rates. Add those figures to a list price of €124,300, and you end up with a car costing €197,275, or about $215,000 at current conversion rates once malus tax is added.
While the M5 Touring officially emits between 39 and 46 grams of CO2 per kilometer and weighs 5,621 pounds, it has an electric range of more than 50 kilometers on the optimistic WLTP cycle, rendering it exempt from the emissions part of France’s malus tax. As such, the weight tax of €20,500, and once you add that to the MSRP of €164,900, the M5 Touring actually works out cheaper in France than the M3 Touring by about €11,875, or $12,938 at current conversion rates.

Then there’s the practicality of the wagon body. At 27.2 cu.-ft., cargo space with the rear seats up trails that of the X5 M Competition by a considerable margin, but that’s not the whole story. The popularity of crossover coupes suggests that many buyers are willing to sacrifice some practicality so long as they’re getting a more flexible cargo area than in a sedan, and not only is the M5 Touring right up there with the X6 M Competition in U.S. cargo volume with the rear seats up, the more traditional roofline of the M5 Touring should be advantageous for loading boxy and tall items.
Finally, there’s a matter of precedent. While the new M5 sedan is constantly being compared to the old one, the last M5 Touring was a fire-breathing V10 model with a somewhat clunky single-clutch automated manual transmission and a fearsome maintenance reputation, plus it went out of production in 2010. It’s certainly not directly comparable to the new M5 Touring, and competition in the extremely fast wagon space is currently limited.

The Audi RS6 Performance is out there as an all-combustion option, but not only does it come in at a tax disadvantage in some locales, it’s a bit anodyne and body control isn’t its forte, allowing lots of squat and dive. At the other extreme, the Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo is unbelievably quick and surprisingly tactile, but it’s also much smaller inside than the M5 Touring and RS6 Performance, not to mention more expensive. With the Panamera Sport Turismo and Mercedes-AMG E 63 S wagon dead, BMW has suddenly found itself competing for a bigger slice of a small pie than it might have a few years ago. Smart move.
Top graphic image: BMW
Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.
-
Why The New BMW M5’s Lower Grille Is Actually Weirder Than Its Main Grille
-
This Is The BMW M5 Touring Before You’re Supposed To See It, And Yes, It’s Coming To America
-
BMW Owners Are Mad That The 2025 BMW M5 Is Both Slower And 1,190 Pounds Heavier Than The Old One
-
Painting A Single BMW M5 Frozen Orange Doesn’t Change The Fact That It Weighs More Than A Ford F-150
-
Who Is The Hero Who Drove A 2018 BMW M5 Nearly 200,000 Miles?
Please send tips about cool car things to tips@theautopian.com. You could even win a prize!
Even without the weird French tax, I must, perforce, ask: Fucking HOW much?!?! Jesus.
VAT’s always included in prices, so there’s that.
For France VAT’s 20%.
I read somewhere that you sit high in this thing, as the batteries are in the floor. Also heard the weight is felt and the dynamics are clumsy due to it. Would prefer the M3 if we had it.
Closer to three tons, actually.
Zing!
I hope that carmakers take notice of the success here. There is a population of buyers who want something different than the ocean of CUVs currently in the market, and someone should absolutely take on the mantle of fun, affordable wagons in the US.
That malus tax is extremely punitive, it tops out at 70k for anything above 192 g CO2/km, which is about 28 mpg.
Oh, and this thing is very ugly, awesome yellow paint not withstanding.
But it has a V8! What more can you ask for in this day and age?!?!
A V8 without compliance batteries and motors on it?
Okay fair enough. Stripping all that out might help it weigh less than 5,500 pounds too…
My Cadillac makes similar power, is similarly sized, and weighs 4100 lb.
BMW lies like there’s no tomorrow when it comes to their forced induction powerplants.
I’d wager that this things pumps our more power at the wheels than the quoted engine BHP.
Is that what’s responsible for the weight?
Or are you saying the 5BW and M5 aren’t direct competitors?
It’s not clear the point you’re making.
I’d rather it have a turbo-4 or something if it meant it weighed about 1,500 pounds less. I think this desperate clinging to specific cylinder arrangements is getting to be more of a hindrance for performance cars than it is anything else.
I’d be perfectly content if it had the S58 inline 6
Hard to celebrate the existence of performance wagons when there’s only like two options, both of which cost as much as a shitty house and one of which weighs more than Jupiter.
Excuse me, please do not mass-shame planets. They are as the accretion disk allocated and that is beautiful in itself.
Correction: the RS6 is also inordinately heavy. It weighs nearly 5,000 pounds. Ze Germans uh…find a way. I think the hubris that drives them to think they can engineer the weight of a car out of the driving experience is going to catch up to them eventually.
ooooo yellow 😀
I don’t love BMW’s current design language, nor the colossal weight of this car, but MY GOD that fast, yellow wagon does things to me. I am so glad this car exists, and it brings me joy to look at and imagine driving.
It’s not just colorblindness that made me try to upvote this twice.
Not shocked at all this is selling well, tax reasons aside. With the E63 Wagon dead, and the RS6 on it’s 6th model year, a fresh, fast, and compelling fast wagon was bound to sell, even if it isn’t the traditional BMW enthusiasts ideal of what a fast BMW wagon should be. Just be glad we 1: Got this at all, and 2: Will hopefully see more of these than XMs on the road.
The term “crossover coupes” just make my head hurt.
The term isn’t nearly as offensive as the styling though
So true!
Okay but can we get a fun wagon that doesn’t cost six figures? I don’t understand why this segment needs to be reserved for the 1%. I would go buy an M340i or S4 wagon tomorrow if they sold them in the US. And yes, Subie Gang-I know the turbo Outback exists but I don’t want a godforsaken CVT.
Hear! Hear! Correct on all fronts.
Was ready to trade in my Mk7.5 6-Speed Golf Sportwagen on a WRX Wagon as soon as they came out, despite not being impressed by the sedans driving experience, because I knew I’d forgive it. Instead, the US didn’t get a WRX wagon, there were no good wagon options in my price range that I would have faith in as a reliable daily, and I ended up with a CX-30 Turbo, an automatic crossover. While I adore my 30, and have no regrets, I still wish we got the WRX wagon and I’d have one right now, despite having a lack of trust for Subaru in general. It is nice to have a crossover as a daily, simply because I’m not tempted to modify it, and the roads around me suck so the ground clearance helps out often.
I regret not buying that exact configuration from Volkswagen when that was an option.
It was a really great little wagon, I specifically had the S 4Motion trim, so base, not lifted, but with 4mo you got a 6 speed instead of the FWDs 5 speed, in blue over tan cloth. I loved driving it, but got out of it at the right time. sold right around 50 or 60k miles, I forget specifics, but day before trade in it threw a low coolant warning light as all EA888 water pumps love to do, and had deferred a lot of maintenance due to not having the budget/time to deal with a lot of it, so it would have been pricey to keep for an additional 1-2 years. Got an insanely good deal on it new, less than 3-year old stick Crosstreks at the time, and only ended up being down about 5k in depreciation after 4 years, which in new-car world is insane. Was an incredible new car, but I wouldn’t want to own a used one with how finicky they can be.
It was at least conceivable to get the MK7 Sportwagen with a manual and a brown leather interior. Unfortunately I couldn’t find one with a manual at all, but I’m very happy with the GTI I got instead.
Agreed fully. If I wasn’t a complete idiot in 10 years ago, I wouldn’t have sold my gorgeous WRX wagon. I so badly wish there were more fun wagons in a reasonable price range.
If only there was a WRX wagon
Indeed. Much like everything else in these United States of Freedom*, wagons are only available to the wealthy, and only available on oversized, overstuffed platforms.
(*your mileage may vary based on race, gender, location, diet, speech, political affiliation, education, search history, immigration status, and oh so much more by the day)
RIP to the Volvo V60 Polestar
I’ve been tempted by the siren’s song of a certified one several times but I just cannot even begin to fathom what the upkeep on a European forced induction PHEV luxury wagon would be like….
I 2nd this emotion.
GR Camry Wagon with AWD? Please!!
^This is the correct answer^ “I would go buy an M340i or S4 wagon tomorrow if they sold them in the US.”
Given the response to this post, one would think that there’s a golden opportunity awaiting some manufacturer. (And yeah, I totally agree!)