Home » Massive Cyberattacks Are Hitting More Than 15,000 Dealerships Right Now

Massive Cyberattacks Are Hitting More Than 15,000 Dealerships Right Now

Plainfield Circa September 2020: Chevrolet Automobile Dealership. Chevy Is A Division Of General Motors And Makes The Silverado, Camaro And Impala.
ADVERTISEMENT

If you’re looking at buying a car over the next 24 hours or so, there’s a good chance that process got much harder, depending on where you’re buying from. CDK Global, the largest provider of dealer management services in North America, has been subject to not one, but two cyberattacks in the past two days, and while the implications for immediate operations at dealerships using the firm’s services are clear, the picture of the total fallout looks murky at best.

On Wednesday morning, CDK Global shut down its services due to what it called a “cyber incident,” plunging more than 15,000 dealerships across North America back into the 1980s. See, CDK is a leading provider of dealer management software, which covers everything from parts invoicing to payroll. Soon after, the firm issued this statement:

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Erring on the side of caution, we proactively shut all systems down and executed extensive testing and consulted with external third-party experts. With the work done so far, our core DMS and Digital Retailing solutions have been restored. We are continuing to conduct extensive tests on all other applications, and we will provide updates as we bring those applications back online. Our first priority is always the security of our customers, and our actions reflect our obligation to them as a trusted partner.

By Wednesday afternoon, it seemed like things were clearing up. Automotive News reported that CDK claimed its dealer management system was unaffected by the cyberattack, and service started to be restored. While not every piece of CDK software was back online, things started to look hopeful. The situation started looking less hopeful later that evening, because another cyberattack happened. Here’s the latest statement from CDK, as published by Automotive News:

We are sorry to inform you that we experienced an additional cyber incident late in the evening on June 19th. Out of continued caution and to protect our customers, we are once again proactively shutting down most of our systems.

We are currently assessing the overall impact and consulting with external third-party experts. At this time, we do not have an estimated time frame for resolution and therefore our dealers’ systems will not be available at a minimum on Thursday, June 20th.

Well, that’s not good. As of right now, continuing operations appears to be a scramble. Some dealerships are going back to paper invoices. Others are dealing with phone system issues, given how some use CDK’s customer communications systems. Dealers using Reynolds and Reynolds or Dealertrack are continuing operations as normal, as software from competing firms is unaffected, but still, while the lighting has flashed, the flood is yet to come in. See, the motive and wider effects of these cyberattacks have yet to be released, and depending on how far deep things go, it could affect more than just internal operations.

Honda Dealer Average New Vehicle Transaction Price
Photo credit: yonkershonda licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

While CDK Global is most known for its dealer management system, it also offers finance and insurance software, including the ability to run credit checks on customers. If a substantial data breach has occurred, information leaks could go far beyond the personal identifying information of dealership employees. Granted, as of Thursday, it’s not known if these cyberattacks exposed customer data, but this is something to hold tight on.

ADVERTISEMENT

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Relatedbar

Got a hot tip? Send it to us here. Or check out the stories on our homepage.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Christoffel
Paul Christoffel
6 months ago

Just took my car in for routine maintenance and everything was handled manually. All the employees looked a little clueless. Could not even print out a copy of what was serviced. Imagine if something like this happens to something really important to daily lives?

Ben
Ben
6 months ago

Now we know what Elon did with all those AI chips he’s been diverting from Tesla.

Flinched
Flinched
6 months ago

Funny comments here but this is very serious business. A DMS houses every transaction in sales, parts and service as well as all inventory, payroll and financial reports. It also keeps a chart of accounts which is every account payable or receivable including all checks issued. The amount of sensitive data is as high as you can imagine. Your social security number, credit history, vehicle purchase and service history are all there. The interest rate you paid is there. And if a dealer uses CDK’s credit card processing system, your card number, expiration date and CVV may be kept on file. A dealer’s ability to issue or transfer registrations is impacted if they use the CVR system. Oh, and independents and motorsports dealers use CDK as well, not just new car dealers.

It’s inevitable this would happen to a DMS and CDK is likely just the first one. I worked for another DMS provider which experienced around 4000 hacking attempts every day. CDK was purchased by Brookfield Business Partners a little over a year ago for 8.3 billion and represents only 1% of their total portfolio. It’s rumored this is more than just a hacking attempt, but has actually been hacked and the ransom is 500 million. CDK just announced service will be disrupted for several days which supports this rumor.

Dealer employees have my total sympathy. Not only is their livelihood disrupted, they’ll have to work triple time for several weeks after service is restored, manually entering every transaction.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
6 months ago

More like the sixties. Dealerships have been fairly computerized since the seventies.

CDKs statements and actions lead me to think this a ransomware attack and probably involved a massive data breach before encryption began. Just my guess.

BeepJeep
BeepJeep
6 months ago

Explains why the dealership couldn’t access their calendar when I called. I needed to get my work truck serviced and they just told me to drop it off whenever. They had no idea on their availability.

H4llelujah
H4llelujah
6 months ago

As a dealership that uses Dealertrack, let me just say…….

Hahahahahahahahahaha!

Seriously though, I hope this doesnt lead to any serious issues for people.

Fiji ST
Fiji ST
6 months ago
Reply to  H4llelujah

Don’t jinx it. They could be next.

H4llelujah
H4llelujah
6 months ago
Reply to  Fiji ST

Im counting on it. Would be nice to have a few days off, if im being honest.

PJ
PJ
6 months ago
Reply to  H4llelujah

I’d rather have a currently broken CDK than “fully functional” dealertrash.

H4llelujah
H4llelujah
6 months ago
Reply to  PJ

There is a luxury in not being able to miss what I’ve never seen lol

Drive By Commenter
Drive By Commenter
6 months ago

I’m in the process of buying a Tesla. The manually entered financing offer went “poof” and the automated financing offer I didn’t want came back. I’m hoping Tesla doesn’t use CDK.

Chronometric
Chronometric
6 months ago

“plunging … dealerships across North America back into the 1980s”

So if I rush to a Honda dealer I can get a 1985 Prelude?
Subscription free?

Last edited 6 months ago by Chronometric
Col Lingus
Col Lingus
6 months ago

This has Sky Net written all over it. It has started.

Lizardman in a human suit
Lizardman in a human suit
6 months ago
Reply to  Col Lingus

Great. It’s been nice knowing you folks.

SNL-LOL Jr
SNL-LOL Jr
6 months ago
Reply to  Col Lingus

Skynet doesn’t seem too bad compared to the two that we had to choose from come November.

Sid Bridge
Sid Bridge
6 months ago

I hope some IT person sits the dealer down, draws four squares on a piece of paper, writes some random numbers in each square, then explains why it’s going to cost twice their monthly budget to fix the problem and why they should like it.

Dodsworth
Dodsworth
6 months ago
Reply to  Sid Bridge

Let me take a moment out of my day to say, “Well done, Sir!”

SNL-LOL Jr
SNL-LOL Jr
6 months ago
Reply to  Sid Bridge

“How much do you intend to pay per month?”

Cayde-6
Cayde-6
6 months ago

What’s the software equivalent of TruCoat?

Cloud storage?

Scottingham
Scottingham
6 months ago
Reply to  Cayde-6

I’d say ‘AI managed’ cloud storage. Cloud storage itself is useful, but ‘AI Managed’ adds 0%

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
6 months ago

“Have you tried turning it off and on again?

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
6 months ago

Just booked a service at my local, they use MyKaarma for that type of stuff so it was all good as far as I could tell.

PJ
PJ
6 months ago
Reply to  Nick Fortes

That’s not a DMS. That’s a piece of software that interfaces with the DMS, for stuff like sending quotes to customers.

Huja Shaw
Huja Shaw
6 months ago

plunging more than 15,000 dealerships across North America back into the 1980s.

I have a mental image of sitting across from William H. Macy wearing a hang-dog expression as I berate him for the surprise addition of an undercoat charge.

Harvey Park Bench
Harvey Park Bench
6 months ago
Reply to  Huja Shaw

With a MASSIVE mustache.

Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden
6 months ago

This is why businesses and people should be removing things from the Internet, not adding more things to the Internet.

Huja Shaw
Huja Shaw
6 months ago
Reply to  Tyler Durden

Name checks out.

Andrea Petersen
Andrea Petersen
6 months ago

This is making my morning a little interesting, can’t get parts from the local BMW dealer.

Jason Roth
Jason Roth
6 months ago

Ah, maybe this explains why I couldn’t make a service appointment online yesterday.

Hmm, or not. Still doesn’t work when I load the page. Guess I’ll have to let my fingers do the walking.

Andrew Wyman
Andrew Wyman
6 months ago

Is this just mainstream dealerships or also used car (only) dealerships as well?

Jason Coble
Jason Coble
6 months ago

I purchased a used VW with an extended warranty from a Subaru dealer. I had an appointment this morning for warranty service but was turned around because they could not research any parts or manuals for my car. It looked like they had to turn a few Subies around too.

ImissmyoldScout
ImissmyoldScout
6 months ago

I expect to see at least one IT guy get sacked for this, potentially more. If they have a CISO (Chief Information Security Office), that person just experienced a resume-generating event.

John in Ohio
John in Ohio
6 months ago

I can almost guarantee you their IT dept has brought up concerns about security just to be shrugged off as being too expensive to implement. Ask me how I know?

Lost on the Nürburgring
Lost on the Nürburgring
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

This, for sure. “Now, Mike, why would we spend that money when the likelihood is so small?”

”Because risk is not just about likelihood, it’s also about impact. Just record my concerns for the record, Bob.”

Cayde-6
Cayde-6
6 months ago

IT teams should have a former recall coordinator on staff.

Wherever I’m going, I’ll be there to apply the formula. I’ll keep the secret intact.

It’s simple arithmetic.

It’s a story problem.

If a new car built by security vulnerability my company found leaves Chicago traveling west at 60 miles per hour, and the rear differential locks up, and the car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside, could be exploited, does my company initiate a recall patch it?

You take the population of vehicles vulnerabilties in the field (A) and multiple it by the probable rate of failure (B), then multiply the result by the average cost of an out-of-court settlement if it gets exploited(C).

A times B times C equals X. This is what it will cost if we don’t initiate a recall patch it.

If X is greater than the cost of a recall patch, we recall the cars patch it and no one gets hurt.

If X is less than the cost of a recall patch, then we don’t recall patch.”

El Jefe de Barbacoa
El Jefe de Barbacoa
6 months ago

Yup. You don’t make decisions solely on likelihood, but also magnitude.

My 0.02 Cents
My 0.02 Cents
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

I’d have the same user name if that happened to me.
The company I work for got a ransomware attack a few years back. It was amazing the protocols that got put in place after… Thankfully We had good back ups and were only down for a day.

Cheap Bastard
Cheap Bastard
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

Proactively bringing up issues and being sacked as a scapegoat for someone else’s failing to act on those issues are not mutually exclusive.

MikeInTheWoods
MikeInTheWoods
6 months ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked, have been sacked.

RC
RC
6 months ago

Maybe, maybe not.

“Internal vectors” (IE, knowledgeable employees) are by far the biggest threat for a lot of companies, to the point that many of the cybercrime gangs offer a commission from whatever ransom they get to employees willing to install software. That’ll get HR and the risk management team some grief, and raise some separation-of-duty concerns, but some people can still keep their jobs after failure like this.

Even past that, a lot of CISO positions are more vendor management than anything else, where software selection and implementation are conducted by third parties.

Ultimately, C-level hiring decisions fall on the board, and it’ll be lively if the CISO can say “I made recommendations X, Y, and Z, all of which were rejected by the CEO and CTO and would have prevented this.”

So while I’ve no doubt somebody will get fired, but part of the fun with entities like this is seeing how in-depth the board investigates.

Dan Pritts
Dan Pritts
6 months ago
Reply to  RC

Hadn’t heard the internal vector theory before but not at all surprised.

The guy who has been ignored for years about all the problems that he know about is likely to be disgruntled. Add some typical corporate “management” that treats them like a cog at the best of times and pretty soon Joe from IT is vacationing in Romania.

RC
RC
6 months ago
Reply to  Dan Pritts

Yep. And LinkedIn and AI have made it all the more easy to discover who your potential insiders are. Find a guy who’s been working at the same place for 7+ years without a meaningful title change, somewhere in the bowels of application support or the like, and chances are he knows enough to push malware to a critical app (even these days, people like salesforce.com admins are not likely to have an IT or security-oriented background).

Cyberinsurance is getting pricier, but a lot of the policies covered 8-figure sums as well as the cost of a third party investigation (that’s useful to determine who you’re going to fire when you’re done). 15% commission on a 10MM policy if you’re an “analyst” pulling down 80k is pretty good. With the advent of bitcoin (among others), it’s even fairly easy (from a tax perspective) to make it look like the money was legitimate.

It’s one of the reasons old-school tech insiders have significant unease with the notion of interlinked autonomous vehicles. Malicious insiders right now are mostly confined to damaging stuff where the human cost is a secondary or tertiary exposure (IE, if I’m a hospital database admin and take down EPIC, the core problem is in software, there are contingencies for paper charting in place, and it’s a significant inconvenience to the patients in which some might die, but the contingency is adequate on a short-term basis). But if you, as an insider, intentionally compromise how self-driving vehicles operate? You can wreak a considerable amount of havoc directly on people. Combine that with automated OTA updates and the possibilities are kinda horrifying. Almost all autonomous systems these days require human judgment in the processing loop (piloting aircraft, medicine, train operation, drone flight, etc.), and while that comes with its own set of problems, it’s also a useful failsafe.

10001010
10001010
6 months ago

That’s the life in IT, you’re either invisible or in trouble.

ImissmyoldScout
ImissmyoldScout
6 months ago
Reply to  10001010

31 years in the business, don’t I know it!

Harvey Park Bench
Harvey Park Bench
6 months ago
Reply to  10001010

Everything works: “what the hell do we pay you guys so much for?”

Everything broken: “what the hell do we pay you guys so much for?”

John in Ohio
John in Ohio
6 months ago

Maybe, just hear me out here, MAYBE we shouldn’t allow whole industries to be managed by 1-3 companies like this? Especially, when vehicles are almost a utility at this point?

Jdoubledub
Jdoubledub
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

Poppycock! What could possibly go wrong?

VanGuy
VanGuy
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

You sound a bit anxious about this, John.

John in Ohio
John in Ohio
6 months ago
Reply to  VanGuy

That’s my secret Cap, I’m always Anxious.

My 0.02 Cents
My 0.02 Cents
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

We probably didn’t originally, but as larger companies swallow up smaller companies this is eventually what happens, then there becomes a lack of choice where to get services from.

Viking Longcar
Viking Longcar
6 months ago
Reply to  My 0.02 Cents

Yes, this is what tends to happen, IF they are not appropriately regulated to maintain a competitive market

Pupmeow
Pupmeow
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

Fewer companies means less economic pressure to do things like offer a competitive product, or pay employees a competitive wage. That’s a win-win for the ownership class. Think of all the wins that are going to trickle down to us someday!

Dan Pritts
Dan Pritts
6 months ago
Reply to  John in Ohio

Counterpoint: cybersecurity is super hard and only a decent size org has a chance.

That assumes that any org tries, or that anyone anywhere really has a chance.

10001010
10001010
6 months ago

I feel for them, it sucks being on the defensive side of network security.

Highland Green Miata
Highland Green Miata
6 months ago

Yeah that’s gonna be bad if they get access to the customer data. Just think about all the information you have to give up to buy a car.

Angrycat Meowmeow
Angrycat Meowmeow
6 months ago

Looking forward to my $3.75 settlement check in 10 years

10001010
10001010
6 months ago

Sadly $.37 is more realistic.

VanGuy
VanGuy
6 months ago
Reply to  10001010

You never know. They might round up to $0.38.

Greensoul
Greensoul
6 months ago
Reply to  VanGuy

But hey, the lawyers will get millions and millions LOL

Harvey Park Bench
Harvey Park Bench
6 months ago

Best I can do is tree fitty.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
6 months ago

China: If they can’t sell cars here, then no one can. Kidding of course (just in case you’re snooping Mr. Xi), but maybe not.

Bomber
Bomber
6 months ago

Well this sucks. Hopefully no breach! I JUST bought my Caddy ATS in the last few weeks!

Haeter
Haeter
6 months ago
Reply to  Bomber

The hackers just released a statement, they’re specifically looking for Chris Moore’s information on a recent purchase..

Harvey Park Bench
Harvey Park Bench
6 months ago
Reply to  Haeter

To discuss the ATS’s extend warranty.

MikeInTheWoods
MikeInTheWoods
6 months ago
Reply to  Bomber

Same concern here, we just bought a 2023 Civic Si about a month ago. I’m sure they didn’t secure the data since the dealership can’t even handle a sales transaction correctly.

71
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x