We talk a lot about cars and trucks, and we’re always aware that there is an important distinction between the two. Yet decades of automotive development have blurred the lines. The rise of the SUV first muddied the waters, and the rise of unibody pickups didn’t help the situation, either. It raises the question—what is the difference between a car and a truck?
You can make up your own definition, of course. You could say any vehicle with an open load bed is a truck, and for most of us, that’s enough. However, that definition isn’t as complex as the standards set by government regulators. The official rules are a touch more complicated.
Thankfully, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a no-nonsense flow-chart that answers this question once and for all. With just nine easy questions, you can determine whether any given vehicle is a car or a truck.
The flowchart above sorts vehicles into “car” and “truck” designations for the sake of emissions compliance. The first real questions regard weight. Anything with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) over 10,000 pounds is outside the scope here, as the they’re excluded from CAFE standards and the EPA’s “light duty” greenhouse gas regulations. Vehicles over 8,500 pounds are excluded too, unless they fall under the “medium duty passenger vehicle” MDPV regulation—which covers bigger SUVs and passenger vans. Many of these super-heavy vehicles are trucks by default, but they don’t need to meet the emissions regulations for lighter-duty vehicles.
The next question is simple. If the vehicle transports more than 10 people, acts as a living space, or has greater cargo volume than passenger volume, then you’re indisputably looking at a truck. Similarly, if it “transports property on an open bed,” it’s a truck. If not, it might be a car.
Further questions aim to refine the definition. Third-row seating makes the vehicle a “truck” as far as the EPA is concerned, but only if the seats fold or can be remove to create a flat cargo surface.
Four-wheel drive could also push the vehicle towards a truck definition, as can a gross vehicle weight over 6,000 pounds. But in both cases, the vehicle must also meet certain geometric requirements to qualify as a truck. The vehicle must meet certain benchmarks regarding approach, breakover, and departure angles, as well as ground clearance, as below. Basically, if the vehicle is rugged and designed to handle rough off-road trails, that means it’s a truck.
If the vehicle fails on all those points, it’s not a truck, it’s a lowly little car. Primarily, this means the vehicle has to meet stricter regulations for fuel economy and emissions. Thus, there’s a benefit for automakers if they can tip a vehicle into a truck classification with a few small changes.
It’s worth noting that this EPA definition doesn’t always line up with our intuitive notions of what makes a car and what makes a truck. Indeed, it gets most complicated when it comes to SUVs. In the EPA’s own words:
Pickup trucks, vans, and minivans are classified as light trucks under NHTSA’s regulatory definitions, while sedans, coupes, and wagons are generally classified as cars. Sport utility vehicles (SUVs) can fall into either category depending on the relevant attributes of the specific vehicle. Based on the CAFE and GHG regulatory definitions, most two-wheel drive SUVs under 6,000 pounds GVW are classified as cars, while most SUVs that have four-wheel drive or are above 6,000 pounds GVW are considered trucks. SUV models that are less than 6,000 pounds GVW can have both car and truck variants, with two-wheel drive versions classified as cars and four-wheel drive versions classified as trucks. As the fleet has changed over time, the line drawn between car and truck classes has also evolved.
By the EPA’s definitions, making a vehicle heavier and more off-road capable tilts it towards being a truck. A pickup bed or lots of cargo capacity does the same. If a vehicle is more about personal transportation and less about work or traversing rugged terrain, it’s a car.
In any case, hopefully that sheds some light on the matter. Next time someone mocks your Ford Maverick, for example, you’ll be properly armed. You can point to the open cargo bed and shout “It’s a real truck!” with confidence, knowing the EPA has your back. You can even print out the above flow chart and keep it in your wallet for easy reference. You’ll solve many a bar argument forever more.
Image credits: EPA report, Ford, Honda, Toyota
So, my 2013 Mazda5 is a truck. Note to self: do not tell the wife.
Wait, I’m missing something. With the 3rd row seating thing, doesn’t that mean minivans are pretty much all trucks? They have a third row, and it’s stowable or removable to make a flat cargo surface. Ergo… Truck?
Yup, I too did not realize I have been rocking a ‘truck’ all this time. Good times….
I mean I use and abuse mine like it’s an old work truck, so I guess that checks out haha.
You couldn’t remove the 3rd row or fold it into the floor on my old Mercury Villager, but you could remove the 2nd row captain chairs and slide the 3rd row bench up in their place. Therefore you could Tetris the Villager into a truck, right?
Bookmarked for future arguments in the comment section.
Great sequence in Buckaroo Banzai.
Buckaroo: It flies like a truck.
John Parker: Good. What is a truck?
https://y.yarn.co/573fff49-0b76-4f17-8c44-2bbee94bc6c9_text.gif
In Canada, or at least Ontario where I live, my 2012 Kia Soul is classified as a Truck/Van.
Is this a truck?
No, this is Patrick.
I think the 2CV Sahara and original Fiat Panda 4×4 might both be trucks.
And the Citroen CX Familiale, but not the CX Safari.
Fun loopholing aside: why are trucks, regardless of definition, given much, much easier emissions limits? I get that work trucks are necessary, and can’t be as efficient as a car, but they don’t have to be half as efficient.
In this Hagerty video, Jason Cammisa talks about the government incentives that pushed us to big trucks and SUVs and how Japan did the same thing but for Kei cars instead.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcB-nFt_bm0
TIL my ’21 Jeep Compass Trailhawk is a truck. It has all 5 of the offroad physical dimension requirements that it needs 4 of. So thats neat I guess. It also helps explain the dysmal 21-22mpg I average.
weights in pounds, lengths in centimeters. check
Keep pointing that out and they’ll start measuring weight in stone and height in hands to spite us.
At least the angles aren’t in radians.
Everyone’s least favourite SI unit.
Wait you mean to tell me you don’t have an intuitive understanding of radians when measuring angles? I’ll have you know that π/8 rad is my minimum departure angle for any of my truck purchases, despite the EPA only requiring π/9. Don’t even get me started on the breakover angle! π/12? What is this mess? That ain’t a real truck!
My Mazda3 has the approach, departure, break over, and ground clearance to drive over grassy hills. Since that’s the same amount of off-roading that most “trucks” will ever do I’m calling my Mazda a truck from now on. Time to go buy some truck nutz!
Take off the trunk lid and it is officially a truck
I used to drive my 2010 Mazda6 on Moab dirt roads. I would often pass Jeeps (not wranglers) that struggled more than I did. So that sedan is now a truck too, right? Right??? 😉
And this is why we have had people using trucks as daily drivers for decades because of emission regs and the auto industry.
This chart fails to explain how the standard PT Cruiser was a light truck
The google said the pt was a truck because of the removable rear seats. Not sure if that is true but it seems like it and the rules may have been different back then.
My guess is this one:
-Does the vehicle provide greater cargo carrying than passenger carrying volume?
Otherwise I’m stumped too.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/a2108816/definition-truck-cafe-loophole-critics-say/ removable rear seat and flat floor.
I’ve seen the Kia Soul classified as a “truck”, but how does it meet all four of the angle criteria? Same for the old Dodge Magnum and Chrysler PT Cruiser.
The google said the pt was a truck because of the removable rear seats. Not sure if that is true but it seems like it and the rules may have been different back then. https://www.autoweek.com/news/a2108816/definition-truck-cafe-loophole-critics-say/
I just made a comment about mine being classified as a truck/van in Canada. When I was getting insurance it took me a few minutes to figure out why it wasn’t coming up when I selected “car” from the first drop down menu.
So by that flow chart – Grandpa’s Country Squire or your Dad’s Volvo 240 Wagon would be classified as a Truck if equipped with the rear seats in the cargo area.
Which begs the question – What is the point of Mercedes-Benz doing the Outback thing with the E Class Wagon if it’s already classified as a Truck by the EPA?
Marketing and conquest buyers