It feels like automotive model cycles are lasting longer than ever before, which means that the mid-life facelift is a critical thing to keep customers interested in a car that’s been on sale for three, four, five, or even more years. However, sometimes a facelift can only do so much. Take the BMW iX, for example. It’s getting tweaked styling, a new entry-level trim, and updated powertrain options for the 2026 model year but I can’t tell whether visually, it’s an improvement or not.
Let’s start by talking about powertrains, starting with the new BMW iX xDrive45, because it seems the most promising. With a 100.1 kWh battery pack and a combined output of 402 horsepower and 516 lb.-ft. of torque, it promises 312 miles of range and a starting price of $76,325, which is three more miles of range than last year’s iX xDrive50 for $12,100 less. Sure, it gives up 114 horsepower over the xDrive50, but it still scoots from zero-to-60 mph in just under five seconds. That’s definitely not slow.
For 2026, the xDrive60 replaces the old xDrive50, adding all of 20 horsepower for a total of 536. It also features a boost in range to 340 miles, and while an extra 31 miles of range thanks to new batteries and silicon carbide inverters shared with the rest of the iX range is certainly nice, you can’t help but get the feeling that the bigger number on the trunk is primarily a marketing exercise.
However, the new xDrive60 would get a bit confusing if it were sold alongside the 2025 iX M60 xDrive, so the M-lite trim for 2026 is now the M70 xDrive, which gets an extra 40 horsepower over the old M60 xDrive yet isn’t officially quicker. Strange, but considering it costs the same as the old M60 xDrive, not the end of the world. Come to think of it, the updated M Sport styling might be more of a turnoff than a bigger number with identical claimed acceleration times, especially on the M70 xDrive with its unique grille.
Let’s jump back the standard BMW iX xDrive45 and xDrive60 for a second, because these variants have changed the least visually over last year’s iX xDrive50. BMW’s gone with the old Sport trim bits, added a new set of faux-grilles and painted almost all the vulgar shiny black plastic trim on the lower parts of the body to match the paint color, and that’s about it other than the new headlights all 2026 iX crossovers get. In this case, painting shiny black trim body color is good and the new faux grilles look less busy, although the new illuminated grille option seems particularly tasteless.
However, these models are also available with an M Sport package, and that’s where things start to go off the rails a little bit by falling into the same trope as other new BMWs, the one where it looks like the bumpers were designed by people who’d never seen the whole car before. Sure, the lines off the front air curtains pinch the headlights, and the butt-chinned grille with a huge KitKat-shaped black plastic slab above it isn’t great, but the busy rear bumper definitely seems like a downgrade over standard. With the M Sport Package, the iX still isn’t the worst-looking BMW launched in the past few years, but what is that really saying?
Of course, questionable bumpers aren’t the only new additions for the new M Sport package. One thing that actually seems worth the money is a set of front sport seats with adjustable bolsters and adjustable thigh support, especially since they look great for skinnier drivers who might find themselves flopping around in the standard seats. The M Sport package also features a circular steering wheel which sounds nice, shiny black plastic on the center console which doesn’t sound so nice, and available 23-inch wheels which sound detrimental to comfort.
It’s worth noting that minor updates like this won’t alleviate some of the fundamental annoyances on the BMW iX. The hatch opening is weirdly small due to a set of concealed second taillights, the surfacing of the quarter panels and fenders isn’t great, and the giant faux grilles are controversial to say the least. Still, if you can get past that, the iX does seem improved on paper for 2026. Maybe stick with the cheapest one, though.
(Photo credits: BMW)
Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.
-
Now That BMW iXs Are Driving Around: Do You Think It Looks Better Or Worse Than Initial Pictures?
-
I Just Sold My 2014 BMW i3, One Of The Greatest Cars I’ve Ever Owned
-
The Death Of The BMW iDrive Infotainment Knob Is Almost Here
-
The New BMW M3 Is Going To Be Electric, But Don’t Get Angry Yet
-
The 2024 BMW X5 xDrive50e Is Three Very Different SUVs At Once
Please send tips about cool car things to tips@theautopian.com. You could even win a prize!
Narrator: NO, it WAS not BETTER!
For me, the E39 5/M5 was peak BMW. At least styling-wise. It was perfect. I had a neighbor with that M5, and it was all I could do not to drool on it as I walked the dogs past it.
It’s been all downhill since then.
The latest ones are so fugly. I don’t know how they sell any current iterations.
I had a ’72 Bavaria and married a woman with a ’15 X5. Both were a) prettier than the current stuff; and b) money pits.
I might put up with that for an E39, as a hobby, but there is no way I would buy or lease anything in their current lineup. I’d be embarrassed to drive or show up in anything they are trying to sell these days.
My retinas are seething in pain.
I think blindness is what you aquired.
Looks like the result of a one night stand between and old X1 and a Forerunner.
only a mother could love it. As long as dad paid support
That headline made me think that Mr. Adrian had finally posted another article.
It has been around two months — was there a farewell post that I missed?
No, it’s not better. It’s worse, and has always looked terrible like the X5 and most new Bimmers
I’ll take an Isetta instead…
“Did I do that?”
Looks at it from the side: “it’s on the nicer side of the spectrum of all these hard to tell apart crossovers”.
Looks at it from the back: “Nice hatch!”
Looks at it from the fron: “CTHULHU F’TAGHN R’LYEH AIEEEEEEEE”
I’m a total BMW guy, but I can’t even tell which is the old one (which I’m supposed to dislike) and which is the new one (which I’m also supposed to dislike).
It looks a little better. I will admit I have a “bile fascination” with these (and the Cybertruck) – I’d like to test drive one of these just to see what it’s like.
Speaking of which, did you happen to see the clip of the Cybertruck someone made into a dually? I saw the short clip of it on the highway on Instagram yesterday. I just googled it and it seems to have a few articles around last November speaking about it…. It is interesting in that “holy shit someone did that” sense.
I seem to remember the lead designer of BMW saying that he intends to push design forward with these latest designs. He is definitely pushing design, I’m just not so sure he got the direction right.
Oink. They’ve outdone themselves in coming up with something worse. I remember the fallout on the release of the Subaru Tribeca B9 – the vagina monologues. This is worse!
The flying vagina! Classic.
Our other car is a 2007 b9. Not a bad car.
Yeah, and on a separate but similar subject from the B9 (the grilles do look silly) what’s funny is that for all the grief that the Edsel got for the grilles (We’ve all heard the nicknames) they were absolutely beautiful cars outside of that. I’m so used to reading about it now that I don’t mind it as much, it’s still way better than this bimmer design! So the Edsel doesn’t deserve to be on any worst cars lists (Torch- we need that column back!) There were multiple failure reasons and part of it was the recession of 1957…along w/ marketing, price, manufacturing, etc
I just think it’s funny that on those the first thought is grille=bad when the rest of the car was gorgeous like a lot of other cars then, and they are very unique
The grill on the b9 is an acquired taste. The rest of the car is great. I agree with you on the Edsel. In their generation they were not the weirdest. Many of the Studes, Ramblers, Chryslers and the like were worse. I think ford should have stuck with the brand. The timing was off on the release IMO.
It’s definitely giving the icks. They just need to fix the spelling.BMW nine? Or are Roman numerals like cursive now?Yeah, I’m 46 but I’m semi-conversational in Gen Z thanks to apps like Rizetta Stone
It does look better, but that’s a low bar to clear.
It looks good from the rear and rear 3/4, but any view with that grille is still hideous.
The grill is the same size and shape. Nothing else matters until they change the buckteeth
I wish there was a picture of the old one, because I can’t tell the difference.
That being said, I try my best to forget the hideous iX
It’s much, much better. Still ugly enough to be a dealbreaker, unfortunately.
It’s a shame because the iX is such an excellent car. I had one as a rental and came away so, so impressed.
They say it’s difficult to whistle at the same time as when you are laughing. I just found out that yawning and barfing concurrently is the same.
This paragraph made my brain BSOD. The model designations are brain-meltingly bad.
I have no other thoughts because I’m still rebooting.
How much M60 could xDrive60 drive if an iXM60 could xDrive m70?
Still ugly. Still looks like a water loving woodland rodent. And will still not feature working turn signals.
From ugly to a bit less ugly imo. Color choices are still really nice though.
Names: terrible
Faces: ugly
BMW: not misunderstood, just wrong and bad
Do a poll lazy
No
Yes
That would be the whole piece for me.