If your car’s wheels randomly lock up at speed, it can be a very dangerous situation. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what’s happening to a range of GM’s vehicles, with a costly recall now required to solve the issue. What makes it interesting is that GM is having this problem with cars equipped with transmission co-developed with Ford.
The automaker first issued an recall over this matter last year, with over 460,000 trucks and SUVs potentially at risk of randomly locking up their rear wheels. Now, it seems that a very similar issue has reared its head in a completely separate line of GM’s cars. As reported by NBC News, a further 90,000 units are potentially affected.


This time around, it’s the 2020-2022 Chevrolet Camaro that’s apparently at risk of sudden lockups, potentially causing loss of control. Also on the list are the 2020-2021 Cadillac CT4 and CT5, and the 2019-2020 Cadillac CT6. The affected models were built between 2019 to 2022. Depending on the drivetrain configuration—all-wheel-drive or rear-wheel-drive—they’re subject to sudden random lockups of the front or rear wheels.
Update (March 24, 2025):Â Here’s a comment from Ford:
Even though the GM 10 speed was co-developed with Ford, they are not identical transmissions. Ford uses different software logic and physical hardware hydraulic controls, for example, among other system and component differences.The issue GM had with its 10 speed is related to a component that we do not use: latch balls. The limit valve that interacts with the latch balls are where they are seeing the wear that is leading to downshifting. We don’t use latch balls.Â

According to documents filed with NHTSA, the recall covers “certain 2019-2020 Cadillac CT6, 2020-2021 CT4, CT5, and 2020-2022 Chevrolet Camaro vehicles equipped with a 10-speed transmission.” In affected vehicles, a transmission control valve may reach a point of excessive wear, leading to a loss of pressure in the hydraulic control circuit. This can lead to harsh gearshifts which may in some cases cause a momentary locking of the wheels. It’s estimated 1% of the total population is at risk of the defect.
Notably, GM first became aware of this issue in September last year, due to a 2021 Cadillac CT5 that had a momentary lockup incident. In that case, the vehicle locked both front tires before the transmission switched into neutral, with the engine and front differential later replaced due to damage incurred in the incident. NHTSA records indicate GM investigated, and considered that the issue only concerned harsh downshifts and a “momentary” lockup of the wheels less than 150 milliseconds in duration. Deeming this to be insufficient to cause a crash, it deferred further action. However, the case was later reopened in November, with GM identifying 115 reports of sudden lock-ups, including “one alleged accident.” This prompted GM to issue a safety recall.

GM doesn’t have a direct fix for excessive valve wear in the transmission. Instead, the recall work will involve dealers installing new software in the transmission control module. This software will monitor the performance of the transmission control valve in question, and issue a warning if excess wear is detected via lower running pressure. GM believes the software should detect the problem around 10,000 miles before there is any risk of a lockup condition. When excessive wear is detected, the transmission will be limited to fifth gear for safety, as the lockup issue occurs during downshifts from eighth gear. Warning lights will then illuminate on the dash to indicate transmission repair is required.
This might all sound very familiar to you—and for good reason. Last year, we reported on GM’s initial Canadian recall in November, issued for sudden wheel lock ups at speed. NHTSA issued a recall in the US market, too. It affected a wide range of the company’s trucks and SUVs, including the GMC Sierra and Yukon, the Chevrolet Silverado, Suburban and Tahoe, and the Cadillac Escalade and Escalade ESV. The recall targeted only diesel-engined models built from 2020 to 2021, which still covered a mighty 461,839 units in total. GM stated at that gas-engined models used different transmissions that weren’t subject to the same failure.

Incidentally—those vehicles recalled last year use the same family of transmissions as those recalled today. The initial recall targeted GM vehicles built with the 10L80 transmission. It appears the new recall has now been extended to further vehicles using other transmissions in the 10L family; particularly the 10L90 and potentially even the 10L60 used in the V6 Camaro. The Autopian has contacted GM for more specific information in this regard.
Amusingly, these transmissions were the result of a collaboration between GM and Ford. As Car and Driver notes, The Blue Oval took the lead on the 10-speed design, using it’s 10R80 version in vehicles like the Ford Mustang and F-150 and the Lincoln Navigator. Meanwhile, GM took the design and employed it in so many of the vehicles already mentioned above. For its part of the bargain, GM designed a nine-speed version and in turn offered it to Ford, but the Michigan automaker famously turned it down and went a different route instead.
While Ford led the design of the 10-speed automatic, each company has been responsible for building its own transmissions. Thus, it’s difficult to say at this point whether the issue is a design problem or something caused by how GM manufactured the transmissions. However, it is worth noting that Ford’s version of the transmission hasn’t been trouble-free, either. Lawsuits have been filed regarding the transmission’s harsh shifting and even sudden loss of power.

GM will be notifying owners starting in April. If your vehicle is affected, it’s well worth ensuring you get the recall work done so you get early warning of any transmission issues before they occur.
Image credits: GM
Torque de-vectoring!
Ford took the co developed FWD/AWD 9 speed and made it into both a 7 and 8 speed rather than use all 9 available ratios of the GM variant, but it’s not a completely different transmission other than the tweaks each one made just like the 10R
So the implication is this is somehow Ford’s fault since they designed it, even though GM manufactures their version & runs their own calibration and only GM’s version is exhibiting this issue? Sorry. I gotta agree that the title is click baity. This is, at this point, looking like a GM driven problem. Ford is not perfect. That much is true. But titles are getting cliche here. Too many geniuses for example…
I think to call the transmissions “Ford Designed” in the headline is indeed a bit misleading, and I take responsibility for not having changed that headline prior to publication.
I’ve reworded it to “10-Speed Automatics It Codeveloped With Ford,” which is meant as more of a descriptor for those transmissions than an implication that Ford is the problem here (they might be on some level, though in this case based on the part in question, I’d say this has less to do with Ford than GM).
Thank you for the feedback.
I worked for a supplier who supplies certain internal components for these, there are actual physical internal differences between the Ford and GM versions.
Oh yeah, no doubt there are SIGNIFICANT differences between Ford and GM variations of this transmission architecture.
This openess to critique and willingness to admit something wasn’t quite right and correct it speaks volumes about the integrity of the staff. One of many reasons I like the site so much.
Thank you. We take feedback very seriously. The internet is already a chaotic place where the lines between truth and fiction are blurred. It’s extremely important to us that, when you see something on this site, you know it’s been well thought-out and fairly considered, and you know it’s free from any sort of agenda.
Our small-but-powerful team is made up of a bunch of super knowledgable (but of course, not all-knowing) car-nuts who just want to write entertaining/enlightening stories about cars for our customers: you. And we all pay close attention to critique so we can keep improving.
Why is the illustration showing an AWD Camaro?
So five years from now an Autopian gets a great deal on a CT5, drives it 5k miles until it’s limited to 5th gear, and is then on the hook for a new trans because there’s no other way to fix it.
Unless GM comes up with a revised part or the aftermarket comes to the rescue it sounds like any GM with a 10 speed is a used car to avoid.
I’m sure Sonnax will come up with a sleeve repair kit. They always do in these circumstances.
What happens when the transmission warning lights come on and it stops shifting beyond 5th gear? Does GM replace the transmission under warranty or is the customer on the hook for repair costs?
Ford hasn’t built a good transmission since the C6 3 speed. The trans in my 2000 F150 broke internally at 38k miles and my 2013 F150 had the lead frame problem, both out of warranty.
AOD was a good unit, built on the FMX lineage of transmissions. I haven’t personally owned an AOD-E so I don’t know if the electronic version should share the same praise. I currently own a Ford with a 6R80 in it that’s doing good so far (120,000 miles). My parents have an Explorer with the 10 speed in it, and while it has given them no problems I actively dislike the way the transmission is controlled, so I’ve been avoiding the Ford and GM 10 speeds on that basis, though I thought they had been doing well on the reliability front. But if 1% of them wear out to the point that they engage two gears at once and lock up the drive wheels, that’s pretty damning. 6-sigma targets 3.4 errors per million units. They missed their quality target by an embarrassing number of orders of magnitude.
If it’s under the warranty period, it’ll be covered but GM hopes the ECU flash will delay the inevitable work until the warranty period is expired. Looks like GM is is using the Ford developed recall playbook as well as their transmission.
same way ford got me on the lead frame recall. Reprogram the module during the
warranty period and hope it lasts until after the warranty expires. Then charge the customer full price for the repair.
I know the lead frame thing sucks but it is fairly minor and not difficult to fix. But the 6r80 is quite possibly the best half ton truck auto transmission out there, I say that as someone who has been bitten by bad older Ford transmissions. I had a 2014 F150 Ecoboost and that transmission didn’t bat an eye at dragging around 12k on quite a few occasions, never even got warmer than normal. The shifting was always stellar too
Yet another reason to drive 3-pedal vehicles.
For a website that provides itself on it’s topshots (which are generally great), it’s surprising the target is focused on the front wheels of a rear wheel drive vehicle when talking about transmission lockup.
I was going to respond that it also affects AWD models but then went and saw that it was a Camaro, which is RWD only. Carry on.
Yeah, Ford has always sucked at automatic transmissions LOL
The C4 and C6 were virtually indestructible. The AOD wasn’t half bad either.
The 5R110 and 6R140 are pretty stout, too.
These are known to be fairly unreliable especially in the first few years in the F150 (2017 [with the 5.0 and 3.5],18,19). They frequently fail with less than 100k mi. Additionally, drivers complained of rough shifting or hunting for gear. Considering it replaced the rock solid 6 speed ZF transmission in those trucks, this was definitely a downgrade.
That “rock solid ZF” was a bastardized ZF built by Ford that had this same issue when it locked up the rear wheels during uncommanded 6-2 downshifts at highway speed. They even had a recall to replace the molded leadframe to correct it.
The Ford 6R80 is the transmission I’ve done the most internal work on in my 20 years as an automotive technician. (Rivaled only by the NAG1 from Chrysler.)
“Ford-Designed Transmissions” is a little misleading, first of all it’s a joint design, second Ford isn’t having the exact same lockup issues so the title just feels wrong.
Maybe “More GM Vehicles Locking Up At Speed.” would be more accurate
It’s absolutely well-established that Ford led the design of the 10-speed.
Ford led the design, but the GM and Ford final versions of the transmission are just different enough that they’re having different issues and failures. The same thing happened when Ford designed the 6 speed transaxle both used for several years; the GM version moved its control module to the inside of the transmission, the Ford version didn’t. Guess which version of THAT one fails way more often? ????
I’m guessing the GM one. And you were were proven right, the headline was edited.
You would be correct. The only failure I’ve personally seen on the Ford version when properly maintained is a range switch failure. The GM version with the control module inside? Every kind of failure imaginable.
I think I read about this a while ago. Is this a case of the transmission downshifting so hard and abruptly that the engine can’t spin up fast enough to match the wheel speed to the road speed, or is this a new and different problem?
If so, I think calling it. A transmission lock up is misleading Because the transmission is still capable of turning.
I used to have a Chevrolet with a Muncie M-22 transmission that occasionally, thanks to the sloppy linkage and worn shifter forks, would get shifted into two gears simultaneously, and was well and truly locked. Of course it never happened while the car was in motion.
Of course on a Porsche the engine would obligingly spin up and need new valves and bearings.
That headline is dirty pool. Disgusting click bait. I’m rarely disappointed in Autopian, but I guess today is such a day.
Yes, they shared development of the transmissions, but Ford isn’t having recall issues with their units, and as you yourself state in the article each side has been responsible for building their own units. And the failures have been pretty one sided.
There was zero need to mention Ford in that headline. Shame on you Lewin (or whoever wrote the headline).
….but Ford is having tons of problems with their variant of the 10 speed, including recalls and lawsuits.These things are infamous for the CDF drum failure and valvebody issues on the Ford side.
Fair, but different issues. This recall is GM specific.
It’s like a “Boeing jet makes forced landing due to engine failure” headline when the real culprit is Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, Rolls Royce or some other engine manufacturer. The airlines pick the power plant, not the airframe manufacturer, so it’s a bit disingenuous to pin the failure on Boeing.
I’ve tweaked the headline, because I see where you’re coming from. We appreciate the feedback!
Better. Thank you.
No regrets mentioning Ford in this headline—Ford led the development of the 10-speed, that’s an established fact. And as outlined in the piece, Ford has had plenty of problems with its version, too. Including hard shifting – the same problem GM is having!
Similar story. Back in the day when I had a ’91 Talon AWD we had a similar issue except for us it was the transfer case rather than the transaxle. The driveshaft yoke had a plug in the center of it that would develop a leak after a while draining the transfer case over time which lead to the exciting event where all 4 wheels would instantly lock up while cruising down the freeway. I was a member of an early internet forum for DSMs back then and we had to go through the NHTSA process to force Mitsubishi and Mopar to perform a recall. Most of us had already had to replace the yoke ourselves by then though and never got reimbursed.
Yikes, esp. back in the days when technical info was a lot harder to come by. Beautiful car though – that first gen of the DSM coupes was my favorite.