Years back, I went along with a salesperson to present a prototype of something that I had helped design, based on what we thought were the requirements of the client. The only way the meeting could have gone worse is if the customer had expressed their displeasure with baseball bats, Casino style. They didn’t like the shape, the size, the functionality, or the price point. Heck, not even the color met with approval.
The ride home was understandably near-silent until the salesperson finally spoke up. “Well,” he said, rather sheepishly, “I think we need to repaint that thing and present it again.” He was not joking.


You can laugh all you want (I did), but this sort of customer rejection happens with products still today, particularly cars, and the manufacturers don’t seem to accept the reason why. One automobile I can think of that might fit this description is the Hyundai Ioniq 6.

In his reviews, our Thomas Hundal has praised virtually every aspect of this car:
The Hyundai Ioniq 6 is one of the greatest electric cars on the market. We’re talking about a reasonably priced electric sedan with full-sized interior space, up to 342 miles of EPA range, an 800-volt architecture, and proper luxury car ride quality that’ll put many German machines to shame. Unfortunately, it’s also not a huge seller.
Indeed, while Tesla (up until recently) was pushing hundreds of thousands of Model Ys, and Hyundai was moving over 44,000 Ioniq 5s, the Ioniq 6 only found 12,264 buyers in 2024. Worse, that’s a decline from 2023 for the Ioniq 6, while the 5’s numbers improved by 33 percent. Clearly, people ain’t digging this thing.

If this car is so good, is there something holding it back in the market? You bet your ass there is. Or its ass.
Butt Seriously…
When a company is doing a rather significant facelift to a car that is barely two model years old, there must be a reason. This seems to be the case with this rather controversial Ioniq 6.
Introduced for the 2023 model year, the Ioniq 6’s styling looked like nothing else on the road, though some felt it bore a partial resemblance to a Porsche 911 or even a thirties streamliner car.

For the just-revealed facelifted version, Hyundai made some detail modifications such as removing the “whale tail” spoiler, toning down the busy diffuser, and de-felining the “cat-like” face of the original car with a set of slim headlamps for a squintier visage.

All of these changes were well received by Thomas and the story commenters alike, but they didn’t address the main issue that many if not most people have with the car: its rear end.

Some funny comments here from Thomas’s post, unless you’re a Hyundai PR person of course:
I still don’t like the rear “droopy butt” look.
Pretty face; sagging butt.
Still looks like a melted bar of soap.
It doesn’t need a facelift so much as a buttlift. Yes, I said it.
It still looks like it was pinched at both ends
Infiniti J30 called, it wants its butt back
Ah, the J30! Are the designers and marketing people here too young to remember that the melted Peugeot 504 tail on the Nissan J.Ferie/Infiniti J30 was sales kryptonite?

Hey, I liked the J30! I found the styling of the original Ioniq 6 very unique and intriguing as well, but you can try to defend it until you’re blue in the face, and still nobody is going to buy it. Generally speaking, the public seems to hate this car’s ass.
What is funny is that Nissan released another car about the same time as the J30 that had a very similar shape yet just ever so slightly tweaked, and with the taillights mounted up a bit higher. This car went on to be a sales juggernaut for the hamburger-logo brand and spawned a whole cult of Big Altima Energy.

With the Ioniq 6, though, it’s worse than aesthetics, as one commenter pointed out:
The styling changes, although a plus to my eyes, don’t appear to have done anything to expand the 11 cubic-foot trunk, which is my main sticking point.
Wow, that is indeed rather pathetic cargo space. This thing could be the most beautiful car in the world, but it still ain’t gonna sell with luggage capacity like that.

What can be done? Is it too late to save this car without a total redesign? Maybe, but I have to at least try.
Your Butt Is Mine
Anything is possible in a facelift (or buttlift), but a car maker will want to reserve changes for parts that can be easily removed and replaced without making major changes to the body structure. This often means parts that are bolted on like the bumpers, taillights, and even hoods or trunk lids. In the case of the Ioniq 6, those parts would appear to be the sloping trunk lid and the bumper / rear fascia panel. I’ll work with the N-Line model since I think that’s the most aesthetically successful and best starting point.
The idea is twofold. First, visually raise the back of the car to make it look more wedge-like in profile and less like it was pinched in at the back. Next, increase the luggage space by enclosing more space at the back of the car. Is that possible? To some degree, yes. Take a look at the old:
..and now the new:
You can see that I’ve added a raised trunk lid to create almost a “bustle back,” but far more integrated than the infamous Cadillac Seville that had such a protuberance on it. Next, I’ve moved the taillight band up higher to visually really help bring your eye up. Finally, almost all of the black fascia that used to contain the taillights will be painted body color, except for the section at the bottom that would line up nicely with the rising curve of the grey rocker panels to continue that sweep around back.
Here’s an animation to show the original and modified version:
If anything, I think it’s made the car less distinctive but also far less polarizing; that’s what’s needed when you’re trying to be a mainstream seller.
In back that addition to that new trunk lid I made seems rather BMW “Bangle Butt” like, yet people did in fact buy those and they don’t purchase the Ioniq 6, so maybe such a change is a good thing. Here is the original:
… and the raised back:
The animation shows the change:
From the side, the changes are not as pronounced looking, but they do work to make that back appear taller (since it is) and add more of a wedge shape to the car’s profile. The original:
…and modified:
Truth be told, I really want to change the rear fenders and quarter window as well, but as I said, at that point you might as well just redesign the whole car. The idea is to salvage as much of the existing car as possible and get a few more years out of it before Hyundai is ready with an all-new model.
Here’s the animation of the change to the tail, which is very subtle from this view:
Most importantly, I hope that such a change might give you enough room to get that last suitcase in there that won’t have to be shoved into the back seat.
No Ifs, Ands, Or Butts
The Ioniq 6 seems to be a great car, and it deserves to be a hit in the market with more than just the few crazies like me who go for its unique and controversial styling.
Are these bolt-on changes a total success? Of course not, but it’s a rather dramatic difference for minimal tooling work. Like that salesperson at my old job, Hyundai seems to be missing the point; their star EV has an Achille’s Ass and changing everything but (excuse the pun) that is not likely to turn the tide.
Here’s Why American Hyundai Ioniq 6 Owners Are Getting Shortchanged On Frunk Space – The Autopian
The 2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Limited AWD Could Teach Mercedes-Benz A Thing Or Two – The Autopian
The Base Hyundai Ioniq 6 Probably Isn’t The One You Want – The Autopian
Gawd no, that looks terrible. The butt is way too big and porky, making the car look fat. All you did was craft the hideous Lincoln MKZ rear-end on. Barf!
If they brought the rear window down farther to allow a better sight line, I would appreciate the low rear. I quit dislike high butt sedans because you can’t see out of them in the back, reference the 06 Cadillac DTS.
The perfect side profile for a sedan was the BMW e38 7 series or Jaguar X308 XJ. Long, sleek, and purposeful without being shouty.
I actually like the original more in this case only b/c it’s more unique, but Hyundai should bring the whale tail back.
The real solution imo has been right in front of us the whole time. It helps the shape and the storage.
Wagon.
Your edits did, indeed, make for a far more attractive car.
I owned a ’71 Peugeot 504 and its trunk was definitely funky. It looked a lot worse after a Plymouth station wagon hit it at 30 mph while the 504 was stationary. But you’re not wrong about the Cadillac Seville’s rear end either.
I don’t know what the sales figures for the Ioniq 6 are in other regions of the world, compared to the US, but the fact you have to find a place to recharge, no matter how fast it is, after oh 300 miles, makes it a hard sale. At least in the US.
If I was 10 or 15 years younger, I would be all over a PHEV. At 67, with a 8-year-old Accord V6 that will almost certainly outlive me, I don’t care how pretty you make it look, I’m not going to spend that kind of money. Doors get dinged. Fenders get dented in parking lots. My self-worth is not based on how pristine my car looks.
I am getting back to my 504, IDGAF, days. If you leave me a note, I’ll send you the insurance company’s estimate and spend it on beer, and then drive a car that looks like it has no F’s to give. Mess with me at your own peril. And, just to be clear, I drive very aware and defensively. Whether I’m the only person in the car or if it’s full of other people.
The change you made probably reduces range by at least 20 miles due to the increased drag from the increased rear cross-sectional area. The rear is probably the most crucial area for drag, which is why we’re seeing so many coupe crossovers. I think a better approach is rethinking how the side beltline droops to the rear, making its lowness more pronounced.
Exactly! That’s what I thought too, I just couldn’t put my finger on it.
I don’t think I’ve agreed with a take this much in ages. It’s a great car, but its problem is 100% butt stuff.
Looks like a Volt now. If they just paint half of the black abomination on the back it’d be 100% better.
I may be among the minority here, but I really genuinely do enjoy the original 2023 design. Do I prefer the concept car? Sure, but it isn’t that huge of a departure. I like the retro-futuristic streamliner look, and even the more “cat-eye” headlights of the pre-refresh version. They give it a vaguely Beetle or Porsche look rather than the more generic post-refresh visage.
Definitely an improvement to this oddly ugly car. I really don’t like it from any angle, but the buttlift is a pretty sizeable (visual) improvement!
I get what you’re trying to do, but afaik the issue with that car is the price. Yes, it has a lowered butt, but it doesn’t look saggy to me. Instead it kind of hints at old aircooled 911s, even has a little ducktail, which makes me happy.
For some reason, wedge-shaped cars with short trunks all scream ‘econobox’ to me,the Fiesta and Cruze sedan come to mind. Those weren’t bad cars, but the images above of the redesign seem to share similar proportions although in person I think it would fair better since this isn’t a compact car.
The real answer is to make it a hatch, if you like big butts then let’s move the needle, live a little, and go full BBL.
I think this minor change is a big improvement, but I also wonder why, in this era of SUV-ing everything, Hyundai didn’t give it a hatch. That, to me, seems like the biggest misstep.
Seriously, there is no saving this design.
The updated back looks like a Ford Taurus, and not in a good way.
I like big “boots” and I cannot lie. Magnificent work, Bishop!
The original trunk was straight up influenced/copied from Mercedes. It had flowing lines and it fit the rest of the shape perfectly. The reimagined version made it mediocre. It has a feeling of an Alfa Romeo concept car bought from Temu.
The Ioniq6 harkens of a 4-door Hudson or worse, a Dymaxion. My mind was blown when they posited this as a step up over the 5, which styling I happen to love. Your improvements, while making it appear a tad nicer, only make it appear to my eyes like there’s a bustle on its boaty boot.
So you’re saying it needs an aftermarket trunk. There could be a market for that like the company ADRO that makes a front bumper to fix the “beaver teeth” on the M3/M4.
The only problem with the updated design is that they’re using piano black for body panels. Why in god’s name would I spend $60k on a car that has unpainted bumpers like the poverty-spec Saturns of the 1990s?
Don’t redesign the thing again, just BLOODY PAINT IT!
A poverty spec Saturn would have had flat grey bumpers that could run into a parking post and not show it. Try that with piano black.
Exactly! It’s aping a horribly cheap design trend that’s long abandoned, while also being so much worse at it!
And if they’re not trying to mimic 90’s poverty spec Saturn, why do it at all?!
It’s like that droopy ass Infinity J30 to me… which look like a melting same era Maxima. At least the J30 was RWD and could be coaxed into doing donuts with that sweet limited slip diff and slush box auto. Ugh
I’m genuinely shocked you could make the butt look *worse*