There’s a few categories of cars that seem to have just sort of disappeared. Anything with a rumble seat, for example, has been effectively gone for many decades, likely the result of people’s decreased willingness to be force-fed insects at 60 mph and an increased interest in preserving human lives. More recently, there’s a kind of vehicle that was once around up until about the 1990s that’s gone today: the truncated-truck fun car.
I suppose some of the earliest examples of these may have been the Ford Bronco, or, really, the second-gen Bronco from 1978, when they were built from shortened Ford F-100 pickup trucks. Though, now that I think about it, the Chevy Blazer, starting in 1969 to compete with the International Scout and the original Ford Bronco, was made from shortened K10 pickup trucks, so that may really be the first of this kind.
These were inherently a fun idea, and in most of these types of vehicles the division between cab and “bed” was eliminated, creating a very open, flexible sort of interior, and, even better, usually the bed area had a removable hard top or soft top to let it be enclosed or open! The one of these I was specifically thinking of today was the Isuzu Amigo:
The Amigo was a great example of one of these shortened pickups, and was based on a pickup I used to own, which was just sold under the very creative name Isuzu Pickup here in America. I guess you could get one at your local Building Full of People Who Would Sell You Isuzu Vehicles back in the 1990s. This was mine:
From the doors forward, this was pretty much the exact same as an Amigo, but where my truck had an all-business truck bed, the Amigo had seats and a soft top and a lot of potential for fun.
I mean, look at that thing! I even like the clunky way they made those rear shoulder belts work, with the pair of rounded-triangular tubes back there. And you have to respect the novel CHMSL solution, giving the third brake lamp its own little rollbar on the roof!
These were just useful, fun little machines. You could easily commute to work in them – these rode well and were pretty comfortable, at least based on my experience with the pickup variant – they were small and easy to park and maneuver, they could haul a decent amount of stuff with the rear seat removed, like a little truck, and you could carry three other friends in near-convertible-like open-ness, going off-road as desired thanks to the four-wheel drive.
These were Swiss Army Knife vehicles, and I don’t know if anything like this is available new today. The Jeep Gladiator is too big to really be like this, and it’s the only open-top truck-like thing on the market now. A cut-down two-door Ford Maverick could be adapted to something like this, but I don’t see Ford doing that any time soon, sadly.
The truncated truck needs to come back. These were a good example of how fun cars could be before everything had to get so stupidly “premium.” I miss when cars could just be a bit silly. For example, look at this late ’90s Amigo commercial:
It’s a parody of this classic Slinky commercial, in case you’re not as miserably aged as I am and don’t remember this:
Also: holy shit, Slinkies were clever! It’s just a spring, a helical spring, repurposed into a toy. A naval engineer saw some coiled wires fall off a shelf and sort of “walk” and that inspired these things. He experimented with the right kind of steel to make the springs from, and boom it was a hit. Later he left the company and became a missionary, but his (then divorced) wife kept it going, well into the plastic Slinky era.
I miss these sort of fun cars. I think our overall mental health as a nation would improve if there were cheap cut-down pickups with back seats and soft tops in fun colors, just out there in the world.
Oh! And also, because I think one commenter kept bitching about it, I’m trying a new variant of the Cold Start graphical bug. Do we prefer this one? Let me know!
It seems critical that the Amigo was built on an existing vehicle platform. In response to the comments about keeping such a vehicle inexpensive and probably low volume – there won’t be enough money to develop a unique platform. So… what vehicles could get a factory modification to become the modern “amigo”? Is that even possible in the modern world of integrated everything vehicle design?
I’d love to see something like the Hyundai Santa Cruz with a fully removable mid-gate, hard and soft bed cap options, and a floor rail system extending from the cab back through the bed. The rear seats would attach to the rail system, could slide from right behind the front seats all the way back into the bed, and accessory systems could be sold that mount to the rails. Through in a giant sunroof (also removable) and you would have options from a 4 seater enclosed cab to an SUV type layout to an open, seats in the bed option. Also more storage capability
The midgate is the critical component I think…
I’d like to have an Amigo these days, but I’d really love to have a Slinky wife.
My 1st gen S-10 was mechanically an Isuzu. I loved that truck. It would have made an amazing “shortened truck convertible “. STC
ASC made a dealer-installed removable hardtop kit for two door 1st gen S-10 Blazers:
s10 Blazer with a factory removable top? | S-10 Forum
I would love to find one.
^^This. Like a K5 Blazer but an S-10
Just look at the amazing new Cold Start Graphic! Wonderful, incredible, edible?
Perhaps one of the greatest disappointments about the upcoming Scout is that it is not a return to the original form that would place it in this category.
I think “Utility Convertible” might be a better term than “Truncated Truck” but they both work. My favorite kind of vehicle either way.
It is a sad world with them gone.
I dearly miss my ‘86 4Runner.
I miss the Pathfinders of that era. The first gen had amazing styling (loved the nose and wheels, especially) and some innovative technology, like being able to go between 2WD and 4WD, on the fly.
The one I drove (a company vehicle) was the V-6 and it wasn’t exactly fast, but it was very sure-footed in snow and mud. The company had a fleet of 10 or so and they were relatively trouble-free. I think all of them made it to 200K+ without an engine or transmission blowing up. I should have bought one when they were being replaced.
This vehicle, along with it’s name (Amigo), simply comes from a more optimistic time.
It’d be neat if we could have such things again.
Yes, everything seemed to be going well. Communism was dead, the stock market was up and the biggest scandal was a possible hummer in the Oval Office. Please take me back…
I try not to do the classic “things were so much better back then” because that’s rarely true. But boy it’s hard not to look back and want to relive it, lol.
The pendulum swings both ways. Hopefully it starts going back the other way soon.
“I guess you could get one at your local Building Full of People Who Would Sell You Isuzu Vehicles back in the 1990s.”
My first job back in California in 1993 after I exited the USAF and returned stateside in was in one of those buildings – it was called the San Francisco Autocenter.
I sold Rodeos to people who couldn’t afford Pathfinders, much less 4Runners – and Troopers to people who recognized their inherent superiority to the Nissans and Toyotas, or didn’t want to stretch for the rare Land Cruiser we’d get in.
Amigos: Those were a harder sell in The City. For obvious reasons.
The Trooper II was a legend.
The Trooper (which oddly came after the Trooper II – Perhaps Jason can do an investigation into this anomaly) was a much more advanced and comfortable machine.
About certain I was introduced to the Trooper II. Square, ’70s ’80s body and and fully angular inside. It was older in the mid ’90s. Seemed rugged as all hell.
That’s the Trooper II
It came as a 2 door and 4 door – I believe in the same body shell/wheelbase.
Trooper was boxy, but rounded off.
It came in a LWB 4 door, and a fairly-rare SWB 2 door that I don’t believe came Stateside – but was the basis for the Vehicross.
there is one for sale in my neighborhood, and it is PERFECT. its been perfectly kept. If i didnt already have a silly “fun” suv i would already own it.
I want a first gen Rav4 convertible so bad! An Amigo would work too, but wouldn’t be my first choice. I parked next to a Geo Tracker convertible this morning too which made me happy. I freaking love all of these style cars and need to own one one day.
As for the cold start, I liked the old one better, but it’s not something I feel passionately about either way.
The first GEN RAV4 always reminded me of the high top sneaker and I mean that a good way
I mean the Bronco and Wrangler are kind of this thing, just need a tailgate instead of a swing gate. But yeah cheaper ones from more makes would be nice. I could see Hyundai trying it with the Santa Cruz.
I liked the old cold start better, ask 40 commenters which of 40 icons they like you’ll get 40 answers so you do you.
Addendum, on the topic of cold start, maybe using a variant of the cold engine light? Thermometer in the ocean, or as my wife calls it, “that little ship”.
My family always called it the Mayflower.
On an unrelated note, have you ever noticed how the Mayflower moving company symbol, from a distance, looks like a fist flipping you off?
I can definitely see that on the Mayflower logo. Not as bad as Kane Logististics trucking though…they really haven’t read the source material.
I was hoping Toyota was going to bring back the open top 4runner. No luck…
Instead they just tease with the Surf concept. I’d buy that.
I think the biggest challenge with making a modern Amigo would be cost. Can you satisfy the government’s requirements and include the features consumers demand while significantly undercutting the Wrangler? If the Amigo’s price gets within even a few grand of the Wrangler I think most of the potential buyers will choose the bigger vehicle with that coveted 4 letter word stamped on it.
It looks like the starting price for a Wrangler is about $32,000. Whether you can actually find one or if there will be incentives is another matter. So for a new Amigo to sell I would guess you need a starting price of no more than $25,000 and maybe $27,000 for a base 4×4. That’s going to be hard to do with something that can actually go off-road. You could keep costs down by making it a crossover, but then you’ve eliminated the one thing that would make it stand out against many other tall fat station wagons.
But, but … I want this toy at Shitbox Showdown prices.
Don’t we all, my friend. Or should I say… Amigo?
I thought about driving across the country for the Amigo featured a while back.
A few of us in college (gawd about 30 years) considered buying a used Trooper, pooling cash and just heading west for a summer. I was the natural mechanic and we had someone to cook. I’m still not sure if we chose wisely or poorly not going.
Well son, the funny thing about regret is that it’s better to regret things you have done than things you haven’t. And if your mom calls…
IIRC was a 3 am conversation while all 3 sheets. Nonetheless we found a cheap Trooper II for sale and had grand plans… Probably would have made it from Ohio to Nebraska and seen nothing anyway.
Frivolous vehicles will only happen when times are prosperous and money is cheap. Manufacturers need money to develop low-volume products that might not even sell enough to break even on costs. When such vehicles are affordable to people who *want* them (as opposed to needing them for practical transportation).
Sadly, none of this is the case, currently. On top of that, add in US safety regulations, which preclude sales of some of the frivolous vehicles (Jimny, etc.) that are available in other parts of the world.
This is a good if depressing point. The market segment that could have splurged on an impractical but fun trucklet 30 years ago can barely keep the lights on today. And you’re definitely not going to sell them to people who can drop $50,000 or more on a Bronco or Wrangler as their fun vehicle.
I remember that Amigo commercial, but it reminded me of Ren & Stimpy, not Slinky: https://youtu.be/8-9scNP5KWk?si=zV2GivcwqZf2khdT
I loved Ren & Stimpy… so irreverant! Log was inspired by Slinky. So it all ties together.
It’s better than bad, it’s good!
All kids love Log!
This makes me want to strap on the Happy Happy Joy Joy helmet.
Isn’t that a song about a whale?
I’m pretty sure it’s about teaching your grandmother to suck eggs.
Just don’t whiz on the electric fence. Or press the shiny red button.
From Blammo!
I didn’t know it at the time, but looking back on it now, in the 70’s we must have all been under the influence of powerful drugs. How else to explain that kind of glee over a spring, not to mention those pants. Goodness, just burn all the pics of me from that era.
I had those pants in the early 70’s when I was that age.
They were my favorites.
Moar Plaid Pants!
The Slinky is sort of the original fidget toy, with bonus other oddly-amusing modes. If it were just invented today, it would probably be all over the “oddlysatisfying” subreddit.
That PUP looks a tad overloaded, but I love and miss these types of vehicles. We had an old rented Suzuki Jimney on one of the Greek islands last summer. How can you NOT be happy in such a fun toy.
A two door Bronco would fit the bill, wouldn’t it?
OK Jason, you don’t just drop that particular photo of your truck with no context. I kinda feel like maybe you’ve used it before? But anyway, explain, please!
He did talk about it on the old lighting site. It was some art project from when he lived in LA.
Jason comes across warm and approachable, but you don’t mess with the Torch! He’s a pixel packing Mono Flutter! I’ve heard frightening stories of chainsaws too.
He kinda buried the lede there. Are those Space Invaders?
Yes. Torch mentioned it a while back in another article.
https://makezine.com/article/craft/photography-video/how-to-build-giant-space-invaders-as-public-art/
Building stuff competently out of wood is some kind of sorcery, isn’t it? Just to cover that last 5% between “hacked together” and “crafted.”
Isn’t the Jeep Wrangler 2 door this?
Yeah, I was surprised DT hadn’t inserted an editorial objection.
I loved the Amigo back then. 14-year-old me wanted one bad. The raked rear roofline worked so well, just as it did on the 1st-generation Pathfinder 2-door. They were like a bigger, more stable Samurai, and were kinder to your friends than the rear-facing plastic seats in the bed of a BRAT. They also got extra points for the oh-so-’90s graphics packages that were available on them. There are still a few running around my area of NC, but not many.
Not truck based, but the first gen RAV4 was the same way, drop the top, blast around the beach, top up and back to work.
I thought about that, but wanted to stick to the cut-down pickup ones. but yes!
I know someone who bought a soft-top, 2-door manual 1st-gen RAV4 as a daily driver, because she wanted to keep the miles off her AW11 MR2. Yeah I know some rad people.
The Jeep CJ was the original. You can still get a Wrangler two door to fit the bill or a two door Bronco which is built on the Ranger platform.
The Hyundai Santa Cruz is pretty close.. but no seats in back.
Also fun fact. The Amigo: is for sun and love an joy, and it’s fun for a girl and a boy!
So close with the Gladiator, when it’s a stretched Wrangler (of which you can still get the fun two-door variant). So, yes, Chrysler very much went the opposite way, and truckified their toy rather than making a toy from their truck, but I still think it counts.
Also, if we’re allowing that, we could probably sneak the new Bronco in too, since it owes so much to the Ranger (if not its body).
Still, while the moment has passed for Millennials to have any fun in their youth, can we start a fund to overpay Gen Z so they can waste money on fun stuff like stupid 2-doors they can only drive for a few years before settling down?