There are plenty of automotive wear items that are expensive to replace. As far as engine air filters are concerned, though, they’re usually pretty easy to change, and cheap to boot. But what if they were more expensive and annoying to deal with? If anyone could pull that off, it would have to be the Germans, right? Only, this time, it was GM!
This historical misstep comes to us from Rare Classic Cars and Automotive History, a YouTube channel that chronicles interesting car tales from long ago. The channel has recently been diving into some of the more questionable air cleaner designs out there.
As it turns out, one of the most egregious examples comes from a GM product that bathes in infamy. I speak, of course, of the accursed Chevy Vega.
If It Ain’t Broke, Definitely “Fix” It
The Vega was an important car for GM. The company needed a subcompact vehicle to grab sales in what was fast becoming a critical and competitive segment. Development began in earnest in the late 1960s, with the car entering production in 1970 for the 1971 model year. Ahead of launch, GM Vice President John DeLorean talked a big game and promised a car with exceptional handling, exceptional acceleration, and exceptional quality.
As we’ve previously discussed, the Chevy Vega was pretty much none of those things. Rust issues, assembly issues, and all manner of other foibles quickly came to the fore when the model hit the open market. DeLorean would later admit that his boosterism was misguided in his book, On A Clear Day You Can See General Motors. “While I was convinced that we were doing our best with the car that was given to us, I was called upon by the corporation to tout the car far beyond my personal convictions about it.”
There’s one flaw to the Vega, though, that is seldom discussed— mostly because it was overshadowed by all the other problems. It’s the air cleaner. GM found a way to make a commodity part more expensive and annoying for the customer. How? By integrating the filter and its housing into one overly complicated assembly.
Back in the 1970s, the vast majority of cars used the same simple design. On top of the carburetor would sit a round two-piece air cleaner housing. You’d undo a wing nut, take the lid off the housing, and inside would sit a round paper air filter. You’d pull it out, put in a new one, reinstall the lid, and you were done. There were only a few sizes of these round filters, and just about every auto shop had filters to suit most every car on the road.
For some reason, GM didn’t want to go this route on the Vega. Instead, it decided to put the paper filter inside an unopenable metal housing. The housing was still made in two pieces, and was pretty similar to a regular air cleaner design, but the top and bottom were permanently crimped together to enclose the air filter element inside. This assembly then bolted onto the carburetor directly.
Thus, when you wanted to change your filter, you weren’t just throwing away and replacing a cheap paper filter. You had to buy the whole metal air cleaner assembly and change it out as a unit. This made sourcing a filter far more painful. Instead of grabbing any old round filter of the correct size off the shelf, you had to get the specific AC brand part for the Vega. AC would become AC-Delco in 1974, streamlined to ACDelco in 1995.
This was an unpopular decision and a confusing one from an engineering standpoint. Enterprising owners and mechanics did find a workaround, however. The popular move was to pry or cut open the sealed filter housing to turn it back into a two-piece unit. Then, it could be used like a regular air cleaner housing, with the paper filter inside changed like any other. However, there are some reports that the original paper element was glued inside the housing and removing it required scraping off some residue afterward.
The aftermarket also offered a nice alternative. Companies like Fram sold their own two-piece air cleaner housings that could be installed in place of the original. Once installed, further filter changes could be handled in the usual manner.
The service manual for the Vega stated the air cleaner should be changed every 50,000 miles, or every 24 months—whichever came first. More regular replacement was recommended for heavy-duty use or dusty conditions. It was a strangely long service interval for the era, which took some of the sting out of the price—it meant dealing with the problem was a regular but infrequent headache for owners. One YouTube commenter notes that sticker shock was common back then. In the 1970s, when a regular air filter might cost $5 at most, the Vega’s air cleaner assembly could cost three to four times as much. In an era that was economically quite turbulent, this was surely an unwelcome additional expense for some owners.
Why did GM do it? The most likely theory was that it had to do with the grand cost-cutting effort that defined the vehicle’s production. GM was chasing wild savings in the Vega program. It even famously figured out how to ship the cars vertically to fit more vehicles into a single train carriage to save on transport costs. In the case of the air cleaner, the all-in-one design would have simplified assembly, speeding the production line to some greater or lesser degree. Normally, the operation would take four stages—install the air cleaner base, then a filter, then the lid, and finally a wingnut. Having a single-part air cleaner with an integrated filter would reduce this to two operations—put the cleaner on, and tighten the nut.
In any case, the Vega’s design thankfully didn’t become a widespread trend in modern automobiles. Most cars on the market will let you change an engine air filter element directly and with a minimum of fuss. In this very specific way, pertinent to air filters only, we’re very lucky to be living in an era as blessed as this one.
Image credits: GM, eBay,
Think the Chevy Chevette used a similar air cleaner housing, but at least the lid could be removable. I used to work at a heavy equipment manufacturer whose service truck (Ford F750 with a service body) had a small gas engine to run an air compressor, and the engine was either a Vega engine or a Chevette engine. Recognized the air cleaner…
My father had a ‘75 Vega Kammback and I spent ALOT of seat time in the back of that thing. Coast to coast twice from SC to CA and four years in Guam and then back again.
I soon discovered when my parents traded that awful rolling hunk of shit for an ‘80 Malibu Classic how much of a rolling hunk of shit it really was.
And why in gods name would they put a non-serviceable air filter in an econobox? You would think that the money to design that tin can of of permanence could have been better used to design some cylinder liners or ANYTHING else.
It was pretty common back in the day to try to clean the air filter either by rapping it against something hard and/or blowing it out with compressed air. My first guess is that they were trying to force people into replacing rather than cleaning the filter.
I’m of two minds on this: first at a 50,000 mile change interval, this would have been the first “lifetime” consumable I’m aware of; second, this is an example of things where I want to smack an designer with a rolled-up newspaper and say “BAD designer, look at what you did!”
They recommend changing the whole air cleaner assembly after 50,000 miles. GM was trolling with that recommendation as most Vega’s died well before for their 50,000th mileaversary.
My thoughts exactly. 50k on a Vega is a lifetime air filter.
After reading the article, one thing became immediately clear. I’m starting a ravedisco band and the group will be named the Delcotrons. Was inspired by that picture of the Vega engine.
Another great cost-cutting move was to eliminate the need for a timing belt tensioner. The Vega used a slotted water pump that was adjusted to apply tension to the belt.
NEW NOS Vega Water Pump TRW 1480 4 Cyl Pontiac | eBay
You would think that was a horrible idea but in fact it worked well. Also, I never experienced or even heard of a timing belt failure in a Vega, where valves didn’t cross paths with the pistons anyhow so it wouldn’t have been a disaster.
In keeping with the “lifetime air filter” comments above, did any Vegas actually last long enough for the timing belts to require an adjusting tensioner?
One more momentous piece of advance technology on the Vega: instead of an alternator, it had a Delcotron.
I’m sure it was notably superior to a run-of-the-mill alternator, but no one has ever delved into this question.
(It reminds me of the 1950’s television advertisement for “Rinso, now with Oleum, so now it’s “RINSOLEUM!!” More complete corporate BS, but it increased sales…)
Along with my wishing I could have been a fly on the wall in the boardroom where they decided to use an open-deck silicon/aluminum block, a huge tall iron cylinder head that upset the c/g of the engine so badly that special motor mounts had to be designed, and make the base radiator half the size of what was needed, I’d like to have heard where they created the edict that everybody had to call the alternator a Delcotron. Sounds like something out of science fiction…”Human Populator #905’s civil compliance difficulties have been resolved via standard processing in the central Delcotron”…
Oh c’mon. How can y’all be hatin’ on the 1971 Motor Trend Car of the Year?! (Yeah, I quit reading Motor Trend when that happened and never went back.)
MT never tested a car they didnt love. I subscribed for 2 years and thought. This is frigging rubbish, I m out.
A little hard to tell from the grainy B/W photo, but the oil dipstick and filler port seem poorly located. What is wrong with a cap of top of the valve cover to add oil?
The engine photo with numbered parts indicates the oil filler plug (3) on the valve cover and the oil dip stick (7) toward the back of the engine. Having needed to check the oil and add it many times, I assure you they were not inconveniently located.
Saving a few seconds of assembly time versus the extra cost of an extra step in manufacturing a crimped-together housing?
I see your point about amortized manufacturing costs, but automation costs money too for the development and manufacture of the automating bits. Sure, standard rolls of steel can be fed into a standard press, the tops and bottoms stamped, and the parts dumped into a catch bin. No problem, just new dies. But then the tops and bottoms need to be fed into a line where the filter is glued and inserted, then the halves crimped together. Transferring halves from the first line to the next can be done manually (paid labor) or they can design (paid labor) and manufacture (at least some paid labor) and install (paid labor) and run & maintain (paid labor) an automatic system to do that. More complexity, more cost. I’m sure there’s an economic justification for that, it’s just hard for me to see. Same with the cost of developing, testing and building special rail cars to save on shipping.
I think you’ve got to remember that for GM, this was the supplier’s problem, not theirs. The supplier is the one doing all the work in assembly for the filter, GM just gave them the contract and the designs. So all that stuff you talked about? The supplier has to figure it out – and there’s a perk for them, because they get to be the exclusive seller of this air filter on this (presumably successful) model – both new and replacement.
Something I’ve always wondered – when did we stop calling them “air cleaners” and start calling them “air filters”? Was it when fuel injection was adopted large-scale?
(I know they technically each refer to different things, but broad-brush, they’re basically the same thing in discussion)
In my 30+ years of working on cars, in my mind and language “air cleaner” has always meant the whole assembly, whereas “air filter” is only the element. If I mean some part less than the whole and other than the element I will specify, such as “air cleaner housing” or “air cleaner base.”
Hope this helps!
Thanks! So would you refer then to the filter’s housing on a contemporary (ICE I mean) car as the air cleaner?
Airbox.