Home » New York Used A Whole New Kind Of Parking Boot For The First Time Yesterday And You’ll Hate This One, Too

New York Used A Whole New Kind Of Parking Boot For The First Time Yesterday And You’ll Hate This One, Too

Barnacle Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Hey everybody! Big news, big New York news! Just days after the city was rocked by an unusual 4.8 magnitude earthquake, the city must have developed a taste for earth-shaking news, because the NYPD (that’s the LAPD of NYC) unveiled an all-new way to disable cars that have delinquent parking or have in one way or another earned the ire of the NYPD: the Barnacle Device. It’s an alternative to the famous/infamous wheel boot, but this thing is a windshield boot, looking like a large book opened and laid flat against the windshield, blocking vision.

Part of me thinks, hey, this is better! At least you can still drive the car! You just need to lean your head out the side window, excited dog-style, and keep speeds low, right? Or get a helpful friend to sit on the hood and yell LEFT or RIGHT or STOP STOP STOP PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF EVERYTHING HOLY STOP and then you can be on your way, right?

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Well, no, those are all terrible ideas and you should in no way do that. Besides, they have all your information when they stick that thing on there, so you’ll be in an even greater depth of shit if you do that, I suspect.

The Barnacle device seems to have been first deployed on a Volvo VNL semi-truck, as seen in this tweet:

ADVERTISEMENT

The Barnacle grips onto a windshield in much the same way as an octopus would attach to something, via suction cups. Ironically, that is not how barnacles (the crustacean) attach themselves to animals like whales. Those biological barnacles secrete a fast-drying glue that is incredibly strong – and works in wet environments. This glue has been the inspiration for new surgical glues that can stop bleeding incredibly fast, and other industrial uses are being studied. It’s amazing stuff!

Oh, but back to the Barnacle device, which lacks any sort of exciting biologically-inspired adhesives. It’s just powerful suction cups. One nice thing about the Barnacle is that the victim – can I call them a victim? Sure, why not– is able to pay their fines right there on the device and have it release itself when a given code is entered, eliminating any need to hunt down a police officer to get a boot off.

The whole process can be seen in this video about these things produced by the Henry Ford Museum:

I guess in cities that use these, those drop boxes would be around? I suspect if you don’t return them to a dropbox and instead choose to, say, fling it into a lake, like a giant, rectangular frisbee, you’ll be charged some exorbitant amount for the thing. Barnacle has their own video showing this process in even more detail, from the “enforcer’s” perspective:

ADVERTISEMENT

I guess overall, these are much better than the traditional wheel boots. At least these have a process for relatively easy removal by the car’s owner, which wheel boots never did. Nobody likes dealing with these, but the windshield variants do seem like a step in the right direction. And, even better, if anyone ever develops spray paint that renders objects transparent, we won’t have to worry about these at all!

Relatedbar

When Did We Get So Weird About Tall Shifters?

The ‘Tow Track’ Is A Smart Little RC Robot Designed To Rescue Cars And/Or Pull Off Some Devious Pranks

If You’re Stuck In A Traffic Jam In China, You Can Pay Someone On A Motorcyle To Get You Out Of It

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
86 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
7 months ago
Curtis Loew
Curtis Loew
7 months ago

Yeah I would just slide something under it and pop the suction cup off. You really only have to worry about it if you live in the state that puts them on AND they suspend registrations for parking tickets. Otherwise who cares? Kind of like the EZ pass pay by plate when you are traveling. Not much they can do to you about blowing past it.

Scott Ross
Scott Ross
7 months ago

My town went with the barnacles years ago. They still use them.

MrLM002
MrLM002
7 months ago

I wonder how much clearance a Jeep Wrangler windshield has, as in could you fold it down to negate the issue one of these provides, till the battery dies and the device comes off.

*edit: Nvm, apparently it’s GPS tracked and has a noisemaker built in.

Last edited 7 months ago by MrLM002
Keon R
Keon R
7 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

It looks like they’re only a few inches thick. If they don’t install it all the way at the bottom of the windshield, I could definitely fold my windshield down and drive perfectly fine. GPS and noisemaker be damned, if I need to get somewhere in an emergency, I will.

MrLM002
MrLM002
7 months ago
Reply to  Keon R

Nice. That being said with how easily one can remove it I imagine it would be even easier to remove with the windshield folded.

OttosPhotos
OttosPhotos
7 months ago

Hawaii started using it earlier this year, and it hasn’t been well-received.

https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/video/2024/02/13/barnacle-device-cracks-down-illegal-parkers-oahu-gets-push-back-drivers/

Matthew C
Matthew C
7 months ago

Lovely. Wildly unpopular opinion here but just another reason that I despise NYC. Not the people or the State but the absurdity of this. I never seen a city that had its hands in your pocket more than that NYC. ( side note, whole family in my side is from there)

Horizontally Opposed
Horizontally Opposed
7 months ago
Reply to  Matthew C

To quote some greats: “where should we relocate after NYC, what do you propose?”

DubblewhopperInDubblejeopardy
DubblewhopperInDubblejeopardy
7 months ago
Reply to  Matthew C

Remember, the mafia was bad because the greedy government couldn’t get their hands on the millions of dollars they were making. Now the mob is gone, guess what the government is doing…..

Frankencamry
Frankencamry
7 months ago

This seems way more fun to go vigilante with than a boot.

Once you get your slim jim with air groove technique down you have a super loud suction cup thing that will go on any suitable window. Will it stick to the side of a subway car?

Will NYPD keep helpfully posting the installations for quicker access?

IRegertNothing, Esq.
IRegertNothing, Esq.
7 months ago

Now cyclists and pedestrians in NYC can look forward to sharing the streets with more drivers who won’t see anything directly ahead of them. At least the idiots staring at their phones can put them down.

Harmon20
Harmon20
7 months ago
MarcK1973
MarcK1973
7 months ago

Just import a right-hand drive car with tinted windows and problem solved!

AlfaWhiz
AlfaWhiz
7 months ago
Reply to  MarcK1973

I had the exact same thought, until I saw how big this thing is on a regular car… but a curved windshield would probably do the trick (good luck with a Lancia Stratos or a Saab 900).

Library of Context
Library of Context
7 months ago

I wonder what a magnetic bulk eraser would do to the electronics of this thing? Especially if it’s not my car, and I’m just thumping every one of these I see on the street.

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
7 months ago

You could be a hero. But just for one day.

My Goat Ate My Homework
My Goat Ate My Homework
7 months ago

you would need a cape and a secret identity.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
7 months ago

I wonder if Rain X would make these things slip right off ?

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
7 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

I think it would actually help it seal better.

Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
7 months ago

I love how they allude to this making parking better EXCEPT THE TRUCK IS STILL IN THE FUCKING WAY AND NOW THE DRIVER HAS TO CALL SOMEONE ELSE TO MOVE THE FUCKING TRUCK.

I hate illegal parkers too, but, this isn’t serving anyone but the boot makers and the traffic enforcement union.

Last edited 7 months ago by Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
AlfaWhiz
AlfaWhiz
7 months ago

Yeah, it’s always been very helpful to render the offending vehicle immobile, thus making the situation worse for everyone.

Jack Beckman
Jack Beckman
7 months ago

Well, no, as the driver can pay the fine right there and then remove the device, so it’s actually an improvement.

Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack Beckman

It’s an improvement on the OLD way which had the SAME problem only worse. They made it worse. Then made it not as worse with this. The driver still has to contact someone; paying the fine is a contact to a solution developed and enforced by a person. Then, hopefully they are capable of removing the thing from their windshield. I don’t think my mom could do it. She’s 70 and in great health. She’s also all of 5 feet tall. My sister is also 5 feet tall. What about little people? What about disabled people? The list goes on.

You may call this an improvement, but now the onus to remedy the parking situation is entirely on the driver, who we already know is a numbnuts because we had to put this barnacle on their car in the first place. So now the person who caused the problem is responsible for solving the problem. That’s not going to work well. Should it not be the responsibility of the law enforcement agency to enforce the laws? If its only 2 hour parking and Parking Ticket Timmy is there for 3. Gets a barnacle, and now he’s parking there for 6 hours because he had to go get his wallet from home because he was running late and forgot it; ultimately leading him to parking illegally in the first place.

Now, what’s the solution? IDK. Tow em. IDC. We talk about reducing congestion in cities, maybe we should actually enforce the laws so the people who make city driving terrible finally face the ramifications of their actions and are either going to change and abide by the laws or just stop driving. We are way too tolerant of people abusing public infrastructure.

Jack Beckman
Jack Beckman
7 months ago

If you can’t remove the device even after paying, uh, I dunno, don’t park illegally in the first place? I don’t object to towing them either, but doesn’t that cost more for everyone involved? I don’t know if the fine with this device is cheaper or not.

Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack Beckman

That’s precisely the point. If the problem is congestion/parking illegally, we’re making it harder to remove the problem. So just remove the problem rather than making the problem worse.

It SHOULD cost a lot of money to break the rules. Maybe people will start following them or utilizing the presumably viable mass transit NYC has to offer, and ease some congestion.

The problem is, the enforcement of that would be done by the same people who do the barnacle and IMO they are a lost cause in solving real problems for real people.

In my young and dumber days (I’m still dumb just not as dumb) I got towed. Lord knows I park like a saint now. An iOT barnacle
just makes law breaking more convenient for the law breaker but just as painful for the population when the goal of enforcing parking should be to keep parking available and reduce congestion.

Last edited 7 months ago by Bjorn A. Payne Diaz
Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
7 months ago

Slim Jim and some oil. I doubt it could resist a metal shim being slid underneath. Even with rigid protective rings around the suctions cup, windshield curvature would permit access. At some point, someone will sell a removal kit on eBay.

Phuzz
Phuzz
7 months ago
Reply to  Crank Shaft

Although at that point they’ve already got your license plate so you’ll still get fined. Probably including an additional fine for “unauthorized removal” or somesuch.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
7 months ago
Reply to  Phuzz

I completely agree. Which is why I’m starting a new service company named Remora Removal that will send out camouflaged workers to melt tiny holes in Barnacles so that they passively fall off your windshield when you drive away.

DysLexus
DysLexus
7 months ago

That thing looks massive. I don’t think it would fit on my Miata. It would rest on the cowl and reach over the front half of convertible top.
Another reason to own a small car in the big city.

Mark Tucker
Mark Tucker
7 months ago

I have a more foolproof solution, one that I’ve sworn by for years: Don’t go to New York.

Nycbjr
Nycbjr
7 months ago
Reply to  Mark Tucker

would be more like “don’t move to ny and not pay your fines”, cause it takes years of ignoring tickets to get one of these!

Spartanjohn113
Spartanjohn113
7 months ago
Reply to  Nycbjr

Or just take public transportation while in New York City. I went last spring for the first time and was blown away at how well it worked and how convenient it was. Or at least it is those things compared to transit options in Michigan/Detroit and the ridiculously short-routed People Mover.

Clark B
Clark B
7 months ago
Reply to  Spartanjohn113

It is pretty remarkable, coming from a city that has a poor bus system at best. Although I have to say, the NYC subway was possibly one of the most filthy, disgusting, smelly places I’ve ever been in. To the point where I got nauseous more than once. It was also difficult to navigate when you’re only there five days and don’t really have time to learn the system. The second time we went to NYC we drove our car some, and used Lyft/Uber to get everywhere else. Cheaper than cabs (then, anyway), cleaner than the subway. I’m probably in a minority, but driving in NYC wasn’t bad. I didn’t try to drive to some of the more popular areas, but for hitting up restaurants in a regular part of town, no issue, including parking. No idea what things are like now though, it’s been eight years since I was there last. A lot has changed since then.

Nycbjr
Nycbjr
7 months ago
Reply to  Clark B

New Yorker here, it’s pretty much the same, tho I don’t find the subways all that smelly (maybe in late august lol). Lyft/Uber is def not cheap anymore, prolly more than cabs. I own a car and driving isn’t that bad, we use it mostly to leave the city, occasionally maybe take it out to brooklyn.

Clark B
Clark B
7 months ago
Reply to  Nycbjr

I was there in late summer so that explains why it smelled so bad. That, and I have a very sensitive nose and am allergic to mold. My body was not happy down there lol

Pit-Smoked Clutch
Pit-Smoked Clutch
7 months ago
Reply to  Spartanjohn113

I went 10 years ago and was blown away by how well it DIDN’T work. It’s great as long as you’re going somewhere 1 train away. I think I had 2 trips like that the entire week I was there. The rest of the trips involved 2 transfers and took 45 minutes to go 3 miles.

Slow Joe Crow
Slow Joe Crow
7 months ago
Reply to  Mark Tucker

I was last in New York over 20 years ago, I feel no desire to return

My Goat Ate My Homework
My Goat Ate My Homework
7 months ago

I’ll bet that in about 1 week there will be at least 2 hacks for it. One to remove it (using only a USB cable), and one to totally hijack it and let you reinstall it on the front glass at traffic headquarters with a ransom.

Alexk98
Alexk98
7 months ago

I see both of these as absolute wins, not because I would ever do either, but because people will just to piss off the NYPD, and the reaction will be priceless.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
7 months ago

But they got your car’s info when they installed it, and probably yours too. I’m sure it has software and a cell connection so that if you tamper with it, it calls for backup.

My Goat Ate My Homework
My Goat Ate My Homework
7 months ago

They already have your car’s info before they install it. That’s how they know to install it, because of the unpaid parking tickets on the cars record. Presumably the person is already a scofflaw so not sure they care.

As for the software and cell connection that is what the hacking takes care of, presumably. And you’re not stealing it, you’re returning it to their window, maybe with a cheeky note.

Also, backup for traffic enforcement, lolz. Three wheeled meter reader mobiles will converge on the target at a rate of… 5 MPH, once their done writing whatever ticket they’re currently working on.

Baron Usurper
Baron Usurper
7 months ago

The device contains a SIM card that some kid from OU was able to hack for free internet. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51133807

Mechjaz
Mechjaz
7 months ago

Oh that *was* Mo Rocca. I was wondering why it sounded so much like the Daily Show of yore, and after the slightly dramatized buildup of parking a car, expected a punchline.

Spartanjohn113
Spartanjohn113
7 months ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

You can also experience him on almost a weekly basis on NPR’s “Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me!”

DadBod
DadBod
7 months ago
Reply to  Spartanjohn113

I irrationally hate that show

Cayde-6
Cayde-6
7 months ago
Reply to  Spartanjohn113

I thought it’s been a long time he’s been on it regularly.

Though what confused the shit out of me a while back was when they had Joel Kim Booster on literally every week for several months.

Turbotictac
Turbotictac
7 months ago

Time to buy a Willys Jeep and become ungovernable

JurassicComanche25
JurassicComanche25
7 months ago

Solution: remove all windows, no barnacle.

Buzz
Buzz
7 months ago

Running your defroster on high for about 15 minutes should help reduce the suction enough that you can slip a credit card underneath and break the seal.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
7 months ago
Reply to  Buzz

If they were smart enough to put a vacuum sensor in, then it could easily maintain suction against temperature changes. I mean, they had to have considered the sun at some point.

JaredTheGeek
JaredTheGeek
7 months ago
Reply to  Crank Shaft

They do and it does, but this still defeats its. There is an internal battery that lasts for about 30 days.

BolognaBurrito
BolognaBurrito
7 months ago
Reply to  JaredTheGeek

How long does it take for this to defeat it? And what if it’s already 80F outside?

JaredTheGeek
JaredTheGeek
7 months ago
Reply to  BolognaBurrito

That may be too warm for it to work.

DadBod
DadBod
7 months ago
Reply to  JaredTheGeek

I am having trouble believing that the people who designed this failed to take defrosters into account.

JaredTheGeek
JaredTheGeek
7 months ago
Reply to  DadBod

Its not just the defroster. You run that to help with the physical attach of sliding something under the edge of the suction cups to release it. They still have all of the vehicle information so they will get you someday.

HOT_HATCH
HOT_HATCH
7 months ago

Nice. $150 bucks for a windshield vs $ a lot more for a wheel and tire.

Dale Mitchell
Dale Mitchell
7 months ago
Reply to  HOT_HATCH

Not sure where you can get a windshield that inexpensive; is it make of chicken wire?

HOT_HATCH
HOT_HATCH
7 months ago
Reply to  Dale Mitchell

As a seasoned Phoenician who replaces his windshield every 2-3 years I can assure you they exist, as long as you don’t have a fancy car. The windshield for my 10 year old GLI is about $150, the one for my SQ5 is about 10x that much.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
7 months ago

Unlike wheel boots, though, these are less useful as a driveway theft deterrent in, say, Portland or Toronto.

Andrew Wyman
Andrew Wyman
7 months ago

How long until a person damages their windshield removing one after paying, and then who pays for that repair?

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
7 months ago
Reply to  Andrew Wyman

You’ll have to file a damage claim with their automated phone system and wait for parking officer Steve Grabowski to get back to you

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
7 months ago
Reply to  Ranwhenparked

Currently not available. Temporarily reassigned to undercover role at the SVU until further notice.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
7 months ago
Reply to  Andrew Wyman

Lets see – Barnacle installed because driver didn’t pay tickets.
Driver removes the thing and breaks his own windshield.

Um – The Driver?

VanGuy
VanGuy
7 months ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

They literally said this is after they pay, and remove it. The barnacle caused damage in the course of its intended operation, through no fault (during removal) of the car owner.

86
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x