Home » ‘I Don’t Think It’s My Fault’ Says Person Who Somehow Did $30k Worth Of Damage In A Single-Car, Low-Speed Parking Lot Accident

‘I Don’t Think It’s My Fault’ Says Person Who Somehow Did $30k Worth Of Damage In A Single-Car, Low-Speed Parking Lot Accident

Polemic Top
ADVERTISEMENT

I’m not always sure how to handle things when some sort of social media something that involves cars goes viral. Sometimes, we just want to ignore it, but then again, our goal is to bring top-notch Brougham-grade quality automotive content to as many people as possible, even if those people didn’t realize how much they were craving and needing said car content. So, when something goes big and has a significant automotive angle, why not try to address it? So that’s what we’re doing now, as I invite you to join me in marveling at a TikTok video created by a person who slowly and destructively sideswiped a parking bollard, causing $30,000 worth of body damage to her new Cadillac Escalade. Over 3.7 million people watched this video, enrapt at a human being blaming an inert metal bollard that is sunk into the ground with concrete for being at fault in a wreck.

I wish I could definitively state why this video has captured the attention of so many; there’s some obvious things, of course. The person making it is conventionally attractive, there’s the undeniable draw of some nice, juicy schadenfreude, and it’s talking about something deeply familiar and relatable to many people: the fact that parking bollards exist. Beyond that I can’t really say, other than there really is something fascinating about watching someone in such complete denial about an event that happened.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

The someone we’re talking about, by the way, is a – I guess you’d call them an influencer?– on social media, named Natalie Vacca, with over 270,000 followers on TikTok, and mostly seems to post videos of herself talking about stuff to the camera, with occasional cameos from dogs and kids. Looking at the environment and materials and locations of these videos, this person seems to be doing just fine, financially. They seem to be living a pretty cushy life, and part of that seems to include a recent-model Cadillac Escalade, which plays a crucial role in the video, which, here, you may as well just watch already:

@nat.vacca

I cant be the only victim to yellow bank polls. #escalade #cadillac #autobody #crunch #matteblack #banks #cement #damage

♬ Whats the purpose – Tash

I’m sure there’s like half a dozen things that you saw just now that are making you want to scream: someone not understanding the purpose of those bollards, saying “look what your metal pole did to my car” and then stating they don’t think it was their fault, and then calling a door handle a “handlebar” and saying “you hear a crunch and freeze, and then you keep going,” all of this, all of this, it almost feels like too much. Is it an act? Can this be serious? Are there people so clueless about the way Earth works that they believe all these things? And are allowed to drive a 5,600-pound SUV like an Escalade?

ADVERTISEMENT

Bankpole1

Of course, the comments are absolutely brutal. But it, somehow, gets even better, because ol’ Nat posted a response video where, bafflingly, she pretended to not be herself, and instead did the video as some other person “playing devil’s advocate about hitting bank poles” as though there’s two powerful and equal sides to the “should you grind your car into yellow parking bollards, causing lots of damage?” debate. Here, you have to watch this one, so you can enjoy that strangely satisfying feeling of wanting to scream about dumb things, yet again:

@nat.vacca

Im just playing devils advocate #bollard #atm #followup #devilsadvocate #stlouis #escalade #cadillac #autobody #crunch #handlebar #satire

♬ original sound – Tash

First of all, what the hell is the point of doing a response video as though you’re someone who is not you, but is also very clearly you? It feels absolutely unhinged. Why would you choose this? For objectivity? I don’t think objectivity works that way. I don’t think anything works that way?

The part where she’s defending the her-but-not-her for continuing to drive forward after hearing the crunch is particularly maddening. She notes, quite correctly, that her shifter only offers options for forward or reverse travel, and no sideways control. This checks out, because her Escalade (and most other automobiles made for the past century or so) have their “sideways” controls in the form of the fucking steering wheel, a cool little driving hack you in-the-know drivers should be aware of.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course, this was noted multiple times in the comments:

Comment1

Plus, this one gets in the extra little dig with “wheelbar!” Gold! brutal, funny gold!

Look, just in general, I would have thought that most people, upon driving and hearing a loud crunching sound, would know to just stop, and ideally get out of the car and see what the hell is going on. Moving in the direction of travel you were going in when you hit the whatever, especially when you can still hear the sounds of bending metal, is generally a bad idea, at least if your goal is to have less damage to your car.

There’s any number of ways she could have slowly and carefully backed away from the bollard, ideally utilizing some of that “sideways” control offered by the steering wheel, to minimize the damage, instead of raking the entire length of the side of the car against the bollard.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then there’s the suggestion that, somehow, if these were red instead of yellow, they’d be much better? Was the color what confused her? It seems more like she didn’t see them at all, but if she saw them, saw that they were yellow and thought “Oh! yellow poles! There’s no way a yellow pole could cause any harm! Yellow is the color of bananas and twinkies, nature’s softest elements, so this yellow pole must be quite similar, quite similar indeed!”

Can this all be real? Is this person just trolling for engagement? Is it all a setup, designed to stir click-worthy and monetizible wrath in the minds of people? Is it just fuel for some misogynist’s future, mis-informed screed about gender and driving? Because I don’t want to hear that shit.

I mean, look, we’ve all fucked up while driving. An Escalade is huge and the visibility isn’t that great; I’m not necessarily immune from a similar sort of fuck-up. The actual driving into the bollard isn’t the issue. It’s the making the video about it, with the determined confidence of idiocy, but, then again, making these videos is what this woman does. Her life is content, and this is definitely content. I’m not so different, just, you know, homelier and drive much cheaper cars. If I did this, the only way I could cause $30,000 worth of damage is if I shredded $24,000 in cash against the bollard in the process.

I think this is real, at least in the sense that the event happened, and her reactions are real. But she’s also likely very aware of the engagement and reaction this will have.

But, here I am, talking about it. To you! Matt told me to, but I agreed without protest because I saw the damn videos and was as baffled and captivated as anyone. What does this say about us, all of us? I mean, there’s her, with these baffling decisions and what seems to be as many qualifications to drive an Escalade as your average land-squirrel, and then there’s me, watching it over and over and wondering how this can be and playing right smack dab into the whole internet economy of cultivated outrage.

ADVERTISEMENT

But still, let’s recap: bollards are there to keep people from driving their Escalades into expensive buildings or over expensive people. If you hear a crunch while slowly driving in a parking lot just stop. See what’s going on before continuing to drive. And, yes, if you hit an inert, immobile object like a bollard or an obelisk or a tree stump, it is definitely, unquestionably your fault.

Relatedbar

This Photo Of A Car Crashed Perfectly Into A Driving School Under A ‘Learn To Drive’ Sign Gets Better When You Find Out Who The Driver Was

The Car Crashes From The ’70s TV Show ‘CHiPS’ Are Dazzling Dances Of Car Chaos

That Viral Tweet About Truck Bed Sizes Over The Years Is Just Stupid

I Can’t Stop Watching This Driver Get Their Car Absolutely Wedged In A Sinkhole

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
243 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Querty
Querty
7 months ago

That’s why I wholeheartedly endorse the campaign “Ignore an influencer today”.

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Querty

You will not influence me to ignore an influencer.

So does that mean you were successful?

Querty
Querty
7 months ago

The house always win

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago

Man, people poo on influencers all the time, but some of them have my respect. A lot of what they do is sponsored, sure, but the good ones honestly disclose the paid-for bits and they really seem to hustle—even moreso than the goofball journalist commenting on the Autopian during her lunch break. (Hi.) I’ll take an influencer who knows their crap and is there to do the work as a press drive partner any day of the week over a journosaur who’s here for the shrimp and thinks he’s the second coming of Juan Manuel Fangio.

…but then you have goofs like this who give the other influencers a bad name. It’s such a broad damn term. I fully admit that I try to stay away from the accounts that smell like undisclosed Shein sponsorships and useless sponcon “lifehacks,” though.

Last edited 7 months ago by Stef Schrader
Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

Do you consider yourself a Puffluencer?

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago

Nah. No one listens to me.

JumboG
JumboG
7 months ago

I hit one, did about 2k in damage to my 2014 Ram. Never saw it.

Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
7 months ago
Reply to  JumboG

That’s because full size trucks and SUVs have become too tall… .hurts visibility.

JumboG
JumboG
7 months ago

Yep, I backed into a space next to a ATM sitting in the middle of an urgent care medical parking lot. I went there because I severely sprained an ankle that I had previously broken. Luckily it didn’t break again. However after I hobbled out in pain, I just put the truck in drive and forgot about the ATM stand, and I turned out in a different direction than I backed in. I was actually surprised the damage was as low as it was because I took out 2 door skins and the rocker panel, and the entire front side of the truck had to be painted.

However, I’ve been driving lifted trucks for 30 years and have never done this, so I’m going to chalk it up to not paying attention due to pain, not because trucks are tall.

Last edited 7 months ago by JumboG
Dave
Dave
7 months ago

This. This is why our insurance rates are skyrocketing.

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Dave

Why blame idiocy when profiteering is more likely?

Dave
Dave
7 months ago

Because the idiocy is driving it. Look at accident statistics and average repair costs. My insurance company has lost $$ the last couple of years. I suspect they’d have loved to make a profit.

Citrus
Citrus
7 months ago

I once hit a fire hydrant in a new parking lot where they hadn’t put a curb around it yet and it was somehow completely hidden by my A pillar. I also did some pretty serious damage! And I recognize that I was an idiot and went to the insurance place with a feeling of great shame.

People need to rediscover shame.

Taargus Taargus
Taargus Taargus
7 months ago
Reply to  Citrus

YES! Bring back shame.

Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
7 months ago
Reply to  Citrus

I once hit a fire hydrant in a new parking lot where they hadn’t put a curb around it yet”

And how many clicks did you get for it?

“People need to rediscover shame.”

What’s this ‘shame’ you speak of?

/jk

Citrus
Citrus
7 months ago

Not a single one. I am bad at internet.

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago

Throw your driver’s license in a wood chipper, Natalie. That bollard is to protect things from abysmal drivers like you.

Also, while this is 100% her fault, without a doubt, it also makes me think that the Escalade shouldn’t be so damn tall? Or that we should at least require actual skill before handing out drivers’ licenses if we’re going to allow every license-holder on the road to drive one of these big ol’ behemoths?

This is one of the tallest SUVs out there, for Pete’s sake. While the 360-degree camera is very good and extremely useful when it comes to cramming one into a tight space, it’s definitely easier to maneuver something that isn’t so tall and slab-sided. Drivers like this who are so oblivious that they won’t even stop for a loud scraping noise probably won’t stop for more important things like kids or pets, either.

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

Tbf pureeing a child with your Escalade doesn’t make a loud scraping noise

StillNotATony
StillNotATony
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

Shouldn’t it also have, like, a zillion proximity sensors screaming at her BEFORE she hit it? Did she just ignore all that?

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago
Reply to  StillNotATony

Usually the front and rear have decent sensors, but I don’t know about the side. It’d be nice if we had them, but as it sits, that’s where skill? awareness? basic common sense??? comes in. If you’re so oblivious that you keep going when you start to hear your vehicle grinding against a bollard, you do not have said skill and should probably swap for something much smaller with better visibility out of the car and drive with an instructor until you figure out this whole “driving” thing.

Last edited 7 months ago by Stef Schrader
LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

Was at the grocery store a few weeks back as I walked to my car post grocery purchase spotted one of those raised bro dozers being approached by a fetching young woman of decidedly petite stature. Said young woman had to scale the running board of the dozer in order to open the door to enter the dozer. The dozer blocked a good third of the parking lot lane and took up 1 1/2 spaces. All to accommodate a woman who weighed maybe 90 lbs and stood less than 5 ft tall. We live in strange times.

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago
Reply to  LMCorvairFan

Yeah, trucks in particular have gotten wild now. We really need to close the “embiggen vehicle to avoid extra regulations” loophole and try to rein in vehicle size. Even when people can drive them well, there’s a lot of extra blind spots (not to mention extra risk in collisions with other vehicles and pedestrians!) with these bigger, chunkier vehicles that pose an extra risk, and it seems to be mainly aesthetic. Surely the capability of modern consumer-oriented trucks and SUVs could be packaged in more reasonably sized vehicles.

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

110% agree. I stand 6’5 and the hood of some are above my shoulder. Old timey delivery trucks and semis where not as tall. Things have gotten absurd to the point of parody. The things are dangerous for all the reasons you cite plus the macho invincible behaviour some drivers exhibit.

Jason Smith
Jason Smith
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

we should at least require actual skill before handing out drivers’ licenses…

My state did a social media campaign on highway safety dealing with bad driving habits (lane discipline, staying in your lane in multilane intersections, roundabouts, etc.) the number of people unironically outing themselves as terrible drivers was amazing. Not just for bad habits but for being bad at the actual act of maneuvering a vehicle through a 3 dimensional space, like seeing the entrance and intended exit of an intersection and not being able to visualize a constant radius arc to connect the two points without needing lines to guide them.

Last edited 7 months ago by Jason Smith
Mr E
Mr E
7 months ago

Well, shit. My daughter hit the recycling bins whilst backing out of the driveway last Wednesday.

Such a missed opportunity for passive income. Instead of just ME laughing and shaking my head at her, I could’ve gotten the whole internet to join in, for money!

Chronometric
Chronometric
7 months ago

I never realized “bollard” is slang for TikTok Barbies.

David Smith
David Smith
7 months ago
Reply to  Chronometric

Never mind the Bollards
It’s the TicTok Barbies
Track list:
I need a Holliday in the Sun
Liar Liar, pants are looking good
$17 Frappaciano, what a deal!

Mr E
Mr E
7 months ago
Reply to  Chronometric

Take a look at the bollards on her…

StillNotATony
StillNotATony
7 months ago

Man, this kinda stuff just slides right off my brain. I saw this yesterday and had already forgotten about it.

Remember The Simpsons Treehouse of Terror episode where all the giant mascots came to life and started rampaging? They were defeated when everyone stopped looking at them. So remember the little ditty Lisa sang: Just don’t look! Just don’t look!

Bendanzig
Bendanzig
7 months ago
Reply to  StillNotATony

Well, it really sounds better when Paul Anka sings it.

ColoradoFX4
ColoradoFX4
7 months ago

This is when I’m glad to be too old for tictac.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
7 months ago

Spoiled, entitled, ditz. Psycho eyes Run away as fast as you can! Avoid at all costs (which are too many to list or count).

I don’t believe any of this was for clicks. This is genuinely who she is.

TheCrank
TheCrank
7 months ago

I think I’m aging out of all social media. There’s enough stupid people that I run into every day in real life, I don’t need to go find more online.

Jonathan Hendry
Jonathan Hendry
7 months ago

Rich person did it on purpose for engagement and views. $$$

Last edited 7 months ago by Jonathan Hendry
4moremazdas
4moremazdas
7 months ago

This is a fun game I like to play. It goes like this:

See young couple about to have first kid.

They insist their CRV will not be large enough and buy the largest vehicle they can finance.

Two weeks go by, and there’s suddenly a giant scrape along the driver’s side because they don’t know how to compensate for the extra wheelbase in a drive-through.

Despite having a sideways control, the rear wheels do not follow the same path as the rear ones…

Turbotictac
Turbotictac
7 months ago

This entire situation could be summarized to “Person who believes they are never at fault for their actions should not be driving an unnecessary SUV while possessing power wheel levels of driving ability”. A Civic would be a much better fit but doesn’t carry that sweet sweet display of status.

Chairman Kaga
Chairman Kaga
7 months ago

I’d bet $100 she did it knowing she’d earn more in revenue from social engagement and brand awareness than would cost in repairs. It’s the same calculus people like Mr. Beast use, just on a smaller scale.

Jonathan Hendry
Jonathan Hendry
7 months ago
Reply to  Chairman Kaga

Yeah, pretty rich girl wants to be an influencer and make money.

Oldhusky
Oldhusky
7 months ago
Reply to  Chairman Kaga

Bollardcorp Industries is really cleaning up on this one. I hear they have a cool ironic self-aware twitter presence as well.

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago
Reply to  Oldhusky

Bollards DO have fan clubs, believe it or not: https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/world-bollard-association

Clear_prop
Clear_prop
7 months ago
Reply to  Chairman Kaga

I’ll take the other side of that bet.

I’m sure she is a bad enough driver to do this unintentionally, and then do the sob story about how she is the victim of Big Bad Bollards for views.

Drew
Drew
7 months ago

And are allowed to drive a 5,600-pound SUV like an Escalade?

In a rare policy misstep in our otherwise completely sensible country, the US allow anyone who can get a license to drive vehicles that large or even larger.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
7 months ago

But she’s pretty, so it can’t be her fault.
Total Quinn Morgendorffer.

Drew
Drew
7 months ago

Then, people get worked up over it, making the folks commenting on her post Jake Morgendorffer.

10001010
10001010
7 months ago

I do agree with her on one point, those bollards could be a few feet taller so you can see them at all times.

Chronometric
Chronometric
7 months ago
Reply to  10001010

Funny, they are easily seen in a Honda Accord or other normal car-like conveyance.

10001010
10001010
7 months ago
Reply to  Chronometric

I live in the land of trucks, the Accord fender height is not the average fender height.

Chronometric
Chronometric
7 months ago
Reply to  10001010

I live in truckland also and on occasion drive a first gen Tundra. And I will admit that I once grazed a bollard protecting the corner of a storage facility where I was unloading a trailer full of stuff. I was sad and embarrassed and repaired the damage myself. Had I only realized that my mistake could have paid for my next two cosmetic surgeries.

Oldhusky
Oldhusky
7 months ago
Reply to  10001010

Interesting theoretical policy debate here, one which is applicable all over the place: do you plan/regulate for the garbageworld of the real or for the one you want to bring into existence. This is basically the difference between reformism and radicalism.

10001010
10001010
7 months ago
Reply to  Oldhusky

I’m still trying to define the term “quality”, please stand by…

Joe L
Joe L
7 months ago
Reply to  Oldhusky

100% reformist here.

FleetwoodBro
FleetwoodBro
7 months ago
Reply to  10001010

From experience, one cannot see the three foot tall yellow bollard outside a certain Popeye’s drive-thru from the driver’s seat of a 2005 Honda Odyssey because of sight-lines to the right front. $11K for a three piece chicken meal. One might even have to drive home with the sliding passenger door stuck open.

AlterId
AlterId
7 months ago

Two things:

Yeah, this is almost certainly intended to generate vitality and therefore clicks. Nothing makes people want to share a story more than “Look how stupid / outrageous / unfair this person is!” It’s the driving force behind the popularity of the McDonald’s lawsuit over hot coffee (which was far too hot for safety, but you have to drill down in a reputable news item to find that out) or most of the headlines or headline-equivalents in any of Rupert Murdoch’s News organs, including The Wall Street Journal to a certain extent.
I remember an elementary-school field trip to a Chesterfield County, Virginia fire station with yellow fire trucks, where it was explained that yellow was a more visible color than red. I haven’t looked into sources or subsequent research to confirm that, but it makes sense. If this happened at a drive-up ATM where she pulled in too close because it’s hard to reach the keypad from the height of an Escalade, the color wouldn’t have made that much difference anyway.

Last edited 7 months ago by AlterId
Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
7 months ago
Reply to  AlterId

In the world of factory machine safety as regulated by OSHA, Yellow is the color to be used for covers and barriers that separate you or your body parts from Things That Will Hurt Or Kill You. Such covers generally require a power down and lockout/tagout before removal. Then, actual moving Things That Will Hurt Or Kill You are to be colored orange. I forget what red is specified for, but it is something lower down the totem pole. And my understanding is that it’s based on visibility.

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
7 months ago

In my world (mechanical services), red is fire: both the hookups for the fire department and valves/controls for the sprinkler systems. Also often marks lockout/tag out points. —this is more in the mechanical rooms serving the factory floor than on the floor with robots, etc. I am seeing more facilities placing secure tie-off/hook rings up high and using yellow to draw attention to those.

Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
7 months ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

I do recall sprinkler system piping being painted red in the warehouse rack systems I dealt with.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
7 months ago

Watching these videos just makes me sad that TikTok wasn’t around when Titanic hit the iceberg. I’ll bet the captain’s victim and Devil’s advocate videos would have been hilarious.

Also, Vacca in Italian means “cow.” Draw your own conclusions.

Chronometric
Chronometric
7 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

Moo!

Cerberus
Cerberus
7 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

I assumed it meant “vacant” and found it all too apt.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
7 months ago
Reply to  Cerberus

They share a root in the word “vacare,” Latin for ‘remaining empty.” So, apt.

Joe L
Joe L
7 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

Vacuous is what came to my mind. All related.

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

> Vacca in Italian means “cow.”

Was that really necessary though?

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
7 months ago

They had to call the animal something.

Cayde-6
Cayde-6
7 months ago

Forget about the “Chinese surveillance” BS, “content” like this is enough of a reason to ban TikTok.

Mr. Canoehead
Mr. Canoehead
7 months ago

When I was a poor university student, I paid my bills by working night shift at McDonalds as a swing shift manager.

One night, I get a frantic call from a woman (let’s call her Karen) who says that her daughter hit the bollard in our drivethrough. She’s very worried that her daughter might get arrested for hit and run. I walk out to take a look and there is some fresh paint on the bollard (which is well back from the edge of the pavement and is located to protect the building from bad drivers) but no other damage.

I tell the woman not to worry, that it “happens all the time” and her daughter won’t get charged with hit and run.

Monday morning, my boss gets a call from her lawyer saying that we must pay for the damage to their car since if it “happens all the time” there must be something wrong with the location of the bollard. I got chewed out for being the nice guy (but the restaurant refused to pay for the damage to the car).

SNL-LOL Jr
SNL-LOL Jr
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Canoehead

Henceforth our corporate counsel’s standard legal advice for all matters:

Short form: shut up
Long form: shut the xxxx up

Turbotictac
Turbotictac
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Canoehead

Good time to respond that your employee didn’t have the authority to make that judgement call and that your store will, in fact, be pursuing charges for damage to property and leaving the scene of an accident.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
7 months ago

This is the basic idea behind how my 2005 Protege5 got demolished. It was parked on a little road, basically a long driveway, with three houses on it. It was parked in front of my sister’s house, which was the middle of the three houses. A teenage girl visiting the last house backed in to the car, pushed the headlight all the way to the strut tower on the drivers side, and based on the debris and tire tread marks, pushed the car about 18 feet before stopping.

She was driving a lifted Avalanche. The Protege5 was in gear and the ebrake was on, meaning all 4 tires were locked up. When asked by her father (who came when the cops were called) if she somehow didn’t hear any noise, she responded that she just “thought it was the gravel”. “The gravel” stuck out only about 1 foot from my sisters front fence is all, so she was still perfectly comfortable being within knocking distance of that fence and just continuing on her way. Her sister than asked their Dad when they were taking her license away as this was apparently the 3rd accident in 5 weeks, and the second totaled car in her wake.

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago
Reply to  Lockleaf

YEEEESH. I’m sorry, man. Glad her license got yanked after that, at least.

LarsVargas
LarsVargas
7 months ago

I’ve swiped up against things in two different cars. One was a yellow bollard and the other was the garage opening on my house. The bollard did real damage. The garage opening did minor damage.

And both times, I called myself a dipshit, fixed the damage to the car as best as I could (the house won, so no damage here beyond a little paint scrape) and carried on.

Then again, I have zero TikTok followers and only influence what we have for dinner here at the house that I hit with my car. So I don’t have to feign doing stupid shit to get clicks and eyeballs, or encourage comments pointing out my stupidity.

Robert M. Graham
Robert M. Graham
7 months ago
Reply to  LarsVargas

I did the same! A little more damage to the house (don’t know if I can fix that or not) and some scrapes on the vehicle. The scrapes on the tail light literally “buffed out”, and the rest of the scrapes will be taken care of when the whole thing gets repainted.

Jonathan Hendry
Jonathan Hendry
7 months ago
Reply to  LarsVargas

I grazed a bollard in my Juke at the CVS drive-up window, but just got a yellow scuff on the fender that was eventually fixed by a body shop after a completely unrelated incident. (I didn’t even ask for it, but as long as insurance was paying…)

EXL500
EXL500
7 months ago
Reply to  LarsVargas

I recently hit our dumpster. In my defense I was avoiding a car in our parking lot.

$2900 later…

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
7 months ago
Reply to  EXL500

If you drive long enough, most of us do. I backed our stakebody truck neatly into the dumpster right in front of my boss and our big boss. Good times.

EXL500
EXL500
7 months ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

At least I had no witnesses!

Cerberus
Cerberus
7 months ago
Reply to  LarsVargas

I grazed the garage once, too, trying to avoid something on the other side. Luckily, the weatherseal along the side was wet, so the damage was almost imperceptible and only in specific angle of light, so I left it alone. Another time, I backed into a pole, not a bollard, but a tall damn telephone/electric pole that was oddly located in the middle of a parking lot behind two spaces. I was barely moving when I tapped it, but still killed the bumper cover. Was distracted by a woman bending over to pick something up. That’s also how I originally met my ex, so this was a difficult lesson for me to learn.

RalliartWagon
RalliartWagon
7 months ago

The irony is that by being a “victim” of the bollards, she proved their necessity.
The property owner didn’t just install them for fun.

243
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x