The 1970s and the early 1980s were a dark period in automotive history. Fuel prices shot up, the economy went into the toilet, and consumer confidence spiraled. Cars pulled a sharp U-turn. Automakers no longer placed a grand importance on power, but on fuel economy. In the early 1980s, Nissan declared itself the king of the pickup truck fuel economy wars with the Datsun King Cab diesel, a truck that got around 40 mpg on the highway, or, per Nissan, better fuel economy than any truck with a gas engine.
One of these obscure trucks has shown up for sale at a Toyota dealership in Kentucky, and it’s a time capsule to the kinds of trucks enthusiasts crave today.
Back in the 1970s and the early 1980s, automakers drew buyers into showrooms by boasting about great fuel economy. In those days, the diesel engine wasn’t seen as the block of brute force that it is today, but the winning formula to beat high fuel prices. Vehicles with diesel engines may have been slow, loud, and smoky, but they promised that their buyers wouldn’t have to visit fuel pumps as often. Even better was the fact that depending on region, diesel fuel was also cheaper than gasoline, too. As I’ve written about before, the allure of diesel was so attractive that major players like General Motors placed diesel engines in pretty much everything with four tires.
The 1970s were also when America got to experience a moderate explosion in light-duty diesel trucks. Automakers had occasionally experimented with implanting diesel power into light trucks for a couple of decades by that point, but the 1970s really gave automakers a good reason to lean into the technology.
In the late 1970s, you could buy an International Scout with a Nissan CN6-33 straight-six diesel, GM pickups with the infamous Oldsmobile diesel V8, or a Dodge D-series or W-series with a Mitsubishi 6DR5 straight-six diesel. The import game was also ramping up during this time with Toyota offering up its own four-cylinder diesels. Going into the 1980s, Volkswagen stepped up to the plate with its Rabbit Pickup diesel, and Isuzu brought diesel power to America in the P’up truck, the Trooper II, the Chevrolet LUV, and the Chevrolet S-10.
In 1981, the EPA conducted fuel economy testing that subjected all kinds of vehicles to a simulation of what an average driver’s day might look like. Out of the other end, the undisputed truck champion was the Volkswagen Rabbit Diesel, which scored an impressive 38 mpg average. At the time, the VW was also the highest-rated diesel truck, returning 54 mpg in EPA highway testing.
However, the caveat was that the Volkswagen was a car-based unibody front-wheel-drive coupe utility. If you wanted something more of a traditional body-on-frame pickup truck that still got great fuel economy, the EPA’s testing suggested your next best choice was a diesel Datsun.
Planting Stakes In America
I’ve covered Nissan’s truck history in the past and you can read that by clicking here. The short version is that Japan’s best-selling trucks until the early 1950s were little three-wheeled jobs. The nation’s automakers did build four-wheeled trucks — Nissan’s first of which debuted in 1934 — but the majority of workers went for the simple and reliable trikes. That changed after World War II when buyers began demanding more from their trucks. Eventually, the four-wheeled truck eclipsed the three-wheeler.
The ancestor to today’s Datsun King Cab is the Datsun 120, which launched in 1955 as the truck version of the Datsun Sedan 110. For Americans, the Datsun truck story begins with the Pickup 220 (above), which was displayed alongside its equivalent sedan variant at the 1958 Los Angeles Auto Show. This truck was a simple unit, featuring the chassis and drivetrain of the Datsun 1000 sedan. Nissan says this was the first “compact” truck sold in the U.S. and the truck that helped Nissan become a household name today.
The Datsun 720 launched in 1979 as a replacement for the 620.
This truck brought Nissan’s latest developments into one truck. It was available with the long cab established in the earlier 620s and the so-called King Cab extended cab that was introduced later in the 620’s cycle. Nissan says the 720 was designed to have a similarly slick exterior design as the 200SX. Nissan also notes that it was during this time when it noticed that people were beginning to use trucks for recreation rather than just work, so it tossed in a four-wheel-drive system for the first time on this model line.
Depending on where you live and what model year you find, the Datsun 720 might have been badged as a Nissan, but America got it as a Datsun. We also didn’t get the four-door 720 that other nations got. Instead, we got a regular cab and the King Cab, with Nissan advertising the King Cab heavily. Look at the cute jump seat!
The biggest accomplishment of the 720 came halfway through 1983 when Nissan brought its Nissan Motor Manufacturing Corp. plant online in Smyrna, Tennessee. This plant marked Nissan’s first American-built truck and also planted the seeds for what Nissan would become in America today.
However, perhaps overshadowed by this was what the 720 King Cab achieved on its own. In 1981, Nissan advertised the 720 as an innovative piece of equipment. Brochures, which didn’t mention “720” but called the trucks by their trim levels, bragged about three different 4×4 models, bold colors, tie-down hooks, a five-speed manual transmission, intermittent wipers, and a tailgate that could be operated with just a single hand. Of course, Nissan was especially proud of the King Cab, which didn’t have four doors, but purported to carry four people with the use of jump seats.
Fuel-Sipping Truck
Americans had their pick of two powertrains. The base engine was Nissan’s 2.2-liter NAPS-Z hemi four-cylinder that made 98 HP. Nissan said if you got this engine with 2WD you’d get up to 36 mpg on the highway. But if you were absolutely obsessed with fuel economy, Nissan also offered its truck with a 2.2-liter inline-four SD22 diesel from the Nissan Diesel division, formerly Minsei Diesel. This unit, a smaller relative of the SD33 that was the optional engine in the International Scout made just 61 HP, but the lack of power was said to translate to a thrifty 39 mpg highway and 33 mpg combined.
According to Nissan, this made its diesel truck the “King of the Diesels” and more thrifty than any gasoline-powered truck on the market. As we established earlier, it also had better fuel economy than any pickup that didn’t have a VW badge. You also got it bolted to a five-speed manual transmission.
If you go back to the EPA’s 1981 simulation, which included tons of idling and other wasteful driving, you’ll find that the Nissan 720 scored 33 mpg during the test, just a few numbers shy of the VW’s 38 mpg average. The closest runner-ups were the Isuzu P’up/Chevy LUV diesels, which got 32 mpg. The closest gasser was the Mazda B2000 at 27 mpg and a reproduction Ford Model A truck at 28 mpg.
Put another way, the EPA said that a Datsun King Cab diesel truck got about the same fuel economy in stop-and-go traffic as a modern city car. But the Datsun was a real truck with a 1,400-pound payload, a 2,725-pound curb weight, and the aero of a brick. Some people claim to get above 30 mpg in real life, too, which is great. If you go by just EPA numbers, that’s better than most gas trucks on the market today.
Technically, Nissan’s claim to be the “King of Diesels” was only true if you didn’t consider the VW Rabbit to not be a real truck. Nissan also wasn’t ahead of the rest of the competition by a particularly wide margin. Perhaps that’s why the finer print of Nissan’s advertising focused on gas trucks.
I have not found production data on these trucks, but it appears that Nissan made as many of them as there were people to buy them. Sadly, America did get the short stick in some regard. The diesel option was offered only on rear-wheel-drive trucks. In 1984, the engine was upgraded to the 2.5-liter SD25 inline-four which made a slightly healthier 70 HP, then the diesel option was removed from the U.S. market after 1985.
This Time Capsule
Regardless of how many of these were built, it seems that finding a clean diesel isn’t easy, yet its gas-powered siblings seem to show up for sale with some regularity. But it’s worth remembering that the majority of these trucks are over 40 years old and most of them were used as transportation rather than collector items. That makes this 1981 Datsun pickup at Gates Toyota a bit of a treat. Someone took great care of a truck that most people would never care about today.
The dealership is short on details, saying that the truck presents in overall good condition with a remarkably low 74,695 miles on the six-digit odometer. Assuming that mileage is correct, and the truck’s condition seems to suggest it is, that means, on average, this truck traveled only 1,697 miles a year.
Flip through the pictures and you might be shocked at how nice this truck is. There isn’t a crack in the dash and the seats look like nobody ever really sat in them. Even the pedals have pretty low wear. The damage I could find includes the torn shifter boot, a crack in the driver door card, and what looks like the beginnings of rust under the passenger door. But that’s nothing for such an old truck.
Sadly, we don’t get to look at the jump seats or at what the inside of the bed looks like, which is a shame. But I do love how this truck came from an era when automakers listed everything out on decals.
When new, a truck like this would have sold for around $7,500 ($27,197 in 2024). Today, Gates Toyota in Richmond, Kentucky, thinks this truck is worth $11,097. It’s certainly a beautiful rig and while you won’t struggle hard to find a 720 in decent shape for sale, the diesels appear to be somewhat rarer. This is a case where many of our readers will say that rare doesn’t always equal valuable, but this price doesn’t seem bad at all for a classic truck.
This Datsun time capsule is just another look into that wild time when automakers thought diesel was the future. Indeed, diesel was the right fuel for the right time as gas prices were high and gas engines guzzled fuel. Almost as soon as the price of diesel shot up and gas engines became more efficient Americans went back to buying gassers. Still, this truck is a sort of fun look into what used to be. It was a truck marketed for its fuel economy first rather than capability or any other truck trait.
(Images: Gates Toyota, unless otherwise noted.)
My friend had one of these. The fuel pumps did not like winter diesel when he went to his cabin 3 hours north of Montreal. It was one litre of gas per 20 litres of diesel to keep things fluid.
Aww, this made me think of my high school chemistry teacher Mr. Chandler (R.I.P.). He had one with a topper in beige, he loved that thing. Thanks for jogging that lovely memory.
Reminds me of the 84′ P’up diesel I had, 30mpg, long bed, but rusting like crazy and gutless, there weren’t enough gears offered with it, but fling it down a dirt road it was still pretty fun.
People ask why don’t they make these now, look at the Maverick hybrid, it’s like 80% this, a little longer but 4 seats, 40mpg, 1500lb payload. What’s sad is the only competition so far is the Santa Cruz. Need a Kicks-Ute and a Trax-Ute and all the small truckness back.
I wonder how hard it is to put a turbo on the datsun diesel? The wheezy mill sure seems like it’s ripe for a little bit more shimmy in its shake.
I went to college in the latter half of the 1980s. Loads of kids had regular cab pickups as they were cheaper than cars, could haul stuff to college, and got decent mpg.
Yup – and I had a VW Pickup during that time period.
Just look at that usefully sized bed. I miss mini trucks with usefully long beds.
My first vehicle was a 76 Toyota LongBed. That thing was so damn useful.
In 1979 My friends and I were small p/u loving guys. I owned a Ford Courier (Mazda), one drove a Datsun pickup and another drove a Toyota Hi-Lux. When the 79 Nissan King Cab dropped I loved how it looked and just had to test-drive one. Oh man, that was a illusion shattering moment. The long floor mounted shifter was loose and horridly floppy. The dash shook. The body panels around the wheel openings visibly vibrated when revved and the rattling noise was horrendous. I started laughing before I even drove it. When I returned, the salesman told me my response was typical and that most people don’t even drive it after hearing it.
The only worse new car I drove was a Chevette, but I had no illusions to shatter about that POS.
Let’s not forget that the diesel engine lives on in Europe. You can buy almost anything with diesel. If not new, you’ll find it used.
My first car was a 1984 Nissan 720 4×4 King Cab with the 2.4L gasser that I inherited from my grandpa in about 1994. I drove it all through high school and college, flogging it in WV back roads and mudding in old strip mines. It sparked a lifelong love of offroading and compact pickups that has led me through a few vehicles (K5 Blazer, first gen Tacoma TRD, etc) to my current Jeep JT Gladiator. The 2.4 was a little gutless, every single weld in the body eventually rotted out, and the torsion bar suspension meant it was never practical to lift it, but I loved that little truck. The head gasket blew in about 2003, and I signed the title over to a friend who had the time and patience to find the parts and do the work.
Mercedes you missed the finest of the Japanese diesel pickups. The Mitsubishi turbodiesel pickup. It drove like a gas truck but got consistent mileage in the 30’s having owned an Toyota diesel long bed, the Mitsubishi turbodiesel and a VW rabbit pickup. I really wished I kept the Mitsubishi. The Toyota, which was kit built in long Beach California, was slower than snot in the winter and the rabbit wasn’t made for someone 6 feet tall
To make no mention of the fact that the 4d55 could take boost safely up to about 200hp with stock internals. Came in the Ranger too.
Why why why can’t we buy something like this today?
Not a huge truck that a step ladder is needed to get into or reach over the bedside?
A small single cab 8 foot box truck built low enough to actually be useful?
Our collective egos are too fragile for that. 3 tons and a 3.5′ bed mean MASCULINE.
That is the equivalent of a huge belly and a tiny… you know what.
That is a good price for the mileage and condition.
The MPG is great to hear but don’t forget how much that 2,725 lb curb weight helped. (Even today’s Maverick is 3,636 lbs and that’s unibody.) Of course, the Nissan doesn’t have the safety features of today’s trucks but you gotta pick your poison.
Thank you for writing about this pickup it deserves it’s time in the spotlight.
1963 Datsun 220 was my first vehicle in 1980. Awful in almost every way (bench seat was literally two plywood planks with 1/8″ of padding), but it was also sweet, sweet personal transportation, and I loved it.
Such a great article. Brings back memories of when I was a young lad. It does make my genius level brain ask “with so many manufacturers willing to share platforms and technology why don’t we have engine manufacturer separate from cars that sell a great motor to different car manufacturers” maybe EV maybe diesel put the best motor out there in every car.
“Look at the cute jump seat!”
The sideways jump seat is the best jump seat.
That being said I have wondered why modern automakers haven’t deleted the center console or made a footwell in it for extended cab pickups and put a single center seat in the middle of the extended cab portion.
You only need to make it as wide as one’s legs, you still have all the storage the behind the driver’s and front passenger seats, and it would be perfect for a booster seat.
I’m sure that stated 36mpg from the 2.2 base model gasser is nothing but some Nissan accountant’s wet deam, I would eat its spare tire if you could get anything starting with a 3 in the mpgs.
Prepare to eat rubber I worked for Dodge with Cummins diesel engines 30mph was standard for full size trucks. As reported to me by customer coming back for more.Try whipped cream on those tires.
LOL put on your good reading glasses and re-read my comment^^, I was talking about the base model gasser 2.2
What’s even funnier is you’re also trying to explain diesel efficiency to someone who daily drives a manual TDI that gets over 40mpg in the city 😀
Read his reply carefully – he stated that the standard for Cummins diesels was 30 MPH. I guess driving at a constant 30 MPH their MPG was probably pretty good.
Nissan was proclaiming 36mpg with the base gasoline engine on the highway. I seriously doubt constant 30MPH on the highway is a realistic speed. Even if you don’t get shot by the exasperated drivers around you, the cops might pull you over for being a slow-moving roadblock
The point went entirely over your head. There was a typo in the article which leads to an absurd conclusion.
You are right, 30 MPH on the highway is unrealistic.
…would that TDI be the cheater version that pollutes like a motherf—–?
My dad had a 720 diesel, and he hauled ludicrous loads in it. Bent the frame and straightened it and welded reinforcements into it. Drove it in the orchards and every panel was scratched and dented. Once blew a rear tire after loading it. I think eventually the rear axle broke, the housing actually, and something out of the junkyard replaced it and the springs, so it needed two spares. Never any engine issues at all.
Imagine what your dad could do with a modern version with 40 years of materials science, engineering and electronics progress.
He would probably break it, then fix and reinforce it then figure out another way to break it and repeat.
That’s just what he did.
I like the cut of his jib.
Man, screw the Maverick, where’s my L’il Hustler?
My VERY cheap former uncle (was married to an aunt) loved his cheap base model Nissan pickups. I remember 2 or 3 in the time I knew him. If he’d been able to find a diesel version he probably would have at least considered buying one just for the fuel savings.
He was a high school teacher, then principal and finally retired as a superintendent so I’m pretty sure he could have afforded a little better, but as I said he was cheap. Also Canada, so teachers get paid pretty decently.
The real story here is that teachers actually get paid in Canada.
They do. Elementary teachers make 100k ish after 15 or so years, high school is a little more. Slightly higher with masters and doctorates and for completing extra classes like reading specialist. Add in absolutely fantastic benefits and retirement plans it’s a great profession.
Yes, my wife’s a teacher.
I am so glad to hear that. 🙂
They get paid here too. I dunno about where you live but here in California all public employee salaries including public schoolteachers are published online:
https://transparentcalifornia.com/
I was pretty surprised at how well teachers get paid given the rhetoric.
Private schools get even more. I was told by a retired public school teacher her friend at a private acadamy was getting six figures even back in the late 90s. And that was for Kindergarten.
Since you asked.
Florida teachers are second lowest paid in America: NEA | FOX 13 Tampa Bay
As they say: YMMV.
Yep
Yeah but in Canadian dollars.
Elementary would be about 75k a year American. I’m in Ontario.
Still way better than what they pay in Florida.
I guess that explains the Florida Man and all the Karens we see in these car blogs :D.
Definitely! LOL!
That Model A pickup was an odd duck, built by Shay Motors under license from Ford to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Model A in 1978, but production delays pushed deliveries way back to 1979-1982 when the company went broke after building about 6,000 of the 10,000 unit production run they presold. Nominally only avaliable as a rumble seat roadster, they did built about 100 convertible pickup trucks and a dozen or so panel vans, which were probably all special orders for corporate buyers. Shay had a deal with Ford to do heritage reissues of a whole bunch of classic models, though only the Model A made it to volume production. They had just started building Thunderbirds when they went under, maybe 100 or so of them
Pinto drivetrain and ultra light fiberglass body makes that fuel economy claim plausible, despite 1928 aerodynamics
Well if Honda made a compact pickup that delivered 36 mpg, I’d be at the dealership. So maybe Nissan does have something to offer besides being the king of the rental lot and having a forgotten luxury brand.
Although surprisingly enough, I saw TWO Infinti Pathfinders this weekend (QX60 right?). Must be a fire sale down at the dealer.
Maverick Hybrids got people lining up to buy, so the market is definitely there.
I vaguely recall dad driving an Olds diesel for a bit in the early ’80s. Think he was helping someone sell it. Pea green over pea green, the hatch looking G-body Cutlass I think. Recall him cursing he could not find diesel at the local gas stations back then (1982?). I also recall our Fairmont being a better car in most regards. Malaise era indeed.
Pretty sure the Datsun 220 truck didn’t debut at the 1858 Los Angeles Auto show…
Good catch. I could have sworn my eyes saw “19…” during my read. I’ll have that fixed.
74,695 miles in 43 years sounds right. These things were REALLY slow…
He’s still doing the first 0-60 run, not quite there yet. Soon though. Soon.
“But I do love how this truck came from an era when automakers listed everything out on decals.”
Those were the days – when you could walk through a parking lot and know exactly what combination of engine/transmission, etc the vehicles you were seeing were equipped with…
…except for the American cars – which might have an engine size on a front fender badge.
But nowawdays? Who knows what a BMW 330i is anymore?
What’s a 330i? That’s someone’s $1400/mo payment, or $700/mo lease.
(yea yea, it’s a joke, don’t tell me how you’re only paying $1299/mo because you’re a good negotiator)
You’re not wrong.
…a shop car. Or a depreciation machine.