Commercial vehicles make up much of the backbone of America’s workforce. They’re the vehicles delivering materials to worksites, getting goods to customers, and helping business owners and tradespeople get their jobs done. As the world converts from internal combustion power to electricity, the humble work truck will be following suit. Bollinger thinks it has the perfect solution using today’s technology with the B4, a Class 4 electric commercial truck for local and regional businesses.
I got to test out Bollinger’s chassis cab validation builds out at Mcity at the University of Michigan. Mcity is a simulated city and highway proving ground often used for the development of autonomous vehicles. It’s also a closed course, perfect to set some journalists loose in prototype electric commercial trucks for shenanigans.
(Full Disclosure: Bollinger invited me out to Mcity to test all of its B4 truck validation builds. I paid for my own travel and the Red Bulls needed to jump-start my body after waking up at 3 a.m.)
Bollinger Motors
Some of you are probably scratching your head right now. Bollinger? Isn’t that the company trying to build an ultra-square, ultra-utilitarian EV off-roader shown below? You know, the very same off-roader with a frunk that our Jason Torchinsky may or may not have invented back in 2013? Yes, this is the same Bollinger that wanted to sell you the boxy B1 SUV and the equally rectangular B2 Pickup. However, those trucks are now postponed indefinitely. Instead, Bollinger Motors now wants to make a dent in the emerging market of electric commercial vehicles.
Bollinger Motors was founded in Hobart, New York in 2015. The company name comes from its entrepreneur founder, Robert Bollinger. At the time, Bollinger said, “Trucks have had the same design flaws for a hundred years and someone needs to do something about it.” His trucks were going to be different; Bollinger said he was going to build the “world’s first all-electric on- and off-road sport utility truck.”
Mind you, this was years before the Tesla Cybertruck was a glimmer in Elon Musk’s eyes, before Rivian pivoted to trucks, before the Ford F-150 Lightning, before the GMC Hummer EV, and before other startups.
Bollinger’s truck ideas rose from a need. See, Bollinger’s enjoyed a colorful career working for Manhattan ad agencies before pivoting to an organic hair and skincare company then finally landing at co-founding a grass-fed cattle farm. While running the farm, Bollinger felt that there really wasn’t a truck out there that was both a practical farm vehicle and a fun off-road toy. This motivated Bollinger to fulfill a lifelong dream and he created Bollinger Motors with the idea of creating a heavy-duty Sport Utility Truck that got work done during the week and had fun on the weekends.
In 2018, the company moved to Ferndale, Michigan, to grow its team and take advantage of proximity near automotive suppliers, engineering talent, and potential manufacturing partners. A year later, Bollinger moved again to Oak Park, Michigan. Bollinger had been working on the B1 SUV and B2 Pickup for years. Development started with a team of engineers who lived with each other in a bunkhouse before the truck was first unveiled in 2017. Bollinger then missed its delivery targets multiple times as development continued. The company also briefly flirted with a panel van concept and chassis cabs.
Then, in January 2022, Bollinger decided to shelve the project, refunding preorders and instead shifting to commercial trucks. In an interview with the Detroit News, Robert Bollinger indicated the company had been developing a commercial platform for a while and that platform was getting a lot of interest from large fleets. Given the interest and the fact that most Bollinger employees were already on the commercial side, the pivot made sense. Bollinger didn’t want to give up on his dream and he hopes to come back to the epic EV pickup idea one day.
That’s where we are today. Bollinger has plans to put the Class 4 B4 cabover truck on the market in Q2 of next year. Following that, the company wants to put a bigger Class 5 commercial truck on the road. This time, I think Bollinger will be successful in getting to market, and if so, it might be due to a shift in how the company is developing its vehicles.
The B4
When Bollinger started, it set out to build the first and the best electric trucks from the ground up. Bollinger was going as far as building those trucks by hand. The B4 is not that. Instead of trying to do everything itself, Bollinger has collaborated with various firms on much of the truck from the cab down to the chunky battery. Bollinger’s engineers tell me that with the B4, it worked with as many suppliers as possible to keep “inventions” down to a minimum. As a result, the B4 is a realistic approach to electrification and one that seems like it could be put on the road tomorrow. At least, that’s how it felt from the driver seat of the B4.
Let’s start with the most visible part of the Bollinger B4, the cab.
At first, I thought Bollinger scored a deal with Isuzu for some N-Series cabs. But if you look closely, Bollinger’s cabs look close to Isuzu cabs, but they aren’t exact. Bollinger tells me that finding a supplier for cabs wasn’t easy, as established brands didn’t offer up their cabs. That makes sense. Isuzu is already working on its own electric cabover truck, maybe it’s not interested in helping the competition.
Bollinger tells me the company had to find a supplier in China for its cabs. What came out of the other side is actually pretty impressive. The cab feels solid, with some of the best visibility you’ll find in a modern vehicle, comfortable seats, and what feel like durable materials. The doors close with the kind of thud you’d expect from taking control of a big vehicle.
Inside, you’ll find that Bollinger hasn’t reinvented controls, either. The buttons and stalks do exactly what you’d expect them to. The only quirk is the shifter. It looks like a manual, but it works somewhat like a Prius. Push the shifter to the left for Drive, leave it in the middle for Neutral, or move it back for Reverse. There is no Park, but a physical parking brake handle.
Sort of amusing was the fact that the cab had an actual ashtray and a cigarette lighter. Briefly, it felt like a time warp back to the ’90s. I’m told that’s a quirk of Bollinger getting its cabs from its supplier. Interior materials felt on the cheaper side and the key to turn on the B4 felt like it was made out of the kind of plastic a McDonald’s Happy Meal toy is. That said, the interior felt like it would last years of hard work.
Keep in mind that these are just validation builds. Part of getting potential customers and media into these trucks was to get feedback on what works and what doesn’t so the company can further refine the product before it goes into production.
Its Frame
That cab is attached to a frame that Bollinger has designed in-house but is constructed by Metalsa, a Tier 1 light and heavy truck frame supplier with a history of working with Detroit’s Big Three, Volvo, Paccar, and more. Bollinger says its frame rails are 40 inches wide, compared to about 32 inches or so found in ICE Class 4 trucks. For example, the Isuzu NPR-HD has rails 33 inches wide.
Bollinger says having those wide rails allows for the company to fit the truck’s entire drive system within and below the frame rails. The trucks come with two batteries and they’re stacked so that their weight hangs really low. Mostly everything is either at or below frame level. With an ICE equivalent, the big and heavy engine would be under the cab with a substantial portion above the frame.
Another difference with the Bollinger frame is its sharp taper up front. Bollinger says its frame allows for the trucks to turn practically within their own length. Currently, Bollinger’s site says 44 feet for turning circle.
The engineers also say that since there’s no ICE powerplant and its associated ancillaries, a B4’s upfit, be it a flatbed, service body, or box, can be closer to the cab. Coupled with Bollinger’s one and only wheelbase, 158 inches, Bollinger believes the B4 to be one of the ultimate vehicles for tight maneuvers. Bollinger says the choice of the 158-inch wheelbase is strategic. In other trucks, you can get different wheelbases to fit your needs. Bollinger decided on a wheelbase that it thinks will fit most customers and thus streamline production.
Its Battery
Saddled roughly in the middle of the frame is a pair of lithium iron phosphate batteries by Our Next Energy (ONE) in Novi, Michigan. The B4 has two of these packs. Each pack is 79 kWh and adds up to 158 kWh of power. Together in the B4, they add up to 800V and each pack weighs 1,212 pounds. ONE says its Aries LFP batteries offer a scalable architecture and the packs are dependent on iron rather than nickel or cobalt.
Further, the company says its packs are good for 5,000 charge cycles and there shouldn’t be a problem with charging those batteries to 100 percent over and over. Bollinger’s engineers tell me that the choice for LFP batteries involved multiple factors including reliability, the lack of cobalt and nickel, and good performance in the kind of wide temperature swings the Midwest goes through.
Bollinger says these batteries are good for a range of 110 to 200 miles, depending on the upfit of the truck and how it is used. Currently, the trucks can charge from dead to 100 percent in nine hours on a Level 2 charger or 1.5 hours on Level 3. Clearly, these trucks aren’t for operators trying to go a long distance. Instead, Bollinger is pitching these trucks at city delivery companies, landscaping firms, utility companies, tree services, parts shops, and similar. Really, Bollinger’s prospective customers are businesses that need to haul goods and gear around cities and neighborhoods. They aren’t hauling packages between Chicago and Detroit, but maybe making a parts run from Chicago to Rockford or cleaning up storm damage in a Milwaukee neighborhood.
Bollinger believes that trucks like these are the best use case for current EV tech and infrastructure. Like electric school buses, the Bollinger B4 trucks can come back to a depot to charge every night before going back out on the road again. But if the trucks need to charge in the field, Bollinger says they can hook up to a public charger. Right now, the charge port is located behind the cab, but Bollinger is testing various public chargers to see if that’s an optimal location.
Most of the trucks at the event had exposed batteries, but Bollinger says the production models will come with protective shields. Those batteries power a Dana e-Axle good for 363 HP and 702 lb-ft torque. Bollinger says going with the Dana axle eliminates driveshafts and external parts as it’s an all-in-one drivetrain. Behind the motor is a Terzo e-PTO rated for 30 HP. Bollinger says potential customers might use the power take off to power a bucket truck or for other hydraulic power needs.
Together, all of this adds up to a truck, which is constructed by Roush, with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of 15,500 pounds, a payload of around 7,100 pounds, and the ability for an upfitter to slap on a 16-foot to 18-foot body of their choice. The payload is an estimate, but Bollinger admits that due to the heavy batteries, its truck will have less payload than ICE competition. The difference Bollinger is expecting is about 600 pounds less payload than a comparable ICE Class 4 truck.
At first, Bollinger also wasn’t expecting its customers to tow anything, but some clients, especially the landscapers and tree services, want to be able to tow equipment. So, Bollinger is expecting the production version to be able to tow about 6,000 pounds.
I’ve been saying “Class 4” a bit through this and to explain that a little bit, the class here is referring to GVWR, or your truck plus what it’s hauling. A Class 1 truck is under 6,000 pounds like a Chevy Colorado or Toyota Tacoma while a Class 8 goes up to and beyond 80,000 pounds like a Tesla Semi or a Freightliner Cascadia. Class 4 trucks are between 14,001 pounds and 16,000 pounds.
Driving The Bollinger B4
So, with all of that data in mind, how does it drive? Now, I love driving big vehicles whenever I get the chance. My Nova Bus RTS-06 has a GVWR of 39,000 pounds and earlier this year Ford let me tow a 40,000-pound trailer. Aside from those, I’ve logged lots of hours driving 25,999-pound GVWR box trucks, a 17,000-pound school bus, an International 4300 box truck, and several points in between. When someone grumbles that they have to rent some big truck, I’m usually the first to volunteer to drive the things.
Something common with all of those vehicles is that they’re slow and they have a center of gravity high enough that under no circumstance would you just crank the wheel all of the way just to see what happens. I doubt my bus would roll, but those box trucks would probably make me pucker.
The Bollinger B4 surprised me in how much it didn’t drive like a commercial truck. The Mcity proving ground was too small for me to really find the limits of the Bollinger trucks, but I got to do things with those trucks that I’d never try with my bus or any of the other trucks I’ve driven.
Out of the gate, I decided to punch the accelerator. The B4 moves like any other EV. It takes off with a satisfying kick of torque and the electric motor gets the speedometer rising way faster than you’d expect a commercial vehicle to go. I’m sure you’ve gotten stuck behind garbage trucks and the like at stoplights. Well, the B4 accelerates fast enough that it could be a garbage truck that is faster than you are between stoplights. The B4 is not “fast,” as in, it’s not going to pull your face’s skin back, but it’ll make a comparable diesel look like it’s sitting still. It’s fast enough that Bollinger tells me some customers want a power limiter so that drivers don’t have too much fun.
That quick dose of power is supported with surprisingly good handling. See, “handling” and “delivery truck” don’t tend to jive well. Try to go full lock and full throttle in a regular truck and you might have a bad day. Bollinger’s trucks have their center of gravity so low that the engineers actually encouraged going full lock while hard on the throttle. There was tons of body roll, sure, but the truck felt planted even when I was at full lock and pushing the truck harder and harder. The tires gave up traction long before the truck felt unstable.
Bollinger also had me try to do a slalom, something else I wouldn’t normally bother doing in a delivery truck. Doing a slalom in the B4 was a ton of work because the truck requires a lot of turns to get from lock to lock, but I’ll be…the B4 actually performed admirably zipping back and forth. Honestly, I didn’t even know commercial tires could grip as well as they do until I tried getting a B4 to drift. Sadly, I was unsuccessful in that regard. Thankfully, the tires just give up and you get loads of understeer. The awesome part about all of this is that the steering is remarkably light, as in you could throw the B4 into a turn with your pinky finger.
While I was doing my testing, the Bollinger B4’s MobilEye driver assist system was warning about me departing lanes, as if that was the silliest thing I was doing. Indeed, these trucks will come with a suite of tech including a collision warning, lane departure warning, and a speed limit indicator. The trucks won’t stop or drive themselves, but it’s helpful tech. Also helpful is the truck’s regenerative braking, which can be set to strong enough that you don’t even need to hit the brake pedal to stop.
Fun, Practical, Realistic
When I finished driving the Bollinger B4, I left thinking that these are delivery trucks that want to moonlight as sports cars. I wonder how these would handle a lot closer to the ground and with a car body. A box truck shouldn’t be this fun to drive. Heck, I don’t think adding “hooning a box truck” was a thing I could say until today.
Of course, with that in mind, most operators aren’t going to see if they could make their Bollinger B4 do donuts, but deliver the dough. The fact that it could perform under such conditions is just icing on the cake.
As I said before, Bollinger expects the B4 to go on sale in the second quarter of next year. Right now, the company is still refining the B4. The customer and media drives will be used to further improve the vehicle. For example, my suggestion would be to change the steering ratio so that the wheel doesn’t require what feels like ten turns to get from lock to lock. Fewer turns of the wheel would make the B4’s good agility even better.
As of right now, Bollinger doesn’t have a price and doesn’t even have an estimate. If Bollinger can aim for a price on par with the competition, I think the company can be successful. On paper and in my test drives, the B4 is the kind of agile truck you want to use in a city and the EV powertrain should bring down operating costs. The Bollinger B4 doesn’t reinvent the electric truck, instead, it leverages the limitations of current tech for a vehicle that should pay dividends.
(Photos: Author, unless otherwise noted.)
Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.
Why have such a gigantic gear lever for three functions? Most auto heavy trucks use button or knob selectors to save space, that shifter boot just looks like it’s totally in the way.
My inclination is that there’s already a spot for it in the cab, and they can implement this style cheaper than another alternative.
Ah, looks like somebody else is doing an electric box truck using the same Chinese manufacturer for the cab: https://news.mullenusa.com/mullen-to-unveil-first-two-ev-commercial-products-at-ntea-work-truck-show-this-week
Mullen owns 60% of Bollinger
Ah, that would make sense!
I really wonder what value proposition Bollinger is bringing to the table in producing these trucks. The battery is from One+, the e-axle is from Dana, the frame is built by Metalsa, the cab is some knock-off junk they bought off Alibaba, and they hired Roush to build them. My guess is that Roush also did the integration engineering. Bollinger, what would you say, you do here?
Disclaimer – I’m not really picking on Bollinger here, specifically. Everything I said above applies to the vast majority of the current crop of commercial EV companies that aren’t traditional OEM’s – they don’t own any infrastructure or have any dealer network, they haven’t invented anything novel (IP), they have to buy everything from tier 1 suppliers and hire someplace to build their products – and every single one of those entities are taking nice healthy slices out of the non-vertically-integrated pie. That all adds up to a poorly supported product with no novel features that will never be able to compete on cost with legacy OEM offerings.
In this particular case, why would I want to buy a Bollinger class 4 box truck when I could go (say) to my trusty Isuzu dealer and pick up an electric N-series truck instead? Keep in mind that buying decisions in the commercial vehicle space are 100% driven by economics (return on investment, total cost of ownership, availability rates) unlike personal vehicles.
I would agree this is likely not sustainable (I said something similar on a Fisker article recently), but if they start with all off-the-shelf stuff and swap in custom-designed components as they can it might be a viable path to viability. TBH, even the big OEMs are doing similar things – the first gen EVs often used third-party electric motors and such, but as R&D has continued and they’ve found ways to optimize those components they’ve swapped in their in-house ones.
Will it work? If I could predict the future that well I’d have made a billion dollars in the stock market and be sending this from my own private island. Alas, I’ll have to settle for sending this on my lunch break from a kind of noisy city park. 🙂
I work for a truck body builder. (Shameless plug for Brown Cargo Van in Lawrence, KS!) I’d echo the comments on frame width. Everybody builds at 34″ outside dimension so that it’ll fit on any commercial chassis. There are exceptions of course. And, we’re small enough that we’d gladly build one to fit 40″. The only electric truck experience I’ve had is with a run of Electric Peterbilts we did for a customer in CA. Honestly, I wasn’t too impressed. I’m sure it’s new model issues, but they were constantly throwing codes and shutting systems down. Pete, however kept the standard frame width, and mounted the batteries outside the frame. Next set we are supposed to get will be Freightliners. We’ll see how they do.
They didn’t think people would want to tow things, while targeting (amongst other industries) landscapers, who are constantly towing things? My confidence in Bollinger halved when I read that.
Did they have any examples loaded to max GVWR for you to compare? Lots of things feel zippy before you get the laws of physics involved.
EVs feel zippy because they have massive instant torque to deal with physics.
I think it’s rather refreshing to see a BEV company making very sensible business and product development decisions rather than feeding grandiose ideas to VC.
No Silicon Valley psychosis.
The cab looks like a Chinese variant of perhaps an older Hyundai EX cab. https://trucknbus.hyundai.com/global/en/products/truck/ex-series
I like that Bollinger dropped their fancy “design” ideas about just ripping off an old Land Rover Defender, and went another way, with just some generic south eastern truck cab (like in the old times when Ford used Renault cabs and MAN used VW cabs..)
But calling yourself bad ass on the side of your own truck is just bad taste 🙁
I’ll give them 1 out of 6 Ichiban Moto stickers.
Re: acceleration. It could easily have passkey accessible menus that control acceleration, top speed, etc. Not unlike an electric forklift.
I want one.
Funny… I was delivering consumer garbage to one of the useless strip mall stops on my route today, in my class 6 diesel truck (braggadocious intonation intended).
The kid (youth? young man?) working the dock, helping me unload the garbage, told me he was going part time.
“Why?”
“Going to school.”
“What are you going to school for?”
“Trade school. Mechanic.”
*big grin on my face*
“Good plan.”
As I released the air brakes with their satisfying whoosh at the push of a knob and pulled away from the dock, I found myself thinking about the future of his and my particular trades.
I wanted to tell him to make sure his schooling focused on modern technology, and what is to come for mechanics in the battery powered age.
Or to focus on diesel engines.
(are you ranting on the interweb again)
(yes, it’s fine, I’ll get to my point)
Then I was questioning my own career choices as I pulled away. Thinking to myself… It’s gonna be a while before battery power can replace a diesel engine for long hauls and longevity?
Anyway… I get back to the shop and this article pops up.
Okay, so what I’M hearing is…
…box truck racing series.
100 laps, with a different cargo load every 10 laps.
As the driver of a large passenger van. I really, really, would love to see a full size van/mini bus out of this thing.
The larger than average people movers seem to be the last to transition even though we could have the largest benefit.
The short run trucking industry produces a surprisingly large percentage of emissions due to stop/go, diesel, and running all day every day. So people moving doesn’t have the largest eco benefit.
But I also have a fondness for people movers. Mercedes is coming out with new EV line, be great of Brightdrop had a people version, and Ford, Hopefully companies like Canoo will succeed in reaching mass production. Europe is big on people vans – I’d bet there are EV versions already for sale.
There is a Canoo running around our neighborhoods. It’s trippy.
I’m an engineer at a truck/bus manufacturer. I’m salivating over the wider frame. I’ve said many times in my career that most of our problems could be solved by widening the frame a few inches.
Before diesel emissions, packaging wasn’t an issue. Now with EGR coolers, large diameter heat shielded exhaust, larger radiators, DEF systems, extra coolant lines, wire harnesses for all the emissions equipment, aftertreatment devices and probably a few other things, it’s tough to fit everything between the rails! Especially the engine with all the emissions related parts bolted onto it. I6 engines used to fit no problem. Now we actually need to do engine roll analysis.
When we get to build emissions free export units the engine block is the same but there is barely anything bolted to it! Everything fits great and the engine is very easy to work on!
Also, we dabble in electric trucks/buses. Some off the shelf batteries are wider than standard frames. That’s why Bollinger made theirs wider.
Why don’t other manufacturers widen the frames if it’s so beneficial? Is it just “the way we’ve always done it”?
(not trying to be snarky, honest question)
There are millions of dollars worth of tooling and fixtures associated with the existing frame width. It’s an epic undertaking for an existing manufacturer to retool. Bollinger started from scratch so they needed to buy/make all that stuff anyway.
It’s about time the US started looking seriously at EV trucks. I live in Beijing and some the heavy EVs are getting so long in the tooth, they have dystopian patina already appearing.
Additionally, being in traffic with an electric box truck is an enjoyable experience, I like to keep the windows open and they are silent, don’t smell bad, unlike their diesel counterparts. Then, when the light turns green, they accelerate so quick that I’ve been outrun by more than a few!
I live in the UK, and I’ve already seen a few electric trucks. I’ve seen even more electric vans though, I reckon at least 10% of the deliveries I see on my street are EVs. That’s gone up from less than 1% three years ago.
I think they are. Rivian, Brightdrop, Canoo, Ford, are all making EV last mile vehicles. BYD and others are making buses and work vehicles like garbage trucks and fire engines. Others are developing trucks targeting super short range – yard trucks, and others are making park and recreation type small trucks (AYRO). It is happening.
Great read! It’s fascinating to get a sneak peak at some of the more “mundane” aspects of the EV transition that will probably have more of an effect on people’s daily lives than the latest luxe EV showpieces that automakers have been focusing on
Mercedes, you should try to get in touch with Lion Electric to try their trucks and buses. They just opened a factory in Joliet, IL saving you the drive to St. Jerome, Quebec.
Full disclosure, I worked for them for about 6 months. Great people with a good product line.
The shifter is a miss. Just throw it on the dash so you have room to put more landscaper workers in the cab.
Having non-standard frame rail spacing is going to limit upfitters since they won’t want to make a bed/body for a one off.
Yup that is the reason that everyone uses the same basic frame width, so that their trucks can accept and any/all of the off the shelf bodies on the market.
City delivery is probably the absolute best case for rapid fleet electrification out there. Vehicles that usually do less than 100 miles a day, sit unused for at least 8-12 hours a day (perfect for even level 2 recharging). The lower maintenance costs (no oil changes, etc) and lower operating costs especially if you’re on a grid that does off-peak pricing where you end up charging these overnight at lowest electricity pricing just make these a no brainer. If these can end up in a remotely reasonable price bracket and Bollinger some how does some partnering to ensure there is a good service network to back them up I can’t see how Bollinger won’t just print money.
On a side note:
I missed the by-line at first, but knew this was Mercedes just from the voice. I’m so glad Mercedes moved on from that old spot and ended up at the best site for auto-obsessives on the internet.
This is such a great example of consistency I wish I was still teaching just so I could walk in tomorrow and use it in class. That ‘icing on the cake’ after the baking idioms was just ‘chef’s kiss’ perfect.
Thanks Mercedes for bringing GREAT content (you’ve greatly helped me narrow my search for an RV) and bringing quality writing along with it.
When I was in college, I worked for a nursery and they had 2 Isuzu NPR cabover trucks with hydraulic liftgates in the back. This would be a perfect electric replacement for them. Even during Christmas when we were delivering cut trees all day we never put more than 100 miles on it.
We have a pretty good hill at an intersection near where I live, DOT is putting a rotary in… So essentially stopping 18wheelers and other larger trucks like these and then asking them to go up a hill at 45mph right after(spoiler alert–when they do that now they go up it at 10-20mph). An electric motor in trucks for short spurts that can brake regen would be cool.
So, Mercedes, what camper are you scheming to put behind that cab? If they really can get 200 miles per charge out of them, that’s getting toward local campability I’m thinking.
Although the tanks may be an issue: looks like you would have to do them like pontoons down each side.
I’m wondering if more steering turns lock-to-lock affords better maneuvering precision in tight quarters like crowded alley docking? What I’d really like to ask Bollinger, though, is whether milk from grass-fed cows is highmogenized.
I drive a class 6 truck three days a week. I would prefer less steering turns lock-to-lock in tight quarters.
Going highway speeds in a high center of gravity truck loaded with freight is where tighter steering gets scary.
The tighter turning radius of the Bollinger would definitely come in handy though.
I say swing and a miss. The COE has a few things works good on paper but sitting over the front axle is torture to drive and death to drivers in an accident. Bollinger missed on the old as Farming isn’t a weekday job have fun on the weekends. And you don’t risk destroying necessary equipment. I also think instead of one rear axle wheel length adopt the same adjustable axles semis have.
Ever heard of a suspended cab, Dave?
No
I, too, would describe myself as a sports car with the body of a commercial truck.
This just might be the most Autopian comment I’ve ever read 🙂
COTW at least!
So this truck is what comes next, but they’re calling it the B4? Didn’t the founder work in an ad agency?
I see what you did there. LOL