Home » Just Gotta Put ‘Em Back Together: 1988 Dodge Ram 50 vs 1993 Mazda B2200

Just Gotta Put ‘Em Back Together: 1988 Dodge Ram 50 vs 1993 Mazda B2200

Sbsd 1 23 2025
ADVERTISEMENT

On today’s thrilling episode, we’re looking at two little trucks in remarkably similar condition. Both have had their engines rebuilt, but are still awaiting re-installation. Which one will have you pricing out engine hoists? We’ll see.

Yesterday’s bad ideas had many of you begging for a “Neither” choice, but that’s how this whole thing works. You must choose. Some of you questioned whether or not the BMW was really an Alpina, too, to which I can only reply that I don’t know. Furthermore, I don’t care enough to find out. There are dumb ideas, and then there’s buying a broken BMW from one of those used car dealers operating out of a self-storage lot on Hayden Island. No, and I cannot stress this enough, way in hell. Though the ad is gone now, so it looks like some poor bastard took the chance.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I side with the smallish majority of you who chose the Jaguar, which I suspect at least can move under its own power – even without a radiator installed. I cannot, however, condone the idea of swapping the V12 out for a Chevy V8. What would be the point? The V12 is a big part of what makes it cool.

Screenshot From 2025 01 22 16 26 53

It’s always a tough call when you have an old car that you love that needs an engine overhaul. Is it worth doing? Is it better to swap in a known-running used engine? Are you better off scrapping it? But I think the worst decision of all is pulling the engine, getting it rebuilt, and then letting it sit there uninstalled. I get it, things happen, life gets in the way, but to spend all that time and money and then not reap any of the benefits must be a tough pill to swallow. Nonetheless, that is the situation today’s two sellers find themselves in, with a pair of little red trucks. Which one is the better deal for a new owner with a little time on their hands? Let’s see.

ADVERTISEMENT

1988 Dodge Ram 50 – $4,500

00q0q Lblvfyqil2j 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 2.6-liter overhead cam inline 4, five-speed manual, part-time 4WD

Location: Las Vegas, NV

Odometer reading: unknown

Operational status: Disassembled, rebuilt engine waiting to go in

ADVERTISEMENT

In the 1970s, all of the Big Three US automakers sold captive import small pickup trucks from their Japanese partners. But while Chevy replaced the LUV with its own S-10 in 1982, and Ford followed suit with the Ranger in 1983, Chrysler kept selling Mitsubishi trucks under the Dodge Ram 50 badge all the way up until 1994, even after introducing its own mid-sized Dakota in 1987. This is a second-generation Ram 50, in short-wheelbase standard-cab trim, with optional four-wheel-drive.

01111 Euclklwlcfr 0ci0t2 1200x900

This Ram 50 is powered by Mitsubishi’s 2.6 liter 4G54 engine, the same one used in Chrysler’s early K-cars and minivans, here driving the rear wheels through a five-speed manual and a dual-range 4WD transfer case. Or at least, it will do so, once it’s installed back in the truck. It actually includes two complete engines: one freshly rebuilt, and the truck’s original, which has a blown head gasket. Two transmissions and two transfer cases are included, but their exact condition is unknown. You should be able to put together one good driveline from what’s there, though. A new clutch, a freshly machined flywheel, and a new Weber carburetor are also ready to bring this truck back to life. The seller is also including the two engine stands, hoist, and transmission jack you’ll need to put everything back where it belongs.

00e0e 4hcl4dpeo1b 0t20ci 1200x900

The rest of the truck is in what I’d call good beater condition. The interior is dirty and mismatched, but functional enough for an old truck, and the floors and sills look solid. The seller says there is some rust in the bed, but includes good doors and fenders from a junkyard truck that you can swap on, as well as some interior parts from the same donor. There is a lot here, and I encourage you to look at the ad before you make a final decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

01212 Bf82k9qrb4o 0ci0t2 1200x900

The seller has already done a lot of prep work for the new engine, and it looks ready to drop in. Obviously, there’s a lot of work to do, but it looks like a project that’s worth finishing, and that’s not nothing.

1993 Mazda B2200 – $2,995

00202 A0l333reqcq 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 2.2-liter overhead cam inline 4, five-speed manual, RWD

Location: McKinney, TX

ADVERTISEMENT

Odometer reading: 262,000 miles

Operational status: Disassembled, rebuilt engine waiting to go in

Mazda and Ford did a bit of a do-si-do with their small trucks: Ford sold the Mazda B-series as its Courier until the introduction of the Ranger, but Mazda kept selling the B-series on its own, even introducing an all-new generation in 1986. That generation lasted until 1993, when this truck was built, after which Mazda slapped a B-series emblem on the Ranger. The fourth-generation B-series trucks like this one have a devoted following to this day, for exceptional durability and pleasant road manners – at least for a truck.

00h0h 1adba3t22tj 0ci0t2 1200x900

This truck covered 262,000 miles and was used daily until the seller pulled the engine for an overhaul. The rebuild is complete, but the engine was never re-installed. It’s sitting in the truck’s bed on an old tire – not the steadiest platform, but I’ve seen worse. Its reassembly is a little less far along than the Mitsubishi; it still needs the water pump and timing belt installed, and the valve cover put back on. Everything is there, though, including a few upgrades like an aluminum radiator and electric fan and fuel pump. The seller says you’ll still need new engine mounts to complete the installation, but those are cheap.

ADVERTISEMENT

00707 A6np6yefgzf 0ci0t2 1200x900

It’s hard to assess the condition of the interior since it’s full of boxes and parts, but the seller says it’s in good condition under all that. Again, it’s a truck, so as long as it’s intact and functional, that’s good enough. I see what looks like a Weber carb and intake sitting on the passenger footwell, and as a bonus, this truck has air conditioning, upgraded to R134a, and from the looks of it, the lines haven’t been disturbed, so it should still work fine once you get the engine back in.

00v0v 8m8og2tdzxp 0ci0t2 1200x900

It has been repainted at some point, and the seller says it looks good from five feet away, again, good enough for a truck. It has a homemade-looking rear bumper and headache rack, and a nice plastic bedliner, so it’s ready to do some real work once it’s reassembled.

I don’t want to downplay the work required for either of these; installing an engine is not a difficult task, but it takes a lot of time and care to do it right. But the hard work of overhauling the engines has been done, and now it’s just a matter of turning a couple hundred bolts and reconnecting a bunch of hoses and wires. Either way, when you’re done, you’ll have a cool little stickshift truck that you’ll know inside and out.

ADVERTISEMENT

(Image credits: sellers)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cyko9
Cyko9
5 minutes ago

The Ram could be a fun truck after putting it together, but it’s just too high for what it is. The Mazda is a better value for the price.

Myk El
Myk El
38 minutes ago

I’m quite loyal to that generation of B-series. I have had two myself, three total have gone through my family. I would not mind having another, but if it’s my own money, I’m not spending it on this one. Of these two, though, Mazda all the way.

OrigamiSensei
OrigamiSensei
58 minutes ago

As the former owner of a B2200 it’s Mazda all the way for me. That was a great little truck that combined for daily driver and project materials hauler duty during my first years of home ownership.

Both are priced way too high for what they are, but I think you could complete the Mazda for something approaching reasonable money, and it shouldn’t be too difficult. Add in that it’s actually pretty fun to fling around on freeway ramps and the choice is clear. Also as others have said I think I have a bit more confidence in the work done so far on the Mazda.

Mr. Canoehead
Mr. Canoehead
1 hour ago

I like the Mighty Max more and I have lots of experience with the 2.6 but for that price, in that condition, I’d expect it to be assembled.

BTW, every 2.6 with the Weber I’ve ever seen or driven has a terrible flatspot at 4000 rpm.

Tartpop
Tartpop
1 hour ago

I don’t have the skills for either one. So, I’ll go with the Dodge since it comes with so many extras.

Baja_Engineer
Baja_Engineer
1 hour ago

I like the Mighty Max a little more because it’s a 4×4, but it sure looks way more beat up than the Mazda. The beat up body plus all those mismatched parts on top of a few ones missing + a 50% higher entry fee make me lean towards the Mazda.

You could actually get the Mazda put back together for about the same money it takes to get the Mighty Max purchased. And having A/C is a valuable asset here

Last edited 1 hour ago by Baja_Engineer
39
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x