The ute was very much an Australian invention, but the Americans gave it a red-hot go over the years. Chevy built the El Camino and Ford offered the Ranchero, both of which served short but meaningful innings. Chrysler never really took a shot at a ute, leaving us one short of a full round of Big Three-built utes. But AMC, America’s fourth-favorite and scrappiest automaker, very nearly did put up a ute of its own.
AMC’s contributions to the automotive world are often forgotten today, but that doesn’t mean they were any less valid. It was a humble but proud automaker that often managed to do great things on a shoestring budget. It was also a fine steward of the Jeep brand from 1970 to 1987.
As covered by Green Hawk Drive on YouTube, AMC executives had a neat idea during that time. What if the company put together a ute of its very own? And what if it wore a grand name like Cowboy?
It all kicked off when AMC bought Jeep from Kaiser Industries for $70 million in 1970. At the same time, it was also spending big on the development of the new Hornet. The plan was to shore up AMC’s future prospects with fresh new products, but these expensive investments put a lot of pressure on the company’s finances.
Given the $40 million development cost, AMC was eager to juice every last drop out of the Hornet platform. It would soon underpin the Gremlin, Concorde, Spirit, and Eagle. But AMC didn’t stop there.
The Hornet was soon sent to Jeep’s design studio, with the group tasked with converting it into a light truck. This was the era when car-based unibody utes, or coupe utilities, were big business in the US. The Chevy El Camino and Ford Ranchero were both shifting real numbers at the time, often over 40,000 units a year. Meanwhile, Japanese brands like Datsun and Toyota were importing smaller trucks in huge numbers, too.
The project was designated ‘Cowboy’ by Jeep’s chief stylist, Jim Angers. As covered by Old Cars Canada, enthusiasm was high, with AMC product planner Jim Alexander assigned to lead development.
Soon enough, though, the Cowboy hit a snarl. Producing a Hornet-based ute in the vein of the El Camino and Ranchero wouldn’t be feasible, financially speaking. The large side-body stampings required for the integrated bed and cabin were simply too expensive to justify given the company’s position.
Alexander drew on his former styling experience, however, and determined the design could still be made to work by using a separate cabin and bed. This solution wouldn’t look as sleek as one-piece bodysides, but it would still look pretty good – and would greatly reduce tooling costs.
To support the now-separate bed, the Cowboy would use a rear subframe design. Alexander reasoned that if the Camaro could do so up front, the Cowboy could do it at the back. The gas tank would then live under the front of the cargo bed, with the spare tire tucked under the rear half.
The Cowboy initially seemed destined to be a Jeep model. It would have been a strange move, as the Hornet platform did not have four-wheel drive. The AMC Eagle would eventually get all-paw grip, but that came much later in 1980.
A number of prototypes were developed. The red model wearing Jeep Cowboy badging was a handsome thing, if somewhat dated for the early 1970s with its simple rectangular grille, white wheels, and dog dish hubcaps. It’s believed this example went to the crusher some years later.
Another example was finished in white, green, and gold. It wore a Hornet front valence and had an altogether more modern look. It was based on a Hornet SC360, which boasted a 360-ci V8 with a healthy 245 hp and 345 pound-feet of torque. It featured a radio, a manual gearbox, and air conditioning—the latter being particularly luxurious for a 1970s truck. This well-equipped example was purchased by Jim Alexander himself and later handed down to family members. Its current whereabouts are unknown, but it is assumed to be still in the family.
There are also reports that a yellow version existed. This was said to be fitted with a six-cylinder engine and the front end of an AMC Gremlin. It’s believed this version was crushed, though there are rumors it lives on in a Pennsylvania-based collection.
There are also some in-development photos floating around. They primarily show us the Cowboy concept under construction, with various different front-end designs notable in the images. The model would also appear in Vintage Truck magazine in 2018.
Sadly, the prototypes were all the Cowboys that would ever be built. The ute was in development at the same time as the new Hornet hatchback, and AMC had only limited production lines to work with. Executives wagered that the hatch would be a better bet, and the Cowboy got the chop. Thus, we never got to see how the AMC effort stacked up in the golden era of American coupe utility vehicles.
It’s a sad story, but not a strange one given AMC’s history. The brand was always trying to do magic on a shoestring budget, and it succeeded more often than anyone might have expected. Still, like AMC itself, the Cowboy would come to a lonely and early end—leaving us wondering what might have been.
Image credits: AMC, Chevrolet, Green Hawk Drive via YouTube screenshot
I caught the video last week, popped up as recommended in my YouTube feed. I think it looks pretty sharp, better than the El Camino and Rancheros of that time.
It’s crazy to see how modern the Hornet still looks. Clean lines and contours. Great proportions. Dick Teague was a genius.
This makes me think of a cool article idea – what are some of the contenders for the biggest uninterrupted body panel on a car? (i.e. rear panel on El Camino, whole body on VW Karmen Ghia). I feel like Torch could get creative (“ooh, this one was a continuous front body panel that stretched 8 feet, but the rear was split up”) – interesting things like that.
Judging by recent repair nightmare tales, the Rivian R1T might be the winner.
Things must have been really tight at AMC there was no dough for a Jeep barred grill.
I loved the late 70’s AMC AM Van concepts they based off of the Pacer. They could have been ahead of their times with that. Oh, and as mentioned in previous comments, The Chrysler L-body ute would like to take you to the woodshed and smack your butt with about 1500 pounds of cargo capacity.. How DARE you forget the Rampage and Scamp. You’re forgiven, Afterall, you are an Aussie LOL. Australia, land of bubble butts and bubble brains apparently. Y’all did gave us the late Pontiac GTO , limited Chevy Caprice cop cars (Retired early due to part issues) and the G8 so all is forgiven. I truly enjoy your articles on the Autopian BTW. I’m just a bored grumpy assed old almost boomer. Forgive me, Lewin, the feds keep threating parts of my old fart pension and I just strike out for the shits and giggles of it all. Luvs. You’re awesome and my bucket list includes a trip to down under.
Wow, this is amazingly interesting…I had no idea about this. Those surviving utes are so cool. Now I want a ute. I miss AMC!
Quick! Someone get a Charger, a Smyth kit, a Grand Cherokee front clip, and make this happen.
“Chrysler never really took a shot at a ute, leaving us one short of a full round of Big Three-built utes.”
In the US maybe, but Chrysler Australia, despite only building cars from 1962 to 1981, built a ute version of every model from 1965 to 1981. And I’m in the process of extending that timeframe by retrofitting a 1966 model ute with all the panels, dash etc from a 1963 model.
I doubt tooling for the special quarter panels would have been any worse than doing the separate bed but there would have been structural concerns, all those ’68-72 El Caminos were subject to buckling (although minor) along the upper rr quarter and a separated bed avoids that. I am pleased to see that AMC used long two-door doors, as did Ford and GM, instead of short little four-door fronts as did certain Aussie Utes.
I’d buy one…
Not sure what you are referring to with ‘short little four-door fronts as did certain Aussie Utes’. The first and only Aussie ute with four doors was the Holden Crewman, produced from 2003 to 2007. I own a Crewman and have done for 14 years. The rear doors on these are short, which can be a pain for rear seat passengers, but I don’t ride in the back seat.
I think he means using the same front doors as used on the 4 door sedan version of the car, rather than doors from the 2 door version.
Yes. My time with a GTO/Monaro has me a bit sensitive to that kind of thing. If it’s only got two doors, if there is to be any convenient access to the area behind the front seats for either storage or people the doors need to be longer than what was provided with the fronts in a four-door set. BTW I also have El Caminos, ’70 and ’78 (with long doors) and always liked the utes.
Okay, now I am with you. Most of the Holden utes had no real usable space behind the front seats, so it wouldn’t make that big of a difference, the VE & VF did have a bit of room. The later model Fords also had space behind the seat, the earlier ones didn’t.
If this had been produced, AMC’s fortunes would have been much improved. History would have taken a different track. Imagine if Chrysler hadn’t taken over AMC, and Daimler hadn’t taken “merged” with Chrysler, then Cerberus hadn’t eviscerated the company, and it were not then in Fiat and Stellantis’s clutches. AMC soldiering on into 2024, Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth still strong and numerous, seventh-generation AMC Cowboys being traded in on eighth-generation utes… no Crossfire made on outdated Mercedes bones…
Oh I so would.
I’ve seen a Pacer converted into a ute and it looked ridiculously good.
With the bed being separate from the cab, I’d wager this would be more capable of “truck stuff” than the other utes of the time and would have given AMC a decent headstart on taking compact pickups seriously before the Big 3. In fact, other commenters have pointed out the rear subframe approach gave AMC the the ability later on to introduce the Comanche as a pickup version of the semi-unibody XJ Cherokee.
I don’t know, according to this not-at-all-racist sales training film, the El Camino was pretty capable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xksacBNzjrs&t=1s
That payload and towing rating is indeed impressive but I’m still inclined to believe the Cowboy could handle more. And if they stuck to their policy of all Jeeps having 4WD, they’d compete with the import pickups better than the Big 3 utes.
Does anyone else think stelanis should do a new version of this based on the little hornet crossover? I mean they brought back the hornet in a package ripe for a maverick rival, preferably a single cab baby ute with a front bench seat or perhaps an extended cab with jumpers. Really lean into the heritage from all of that history they own, they could even call it a rampage, or “ram-paige” as I always thought they should have punned with the name using paige in the errand boy sense of the word.
Stellantis is way ahead of you – Ram Rampage – Wikipedia. Like you suggested, the new Rampage is on the same as the Hornet, as well as the Jeep Compass and Commander.
Still waiting to see if it makes it to the US.
Thanks for the info. With luck they’ll bring it here and perhaps undercut the maverick with a legit base model since nobody does that anymore, at least not one that you can actually buy.
I’m of the opinion that Truck beds should be separate from the cab, and preferably not structural.
If you’re using your Truck for Truck things the bed is going to get scratched and beat up, scratches in a steel bed make for the perfect environment for rust, and in many environments beds end up being a wear item that needs replacement.
Now when you make the bed a structural part of the chassis you run the risk of compromising the structural strength of the Truck, also replacing the bed once it needs replacement is either impossible, a custom job, or a massive PITA.
The alignment of the passenger door handle on the white and green one triggers my memories of a Hornet my parents inherited from a friend who aged out of driving. That thing was such a POS, built with all the enthusiasm for quality control of a dog going to the vet.
The same door handle was used on the tailgate.
“Whatever’s available use that… there’s only one possibility? Well, make do with that one. Whadaya mean, you need it for the seat belt?”
The craziest thing here is that using a door handle on the tailgate was NOT a quirk of this concept, or unique to this at all. J-series pickups had already been using an AMC door handle on the tailgate since 1973, and they continued to through the end of production.
Ahem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ute_(vehicle)#History
Ranchero: 1957-1979, 22 years
El Camino: 1959–1960 and 1964–1987, 25 years total
Between the two, a “ute” was available in the US for 30 years, not counting the Rampage or Brat or Baja. I’d call that a little more than a few “short” innings.
Objection granted!
Don’t forget GMC also had the Sprint/Caballero rebadge of the El Camino in the ’70’s and 80’s.
There is also the strange world of Cadillac pickup/flower cars, which were related to the herses and ambulances of the time and predate the Ranchero and the El Camino.
Was the Crossley Pickup a ute?
Those capped, white steelys on the red one are so perfect. I wonder if those double striped tires are available anywhere…
That unibody with a separate subframe under a detached bed would re-emerge in the Jeep Comanche, a tough little AMC/Jeep truck that did get produced from 86-92. During that time, Chrysler bought Jeep and killed the Comanche to avoid in-house competition with the new Dodge Dakota.
I was surprised to find out that most kei trucks use exactly the same half unibody half BOF arrangement as the Comanche.
It looks nice but the Spotabout was the right move for the era. If AMC was bigger in Australia it would have made more sense. FWIW the suffrage set the precedent for the Comanche
We had a Sportabout bought new. Its concept was better than its execution, but it sold me on hatchbacks. I drive a Honda Fit after 35 years carless in Manhattan.
Looks to be a handsome vehicle and I like the separate bed. The green prototype is more jeep looking with the grille.
That’s literally just the AMC Hornet grille.
I know that, but it resembles a Jeep J10/Cherokee grille from the time period as well. See David’s J10. Definitely keeping it in the family.
AMC’s predecessor had done something similar for a long time, all Hudson pickup trucks from 1926-1942/1946-47 used cut down passenger car body shells with a bed grafted on the back, the line was discontinued in part because the new 1948 Step-Down bodies were too difficult/expensive to adapt as pickups. Of course, in the old days, the line between a truck and a car was sort of blurrier
I’m left wondering if the design process of adding a rear subframe to a unibody vehicle would be useful 10 years later in adding a rear subframe to a Cherokee in order to create the Comanche pickup. Seems like a very similar conversion, conceptually speaking.
Holden did similar on the VY One Tonner I believe.
Both the VY/VZ one tonners and the Crewman variants. As far as I am aware the one tonners only have tray bodies, no tubs, as do quite a few Crewmans, I had one on mine for a while.
Alright
AMCDodgeFCAStellantis, hear me out. I got a lesson for ya on corporate synergy. Take the outgoing Charger. It’s had a long run, sure, but why throw away those dies just yet? Tweak them a little. Take away the rear seats. Add a truck bed. I dare you, make a ute from the remains of the old Charger.We ain’t keeping the drivetrain though. Sell those leftovers as crate engine. No, we’re reaching across the corporate aisle. We’re using the 2L turbodiesel DW10 from the Citroen corner. Hook it up to the 6-speed manual from a Jumpy. We’ll drive the other axle with the motor off a Fiat 500E. It’ll deliver power anytime you are on the throttle. We call that feature “hill start assist” because the lil’ truck starts moving before you take your foot off the clutch.
Look, parts bin cars are how you win. The way I see it you have the deepest collective parts bin of all the automakers. It’s about time we turn that bin into small-batch artisanal utes.
Is that prototype trying for a Jeep Gladiator look?
If the Dodge Rampage (Plymouth Scamp) is not a Ute, then what is?
Exactly. Sure, they didn’t last long and came out at least 10 years too late, but they were solid little utes. I had an ‘82.
Yup, Lewin missed those, but hey he’s from Oz and those existed before he was born. I’ll give him a pass THIS TIME.
I just came here specifically to call this out. The Rampage was very much a ute from Chrysler.