Driving in snowy and icy conditions can be treacherous at the best of times. Winter tires and chains are the standard solution for these conditions. Back in the chemical-crazed 1960s, though? GM and Big Chemistry had other ideas. What if a can of goo could get you out of a slippery spot?
Liquid tire chain promised to be a more futuristic solution for winter driving. No longer would you have to change tires or wrestle with ungainly chains every time the snows came down. Instead, at the push of a button, you could douse your tires in a highly-toxic chemical and drive on at your leisure.


Thankfully for the environment, this idea never really caught on. Regardless, let’s explore how this wacky out-of-the-box idea helped motorists deal with slippery winter conditions.

The concept was so simple it was almost like something out of a cartoon. In the 1960s, Dow Chemical had developed a chemical solution that could add grip to your tires with the spray of an aerosol can. It called the material “Liquid Tire Chain” and noted that it replaced “ashes, rock salt, shovels, sand, and strong men pushing.” It was effectively a spray-on traction improver that you could stash in your glovebox until you needed it.
The cans of liquid tire chain contained styrene butadiene latex dissolved in methanol. If you’re unfamiliar with the former chemical, it’s actually one of the more popular forms of synthetic rubber, used for tires and all sorts of other applications. In this case, spraying the chemical mixture onto tires effectively made them stickier and improved grip, which was particularly useful in cold, icy conditions.


Spraying the fluid on by hand was all well and good, but GM had an even better idea. It had AC (later AC Delco) license the idea from Dow Chemical. It then created applicator cans that could be used by hand, and also be fired by an actuation mechanism. If you were lucky enough to have purchased just about any new Chevrolet in 1969, you could specify option V75 for $23.20, which saw Chevy mount a can of liquid tire chain in each of the rear wheel wells. At the push of a button, a small actuator running off engine vacuum would cause the cans to spray on both rear tires, coating them in the sticky fluid.
No matter the application method, the instructions for use were fundamentally the same. Users were instructed to spray the fluid on the driving tires, and then to “momentarily spin wheels slowly” to distribute it around the whole tire. Basically, you were supposed to spin the drive wheels in place while you sat in place, preparing to leave your icy parking space. After then waiting a further minute, the car could be driven away slowly with its new-found grip.

Remember when we said this stuff was toxic? The first aid instructions on this stuff are appropriately brutal. These days, most chemical containers advise you not to induce vomiting, but this was 1969. If you swallowed the stuff, the cans manufactured by AC (later AC Delco) advised you to keep drinking warm salt water until you eventually vomited clear fluid. Then, you were to follow this with a solution of water and baking soda while protecting your eyes from light, while calling a doctor. Given the methanol content alone, you absolutely don’t want this stuff in your body, but modern treatment would probably look a little different than the old-school spew-and-soda.

The liquid tire chain option did not last long at GM. According to Hagerty, only 2,600 cars were ever fitted with the push-button spray option, most of which were models from Chevrolet’s full-size range. All of those were built for the 1969 model year, with the option cancelled for 1970 and beyond.
It’s perhaps no surprise that liquid tire chains didn’t catch on. The idea of push-button grip just sounds fanciful, like something out of a James Bond – even if it did work to some degree. It’s also a relatively fussy solution. You’d have to spray your tires on the regular, spinning them up and waiting each time. Perhaps every day on your commute if the snow stuck around for a while. Contrast this to tire chains, which you can fit and leave on with only periodic inspections required.
There’s also the concern about longevity. You’d have to replace the cans of fluid as they ran out, and there was really no way of knowing until it happened. This could easily leave you stranded. Meanwhile, GM’s applicator setup put the spray cans in the trunk, with holes for the nozzles cut into the rear wheel wells. If you lived somewhere snowy, such an install would be like laying out the red carpet for rust.


Broader Use
The concept is most closely associated with GM and Dow Chemical. However, other brands did fuss around with liquid tire chain in the 1960s. You can find cans of the stuff with Ford branding, too, and Shell to boot.
However, don’t get too excited about those listings of “new old stock” cans of AC liquid tire chains from the 1960s. The chances of them working after fifty-plus years in storage are slim to none, with the contents long ago having turned to sludge.

Even if you did find a 1969 Chevrolet with the system still fitted, you’re not going to find a set of cans to slot into the tire well dispensers. However, you can still buy spray-on traction compounds to this day. In recent years, companies like Bare Ground and Bluecol have released such products.

Bluecol also sold a similar product known as “Snow Grip.”
Ultimately, though, liquid tire chains have never been particularly popular. While the concept is largely sound, motorists have tended to stick to more tried-and-true solutions. It’s hard to beat real tire chains, winter tires, and studs when you need winter traction you can rely on.
The benefit of these traditional solutions are that they tend to last a lot longer. Spray-on traction compounds are at best are good for maybe 50 miles or so at maximum before they need reapplication. Imagine making a winter road trip and having to get out to spray your tires down every 50 miles. You’d get sick of that pretty quickly.
Liquid tire chain will forever remain a chemical curiosity that few motorists ever actually wanted to use. As much as Dow Chemical might have believed in traction-in-a-can, the practicalities meant it simply wasn’t something the average driver ever took an interest in.
Image credits: GM, 2040 Parts, Bare Ground, Dow Chemical
The can said not to store in temperatures above 120F. Did people remember to remove these cans from the trunk in the summer?
This was obviously more relevant to the days of rear wheel drive car. In the 1970s I had a Saab 96V4. No problem getting around New England and pulling out of snowy parking slots while others we’re spinning their wheels. However, it appears that liquid tire chains met their demise for lack of practicality long before most everyone had front wheel or all-wheel drive.
James Bond had the “cannons” he fired, all others had dispensers Lewin.
Back in the day (1980s) I had a ‘67or ‘68 Firebird convertible that had some sort of seemingly ballest type canisters mounted in the same position as the traction enhancing spray cans ????
I wonder how chemically different it is from the current traction compounds (specifically VHT/TrackBite) that all dragstrips use, along with a number of other tracks. I know of a couple people that made their own version of this application method using Trackbite for street racing back before it was common practice to have people pouring VHT puddles for burnouts.
Looking at the MSDS, TrackBite seems to be more lighter liquid hydrocarbons plus acetone. Basically more solvent and less dissolved polymer. I suspect the stickiness comes from the partially-melted tires and asphalt.
I always felt like this was a nod to drag racers. I wouldn’t be surprised if the compound helped on the drag strip as well, or could be replaced with something like dish soap for sick burnouts. I’ve always heard of bleach used for that, though I don’t get why.
We tried it when I was a kid, our friend had a rwd Peugot wagon. We had to lift up on the rear fenders to actually get them to spin, then we all had white spots on our clothes from when the tires started kicking it up. Man, I miss the days of thinking dumb shit like that was a good idea.
My former gf & I celebrated getting the head on & clutch installed in her old truck by getting high AF, then heading out to an industrial park where I poured a couple cups of bleach on each back tire, then stood back with the Polaroid. Burnout went well, but those greasy jeans sat around for a week or two before I did a load of car clothes. They came out looking like I had been peppered with large buckshot
I’m with you: fun stupid times.
LMAO, sounds like a great time.
I remember seeing Levi’s for sale (at County Seat, jeez remember that store) in that speckled pattern. You probably saved a good $50-60
https://i.etsystatic.com/22195582/r/il/06485a/6568849872/il_1588xN.6568849872_rpt8.jpg
Dude, like, wow!
Sometime around then there were reports of well-used jeans selling in Japan for crazy prices. Also, people driving over them on gravel to give that used look.
I didn’t know it was a trend: mine were just done
No thanks. I’m going to just stick with my cans of liquid personality.
I use Wessonality brand myself
A similar idea used be a relatively common option on diesel/heavy equipment for a “cold start assist”, except it was just a can of ether you could remotely trigger from the cab and it’d spritz some into the intake.
It took standard spray cans you could get anywhere (so these systems are generally still totally usable), you’d just yank off the little spray nozzle, jam it into a special holder with a solenoid on top usually mounted to an easily accessible maintenance panel, and clip a clamp down.
Those systems were largely gone by the 1990s as glow plugs/grid heaters took over.
The other, more fun treatment for methanol (wood alcohol, bad moonshine etc.) poisoning? Get drunk and stay drunk.
At least according to one thing I read on the internet (!!), the danger from methanol is not from the methanol itself, but from the toxic metabolites that the liver produces in breaking it down. Drinking regular alcohol (ethanol) keeps the liver busy working on that alongside the methanol, and reduces the concentrations of the metabolites to a safe level over a longer time. According to the article, this was true in theory plus there is one documented case of a doctor using the method successfully with a patient.
Now son, I’m going to sit here and watch you finish smoking the whole pack…
That’s only for if your son has a stuttering problem and needs to relax the throat, or if he has throat irritation that only the air softened, springtime fresh flavor of Salem can cure
I finished the pack and asked for another.
Yes, that is indeed an acceptable treatment for methanol poisoning – a 3-day IV of grain alcohol. Preferred is the administration of fomepizole but if that’s not available, ethanol will be used. The problem is that methanol gets converted to formaldehyde by an enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase, and then to formic acid by aldehyde dehydrogenase. You need to basically “flood the end zone” with ethanol so the methanol can be eliminated through other processes. This was always a favorite topic of the students when I taught college general chemistry, and I always took great pains to point out that they really shouldn’t intentionally poison themselves in order to get a 3-day drunk at the hospital. For one thing, you can buy a LOT of drinks for what that hospital stay is gonna cost you.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482121/
Automotive antifreeze (ethylene glycol) will cause a similar problem if ingested, and a similar solution can be used. This is what Peak antifreeze says to do if the product is ingested:
“Obtain emergency medical attention. Rinse mouth. Do NOT induce vomiting. Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell. If medical advice is delayed, and if the person has swallowed a moderate volume of material (a few ounces), then give three to four ounces of hard liquor, such as whiskey. For children, give proportionally less liquor, according to weight.”
I have told auto technicians (semi-jokingly) that THIS is why you keep a flask of whiskey in your toolbox.
Peak LL 50-50 SDS 2-16-16.pdf
Now that is an awesome MSDS, thanks.
Common advice to Australians that get methanol poisoning in Bali—go find some name-brand vodka and drink it, fast. Of course, easier said than done given how much fake stuff is out there.
Any chance this had for market success fizzled when that iconic photograph of a burning Space-Saver Spare rolling down a path between two Vietnamese rice paddies hit front pages worldwide.
Dow Chemical keeps doing nice things for mankind, but we just keep snubbing them.
Oh, you’re goin to hell—but I did laugh, so I’ll be there too
😉
Too soon, man, too soon…
How about the best of both worlds? Push-button automatic tire chains do exist and do work. Devices such as Rotogrip and Onspot let you activate a set of “weed eater” chains that circle under the driving wheels for more traction. No sticky, toxic mess, and all the chain traction!
I feel like I just shilled for these things. I need a shower
I remember when the weed eater-style automatic chains started getting proliferation on commercial vehicles in my area in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The first was on a batch of new school buses the local district bought, and it was the most amazing thing (at the time) to watch when they got deployed.
The sound is rather distinctive
In addition to this, there are also special sand/gravel deploying boxes mounted on some trucks. Push a button, a roller starts to spin, and the path in front of the wheels are strewn!
I remember seeing the sand system on a train!
Could these be front mounted? Behind the headlights of, I don’t know… maybe an Aston Martin? Asking for a British guy I know
They now sell plastic toothed zip tie “chains”. I keep a pack in each car in case of emergency. May get me out of a bind if need be but not driving miles on them.
I use Panduit straps from HVAC supply stores. Just 3’or 4’ zipties we secure flex duct with. They’ll get you home usually—but you don’t want to drive fast or far, as you say
A pack on Amazon is a few bucks, toss in the trunk with the spare and forget about it till you need it. Western PA gets winter, but all municipalities can handle it without issue 95% of the time. I normally run quality all seasons on the FWD cars. I do own one AWD SUV but TBH I almost never need that capability. Last time I NEEDED 4 wheel drive was the freak 23″ snowfall Feb 2010.
I always had a couple packs of Panduits in the van when I was on installs, so I threw one in my beater Subaru a few years back. Frankly, my snow tires are dry-rotting, but having a few things in the trunk for our infrequent snow is just good peace of mind.
-at least when I DO get stuck, I’ll have stuff to shovel with & curse & get good and tired before I walk out and hail someone
I wonder how you’d keep the installed version from jamming, either from ice and road crud, or else from spray residue.
Nothing gives me more joy than reading this sitting in sunny Phoenix, AZ. Can’t shovel sunshine! (just ignore the fact that vehicles are torture tested during the summer at the proving grounds 2 miles from where I live)
You’ve got scorpions though. The only scorpions I like are on Fiats.
I have a lot of new neighbors who are military transfers from other states. I often casually say to watch out for the flying scorpions into conversation. I haven’t gotten a bad response yet.
In reality, it’s not the scorpions I fear; it’s the Africanized Killer Bees!
It’s the Bark scorpions I’d be worried about if I lived in Arizona:
https://www.americanoutdoor.guide/prepping/safety-prepping/fatal-stingers-the-6-deadliest-scorpions-in-the-world/
Sure there’s anti venom but between the sting and the cure sounds like a rough time.
One interesting fact I learned is that chickens LOVE scorpions! Chickens see them as tasty, protein filled treats and are very good at grabbing a scorpion and smashing its tail before it can react. These days maybe turning scorpions into chicken eggs isn’t such a bad thing.
Also that scorpions are attracted to the bugs that eat fallen fruit so if you have a bunch of citrus trees make sure to keep the yard free of fallen fruit…unless you also have a bunch of chickens.
Winter kills more people than scorpions. And snakes. And lizards. All combined. And I’ve lived here for ten years, never got stung. But winter has almost killed me a couple times.
Is that because lizards are cold-blooded and don’t regulate their own temperature well? 😉
That too.
Very true, however that doesn’t make scorpion stings any less unpleasant. At least to humans. Lizards apparently are immune to scorpion venom
https://www.chefsresource.com/faq/do-lizards-eat-scorpions
which explains a lot doesn’t it? To you scorpions are just another tasty snack.
I don’t like insects. There is a reason I live on earth. Have you tried the long pork?
Good thing scorpions aren’t insects ;p
Long pig? It’s on my bucket list.
We have been cultivating it for millenia. And using it to terraform the planet. Such an elegant solution
Pish! You and the crab people. Why just this morning I got the exact same diabolical monologue from a crab in a human suit. To be honest nobody (except maybe the cephalopods) squeezes into a human suit like a crab. I imagine it’s thanks to their millenia of practice wearing shells. And oh boy can those decorator crab people make those human suits shine!
So just which new overlords are this puny human supposed to welcome? And will humanity be toiling on mealworm farms or slaving in fish fermenters? If it were up to me I’d prefer the meal worms as they stink less but the crab promised they will only eat humans that die of natural causes. Apparently they taste better that way.
Well, not long now. The tipping point is almost here. I’d say we will be finished within the next century. So you with your puny life span will not live to see the glorious day. And the crabs work for us. The Daconian Emperor (Long may he reign!) holds sway over many worlds and peoples. Including humans.
BTW, Draconian Emperor is a rather sloppy translation. It is closer to The Merciless and Brutal Imperious Leader. But Draconian is such a wonderful word, and a good play on words
As for where you work, well depends. We envision this place as a high end cattle ranch. Meal worms are basically oatmeal. Plenty of that can be grown elsewhere
Well I suppose I can best serve the empire by being meal worm food.
Meh, the way we fling salt and beets around here during a storm, I’m not sure how useful this would be. Add in better all-season tires, AWD, traction control, ABS, etc, and this product becomes moot.
Um… beets?
Beet juice/rock salt blend
Beet juice is used to treat icy and snowy roadways, before and during the storm. It helps prevent the precip from bonding to the pavement, which keeps snowpack at bay.
Considering how they taste, this is the most appropriate use for beets.
Okay, that makes a LOT more sense. I thought maybe autocorrect had bitten you, but I could not for the life of me figure out what it originally was.
I take it these aren’t sugar beets.
Nope, the borscht kind. Yuck!
Borscht is delicious.
One of three things my mom fed me as a kid that I won’t touch. Beets, Tangerines, and PAR SNIPS, the grossest thing ever.
I used to dislike beets too until I discovered they don’t necessarily come out of a can and they can be used in more than salads.
And so are red beet eggs
Booo. Borscht is fantastic, depending on the ingredients you can make it taste pretty much any way you want, and it’s about the healthiest thing you can cook.
I daily drove Firebirds for the first couple decades of my driving life, and we get snow here. Best advice I can give is keep a container of Oil Dri in the trunk. If you do get stuck, throwing some under and around the tires is like magic. I didn’t get stuck much but when I did this was nice to have.
I remember 2nd-Gen Fs being absolute garbage in the snow. My buddy almost killed us with his ’81 Z28 by “exploring” a ravine the hard way.
Another buddy with a Camaro always ran gnarly truck snow tires out back, and stored the summers in the trunk for extra weight.
I had my Firebird’s rear wheels break loose on a very slight downhill on a snowy street, then sweated drops of pure helpless fear during the five-seconds-that-feel-like-a-lifetime as the car did a forwards-sliding 180 towards an oncoming city bus. I ended up in the opposite lane, just missing the back of the bus.
I used to DD my 88GTA all year, one time I was out late and came out to find a few inches of fresh snow on the roads, no plows out yet. I made it to the highway, then proceeded to drive home basically sideways, with the posi every time I gave it any gas the rear would kick out. I eventually found a balance of minimizing sideways shift while still maintaining forward momentum.
Common practice with 60s-70s muscle cars to keep two 50lbs. bags of the cheapest kitty litter in the trunk during winter. The extra weight helped traction, sprinkle some if your parking spot turned ice. We used to practice sliding our cars around empty parking lots when snow covered, and got a good feel for how they behaved, and the importance of maintaining steady momentum, and gentle inputs. Too many people absolutely freak in the snow. Go find an empty lot and get acquainted.
We used cheap kitty litter. I well remember the day Mom realized her catr’s trunk seal didn’t anymore and all she had was clay: learned some exciting new words that day
Of course, if you live in a place where tire chains and studs are illegal, then this could help in a pinch. Winter tires are still the best option though.
As with almost anything, making a physical change is almost always better than a chemical substitute. That’s something I borrowed from a plumber who was going on and on about how people use Draino because they’re too scared (or incompetent) to just disassemble their sink’s P-trap periodically — especially if it’s easy-to-use PVC. I highly recommend this, by the way. If for no other reason than to build character. Because whoa…
That is a really great way to get to know any house you just bought as well as its previous owners. It’s also a great way to skip a meal. Speaking from experience.
I don’t think you’re supposed the eat the stuff you clean out…
Stupid YouTube! The vloggers left that part out.
I have been ignoring my slow drain twice a day now for weeks when I go to brush my teeth. IKEA sinks are the absolute worse, and I am in there once a year pulling those fucking plastic pipes apart to clean them.
That same sink actually is a double sink (which I also hate). Just last night I scooted over and just used my wife’s side to continue to avoid that stupid slow drain. I suppose this weekend is my time to smell that smell once again.
Another option is to fill the sink with hottest water you can get from tap, plug up the overflow hole and use a sink plunger to fire some big slugs of water down the pipe
That is likely my step 1 solution, actually. Also, I may buy another one of these since I threw my last one out a few months ago after much usage…
https://www.amazon.com/FlexiSnake-Drain-Weasel-Sink-Snake/dp/B01NB0729G
Thanks for the reminder. I’ve had very good results with cheap ass Dollar Tree drain routers in my non Ikea sinks but they do eventually wear out and I need to get a new one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P65wNPZQDag
Additional info on this topic from YouTube channel : Rare Classic Cars & Automotive History
This is a fantastic channel, and very under-recognized.
I agree, I have been a subscriber when Adam just started and had 10K subscribers.
He really excels in creating interesting, original content.
I still think lasers aimed just ahead of wheels to instantly vaporize snow and ice and leave a dry surface is the way to go, but it’s probably cheaper just to move to Florida.
Well, it was before all the condo association fees came to be. Now the lasers might be the cheaper option.
I think you’d be better off with flame throwers.
If you live in places with real winter, not so useful. On the other hand, if you live somewhere with only a few days of snow a year, this could be tremendously useful. Especially with a real wheel drive vehicle with sporty tires.
My RWD sports sedan is fabulous 360 days a year. The 5 days each year that we have snow? Completely useless, even with very light amounts of snow. Like the Camaro in the headline, liquid tire chain would help immensely for those rare snow days.
Also: methanol is a major component of windshield wiper fluid. There’s a lot more of that sprayed around than there ever would be from liquid tire chain.
The methanol is probably the least of our concerns in that chemical concoction.
I wonder what would have been worse for the environment over the next 50 years, mass adoption of liquid tire chain, or the absolutely massive increase in the volume of salt we dump everywhere, often for no practical reason? Probably the tire chain, because liquid synthetic rubber, but we’re not doing the environment (or our cars, or our infrastructure) any favors with our current system, either
I was about to say this. That being said I think the liquid tire chain would do less damage to the roads than all the salt, since the liquid tire chains would be occasional, vs all the winter long road salt