As I may have brought up before, my college degree is in Art History, and while I think it actually has informed some of my professional life, it’d be kind of a stretch to say it’s been an actually useful degree, if I’m honest. I mean, I don’t regret it at all, and I think it helped me develop as a human and creative person in innumerable ways, but it doesn’t necessarily come up directly all that much. Unless I force it into things, which I like to do! Like today, with these pictures of truck engines!
Also, in that hed where I referenced an “art historian” I just meant me, which I realize is some vast hyperbole. I’m no art historian, and I don’t mean to compare myself to those that really are. Just saying.
This started when I was looking at a brochure for a 1971 Fiat 684N-T large truck. As you may have guessed, I’m always considering starting a large-scale rubble hauling concern that exclusively uses vintage trucks, for the rubble-hauler that demands a certain old-school class for their rubble-hauling needs.
The truck is a handsome one, looking like this, a nice example of ’70s clean design:
But that’s not what caught my eye in the brochure. What grabbed my attention were the cutaway illustrations of that beast’s big inline-six diesel:
It’s a striking image, no question, but something about it went further, and it really reminded me of the works of early 20th-century cubist/tube-ist Fernand Léger, a painter enthralled with machines and their aesthetic, and who painted with bright primary colors and heavy black outlines.
That’s just an example, but there’s a specific one that this engine picture seems to be making some neurons fire to remember, but I can’t seem to find it anywhere. Maybe I imagined it? Regardless, that picture of an engine really, really reminds me of Léger’s paintings.
So, let’s see what other truck engine illustrations bring back from all those art history classes!
This one, from a 1963 Austin brochure, feels more like the careful yet moody sort of rendering of an artist like, maybe Edward Hopper, most famous for his 1942 painting Nighthawks, which is most commonly seen debased with actual neon and Marilyn Monroe and James Dean crudely shoved in the composition.
I think it’s the muted color palette that gives this one a real Hopper feel, and a sort of underlying sense of melancholy. Sure, it’s got a bright yellow fan to try and liven things up, but you can feel what a hollow gesture that really is.
These engines, from a 1959 Ford Thames, have a pop-art quality to them, and remind me of the work of Roy Lichtenstein, best known for his wonderful aggrandizements of comic strip panels, usually painted with exaggerated ben-day dots, the halftone method used to produce color in cheaply printed materials like newspapers.
There’s an energy and vibrancy to these engines, with their bold outlines and limited color palettes. The solid red panel behind them that they are upon but not fully contained by just adds to the energy here.
At the other extreme, we have this extremely careful rendering of a 1955 Henschel diesel, and there’s an old-school lithography feel to this that calls to mind the work of Albrecht Dürer, the German printmaker active in the late 1400s and early 1500s and known for his detailed and careful prints, such as his famous image of praying hands.
Dürer’s goals were, at least in part, naturalism and accuracy, something vastly more crucial in an age before photography, but also to convey a mood and tone, which Dürer was a master at.
I think we could argue this engine image accomplishes both: a highly detailed and accurate rendering of the object, and yet you can somehow feel the stoic determination of this machine to turn diesel fuel into hauling your crap. I especially like the attention given to rivets, bolts, and fasteners, which give this engine a certain formal look about it.
Finally, let’s look at this 1964 Ford Thames Trader engine:
I like this one because it feels more like its influenced by commercial art of the 1960s – which, of course, it was, being literally commercial art from the 1960s. But there’s a method here, one that was used all over the place in this era, on book covers and poster art and more, where a halftoned photograph would be placed over a boldly colored background.
In a way, this also feels a bit like what Warhol was doing at this time, influenced as he was with commercial art, and I could see this silkscreened onto some larger Warhol canvas.
Look at that! I used my degree! Sort of!
a university education is NOT supposed to be vocational training.
in the philosophical dimension, it is training on how to learn.
in the economic dimension, it is readily understood evidence that an individual can learn a business.
Ed Ruscha has this covered.
Well you know Edward Hopper painted more automobile-oriented paintings too.
It’s funny, when I was a parts salesman deep in farm country, I had an immense amount of respect for farmers who still ran 50s-70s medium duty trucks. My favorite was a beautifully restored Ford C-Series in a dark brown color. Was pretty funny to see that ol’ girl loaded up with wheat running down the highway.
You have an Art History degree and drive a Yugo? The jokes practically write themselves
“Edward Hopper, most famous for his 1942 painting Nighthawks, which is most commonly seen debased with actual neon and Marilyn Monroe and James Dean crudely shoved in the composition”
My copy tasefully has Elvis playing poker with a pack of hound dogs.
Why, yes it IS painted on black velvet! How did you know?
Are these in the public domain? Could y’all sell prints? I, a dullard ignorant of art theory, like these and liked reading about WHY they’re good. Would buy.
That was one Bold Fart.
I took an art history class senior year, and there were girls in it. Fellow students I mean. I realized I should have taken it much earlier because there weren’t many girls in my engineering classes, or my information systems classes after calculus and statics/dynamics kicked my ass.
Also I enjoyed it, and still have the textbook (Janson 4th ed.)
Also, you see Leger, I see Kirby.
There was a bombshell in my calculus I class. She broke down in tears, just great heart-wrenching sobs at the end of the first day of Cal II the next semester. I always appreciated her expressing the feelings I was just keeping inside.
A young, attractive gal in my EE cohort was a regular Linux kernel contributor. It took every bit of my sysadmin-grade social skills to act cool around her.
The Mercury post made me think it must be nice to be an artist like you to have some understanding of the design/artwork there.
And, David still calls himself an engineer despite really just blogging about buying cars he shouldn’t buy / hanging out with his SO, so not too much of a stretch to call yourself an art historian
I feel like the online-car-blog format really let Torch spread his wings, increasingly on this site but also the old site.
Having an engineering background is super helpful in auto journalism – it helps to understand why things are a certain way. Having an art background but a love for cars (and a great way with words, I’d add) makes for a tougher career path. I think in the 90s when car magazines ruled the space, it would have been hard to carve out the niche that Torch has. But thanks to the internet, we’ve been blessed with his odd renderings of mini trucks, cars that we’d see if the USSR never fell, and endless rants on 1-year-only Brazilian beetle tail lights.
Torch: you are definitely an actual Art Historian. Why, I just read a publish article about Art History written by you, so that definitely counts. Also the only other Art Historian I know has a degree in French and Spanish, so you’re the most qualified Art Historian I know.
Back when I was studying for my degree I used to ask people what they were going to do with their degree, and I got the most wonderful and baffling answers from those studying the humanities. Some had weird tangential links to future dreams, some had no plans at all beyond studying what they loved and some had frankly bafflingly literal and short-sighted plans like “become a professional philosopher”.
I studied engineering design, so, you know. Design engineer.
I thought Roy Lichtenstein just the second I saw those two ’59 Ford engines! (before I read your text on them) So I hereby consider myself a classy well educated guy 😀
Only one possible response: Stay classy!
“Nighthawks, which is most commonly seen debased with actual neon and Marilyn Monroe and James Dean crudely shoved in the composition.”
Here’s a nice antidote to that, Charles Schulz’s Peanuts Sunday comic strip from August 29, 1993:
https://static1.cbrimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/aug-29-93.jpg?q=49&fit=crop&w=500&dpr=2
Warhol would also turn every cylinder into a….
It’s so predictable I can’t even type it.
I’d like to see a VW service manual done by Liechtenstein. At least as a warning.
“BUT BRAD, IF THE TEETH ARE OFF TDC BY MORE THAN 2 DEGREES, YOU’LL DESTROY THE VALVES!”