Home » Granddad Left The Option Sheet Blank: 1983 Mercury Zephyr vs 1986 Olds Cutlass Ciera

Granddad Left The Option Sheet Blank: 1983 Mercury Zephyr vs 1986 Olds Cutlass Ciera

Sbsd 12 2 2024x
ADVERTISEMENT

Good morning! I hope you all had a pleasant holiday weekend, full of good food and good company. We’re back with more crappy cars for your consideration. Whoever originally ordered today’s choices was obviously trying to save some money; neither one of them has a whole lot of extras on it.

Back before the break, we took a look at a couple of Cadillacs, and the results should surprise no one. The old Fleetwood took home a big win, one could even call it a landslide, and made that poor Escalade look like secondhand news. I mean, you could go your own way and choose the Escalade instead, but it’s not exactly the sort of thing anyone dreams about. The Fleetwood you could drive everywhere, all the way to Silver Spring and back. And if someone complains about a little rust on it? Oh well.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Seriously, though, that old Fleetwood Talisman is a nice old classic car, in good condition, for a fair price. And it would obviously be my choice as well. A few of you mentioned using the Escalade as an engine donor; I think that might be the best use of it. It’s really rusty.

Screenshot From 2024 12 01 16 25 54

Now then: It’s hard to find a “plain” car anymore. Even work-spec trucks and basic economy cars come with power windows and air conditioning; those things have just become the basic level of equipment buyers expect, so it’s cheaper for carmakers to just put them on every vehicle. But it used to be that if you wanted such things, you had to ask for them specifically, from an a la carte list of available options, and every box you checked upped the price by a little bit. These two are lacking in the bells and whistles department; somebody cheaped out forty years ago. Thanks once again to the Underappreciated Survivors group on Facebook for pointing these two out. Let’s take a look.

ADVERTISEMENT

1983 Mercury Zephyr – $3,800 Canadian ($2,700 US)

468536853 10169765401160397 7954435687794506518 N

Engine/drivetrain: 200 cubic inch overhead valve inline 6, three-speed automatic, RWD

Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Odometer reading: 41,000 kilometers (probably 141,000)

Operational status: Runs and drives great

ADVERTISEMENT

Something occurred to me just now, when I was reading up on the Ford Fox platform on which this car was based: The Fox is essentially Ford’s version of Chrysler’s K platform, a simple unibody platform that ended up as the basis for a whole bunch of different models. Both ushered in the ’80s boxy styling to their respective brands. And both were greenlit by Lee Iacocca. That guy was responsible for a lot of square, boring cars.

468522682 10169766135390397 1822794723018918264 N

This is the Mercury Zephyr, a badge-engineered version of the Ford Fairmont. Though the Fox platform was new, having been introduced in 1978, the engine in this particular example is a whole lot older; the basic design dates all the way back to 1960. Its three-speed automatic is an ancient design as well, but that’s not all bad – they’re both more or less bulletproof. This one runs great, according to the seller, and it doesn’t have many miles (or rather, kilometers) on it.

468726032 10169766135285397 4889260240796942891 N

The six-cylinder engine was an option, but it looks like one of very few pieces of optional equipment on this car. It has a basic vinyl and cloth interior, what looks like an AM radio, and I’d be shocked if it has air conditioning. The fake woodgrain is only there because it’s a Mercury instead of a Ford, I would imagine, and its instrumentation consists of a speedometer, a fuel gauge, and a bunch of idiot lights. It’s all in nice shape, though, and the seller says everything works – though “everything” isn’t much.

ADVERTISEMENT

468546242 10169765521085397 1544320836357546193 N

The paint is pretty dull, and the seller notes some surface rust on the left rear door, but otherwise it’s in good condition outside. It even has all four original hubcaps, and if you watched any TV back then, you know how easily the hubcaps went flying off from cars like this.

1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera S – $2,250

Sbsd A1

Engine/drivetrain: 2.5-liter overhead valve inline 4, three-speed automatic, FWD

Location: Hellertown, PA

ADVERTISEMENT

Odometer reading: 69,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives great

The Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera is one of those cars that was absolutely everywhere in the ’80s. Someone’s mom had one, or your college friend drove one they bought used and cheap, or something. Oldsmobile sold a ton of them, and it was so popular it stayed in production six years longer than it originally was planned to. Most of them were four-door sedans, but you could also get a wagon, or this two-door coupe.

453870590 1148304059587434 3617144657820410671 N

This is the basic S model; there was also an SL and an International Series. Olds offered a bunch of engines in the Ciera, but based on the age of this one, and the fact that it has a “Fuel Injection” badge on the front fender, I think this one has the base 2.5 liter “Iron Duke” four-cylinder. It boasts – if that is the right word – 92 horsepower, which is pretty sad for a midsized car, but it will keep clattering along and taking fifteen seconds to reach highway speeds until the end of days. These also get pretty decent fuel economy, if I recall. You could do a lot worse.

ADVERTISEMENT

453436676 1148304089587431 5101297943868398298 N

This one has a pretty basic interior as well, with a simple split bench seat and a column-shifted automatic. I see a tape deck, but the seller says it doesn’t have air conditioning (when was the last time you heard of an Oldsmobile without air conditioning?), and I see the standard instrument cluster and window cranks. It looks clean and well-kept, though, and these are nice comfy cars.

453873207 1148304022920771 1909748679013680373 N

The styling of these was never really much to write home about, but it’s inoffensive, and the coupe looks a lot nicer than the sedan. It looks clean, though it is missing the hubcaps on both front wheels, as well as a piece of trim on the passenger’s side. I don’t see any rust, but it is a Pennsylvania car, so it’s worth taking a peek underneath.

I guess you could call these cars “classics.” They’re old enough to qualify for antique license plates in most places, after all. But if they’re classics, then that makes me old, and I don’t like that, so I’m going to make the case for these being viable daily drivers. Both should be reliable, parts are dirt-cheap either way, and they both should keep up with traffic just fine, as long as you keep your foot in it. So which dead brand will it be – the Mercury or the Oldsmobile?

ADVERTISEMENT

(Image credits: sellers)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
55 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin B
Kevin B
1 hour ago

Dear old Dad was the worst ever with eschewing options and other “gingerbread” has he called it. Imagine going into an Oldsmobile dealership in early 1973 and ordering a brand-new Colonnade Cutlass S. Standard bench seat instead of the cool swivel bucket seats, No A/C (but fake vents to constantly remind you there’s no A/C), no power brakes, no power steering, 3-speed manual on the column, black wall tires, and dog dish hub caps.

He probably could have got a loaded Olds Omega for the same price.

StupidAmericanPig
StupidAmericanPig
1 hour ago

As a kid my parents had a 79’ Mercury Zephyr 2 door. It was less optioned than the one in this article and I still have scars and PTSD from the vinyl seats burning any and all areas of exposed skin. Ours had the 200 straight six and 3 speed as well. I believe it was sold late 84 to mid 85 on trade for one of those fancy new Plymouth Voyager minivans. So back to the old showdown here. The mental and physical scars from the Zephyr make me choose anything but that.

Comet_65cali
Comet_65cali
1 hour ago

That Ciera is just going to run forever….

…but I like non-, two-door body styles of the fox better for the sleeperness.

Zephyr for the Fox-body Lego architecture.

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
1 hour ago

This was easy…Ciera for the win…I miss Oldsmobile! These always make me think of Fargo: “Tan Ciera!” (I’m not falling for the TruCoat) That Mercury is so boring and pretty much trash since it’s a Fix Or Repair Daily product…it’s not even a V8!

Last edited 1 hour ago by Freelivin2713
Dodd Lives
Dodd Lives
3 hours ago

Gotta vote Zephyr, just for the nostalgia factor alone. A long-lost friend drove a similarly basic example through our high school and university years, and that thing was a steadfast companion on a lot of misadventures.

Bonster the Monster and the Zeph of Death, I salute you, wherever you are.

Cake_taco
Cake_taco
3 hours ago

it’s funny, the mercury predates my birth and would have been an “old” car by the time i was old enough to pay attention, and yet seeing it sitting in the snow like that gives me a warm feeling of nostalgia. that interior looks so inviting even though I know it would probably be a dog to actually drive.

JDE
JDE
3 hours ago

Neither normally, but if I had to choose, I would consider snow tires on the old Zephyr. RWD for the win, even though it would not win anything. Sadly that 200 also only made 90ish HP new, but still.

Drive By Commenter
Drive By Commenter
3 hours ago

I’m a distinguishing human being. Mercury for me. The Iron Duke is just awful. If I don’t like the I6, the Mercury is a Fox. The options are limitless for engine swaps. I’d keep the gray paint to make it a bit of a sleeper.

ColoradoFX4
ColoradoFX4
3 hours ago

My aunt had a ’90 Ciera and I hated that car so very much. I’ll take the Mercury.

CuppaJoe
CuppaJoe
4 hours ago

I’ll take the Cierra, but I don’t need no damn Tru-Coat!

Grey alien in a beige sedan
Grey alien in a beige sedan
4 hours ago

Gotta go for the zephyr. Besides that name being a good high scoring word in Scrabble, it at least has an engine that won’t leave me hating myself.

Nicholas Nolan
Nicholas Nolan
5 hours ago

I had the wagon version of the Olds, and I’d be nearly as fine with the coupe. Canada can keep its Fox.

Beasy Mist
Beasy Mist
5 hours ago

My friend in college had her grandfather’s ’87 Ciera similarly spec’d and honestly it was a comfortable car that never let her down. The iron duke (sorry, TECH4 lol) was not as terrible as I expected. It wouldn’t win any races but it never felt dangerously slow either.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
6 hours ago

I voted for the fox body

If the I6 isn’t enough power, swap in a Godzilla 😀

Geoff Buchholz
Geoff Buchholz
6 hours ago

Maybe the Olds doesn’t have working air conditioning … but the control set in the dashboard is the familiar GM aircon setup.

Even with that demerit, I’ll take the Ciera. I miss two-door sedans, and this one deserves to be saved.

Nycbjr
Nycbjr
6 hours ago

I went Olds, I have a soft spot for A bodies, but man the iron puke made me go oh god!

55
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x