Home » It’s Time We Stopped Clowning On Convertibles

It’s Time We Stopped Clowning On Convertibles

This Is Good
ADVERTISEMENT

The automotive kingdom certainly has its fair share of misunderstood genres. The sport utility truck, the coupe SUV, even the sedan to an extent. However, as the decades have rolled by, cabriolets became one of the most misunderstood of all vehicle subtypes. Even though they were once common fixtures of the roads, as a society, we seem to have forgotten what they’re all about. Despite the vehicles themselves being at least mildly interesting, we’ve all heard the insults that get bandied about for drivers of convertibles. Mid-life crisis. Golfist. Poser.

Oh, and it often gets worse as the cars get faster. If a performance car offers the option of a fixed roof or a removable one, the one with the fixed roof is usually more desirable and the one with the ragtop is usually treated as a second-class vehicle. Why? Convertibles often cost more than their coupe equivalents, and people have proven willing to pay up for the privilege. What do these convertible buyers know that forum elitists don’t?

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

The truth is, they know a few things that are more overarching than outright technical expertise. They value experiences and involvement in the same way the slicktop, three-pedal-or-die brigade does, but their means of obtaining involvement are slightly different. Every convertible is, to at least some degree, an enthusiast car, it’s just that accepting this fact can be hard for some.

Access 1987 Ford Mustang Gt Convertible Neg Cn45001 156

Granted, the elitists’ talking points aren’t drawn from thin air. Forty years ago, the average unibody had the torsional rigidity of al dente spaghettini, and cutting the roof off was a surefire way to make the cowl shake over expansion joints like it just took a polar plunge. Automakers attempted to compensate by welding in heavy bracing, but those mostly bloated curb weights without curbing apocryphal stories of air vents violently ejecting themselves from dashboards. However, we aren’t living in 1984 anymore, and for the past 20-some-odd years, convertibles have grown substantially more rigid. Sure, they’ve also grown substantially heavier, but in the real world, how much will you notice?

ADVERTISEMENT

Porsche 911 Carrera 4s Cabriolet 2019 1600 3c

You may still be able to make this argument if you do a trackday every month and have teeth the shade of a freshly built model home’s walls, but most of us don’t commute to the office through carousel turns or think too much about what we eat in the context of lap times.

In fact, most of a typical car’s life will be spent sitting, followed by the daily grind on public roads at sensible speeds, and only a handful will ever turn a wheel on track. In the real world, with congestion and potholes and speed cameras conspiring to keep average speeds low, the sensations of letting the wind and sky in are more noticeable than a little extra chassis rigidity and a few dozen fewer pounds. It helps the car become an instrument of joy, and the Chrysler Sebring Convertible is one of the more telling examples from history.

Chrysler Sebring 2003 Images 4

Don’t get me wrong, the first-generation Chrysler Sebring was a perfectly okay car. Sure, the Ultradrive automatic gearbox wasn’t strong, but the Mitsubishi V6 was stout enough and the styling was perfectly handsome. When the second-generation model came along, it gained the abhorrent 2.7-liter Chrysler V6, frumpier styling, and a direct sedan version just to show everyone how truly uninspired the bones of the car were.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite this, the convertible variant took a subpar midsize sedan, removed two doors and a roof, and turned it into a little bit of an occasion. Sure, the interior was still an uncouth mishmash of shapes and materials, and the facelifted model still had the facial expression of a particularly bewildered rodent, but with the roof down and a breeze coming in, it was hard to care too much, wasn’t it? At that point, a dashboard is just a shelf for dust, after all.

Chrysler Sebring 2001 Pictures 6

Instead, drivers of these mediocre-at-best convertibles found themselves breathing in harmony with the universe, their senses fascinated by the machinations of Mother Nature. The rustling of hedges, the weight of the wind, an unfiltered view of 100 billion stars. A convertible reminds us that on a long enough timeline, we’re all just passing through, single-cell travelers in the universe’s largest terrarium. There’s a cathartic sense of insignificance that comes with such an experience, a freeing vulnerability that transcends metal and glass and reveals certain truths about humanity. Plus, it’s theoretically at least a little bit safer than a motorcycle, and you still get to meet some interesting people in the process.

Audi S3 Cabriolet 2015 1600 05

Sadly, going roof-down is something fewer and fewer people are able to experience. Drop-top choices have been steadily dwindling since the turn of the millennium, with no signs of that trend reversing. There’s no more Chrysler Sebring Convertible or Toyota Solara Convertible or Pontiac G6 Convertible. No more BMW 2 Series cabriolet, or Mercedes-Benz SLK, or Audi A3 cabriolet. Mitsubishi doesn’t offer a convertible in America anymore, nor does Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Honda, Infiniti, Nissan, Toyota, Volkswagen, or Volvo. Even Jaguar’s current convertible dies this year, with no guarantee of a replacement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ford Mustang Gt Convertible 2024 1600 03

If you’ve ever wanted a cabriolet, buy one, and don’t let the haters convince you otherwise. Better yet, if you’ve hated on convertibles for technical reasons in the past, I encourage you to take a step back and query whether or not the universe is about more than just objective engineering truths.

Yes, cutting the roof off a car can make it a bit heavier, a bit floppier, and a bit slower, but it can also make it better, for “better” can’t always be measured. Every incremental improvement in tin-top car rigidity will eventually become outmoded, so it’s worth approaching things with an open mind and trying to let the sun in for an experience that will always be timeless.

(Photo credits: BMW, Ford, Chrysler, Audi)

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
182 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
4 months ago

“al dente spaghettini”
So is this the same kind that David eats in the shower?

Wagonsarethebestanswer
Wagonsarethebestanswer
4 months ago

Since it was mentioned: I rented a Sebring convertible for several days in 1997. Drove it from Las Vegas to, and around, L.A. Then did an overnight run up the Pacific Coast Highway to San Francisco, with the top down all the way. It was an amazing experience, and the Sebring wasn’t terrible.

Ea Gregory
Ea Gregory
4 months ago

That reminds me, years ago we did a trip to Barcelona and after a week I rented a Peugeot convertible and we drove north into the south of France. The weather was perfect and we got to see several castles and some gorgeous beaux villages. I was shocked how little power that 4-cyl engine had though. I had scary moment when I realized we were about to pass our exit on the highway and I was in the left lane. In my car at home there’s always power, but the little Peugeot didn’t move any faster at all when I stomped on the gas. Had to go to the next exit and turn around.

Stephen Walter Gossin
Stephen Walter Gossin
4 months ago

This is the way.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
4 months ago

Everyone always talks about sunny days and convertibles, but I’m here to tell you that what is really great is driving convertibles at night. My top three convertibles at night scenarios are:

Driving in the Mojave desert with a full moon and the headlights turned off.

Driving across Kansas in a light rain storm on the interstate, didn’t get wet until I stopped for gas. The smells of the farms were amazing, now I know why dogs stick their noses out the window all the time.

Manhattan at night in the summer, it’s always a party even if it’s Tuesday.

Ea Gregory
Ea Gregory
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Love it. I’m right with you – there’s something magical about driving at night, especially nowhere near people. I love the drive out to Bend, Oregon, over the mountains and all around the volcanic peaks – it’s beautiful out there. The stars near Crater Lake are just astounding, so much so that I felt the danger of driving so diverted that I pulled of the road.

3WiperB
3WiperB
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Yep. My favorite time to drive the MGB is on a summer night.

Protodite
Protodite
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

NIGHT CONVERTIBLE IS THE BEST

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

I’d have to drive mine more often at night then!

I’m a believer that the best time to drive a soft top is early in the spring or late in the fall, when the air is cold, the road is dry and the sun shining. I love it especially through the autumn colors!

Justin Thiel
Justin Thiel
4 months ago

YES this right here is what i am dreaming about and why I want to get one. You hit the exact conditions i am after. A comfy sweater and heated seats on… but the top down

The Schrat
The Schrat
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

I was in the Mojave in March with a convertible and night driving with the top down was so damned pleasant.

Vb9594
Vb9594
4 months ago
Reply to  The Schrat

YES. Night driving and daytime during Autumn in New England are the two best times for a convertible.

Top down in blazing summer suuuuccckkksss.

MrLM002
MrLM002
4 months ago

I have and will continue to clown on every convertible without a waterproof interior.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

Just drill some quarter inch holes through the floors and you’re fine.

Roofless
Roofless
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

You know the top goes up, too, right?

MrLM002
MrLM002
4 months ago
Reply to  Roofless

Not always, and when it doesn’t it’s not fun in rain, snow, hail, etc. Unlike older cars with manual tops you’re dependent on some system that can fail and you cannot put the top up manually.

Roofless
Roofless
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

Sure, and when the car doesn’t start the mileage suffers, too.

MrLM002
MrLM002
4 months ago
Reply to  Roofless

Having a dead engine doesn’t allow for water damage unless where you parked your car floods.

Having a convertible top stuck down in a convertible without a waterproof interior when it rains, snows, etc. is a recipe for water damage.

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

It never happened to me in 8 years of ownership. And even then, no guts, no glory. It’s a risk I’m willing to take for what it gives me.

Richdelish
Richdelish
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

I’ve owned four convertibles over the last 20 or so years. That convertibles *need* a waterproof interior is a ludicrous assertion.

MrLM002
MrLM002
4 months ago
Reply to  Richdelish

How many miles have you put on them collectively?

Richdelish
Richdelish
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

I’d estimate about 320K miles. Three soft tops and one retractable hard top. Each one was/is a daily.

Last edited 4 months ago by Richdelish
MrLM002
MrLM002
4 months ago
Reply to  Richdelish

Never had a top fail?

Richdelish
Richdelish
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

Not once. Three Miatas and a Boxster.

Last edited 4 months ago by Richdelish
MrLM002
MrLM002
4 months ago
Reply to  Richdelish

How many of them had manual tops?

JumboG
JumboG
4 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

My automatic top BMW 330Ci has a backup manual way to raise or lower the top.

MrLM002
MrLM002
4 months ago
Reply to  JumboG

Nice!

The Schrat
The Schrat
4 months ago
Reply to  JumboG

The ultimate drenching machine.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
4 months ago

Compare the Renault-AMC Alliance and its convertible version. The convertible makes every trip an adventure. Well the steel roof one makes every trip an adventure too, but not in a good way.

Ea Gregory
Ea Gregory
4 months ago

Good article Thomas – my last car was a black manual Miata and I loved it. It was so small and apparently so black that I was hit THREE times. Once by a pedestrian running late to work (bloody, stomach turning!) , once by a drunk woman (I wasn’t even in the car!), and once by a guy returning his rental car he got when someone else hit him (I was sitting still in traffic!).

After that madness I sold it and bought a white Mercedes convertible. I love the car and (knocks on wood) no one has hit me yet.

FloridaMatt
FloridaMatt
4 months ago

I don’t know, I just keep buying (and driving) convertibles. Corvair turbo Corsa, c4 & c5 Corvettes, 3-series BMW, An SLK then a SL. RR Evoque, which would have been a great car if the audio system worked, and the designers hadn’t decided to disable voice recognition because it’s a convertible. Mustang, brief mistake of a C6, current Audi A5 which I expect to drive until someone makes as good or better EV convertible.

Farmer Meeple
Farmer Meeple
4 months ago
Reply to  FloridaMatt

I think it is one of those things that are easy to hate when you don’t own one. My first convertible was a new S2000. I only bought it because that was the only way to get one. Now I’m on my fourth ragtop and can’t imagine not having one.

Vic Vinegar
Vic Vinegar
4 months ago

At least for now, I’ve decided that if I plunk down the money and driveway space for a “toy”, it is going to be a convertible.

A hardtop convertible would be awesome if I weren’t convinced they would be nothing but trouble. Maybe the Volvo isn’t so bad.

If there were more targas out there, that would also be an acceptable solution.

Drew
Drew
4 months ago
Reply to  Vic Vinegar

I’m with you on the hardtop convertible. Every time an Eos comes up for sale near me at a reasonable price I consider it. Then I ask myself why the combination of VW reliability and a complex moving roof sounds appealing.

The Volvo does seem the better move, probably.

TDI in PNW
TDI in PNW
4 months ago

I see cheap, ~15 year old Volvo c70 convertibles that look pretty nice inside/out going for under 5k. I might have to buy one as a toy.

MATTinMKE
MATTinMKE
4 months ago
Reply to  TDI in PNW

Do it!

Jon Benet
Jon Benet
4 months ago
Reply to  TDI in PNW

I kinda want one too. You can even find the C70 T5’s for about 5k. Turbo charged and a retractable hard top. Would be a cool first car for a teenager.

Idiotking
Idiotking
4 months ago

My convertible is a truck, and I’ve owned it for 15 years. Before that, I had another for eight. No regrets.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
4 months ago

I think a lot of it is how people (as Jerry would say, not you, but other people) engage with their cars these days – the driving experience is no longer the primary goal.

To most, cars are now are rolling tech platforms, avatars of power and speed, and things that say something desirable about them. What they’re not is about engaging in the activity of driving.

And engagement is what convertibles represent at their heart. Taking your car’s top away represents nothing else other than improving the experience of driving. So that’s why most buyers don’t want them.

MATTinMKE
MATTinMKE
4 months ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

There’s a great deal of truth in your statement, Jack. But I not sure it’s that they don’t want the experience, I think it’s that they don’t know the experience is available. High School girl down the street has a convertible Mini, just like my family’s. Our top is never up, hers is never down. Never talked to her, but I’d love to ask why.

Dudeoutwest
Dudeoutwest
4 months ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

Perfectly stated. I’m a motorcyclist and a car person. I love bikes because I’m out there experiencing the speed first hand. The wind. The noise. The smells and temperature changes and the like that make me very much “right there” on a ride, even a slow one. Convertibles replicate a great deal of what I love so much about motorcycles. You’re part of the landscape, not just rolling through looking at it through glass.

I love cars, too, but sedans/coupes with a roof are so isolated that the visceral parts of the speed are squashed for me. Sure, windows down is great, a sunroof is OK, I guess, but neither like no roof at all.

I have a Boxster and it’s the perfect amalgamation of my motorcycles and a car. My wife was my pillion and riding partner for decades. Now that she can’t ride comfortably any more (thanks, arthritis), a sports car convertible allows us to do “motorcycle”, but while we sit side by side. Same “right there” experience. The sounds, the speed, the smells, the temperature changes are all part of convertiblling. The link to what you’re driving through is all there in a way that isn’t possible in an enclosed vehicle.

It’s not for everyone. That’s fine. But there are fewer things better than rolling out on a warm summer morning, before everyone is up, and having a nice top down tear around the local curvy roads.

And a solid +1 on night time drives in convertibles.

Roofless
Roofless
4 months ago
Reply to  Dudeoutwest

I always worry that I’m gonna get pulled over for suspicion of a dui with the top down at night, but goddamn, it’s so good. Especially driving through the city – the lights, the building, the night life, it’s just amazing.

Wordguy
Wordguy
4 months ago
Reply to  Dudeoutwest

+1 on all your points. My wife and I took the same approach for similar reasons and replaced our Gold Wing with a Mini convertible. No it’s not the same, not “as good”, as being on a bike. But the experience is great.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
4 months ago

I’ve owned three convertibles, all Jeeps of one stripe or another, and I wholeheartedly concur with the sentiments expressed by Thomas. And Jeeps aren’t easy convertibles to live with as it’s like putting up a tent in a breeze to get the top on or off. Still, top down cruising is worth every effort. Doors off doesn’t hurt either.

Several years ago a friend loaned me her Mini convertible while she was overseas for a month. At that time, it had been awhile since I’d driven topless. What blast that little car was. I determined then that I’d once again own a convertible. Hasn’t happened yet, but it will.

I’ve decided that even though there are technical disadvantages to driving old cars, my next convertible will be some type of classic. Older ragtops do suffer from all the structural and handling drawbacks Thomas mentioned, but the kind of driving I’d be doing doesn’t require modern car capabilities. Older rides are easier for me to maintain, too. Plus, preserving old cars, especially convertibles is a worthwhile pursuit. All bets are off, though, if I ever have enough fun money to buy a Morgan Super 3.

Maymar
Maymar
4 months ago

I’m just bitter there aren’t more pillarless hardtops, because convertibles look like ass with the top up, and I can’t deal with direct sunlight. A pleasant cruiser sounds nice, I just want my canopy to hide under.

Bill Garcia
Bill Garcia
4 months ago
Reply to  Maymar

You need to try a Jeep Wrangler JL with the half-doors and the soft top in safari mode.

Or if you want a more convenient option go for the Sky One Touch top. It’s why I did since I had to go with the 4-door for the family. The dream toy remains a manual two-door with the soft top and a miracolous 392 or 5.7 Hemi swap 🙂

Nsane In The MembraNe
Nsane In The MembraNe
4 months ago

I couldn’t agree more. The structural rigidity argument I see circulate in enthusiast circles is particularly absurd to me. You are absolutely not going to notice a difference driving on the street. At all. And if you think you do I can assure it’s placebo.

If you’re going to do serious, and I mean serious track work then a coupe is better. If you’re tearing up the HPRDRE or “member” days at your local track every weekend and legitimately looking to set the fastest time possible then yes, you will likely notice the extra weight and additional bounciness of a drop top.

But if it’s never seeing more than an occasional track attack day and/or spirited backroad drive then get the convertible, my dude. There is no substitute for open top motoring and it’s becoming rarer and rarer because enthusiasts have convinced themselves convertibles aren’t hardcore enough and normies all drive crossovers now.

Last edited 4 months ago by Nsane In The MembraNe
Rust Buckets
Rust Buckets
4 months ago

I say this as somebody who has never driven a convertible.

Are you sure you couldn’t tell the difference in stiffness? At least for older convertibles, I understand the difference is pretty large, and you can absolutely feel torsional stiffness in street driving. Like I can feel how twisty my f150 is compared to my other cars.

Nsane In The MembraNe
Nsane In The MembraNe
4 months ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

I should’ve clarified. You won’t be able to tell in modern convertibles. Old stuff is definitely a different story, although I’ve driven an NA Miata and found the chassis to be super settled.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
4 months ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

I could tell the difference between roof down and hard top on in my mk3 MR2, but not in my MX5 or Elise.

Although that might just have been placebo effect from the dash wobbling all over the place. No wobbles with the hard top one.

The MX5 had a cage, so that’s not really useful data.

JumboG
JumboG
4 months ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

It’s greatly overblown how much less stiff a convertible is. In average driving, I can’t tell the difference between my X3 and my 330Ci, both of the early 00s. The convertible outperforms the X3 in the twisties.

Logan King
Logan King
4 months ago
Reply to  JumboG

BMW would have had to do a spectacularly poor job with the conversion to make an E46 handle worse than an SUV.

JumboG
JumboG
4 months ago
Reply to  Logan King

An X3 is essentially a lifted e46 wagon.

Logan King
Logan King
4 months ago
Reply to  JumboG

And an X5 is a lifted E39. My point remains. Being a convertible would have comparably little bearing on whether an E46 with the roof cut off would handle worse than an E46 that weighs ~600 hundred pounds more and is 10 inches higher.

Last edited 4 months ago by Logan King
JumboG
JumboG
4 months ago
Reply to  Logan King

My point is if structural rigidity was a huge concern, it would handle worse than a lifted version of the same car.

Logan King
Logan King
4 months ago
Reply to  JumboG

I’m aware of what your point is. It’s just irrelevant to the standard that you were judging it by (“The convertible outperforms the X3 in the twisties”). An E46 convertible is in the same timezone of chassis stiffness as a C5 Corvette, Lotus Elise or 996 convertible. It’s a late 90s car that was always designed with a convertible version in mind, so you wouldn’t see the drop off for the convertible that was seen with older designs like an E36 or C4 Corvette or A80 Supra or NSX-T or 993. Going by what BMW forums say about it, an E46 convertible is notably less than a coupe/wagon/sedan but no so much that it drops to the level of cars designed in the 1980s. Enough that you’d be able to tell if you drove one back to back with a coupe/sedan but not enough that there would be the kind of downsides typically attributed to convertibles of the prior era (rattling/groaning interior components, lots of cowl shake, jittery suspension on rough roads, steering kickback). There are diminishing returns for cars that debuted in 1998-ish vs cars that did before then, but make no mistake: You can tell the difference. You can tell it with a 996 convertible vs a 996 coupe. You can tell it with a C5 vs a 996. You can tell with cars that started as coupes but are available as convertibles today (even ignoring infamously flabby shitboxes like the VW Eos) like the Cayman/Boxster twins.

The actual reason that your E46 convertible handles better than your E83 X3 is that the E46 convertible weighs around 600 pounds less, most likely has an even lower center of gravity than an E46 coupe, 3 less inches of wheelbase and ten less inches of height. An early M Roadster also would handle better on twisty roads than your BMW SUV, and that was rather infamously a car that had more power than the noodle chassis was entirely comfortable dealing with even before BMW put the S54 in it.

Last edited 4 months ago by Logan King
Logan King
Logan King
4 months ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

It’s just not nearly as much of an issue as it was before the late 90s. A lot of that was just cars in general being substantially stiffer than they were up through the mid-90s, since so many cars of the time transferred over to all new chassis to meet stricter crash ; and the only notable cowl shake is in comparison to the extremely stiff roofed version. Stuff slips through the cracks still that is pretty putrid in that regard (the VW Eos comes to mind), but you never generally see stuff now like you did in the 70s/80s/90s where you are chopping up something that was already by modern standards somewhat marginal as a coupe and trying to make up the difference by bolting in a ton of bracing. The noodly feel you’d get with targas in the 80s and 90s (Supra, C4, NSX) is all gone too.

Another major factor is that after the 90s nearly all convertibles were designed/produced in house on a chassis that was always planned to have an option for a convertible, rather than ASC or Karmann or someone taking a Sawzall to a coupe after it left the factory (even when it was a factory option).

Last edited 4 months ago by Logan King
Roofless
Roofless
4 months ago

There’s a particularly American thing where we just can’t do anything half way. Getting into biking? $6k carbon fiber racer and a pair of booty shorts. Jogging? Hell no, 5k or bust. Cup of coffee in the morning? I’ll raise you a Red Bull every 30 minutes. Like driving? Well then why the fuck do you have a passenger seat and air conditioning?!

The marathoner’s secret is nipple tape. It’s okay to just enjoy things.

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
4 months ago

Even when you’re way into tracking your car, you can have fun with a convertible. I was chasing lap times in my Z4 for years and never complained about its rigidity.

Last edited 4 months ago by Manuel Verissimo
StillNotATony
StillNotATony
4 months ago

You know who clowns on convertibles?

People who wish they had a convertible.

Fact.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
4 months ago
Reply to  StillNotATony

Two of my convertibles were less than £1500. Anyone with a car could have bought one instead, so the hatred can’t be envy.

Wayne F Bailey
Wayne F Bailey
4 months ago

My convertibles through the years: 1961 Buick Electra 445, 1974 Corvette, 1986 Mustang GT, 191(is Miata and now a 2012 Lexus is250c. I just enjoy open air.

Wayne F Bailey
Wayne F Bailey
4 months ago
Reply to  Wayne F Bailey

1991 Miata

Albert Ferrer
Albert Ferrer
4 months ago

I used to drive an MX-5 years ago. I ended getting rid of it due to road noise on motorways (it was my only car). When I had it though I used to drive with the top down as much as possible (e.g. 0 degrees Celsius, anorak and heater on).

I somewhat miss it. And anyway drive another noisy motorway car now…

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
4 months ago
Reply to  Albert Ferrer

Cold day + heated seats = bliss

Roofless
Roofless
4 months ago

I am strongly convinced that anyone who clowns on convertibles hasn’t driven one, and certainly hasn’t taken one through the woods, along the coast, or anywhere scenic. Hustling an open-top car through a windy road on a nice day with a beautiful backdrop is just bliss – the wind, the sounds, the smells of nature, there’s nothing else like it. I’ve got a 3-series convertible and have had borderline religious experiences in that car. There’s faster and better-handling cars out there, but I promise you won’t give a shit once you get it moving.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
4 months ago
Reply to  Roofless

Or to be slightly but complementarily contrarian, taken one on a trip to the grocery store in the evening to get something needed for dinner.

Convertibles can make the most everyday trips suddenly fun and interesting, and for many, remind them of the magic of driving as its own thing, like what it was like when they first got their license and the world was theirs.

Roofless
Roofless
4 months ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

Absolutely yes, this too. Even for short trips the top goes down. I got mine initially because I needed a car but I didn’t really like driving, and boy has it changed that.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
4 months ago

“the first-generation Chrysler Sebring was a perfectly okay car. ”
“the styling was perfectly handsome.”

Are you high right now? It’s ok, you can tell us.

Laika
Laika
4 months ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

Yeah, not so perfectly okay. I rented an early Sebring on a business trip once. The massive, raked A-pillars make it the only convertible I’ve ever driven (out of a lot) where the sight lines are considerably worse than in a typical hardtop. I kept having to move my head to see around them.

Ken Ehlert
Ken Ehlert
4 months ago

Recently purchased a 2004 Mercedes Benz CLK convertible. It’s going to be our weekend road trip vehicle. Been touring on a motorcycle for years and getting sick of rain or 95 degree direct sunlight. With the convertible, we can do top up, top down, A/C on or heat on. Covers all the bases. That and the 302 HP, 339 pounds-feet of torque V8 make the drive interesting!

Dudeoutwest
Dudeoutwest
4 months ago
Reply to  Ken Ehlert

We replaced our R12RT with a Boxster of the same vintage: 2005. The Boxster has two trunks! I may be done touring on motorcycles to some degree but I’m definitely done with riding when it’s not fun.

Abe Froman
Abe Froman
4 months ago

I have said it before and I’ll say it again- there’s no point in buying a Wrangler with a hard top. I don’t buy the “it’s too hot in the summer” or “it’s too cold in the winter” lines people use. Fact: Most hard top Wrangler//Gladiator owners never take the two front freedom panels out. Even fewer remove the top completely.

I have never understood this. The whole point of putting up with the on road deficiencies of these vehicles is the open air experience. I’m near Chicago and my half doors go on the Gladiator in April, come off in October (full doors/soft top mid October-mid April). The heater does a fine job in the winter even with the soft top.

Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

Tricky Motorsports
Tricky Motorsports
4 months ago
Reply to  Abe Froman

My 2dr Bronco only came in a hard top. I swapped it out for an aftermarket soft top within a couple months. I may never go back.

Abe Froman
Abe Froman
4 months ago

This is the way.

Rust Buckets
Rust Buckets
4 months ago
Reply to  Abe Froman

No, the whole point of putting up with the on road deficiencies of a Jeep is to gain the off road strengths. A Jeep is far from the only convertible, and you can take the doors off of literally any car(at least once).

Source- I own a hardtop Jeep XJ. I also like driving with the doors off in my CJ.

Pupmeow
Pupmeow
4 months ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

No. The whole point of putting up with the on road deficiencies is so you have adequate dash space for your rubber duckies. At least that seems to be the case where I live.

Jack Beckman
Jack Beckman
4 months ago

My ’01 Boxster is my track car. There are usually one or two of them out with me on track days. Yeah, the hard-tops are more rigid and probably better, but on the way home from the track (among other places) I get to drive top-down.

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
4 months ago
Reply to  Jack Beckman

Amen.

Crab People
Crab People
4 months ago

I recently sold a Lexus GX 470 so I could buy a Wrangler TJ. It’s a much more primitive (worse) vehicle in almost every way, but I can take the top off and row my own gears.

Laika
Laika
4 months ago

I must be out of touch; I had no idea people were cracking on convertibles so much. Is the hate just for performance cars, for sacrificing some degree of performance to have the option of dropping the top? ‘Cause there’s nothing like cruising around in an old ragtop (gas mileage and performance be damned) on a mild summer day, cranking the 8-track. I have the scruffy ’66 t-bird convertible to prove it.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
4 months ago
Reply to  Laika

I passed on a ‘62 bullet Bird and have regretted it ever since.

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
4 months ago
Reply to  Laika

I still get “hairdresser car” comments on my Z4, but you don’t care when driving with the wind in your hair.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
4 months ago

I got exactly the same comment when I had my Z4.

Except mine was the coupe.

I really miss that car.

1 2 3 4
182
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x