Last week, Autopian Asks asked you to name cars that were really deserving of the drop-top treatment but never got convertible options from the factory (or possibly even from the aftermarket).
The staff offered a few suggestions, and we probably could have come up with a lot more. We didn’t need to, since with nearly 100 comments, the Autopian hive mind came through with plenty of answers (and then some).


However, one response from commenter Pat Rich felt rather poignant:
Well, that’s a valid point. Let’s see ’em!
A bit of Google-fu reveals many of the convertibles that commenters suggested already exist in some form, be it an aftermarket conversion or one-off concepts from the brands themselves. Others I’ve already scribbled up myself; and if I haven’t, then I need to fire up my system and get to work. Regardless, if it’s pictures you want, it’s pictures you get.
Dodge Challenger Convertible
This was probably the most popular request in the comment, and it’s easy to see why. With Mustangs and (now discontinued) Camaros offered as ragtops, it would seem only natural for Mopar buyers to be able to buy an open Challenger as well. Dodge never offered such a conversion from the factory, but from August of 2022 you could have ordered a Challenger Convertible from a dealer and work with conversion firm Drop Top Customs to make your own.

Any Challenger R/T, R/T Scat Pack, or Challenger SRT model could have been converted from 2022 or 2023 (and they’ll likely do the work on any Chally for something like $26,000).

Toyota 86/Subaru BRZ Convertible
Another one that staff and commenters together seemed to want was a droptop version of Toyota’s small rear-drive sports coupe. In fact, Toyota presented renderings of such a car in 2013; the frameless door glass and a trunk lid (instead of a hatchback) on these cars certainly meant that they thought about a production convertible version.

Sadly, it was not meant to be. Some cited the drop in sales of convertibles in general making in not worth Toyota’s time to put in the money and effort required.

Others claimed that the lack of rigidity from a removed roof would hurt the car, but I think that’s assuming too much of buyers who likely would have just wanted a slightly larger Miata with a kid’s back seat. It certainly might have expanded the market from hardcore enthusiasts who tend to gravitate towards the 86.
Convertible Mavs and RAVs and Muranos, Oh My
As controversial as cabriolet crossovers and pickups seem to be, some people did request them in our Autopian Asks. Sure, things like the Dakota convertible from the late eighties and the Murano and Evoque droptops had rather miserable sales, yet our readers still wanted to see new renditions.
In case you missed it, I’ve actually already wasted countless hours of my life that I’ll never get back making renderings of those exact products as convertibles or “targa”-style open products; I’ve dropped them below so you can go ahead and get a chance to tear them apart if you haven’t already.




I mean, you might actually like them too, but I’m not holding my breath.
Tesla Convertibles
Love ‘em or loathe ‘em, there were requests for an open-top Telsa. I’ve already sketched up a couple of examples of that brand in past posts, including a Swiss-built custom luxury Monteverdi-branded Model S converted to a two-door convertible.

There is also a topless Cybertruck that I rendered with a retractable roof system that collapses into the bed. Oh, and two windshield wipers instead of that stupid giant single blade.


I mean, it’s still a Cybertruck for better or worse, but at least you can get rid of the pyramid shape with a push of a button.
Non-Mustang Ford Coupe Convertibles
A surprising number of requests for 1970s-’90s fancy Ford products were in the comments. Most of these have already been done in some form from the 1969 Mark III all the way up through the aero-looking 1984-92 Mark VII. However, the dark horse request was for a chop-top version of the last big Lincoln coupe- the 1993 Mark VIII- and it actually came out quite nicely.

This particular example once belonged to early rocker and underage-cousin-marrying Jerry Lee Lewis:

Convertible versions of later Thunderbirds also appeared as requests in the comments, including the ultra-popular 1977-79 model. I did indeed see an example of one of these for sale that had gone under the knife.

The end result is, unfortunately, a bit slab-sided with the top down, and with the canvas roof raised, it looks rather clunky and appears dark as a cave inside. Worst of all, the signature “basket handle” roof and expansive greenhouse of this era’s ‘Bird is gone.

There might be a better way. Even as a kid, I was surprised that Ford offered a T-top roof for this Thunderbird and could easily have made an openable canvas roof right behind the “basket handle” in a manner similar to a Lancia Beta Zagato. They’d have had a convertible with likely no loss in structural rigidity, some kind of rollover protection and a conversion that probably would have cost them very little time and money to do. Take a look at my rendering below showing the T-top glass removed and the rear roof retracted:

The T-Bird’s Fox-body baby brother at the time had the same roofline, so a similar targa top-with-folding-rear-roof convertible Fairmont Futura could have also been offered, as seen below. Ford could have sold both a luxo-barge and more Euro-styled-and-sized convertible for a seemingly limited investment.

… But it didn’t happen. Instead, Ford fired Lee Iacocca, who ended up reviving the convertible with the Chrysler Lebaron in 1982. Opportunity missed.
Commenters also asked for newer open Blue Oval products. Ford continued to tease us with sedans-turned-to-convertible-coupe concepts through the next few decades. In 1989, the auto show circuit saw a Mercury Sable converted to a two-door droptop (a car that has come up for sale in the past):

Even the big Panther-chassis Ford got the treatment in the sunset years of its life. The 2002 Mercury Marauder concept was a Grand-ma Marquis with the roof and two doors missing; essentially the first full-sized Ford convertible since around 1972. This one was especially cool-looking in my book.

Naturally, neither the Sable nor Marauder went anywhere but the history books, but they’re great what-ifs.
Chevrolet Monte Carlo
Various seventies Monte Carlos were suggested by commenters, but the first generation did the swoopy-flanks aesthetic so well that I assumed that it might be the best candidate for a conversion. Boy, was I ever right. Look at this gorgeous one-off somebody created:

Those exaggerated “pontoon” fenders look perfect in a convertible. It’s a shame that the launch of the Monte came just as manufacturers were starting to fear the upcoming rollover safety standards that never happened; hardly anyone was launching new droptops, and all the American convertibles were gone by 1976.
Datsun Z-Car
This one was my ask, since I somehow remember seeing a few conversions done years back that were rather fetching. The more rounded first series S30 seems to be the best Z for the droptop to visually work, looking a bit like an E-Type but without the upright windscreen issues that give our Adrian seizures.

Most of the S30 Z cabrio conversions I see for sale online are later 260 and 280Z models, since they tend to be less valuable and therefore more sacrificial than the vaunted initial 240 model. Honestly, it’s probably a better choice since we appreciated instant starts from the fuel injection system in the 280Z we owned, as well as the ice-cold A/C.


I like the look of the one for sale here with the 5MPH bumpers removed, though as a Real Car I’m glad ours had them.
AMC Matador Coupe
Where did this suggestion come from? Talk about an Autopian choice here. This poor commenter took some heat from a few haters, but they just knew that our website champions virtually anything and everything from the last independent American automaker.
As AMC’s 1974 replacement for the Javelin, the Matador coupe was their entry into the bustling “personal luxury car” segment, and it was everything you would hope a Kenosha product would be. Bizarre “Kilroy Was Here” headlamps bulging out of the hood, a swoopy roofline when everyone else was going with upright back windows, and even an Oleg Cassini-styled edition were all the expected polarizing qualities that spelled an early death for the Matador coupe.
As with most AMC products, I’ve always had a soft spot for this thing, yet I had no idea how slick it would look as an open car. This rendering I did is unironically hot:

“Sure,” you say, “It’s better, but those battering ram bumpers just kill it”. Well, let’s spray some PB Blaster on the bumper bolts, take them off and cover up the holes:

If you still hate it, that’s fine, but you’re wrong. I’m sorry; that commenter was spot on with this one.
Nissan Pao
One commenter had Jason Torchinsky’s interests at heart, feeling that Torch needed a convertible in his life. He probably does, but it wouldn’t be the first time; you might remember a few weeks back, Jason mentioned the first-generation VW Rabbit Cabrio that he owned, complete with “basket hoop” roof and rear windows that didn’t roll down all the way. That car is obviously long gone and now replaced in part by a Nissan Pao “Pike” car.
Why not mesh both of these cars? That “basket handle” would provide the same structural rigidity to the Pao that it did on the Rabbit, and I think we could find enough room to lower those quarter windows flush with the beltline.

Kind of cute, right? Plus it’s got the looks of two cars that Torch loves combined with Japanese reliability. Jason already has two VW he either can’t drive or can’t depend on, and I think a thirty-five year old Bosch fuel system would make revisiting old Rabbit ragtop ownership a far worse choice.
Keep Chopping?
That’s about all the cutting I can do for one day; you know how your arm gets shaky after holding a Sawzall for too long? Maybe I missed your suggestion, but I’ll be back at again soon, I’m sure.
Keep those suggestions coming!
A Ford Maverick Could Be The Affordable, Practical Convertible The Market Is Missing – The Autopian
Subaru Needs To Bring The Weird Back With A New BRAT – The Autopian
Does The New Dodge Charger Mean That A Revived Chrysler Cordoba Won’t Be Far Behind? – The Autopian
How An Open-Topped Two-Door Could Bring Back The Fun Missing From Toyota’s RAV4 – The Autopian
The Monteverdi-branded Model S converted to a two-door convertible has some Saab 9-3 vibes for it – which is cool.
It also has a bit of a Subaru SVX vibe. Which is a very good thing.
The only article where M.I.A.T.A. doesn’t apply.
Imagine that Cyber Targa with the windows up.
I have never liked AMC cars, but that Matador – yum!
I understand the melding of Jason’s historic rides but I think the Pao’s sibling the Figaro does it a little better with the b pillars staying up, that may do good for the Pao as well.
I like the Rav-4 render, back to it’s roots, I just saw one the other day around town, 2 door Rav-4 with a hardtop on the back so cool.
For the Cyberfu…truck maybe just chop everything above the beltline… and below the beltline.
I always thought the last Lincoln Continental should have come in a convertible flavor. Ford impressively made the suicide doors a real thing, so just go the final step and offer the only four door convertible car as a true send off to such an icon.
Also, Geo Storm. Convertible or Targa, I’ll happily take either.
I’d rather a convertible top than a convertible bottom.
How about a Javelin?
AMC Pacer has entered the chat.
https://www.imcdb.org/i611969.jpg
An early Lexus SC would be cool. I think there are some custom examples out there..
As for truck/SUV drop tops, there is a dude in town with a lowered (slammed) 1st gen bronco with the door frames chopped off. I like it way more than I thought I would.
None, convertibles are automotive blasphemy.
Most original cars never even came with a roof. It took years before the early 1900 snowflakes whined about getting wet or being cold. Back when even the women were tougher than the men of today
They weren’t closed because those were so much more difficult to build, hence the popularity of the phaeton that fell off when people had other options. They also didn’t drive in winters. Registrations—at least here in New England—didn’t even cover a year with the assumption that people wouldn’t be driving in the winters (though I think one could register it for winter months if they wanted to at extra cost, of course). Source: my grandfather who was born in 1913 and used to hitch rides to school in CT winters by jumping on the backs of horse-drawn plow-sleds. Sure as hell he was tough, though! Thing is that people kind of had to be. Not that I don’t lament the wussy obsession with safety people have today to the point where it negatively affects not only simple enjoyments, but ordinary everyday actions. I figure I’ll probably be the first officially documented case of death by annoyance (very likely by safety features). Any day now….
My reason is it kills the profile and the torsional stiffness. Not to mention the litany of issues that come with another mechanism and a lot more seals.
There are a few examples of convertibles that still look good.
Thanks for the uber macho response though… pretty sure more women enjoy convertibles than men. Good try though.
Every time someone brings up not liking convertibles because of reduced structural stiffness, I wonder how much that really matters to most people.
All design is a series of trade offs. For me the ability to remove a top at the touch of a button, or even individually removing a bunch of pieces like on a jeep is well worth any decrease in handling performance. They have other trade offs as well, like complexity, space and cost. I think the average car buyer is most likely turned away by the cost delta.
Convertible > Hardtop. Much more enjoyable. A little bracing goes a long way. But if TFarts doesn’t buy one, then there will be one more for those who know better.
Are you saying convertible is better than hardtop or hard top is better than convertible? If the latter then you meant convertible < hardtop. Math is hard :).
Convertible is greater than hardtop. The big side of the > goes to the greater of the two compared quantities. The lesser of the two just gets pointed at.
That is an odd take my friend.
When I was in second grade (or so) I was told “the bigger one gets a piece of pie, and the smaller one just gets pointed at”. I never forgot that.
It also made me hungry for a piece of pie.
I don’t disagree, I listed it second for a reason. The only case where it really applies is sports cars that are actually tracked.
Probably the most annoying thing is when shopping for say a corvette or a 911 your selection is reduced significantly if you don’t want a convertible.
You’re just jealous.
Nah, Cayman > Boxster every time.
I think the BRZ/86 would have been better as a split targa or t-top, the latter would go especially well with the bubble roof, as the raised sections could be the removable panels. Then they could have possibly gone with a useful hatch over a small trunk opening, too. I always thought the Z looked terrible as a convertible—visually imbalanced. Another candidate for a T-top, which were common back then (and, of course, the ZXs had), and would be better for a vehicle wanting in rigidity even before the ubiquitous rust got into the structure. I really like the Marauder.
I really like those convertible Z-cars. The top-line from the door to the the trunk is perfect.
They do look better than many cares made to be convertible only.
The revived Holden Monaro should have been offerred in a convertible. Especially when it was sold as a Pontiac GTO
Sign me up for that AMC Matador!
That Toyota 86 render is gorgeous. I would totally consider one of those for the reason stated: a Miata with a back seat for my kids. There are very few 2+2 sports cars out there for us dads!
That early Monte Carlo looks great. You might check your spelling on the “Merury Marauder” that looks great and would tempt me to buy a Panther platform car.
I think the 5th generation Monte Carlo could have worked as a convertible. It could’ve been a good competitor to the Chrysler Sebring.
I’ve seen a few first gen Monte Carlo convertibles before. As I understand it, the passenger compartment dimensions are unchanged from the Chevelle, so once the Monte’s roof is out of the way, the Chevelle top components just about bolt in. They look damn near factory made as opposed to most aftermarket jobs.
And I’ve always had a soft dpot for the Marauder convertible, even though I know full well that wouldn’t have saved Mercury or the Panther platform.
I mean, the platform itself carried on for another full decade after the concept, extending it beyond that might have been asking a bit much from one more body style option
Quality content
Some of these are pretty cool!
…
I think I like this?
…
*Cyberbarf*
2016-ish (?) Caddy ATS-V would be nice.
Here’s one
cadillac ats convertible – Google Search
Ohh, the red one on the right looks damn slick! No VW “rollbars” is the way to go. Thanks, dude!
It is my sincerely held belief that there is no convertible that looks good with the top raised, including folding hard tops.
It’s cheating because its a removable hardtop so there is no compromise for folding mechanisms but the MB R129 SLs are very attractive with and without the top.
Most other cars though I really have to agree with you – the proportions are very rarely right with the folding tops.
https://www.theslshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Bornite-Blackberry-USA-481.jpg
Those look awesome. How about a minivan?
i kind of did that a while back:
You Asked For It: A Minivan Made Cooler And More Versatile At The Same Time – The Autopian
Jeez I even commented on that article. Those designs look sweet!
Top Gear demonstrated why it was a bad idea. Of course, anything that trio did was a bad idea.
Great work!
I’ll take Lewis’ Lincoln, wow does that work! And on a car that looked rather ungainly in coupe form.