Back in December, the state of Colorado proposed a full assault on oddball enthusiast vehicles. A new DMV rule would have banned not just adorable Kei cars from Japan, but golf carts and all vintage surplus military vehicles from classic Jeeps to Humvees. The proposed ban was a total one, too. If passed, the ban would have not only removed these vehicles from the road, but would have made them illegal to use off-road, too. Enthusiasts successfully beat the proposal, but the state is still trying to ban their cars in secret. Now, enthusiasts are fighting back.
Back in the summer of 2021, the state of Maine launched what is currently the worst car ban in America. The state passed a law to change the classification of what can be considered to be a road vehicle. As of that summer, the state of Maine now says that any vehicle not built to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) will be barred from public roads. Practically overnight, all sorts of gray-market cars from Euro-spec BMW wagons to big 4×4 Mitsubishi vans were re-classified as off-road vehicles. Legally, anything without an FMVSS sticker cannot be registered for road use in Maine.


Maine passing this as a law has thus far prevented enthusiasts from overturning the ban. As I have reported in the past, Maine did this based on guidance issued by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA). The organization is a non-governmental, non-profit lobbying organization composed of motor vehicle and law enforcement administrators and executives from all 50 states, Washington D.C., Canada, Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Its core goal is to motivate the states to standardize driving laws across America.

AAMVA does not have the power to create policy, but the people who run it do. The organization first recommended the banning of mini-trucks speed-limited to 25 mph back in 2011, based partly on crash testing conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Somewhere along the way, AAMVA decided to attack all gray-market imported cars. Many of those vehicles were Kei vehicles, which are just as small as off-road-only mini trucks, but built for road use. In 2021, AAMVA decided to come down on anything not built to FMVSS specs, but specifically targeted Keis.
Maine’s Director of Vehicle Services co-authored the 2021 guidance that has led to bans stretching the Eastern Seaboard. In the time since Maine announced its ban, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Massachusetts, Texas, Virginia, and Michigan have each imposed their own restrictions on vehicles imported for road use. However, most of these states only made DMV policy changes that reinterpreted existing laws and targeted only cars in Japan’s smallest class of road-legal cars, the Keis.
Update: According to a Maine reader, while Maine has a ban on its books, apparently the state is quite terrible at enforcing it, which is great. This mirrors what happened in Rhode Island when the state initially banned a bunch of cars and then sort of forgot to keep enforcing its ban.
Since 2021, enthusiasts have successfully overturned bans in Texas, Massachusetts, and Michigan. All three of those wins came in 2024 and suggested that car enthusiasts turning the tides against AAMVA. Then Colorado tried to end the year with a total Kei ban.
Colorado’s Hard Ban

If you’re interested in reading all of the legalese, click here to read my previous coverage. But what you need to know is that Colorado’s proposal was frightening in its scope. Here’s what it said about Kei vehicles:
The Department will not title or register Kei vehicles or mini trucks for on- or off- highway use.
Based on my research, Colorado officially banned historic military vehicles from on-road and OHV use in 2019, but hadn’t fully gotten around to implementing the legislation. In December, the state wanted to make sure that was all tidied up:
The Department will not title or register Military Vehicles built for Foreign Armed Forces or Historical Military Vehicles for on- or off-highway use.

Curiously, Colorado felt the need to clarify for a second time that an old military vehicle cannot be used as an OHV:
Historical Military Vehicles do not qualify as Off-Highway Vehicles, pursuant to 42-6-102(11.5)(b)(I)(C), C.R.S.
However the state did acknowledge that emergency services might operate surplus military vehicles, so Colorado carved out an exception for them. Before the state was finished, it also took a swipe at kit cars:
In order to be titled and registered for on-highway use, a Kit Vehicle must also meet the definition of Motor Vehicle in section 42-6-102 C.R.S.; which means they must be designed primarily for travel on the public highway and are generally and commonly used to transport persons and property over the public highways in the United States.

Then it considered that there might be other weird vehicles that might slip through the cracks of the ban, so it wanted to figure that out, too:
The Unconventional Vehicles Working Group (UVWG) will review Unconventional Vehicles for eligibility for on- and off-highway titles and registration, pursuant to Article 6 of Title 42.
While Colorado wasn’t changing any laws like Maine did, if enacted, it somehow found a harsher way to implement its ban. Maine at least lets you drive your Subaru Sambar off-road. Colorado is essentially saying, “Too bad, you now own a paperweight.”
Thankfully, enthusiasts in Colorado banded together and used the winning strategies pioneered by enthusiasts in Texas, Massachusetts, and Michigan. They educated their lawmakers and successfully convinced the Colorado DMV to reverse its course. The state officially canceled the changes to its policy, technically allowing the registration of these vehicles. But it’s not over yet; according to a recent report by Colorado Public Radio (CPR), the state hasn’t stopped trying to do its ban. Instead, it’s just doing it quietly.
Colorado Won’t Leave The Keis Alone

According to CPR, enthusiasts are still reporting that they’re not being allowed to register or emissions test their vehicles. The effect of this is that the state is running out the clock on the registrations of Kei vehicles. This makes the cars illegal to drive since the owners cannot renew their registrations without a valid emissions test. The state also refuses to give these vehicles OHV registration, so they’re effectively banned from roads – again, car-sized paperweights.
CPR spoke with one Colorado JDM owner, Ryan Albarelli, who told a frustrating story about being able to register a 1990 Honda Acty, but the state subsequently refused to emissions test it. Other folks online report similar stories.
Sadly, this strategy of a quiet ban isn’t anything new with Colorado. Enthusiasts in some counties haven’t been able to register Kei vehicles for a long time. Others who did get registrations haven’t been able to emissions test their vehicles, which meant they eventually became illegal to drive even if registered. Enthusiasts have been calling this a “shadow ban” since the state doesn’t have anything official noting the ban.

This huge headache is actually the very reason I got a 2005 Smart Fortwo (above) entirely for free in 2017. The 2005 Smart Fortwo is technically one of the cars exempt from the infamous “25-Year-Rule” because some importers went through the work to federalize the first-generation Smart Fortwo. However, some first-generation Smart owners have issues with emissions tests in their state. The previous owner of my car got fed up with Colorado’s system and just gave the car away.
The problem, CPR notes, is that all of these vehicles are neither explicitly illegal nor legal in Colorado. Instead, they sit in a sort of legal limbo where individual DMV offices are making the decision whether to register a car or not.
In an effort to solve this once and for all, HB25-1281 Title Register & Drive Kei Vehicles was introduced into the Colorado house on February 20. The prime sponsors of the bill are Rep. William Lindstedt – D, Rep. Larry Don Suckla – R, Sen. Nick Hinrichsen – D, and Sen. Byron Pelton – R. This bill, which has passed HOU Transportation, Housing & Local Government committee, is one of those rare glorious moments of bipartisanship.

You can click here to read the bill in full if you want, but the legislators have provided a handy summary:
Kei vehicles are small, imported cars that are at least 25 years old and have a top speed of approximately 55 miles per hour (mph). Starting July 1, 2027, the bill adds kei vehicles to the definition of a motor vehicle, requiring them to be registered, titled, and to follow traffic laws. They must undergo emissions testing, but cannot be tested using a dynamometer; instead, they must pass a two-speed idle test based on the emissions standards of their manufacturing year. The bill also prevents the Department of Revenue (DOR) and the Colorado State Patrol (CSP) from requiring additional inspections solely because a vehicle is a kei vehicle or from deeming them not roadworthy based on design alone.
The bill prohibits kei vehicles from operating on roads with speed limits above 55 mph or on limited-access highways. The bill creates a new class B traffic infraction of driving a kei vehicle on a road with speed limits above 55 mph or on a limited-access highway.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) ensures that vehicles meet minimum federal safety and equipment standards. Under federal law, any vehicle designed to exceed 20 mph is classified as a motor vehicle. However, NHTSA does not currently certify kei vehicles for road use because they do not meet these federal safety and equipment requirements.
The Imported Vehicle Safety Compliance Act of 1988 allows vehicles over 25 years old to be imported even if they do not meet NHTSA’s safety standards. These vehicles are classified as “classic” and are exempt from the federal safety regulations that apply to newer imported vehicles. Imported kei vehicles that are over 21 years old and have their original engines are also exempt from current federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) motor vehicle emissions standards under the Clean Air Act.
These definitions seem more than fair to me. If passed, this would create a law that would treat Keis mostly similar to regular cars. They just wouldn’t be able to access an Interstate or similar. That’s pretty much how 125cc motorcycles are treated in most jurisdictions.

The bill would also create a new class B traffic infraction for driving a Kei vehicle on a road faster than 55 mph. Proponents of the bill say that allowing Kei vehicles to use the road would add $25,000 to the state coffers in tax revenue in 2027 and another $68,000 in 2028, so officially legalizing Keis would be a good thing for the state’s budget. Proponents also say that the funds from allowing Keis can be used to fix roads. Likewise, the ticket revenue from catching Keis on Interstates can also be used to pad the budget as well.
Proponents of the bill do note that legalizing Keis will cost the state a one-time expenditure of $101,000. These costs will largely be incurred when reprogramming the state’s DMV and Department of Revenue computer systems to explicitly allow Keis. Other costs will be incurred because the DOR will want to issue every Kei vehicle a new 17-digit VIN so that the computers won’t freak out.
Sadly, this effort does not appear to change the uncertainty about classic military vehicles. Officially, the state says if you have a vintage Jeep you’re not supposed to be able to register it. If you happen to have an old military vehicle with plates, the state is instructing its offices not to renew those plates. That being said, it does appear that the harsher restrictions on kit cars would not be going forward.

This is an issue that the state has attempted to solve in the past. In 2015 and 2016, bills were filed that, if passed, would have codified Kei vehicles into law. However, both bills failed. CPR reports that the Colorado Automobile Dealers Association and the Colorado State Patrol strongly opposed both bills. From CPR:
Both groups declined to comment on the coming bill from Hinrichsen. But Tim Jackson, former president and CEO of the Colorado Automobile Dealers Association, said the arguments against legalizing kei vehicles at the state level boil down to two issues: pollution and safety.
“It does set up a two-tier system on both emissions and safety, and I think it contradicts everything that Colorado as a state has been trying to do,” Jackson said, referencing Colorado’s various efforts to improve road safety and clean up the state’s dirty air. Older kei trucks, including Albarelli’s Honda, lack modern systems like fuel injection that lower emissions.
Yep, in this case, it wasn’t the expected UTV lobby fighting Keis, but car dealerships and cops. The state’s official stance is that the proposed rules from December weren’t necessary in the first place, from CPR:
Asked why the DMV proposed and then pulled the rule explicitly banning kei trucks, spokeswoman Jennifer Giambi said in an email that the rule “aimed to clarify existing state laws regarding vehicle classifications to ensure consistency and better understanding.”
“Kei Vehicles have never been eligible for on-highway title and registration in Colorado,” Giambi wrote, adding that the rule was pulled because it “was already covered by existing statutes.”
If you took this at face value, it’s basically the state admitting it wasted everyone’s time back in December. It also doesn’t explain why the state doesn’t have a public-facing policy regarding Kei vehicles.
The CPR report pointed out something else interesting in all of this. AAMVA rarely returns media requests. The organization has never returned correspondence from The Autopian and it looks like AAMVA has done the same to CPR.

So all of this remains incredibly messy. But there are hopes about this latest bill. In addition to bipartisan support, the bill has gotten a thumbs up from Colorado Governor Jared Polis. According to CPR, Gov. Polis says he is “excited to expand consumer choice to affordable vehicles and looks forward to supporting kei freedom.” So it sounds like the bill just needs to get through the legislature to secure the rights of imported cars in Colorado.
If you want to support Colorado’s bid to legalize imports, you can send comments to the state DMV by clicking here. You can also contact Colorado representatives and voice your support for more vehicle choice. Kei enthusiast Ryan Albarelli, one of the people who helped kick the proposed rules to the curb in December, has also founded an advocacy group, the Colorado Kei Advocates. At this time, the organization exists only on paper, but Albarelli is considering taking it further.
For now, Colorado enthusiasts are trying to educate any lawmaker who will listen about why Keis should be legal. Hopefully, they are successful. This bill joins one filed in Texas and if one or both of these pass, they will signal that AAMVA has gone too far. That would be good for every lover of former forbidden fruit cars.
I still CAN’T BELIEVE that there’s no legal way to register kei cars and trucks in California (of all places!). Which is not to say that I haven’t SEEN keis w/CA plates at the Long Beach JDM show, etc… just that they’re in the minority (most have plates from other states) and I’ve no real idea how it’s possible (to register/plate and then insure a kei car in California).
Progressive blue state my ass! Probably the evil machinations of the domestic auto manufacturers and their
politicianshired goons.I always worry this will eventually trickle down to classic vas and trucks, which we all know don’t meet safety or emissions guidelines. And that’s all I own except my excursion. I refuse to buy new crap, and I’ll die on that hill too. I’m In Georgia and I have quite a few friends that own kei vehicles, some use them for work and use as dailies and it suits their needs perfectly. SMH lawmakers SUCK, we need some die hard gear heads to take control!
I grew up with a Willys M38A1. It is functionally equivalent to a CJ5. And I believe most of the engineering is equivalent to CJ5.
Why would one person jeep be allowed, and another person’s Jeep not be allowed?
Denver resident here. Not sure how it falls into the military vehicle thing but a guy in my neighborhood has a street parked Unimog and drives it regularly.
I can get behind the safety thing. I have a 1982 Toyota pickup that I never take on the interstate for fear of getting hit. An outright ban on these just seems like they don’t want to deal with them.
Unimogs are usually imported under the 25-year rule, and they’re fully VINned.
Every time an article about keis comes up I post the same comment: I do not believe a single one of the people claiming to want ‘consistency’ or ‘safety’ until they start cracking down on bro-dozers, coal-rollers, and other unsafe and anti-social car mods.
(In b4 someone tries to tell me that because the government says “we have no program to certify aftermarket headlights” that means they’re legal)
Agreed. A few years ago I was bicycling and got t-boned by a red light runner in a Honda Fit. If it had been a bro-dozer, I’d be dead.
I’m glad you’re not dead.
Me too, though it was a life changing experience.
While it is easy to say “the state does not enforce its own ban” there are other issues you need to be aware of. If I drive a vehicle that can be registered in my state, but cannot be in another and I get in an accident in that state, then all bets are off on any kind of insurance coverage (or worse liability if someone were to die). It is not dissimilar to transporting a gun across state lines that have different licensing laws.
I will take the army Jeep, the little white Honda Life, and one of the Honda Kei trucks. Have them washed and taken to my
tentdriveway.Land of the free xD lmao
I smell a conspiracy here, frankly. Both the NADA and automakers have powerful sway in our government. The last thing they want is an option for people to acquire affordable transportation without them getting a taste. These states must have some kind of legislative vulnerability.
This nation would be a better place if everyone drove Honda Actys instead of F150s.
A lot of the Kei hate is funded by utility ATV makers who see them as direct competition, hence the push to make them illegal off road as well as on.
I should have known big ATV was dirty. Next thing they’ll resort to mudslinging…
A state that like banning things illogically bans another group of things illogically? Color me shocked!
I thought Colorado was pretty well known for making things legal. Are you referring to something specific?
Weed and mushrooms, but anything else fun gets banned because they want one giant HOA.
Guns, magazines, and gun accessories.
Oh. Good riddance then.
Yeah, I’m sure they’re very concerned about emissions of a low number of 660cc engines that will be driven infrequently coming from a country with good emission standards, much lower fleet mileage, and better inspection requirements vs a country packed with overpowered wheeled hippos, widely varying state inspections, and morons who think climate change is a hoax.
I don’t think that it’s just ‘freeways’ that will be off-limits – plenty of two lane highways have speed limits higher than 55. This may make it so you could never leave the city.
I’m thinking if I own a WWII tank and decide to drive it on the road in Colorado it would take an Colorado Mountie with stones as big as Chuck Norris to pull me over. And then even Chuck would be less than Heroic with a tank barrel pointed at him.
But really if they are technically legal but the state does not allow a process to register them drive them fight the tickets in every Colorado court as illegal as the vehicle is legal but state will not provide the process to register them
It’s pretty easy to own a tank.
Most people that own them don’t have a license for the breach mechanism because the paperwork is nightmarish.
They are often set up for black powder for show.
Colorado has been ripe for outside groups lobbying for stupid ideas and some how getting them passed. Someone really needs to get the lobbiest in check.
Who funds the AAMVA?
Much of their funding probably comes from fees collected from all 50 states as part of AAMVA’s appointment as the administrator of the nationwide CDL (Commercial Driver License) system. That’s a big part of their original purpose. (And the only part of AAMVA worth having.)
But they also have their political and regulatory lobbying arm which is what’s behind these kinds of legislative shenanigans. That likely runs on donations… which are alleged to come in large amounts from the off-road recreational vehicle industry, insurance groups, automobile dealers’ associations, and just about anybody with an axe to grind over car culture that doesn’t fit within their profit objectives and/or views on what people just should or shouldn’t be allowed to drive. But they’re a non-governmental, non-public, non-profit organization, and they don’t have to disclose all their sources of income and/or donations. Nice for them, eh?
Thank you very much!
If they are a lobby and a regulatory group, a legal attack on ethical grounds would be rock solid.
The problem being that they publicly equate themselves with advancing highway safety. So anyone questioning them has to be able to answer their immediate counter which can be paraphrased as, “You’re supporting making cars and roads less safe?”
They’re firmly in control of both the optics and the political capital necessary to launch an investigation into their activities and means of support. Not saying it can’t be done, but it would be considerably more difficult because there’s no transparency imposed upon them, and they have the high ground on attempts to shine a critical light into their activities.
They can’t claim to be objective or impartial.
They publicly list Associate members which help fund also, and yes it’s mostly full of companies and organizations which profit from new car sales and registration
As a Coloradan, I’ll vote for this if it ever makes it to a vote. The emissions issue is really only a problem for the counties that cover the greater Denver area, as the rest of the state doesn’t have emissions testing, but it is still a silly issue. I’m still salty about the military Jeeps more than the kei cars, but I doubt that will ever get corrected since there isn’t an influx of WWII-era Jeeps at the same level as that of kei cars.
Tim Jackson, former president and CEO of the Colorado Automobile Dealers Association, said the arguments against legalizing kei vehicles at the state level boil down to two issues: pollution and safety.
So Tim if you are so concerned about safety how about not selling giant people crushing pickups and SUVs? And on emissions why aren’t you trying to ban motorcycles too?
So long as I can carry my young kids in my motorcycle sidecar the safety argument will continue to be total BS. This is about used car dealers wanting money, simple as that.
If they want money selling used cars open a used Kei dealership.
Don’t give these dipshits any more ideas, they’ll ban them too.
Or airplanes….
Those too.
Tim doesn’t care about the safety or emissions from motorcycles, side-by-sides, airplanes, lawn mowers, tractors or farm equipment because none of those replace vehicles sold by the Colorado Automobile Dealers Association.
I would argue a WW2-era or vehicle subject to the 25-year rule would not replace a daily driver, and is not a lost sale for car dealers. Old Jeeps and kei vehicles are hobbies and no different from road-worthy motorcycles and Polaris Slingshots, which are unsafe, non-emissions-tested vehicle used on weekends for lols.
Tell that to Tim.
I would say- “why shouldn’t they be legal if they pass a sniffer test”. Motorcycles aren’t really safe either. If my vehicle wasn’t up to highway traffic I wouldn’t drive there. Tractors are excluded. DPW tractors are too.
Only kei trucks have top speeds as low as 55mph. But I guess this is better than the alternative.
How do the Colorado DMV computers handle pre-1981 cars that don’t have a 17 digit VIN?
Don’t know about Colorado, but in Maryland, MVA offices (but not other service providers like AAA) can enter non-17-digit VINs into their system. So all it takes is a trip to Glen Burnie (Maryland Autopians moan in unison…)
Can confirm.
I work for a company that is regulated by the MVA. They are a nightmare.
I have never had an issue – they just type in my 10 digit VW VINs and never bat an eye so I am confused why they make a big deal out of it.
When I registered my ’96 Alfa Romeo Spider (never sold in the U.S. and imported from Belgium), they just entered the VIN. No issue. My insurance company (State Farm) actually said that it wasn’t a valid VIN. I took some photos and sent them to my agent and then it was cool with them, too.
How exactly does emissions testing work in Colorado? Is there a particular number they need to hit on the sniffer test or is it just a check that the OBD system has no faults situation?
Utah had sniffer standards that vary based on the year for anything not equipped with OBD II, I would imagine most states are similar.
They seem to have the antiquated California junk sniffer and rolling road. Not sure how they do diesel emissions seem to be based primarily in diesel shops.
Both.
Vehicles capable of going on a dyno gets the sniffer test. Vehicles that can’t use a rolling road (like my Smart) get an OBD-II test. Colorado says that imports would get OBD-II tests. My Smart got OBD-II readiness tests for a few years before the state decided to stop testing the vehicle.
It’s much more complicated than that. Vehicles from certain manufacturers don’t have to do a sniffer test. My ’09 Tacoma is perfectly capable of being tested on the dyno, but it only needs an OBD test because it’s a Toyota. My ’05 Murano had to pass the sniffer test. And my fiancee’s ’18 F-350 gasser is exempt for one more year. Go figure.
Denver metro here. There’s a bit more to it than that and it seems to depend on who is working that day.
My gas excursion has been through just a sniffer and the dyno the next year.
It was never required to be OBD2 compliant based on weight.
I had 2 jeeps of the same year and motor – one went through OBD and the dyno, the other just OBD in the same week.
I had to call the Colorado Emissions Technical Center and pitch a fit because they wanted to toss my 70 beetle on the dyno.
Dont get me started on diesels. That is the wild west here.
I had a 6.2 / 6.5 GM fetish for a bit and the emissions shops tried to fail them for missing EGR that never came from the factory, all while the guy behind me passed on a deleted cummins, testing him on opacity alone.
They never hassled me on my 7.3 though.
Wish me luck – I have to test my own cummins this week on a replacement DPF.
I believe it’s only the Denver Metro Area that does emissions testing in Colorado. The rest of the state, including where I live doesn’t have any emissions testing or inspections for gas vehicles. Diesels are required to pass an emissions test.
From Fort Collins to the Springs needs it now. And we’re under CARB standards. I hate the direction this state is going.
Edit: Only down to castle rock, not the springs.
My cars with OBD-II just get plugged into the computer. My ’74 Alfa Romeo is old enough that it doesn’t need a test (which is good since there is zero emmisions gear on it). My two Alfa Romeo Spiders (’91 and ’96) are put on the dyno rollers and run at certain speeds/RPMs with a sniffer in the exhaust. They are supposed to be tested every other year, but last year, I was able to put collector plates (good for 5 years) on my ’91. We’ll see if I get a notice for an emissions test this year or if I can wait the 5 years. Funny aside, when they went to put my ’96 Spider on the rollers, he thought it was rear wheel drive. I had to run out to quickly tell him it was FWD. And even then, he question me…”Are you sure?” Yikes.
“As of that summer, the state of Maine now says that any vehicle not built to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) will be barred from public roads.”
Doesn’t that also effectively make any classic or antique vehicle from before (*checks notes*) 1967 unable to be registered, even a classic/antique vehicle? They would pre-date the FMVSS.
And if you can’t register it, does that mean its not able to be insured unless its some sort of museum piece?
Yes, this. We’d like to know if any Maine owners of a 1965 Studebaker or Ford has been banned from renewing their registration. Do we have any Mainers here?
Mainer here. No no-one has. This law actually isn’t really enforced in any meaningful way. Like you still see Kei cars, imports, what have you with plates. I have a neighbor who’s got an Austin or something British from the 30’s with collectors. My other neighbor has a freakin m211, don’t know why, plated. There’s even that RHDGuys podcast in I think Winslow, or somewhere around Augusta. And they have an R32 with Maine Vet Plates on it. Maine is let’s say a unique place, laws are just collectively ignored. Like during covid, we just decided to start ignoring stickers. And haven’t gone back. The only thing I’ve heard of as an actual effect from this law, is every Delica at the time had its registration pulled. And you can register the car with the import paperwork, unless it came from Canada. So, say if you bought a S15 from Quebec, the town office would highly likely plate it. Might get flagged at the BMV, but most people register at the town office.
Color me unsurprised that these states can’t even do their bans properly. What you describe is also what happened in Rhode Island. A bunch of cars got banned when the policy came out, and then they just sort of forgot to keep enforcing it. Rhode Island then forgot about this whole thing for three years!
Sadly, reports from people in Georgia suggest that they’re still having a bunch of issues today. Seems that Georgia is on the ball about its ban. Though, I wonder if part of that is because of the lawsuit keeping the wounds fresh.
Hopefully, Maine doesn’t pull a Rhode Island and suddenly remember that it has this law on the books…
Heck, you can register about *anything* as a “hot rod” in Maine for that matter.
And for sure my local city hall in Maine only wants the money, since excise tax revenue is local, not state. And every car guy in Maine “knows a guy” come state inspection time, who won’t look too closely. Not that inspections and registrations are all that linked, other than a car needs to be registered before it can be inspected (always seemed like it would be smarter to do that the other way around, but what do I know?).
Yes, technically it does
If you want to get more technical, 25+ year old foreign market vehicles actually do meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, because those standards are created by NHTSA, and NHTSA has said that imported classic vehicles are exempt from those standards – that exemption is a federal standard. So the federal rule is they don’t have to meet federal rules
My friend and legendary auto journalist Murilee Martin lives in Colorado and owns a Subaru Sambar kei van. Wouldn’t be surprised if we hear more about this from him in the near future.