Welcome back! Since we have a short week because of the MLK holiday yesterday, I thought we’d spend it looking at some project cars. Today we’ve got two adorable little vehicles from Japan that both make do with two-cylinder engines. Neither one is drivable as it sits, but they both look like decent projects to me.
On Friday, we looked at two cars that complemented each other well enough that I gave you a “Both” option in the poll. But the old Volvo wasn’t enough of a pull to put that option at the top – and the little Datsun pickup handily outscored it by itself. The love for simple little old trucks continues, it seems.


I still like them both, but if I had to choose, my imaginary $3,500 is going to the Datsun as well. It’s just so damn charming. And you never see them that clean anymore, especially for that price.
It took a while for Japanese cars to be taken seriously in the US. Yeah, they were cute and all, but when you could just as easily go to the Chevy dealership and get a Malibu with a V8 and air conditioning and seats like a Barcalounger, they were a hard sell. But the early adopters did love them, and of course, the rest of the market caught up pretty quickly. And now, those rare early Japanese imports are becoming true collectibles, when you can find them. I found a couple for sale that both need some work, but also don’t cost a whole hell of a lot. Let’s see which one you prefer.
1972 Honda Z600 – $2,900
Engine/drivetrain: 598 cc overhead cam inline 2, four-speed manual, FWD
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: Ran and drove before being parked for restoration
The Honda Z600 was the “sporty” version of the N600, a tiny hatchback that pre-dated the Civic. I guess, in a way, that makes the Z600 the predecessor to the beloved CRX. It’s a two-door hatchback, basically a two-seater, meant to add a little style and sportiness to the economy car formula.
Like the N600, the Z is powered by a 598 cc twin, with roller bearings on the crankshaft which allow for an absolutely ludicrous redline. This tiny engine makes 36 horsepower at a mind-bending nine thousand revolutions per minute. It drives the front wheels through a four-speed manual. This example was running and driving before it was parked and disassembled, the seller says, but it has been sitting for a while and will need reviving.
Someone already put some work into this car; the interior has been gutted, but the front seats have new upholstery. The rest of the interior panels aren’t shown in the photos, but the seller says they have “every part plus some,” and show boxes of stuff that comes with it, so I assume and hope that the rest of the interior and glass is in there somewhere.
There has been some work done on the outside as well. Most of the original orange paint has been covered up with primer, and it looks like someone was getting it ready for paint. This looks to me like a perfect candidate for attempting a DIY paint job: it’s small, half the work is done, and all it needs is a simple bright color to look really cool.
1972 Suzuki Jimny LJ10 – $2,250
Engine/drivetrain: 359 cc two-stroke inline 2, four-speed manual, 4WD
Location: Monrovia, CA
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: “Does not run yet”
Suzuki’s little Jimny 4×4 is a legend among car folks. It was sold in the US as the Samurai for a number of years, and sold well despite a hatchet job by Consumer Reports over “unsafe” handling allegations. (I mean, it was no Miata, but it was not nearly as bad as they made it out to be.) We lost the Jimny in favor of the larger (and presumably safer) Sidekick/Vitara after that, but a lot of enthusiasts, including me, have loved the Jimny from afar ever since. But the Jimny’s story goes back even further, all the way to this little off-roader, the very first 4×4 to meet Japan’s Kei specifications.
The key to reliability when it comes to off-roaders is simplicity, and engines don’t get much simpler than this. It’s an air-cooled two-stroke two-cylinder, displacing 359 cubic centimeters and putting out 27 horsepower. It won’t even hit 50 miles an hour, so don’t expect to drive it on the freeway, but that’s not what it was made for. It’s made for going places other vehicles can’t, and at that, it excels. This one doesn’t run at the moment, but it sounds like the seller has done some work on it and it’s close to firing up.
This era of Jimny was never imported to America by Suzuki, but you may notice that it’s left-hand-drive. Suzuki did intend the LJ to be exported to other markets; it was brought here by a company called International Equipment Co. I tried to look them up, but the only company by that name I found here is in Tennessee, and specializes in fire suppression systems for buildings. I have no idea if it’s the same company, but if so, they certainly were diverse.
It’s complete except for the bumpers and grille, and the seller says the only rust that’s a problem is in the passenger’s side floor. Obviously it needs complete restoration, but it looks like a good candidate for it. The little two-stroke engine won’t be up to much, but it could be a fun little in-town runabout or a unique way to get around a big property.
The advantage of little cars as projects is that you can fit the car and all the parts for it in one garage stall, with plenty of room to work. You’ll have your work cut out for you with either of them, but they both look like fun rides once they’re finished. So which one are you willing to take on?
(Image credits: sellers)
We’ll take the Z600. It’s like a 1:1 Revell kit! Then I can drive it to the parking garage at work and finally fit in the 7/8ths of a space between an Expedition and a Tahoe.
Take the jeep easier to get in and out of with no top and no side room
The Jimny, because part of me wants to be a jackass and turn it into an faux Willys for parades. That would mean removing the roll bar, which would be OK since it’s obviously not mounted to anything meaningful – if you’re riding in a deathtrap, you might as well lean into it (perhaps literally).
I’m sure they mounted that rollbar into structural sheet metal…
The rollbar actually makes the Jimny less safe IMO, because anything that stops you from bailing out of that adorable deathtrap is your enemy.
When I worked in town, there was someone who daily-drove a Z600 and parked it in the same garage as me. I always wanted to be that guy.
Also, I live on a country highway and at 40MPH that cute li’l Jimny would get smooshed by a log truck or brodozer before they even saw it.
It’ll do 70mph (allegedly). Think of it as an Austin Mini, but with less cylinders.
Nope, 70 km/h according to the info I found. About 43 miles an hour.
Hmm, I was going off of this page, which claims:
and also
But you have to pay for access to the archive of Autocar to read the review, so I can’t confirm that it really does say that (and I couldn’t find any online archives for Motor).
70mph from ~35HP seems plausible for something that only weighs 600kg (1300lbs). Probably rather terrifying, but plausible.
As a former LJ80 owner, they were imported into Canada in 1980 and 1981, Convertible, Hardtop and LJ81 truck. That looks like a good price for a not too rusty body tub and frame. I had to pick it, no choice.
Too bad this time I wished for both and it wasn’t a choice.
No choice pal. )-:
Having tried cars without them given the choice I will always pick the car with a roof and a redline on the far side of 8,000.
The tiny truck looks cute, but it’s even less use to me than a tiny slow Honda.
This is a tough one, honestly….. but I think I’d go with the LJ. I could use it in the woods around the property, and it’d be fun to keep in a corner and work on from time to time.
I somehow doubt I’d fit in the Honda, but it’s REALLY cool…. so I’d give it a shot, but I know I could use the LJ right away.
This would have been a both day for me. Having had to crawl out of 3 Samurai’s that “somehow’ ended up on their sides in the early 90’s I still went with the Jimny.
Based on relative condition, I’m picking the Honda. But I’d gladly have both!
I used to enjoy taking lightweight 4wd wagons inappropriate places, so instantly clicked Jimny
The Honda is in better condition, to that’s what I’ll pick. It actually has doors and a roof.
Too bad the Fiat TwinAir wasn’t used in US-market cars. Yes, they made 2-cylinder engines until a few months ago!
There is no way I will ever be able to fit into that Honda. There are perhaps enough hammers and crisco in the universe to squeeze me into the Jimny. I’ll try to make a poor man’s Golden Nugget. Good luck finding that grill though!
I’d have to Bubba Smith the front seat to fit in the Z. In the Jimny, I’d just look like a kid who has outgrown his Power Wheels.
Having owned an N I have to go with the Z. However the LJ is tempting. While the LJ wasn’t imported to the mainland officially they did send a number to Hawaii. There was one just down the street in my Midwestern home town in about 1973 and was wearing Hi plates when it showed up in town.
Totally dig that Jimny. My only problem is the motor being a 2 stroke. Wasted way too many hours fiddling with old 2 stroke snowmobiles…
Definitely a “both” day. I voted for the Honda, though. It looks like a lot of the work I don’t want to do (i.e. fixing rust and body work other than painting) is done, so I think I would have more fun working on the Honda than the Suzuki.
I’m gonna have to talk the seller down a bit on that Jimny, but I’ll take both. If I had the space for them, I’d be on the phone to those guys as we speak. The Z600 is cool as hell, and I have a soft spot for anything Jimny/Samurai related.
That Z600 would be amazing with a Tesla Model 3 drive system.
A Model 3 drivetrain would quadruple the weight! A Changli drivetrain should be sufficient. Maybe two if you really want performance.
No it wouldn’t. No need to use the Model 3 battery, when you can use something more power dense, such as LoneStar Sleeper Cells. By drive system, I mean the motor and inverter, with a single speed ratio and custom-made CV axles/shafts. A 15 kWh pack or so would have weight go up maybe 200 lbs over stock, and get the car around 60-80 miles range driven normally. At the drag strip, it would have about 300 horsepower with an EV’s torque curve in a sub-1,600 lb car, and run 10s(if you can get the tires to hook up)…
I think it might get close to quadrupling the weight of just the drivetrain, even without batteries.
Mind you, if you want to make a drag car, extra weight might give you a help with traction. That said, I fell like if it did hook up the torque would immediately just flip the car onto it’s back.
If you were designing something less mental, I’d go look at what people are putting into (Austin) Mini’s, because they’re about the same size and weight…
When it comes to EV powertrain swaps, especially into an ICE car, I assume that batteries are included.
Nah put it in the the L and you could put a generator in the back, run it while driving and convert it to a Tesla 3 Hybrid as no problem with fumes
I just watched a reel the other day of a z600 that they put ATV tires on and drove it around in the snow.
I picked the Suzuki. If I ever got it running, there’s at least a chance I’d be thrown clear in any accident. In the Honda, I’d just become one with the car.
Definitely, a why not both day, but I went with the Jimny.
Bike swap the Jimny engine, rev it out.
I’ll take the Honda. What could go wrong?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mJMsVz5FoX0
I LOVED that episode!!
Pretty tough decision today. I really could have gone either direction but voted Suzuki. A little offroad vehicle may be slightly more useful to me than a tiny on road one.
I’d be curious to see how the Jimny’s 359cc engine copes with the average-sized American (which is what, like 325 pounds now?)
I want both, but had to go with the Honda.