Home » Scout Might Be Planning A 2-Door Convertible Jeep Wrangler-Fighter But I’m Skeptical

Scout Might Be Planning A 2-Door Convertible Jeep Wrangler-Fighter But I’m Skeptical

Scout Drop Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Scout purists, I have interesting news: I have it on good authority that Scout — a subsidiary of VW and future purveyor of the glorious Traveler and Terramight build a two-door convertible 4×4 SUV variant of the Traveler/Terra. I’m a bit skeptical, but here’s what I know.

While at the Scout reveal in Nashville, I spotted on one of the manufacturing-presentation slides a little nugget about portfolio expansion.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Here’s a look:

Screen Shot 2024 10 26 At 9.42.42 Am

Look at that. There’s the Terra pickup, the Traveler SUV, and then… something else. It looks perhaps a bit shorter than the Traveler, which makes me think it could be a two-door; and at that point, given how niche the vehicle would be, I wouldn’t’ be surprised if it were a convertible like the old Scouts (and the old Willys Jeeps that inspired them).

ADVERTISEMENT

I reached out to Shaheen Karimian, head of product marketing at Scout (and one of the most legit car enthusiast there is), to ask about the decision to go with a hardtop on the Traveler given how big of a deal convertability is in the Jeep Wrangler/Ford Bronco space. Here’s what he told me:

It’s about the comprehensive customer experience and setting up the vehicle for success

Our core customers are saying they want a rugged vehicle. Meaning great packaging, competitive off road attributes, and something that can comfortably take a family across the country or into the outdoor environment.

How can we provide an open air feeling with the maximum amount of benefit, with the least amount of compromise? We landed at the cabana roof and glass roof options. On a two row vehicle of this size, to deliver on all the other customer needs, the removable panels would be large, heavy, and challenging to provide a high quality experience without creating a higher customer price or an impacted vehicle experience.

It is true a smaller subset of customers are saying they want that removable roof experience….Doesn’t mean we can’t do one in the future, on say a vehicle with fewer doors and a shorter wheelbase.

HOT DAMN.

Please car gods, deliver!

So that’s not a whole lot, but still, there is some amount of reason to believe that a two-door convertible Scout could be on the horizon. If that two-door comes with the range-extender option, I’d be tempted to choose it over the Traveler I just preordered. Because a two-door Extended-Range EV with a tailgate, a rear spare tire carrier, a solid axle, and a bench seat is the Grail of Grails.

Either way, consider my hopes up!

ADVERTISEMENT

Though really, I should keep those hopes in check. The two-door Wrangler is such a low-volume product, and ditto with the two-door Bronco. I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if those were canceled at some point in the not-so-distant future. The take-rate for a two-door SUV is just so low. But perhaps as a halo product to to build up a brand that’s new on the scene it could make a bit of sense? I’m not so sure.

All I know is: I want it to happen. So I’ll be doing “manifesting” or whatever it is the teens say I need to do to make this two-door open-top EREV dream happen.

[Graphics Guy note: top image via Scout Motors. The convertible 2-door is Photoshoppery, of course]

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
52 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JDE
JDE
3 hours ago

I think a Scout II length vehicle with stubby clamshells like the old FJ would be a decent compromise, but the real thing they need to do regardless of the door configuration is offer a full drop top version. That is the Iconic Scout look. A more full size SUV style with no roof on a beach somewhere.

JDE
JDE
3 hours ago
Reply to  JDE

Actually, how is it that Toyota has let the FJ Dies with no replacement. Missed the note about off roady looking things as being the darling of the ball right now? or what?

Maxzillian
Maxzillian
4 hours ago

At 92″ wide where the heck is it going to fit? I love what they’re aiming for here, but it’s absolutely massive…

Last edited 4 hours ago by Maxzillian
TheHairyNug
TheHairyNug
7 hours ago

I feel like the Traveler in that photo is already a two door

Bob the Hobo
Bob the Hobo
9 hours ago

Best chances of this working out for them financially are if they can build it on the same production line as the 4-door with little interruption. I’m not aware of Scout’s factory setup, but it has been successfully done before by other manufacturers.

Grey alien in a beige sedan
Grey alien in a beige sedan
9 hours ago

If you could hear me in the comment section here, I’m singing “Baby Scout” to the tune of Baby Shark.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
6 hours ago

Thank you for getting that song stuck in my head. Now every time I hear it, it will be about the scout. Grandpa scout do do do do do.

NC Miata NA
NC Miata NA
9 hours ago

A 2 door Scout convertible is perfect, I love it.

VW will totally be down for building something that will make Areton sales look like F150 numbers in comparison.

Harvey Firebirdman
Harvey Firebirdman
10 hours ago

If they make a 2 door with a removable hard top I would be near sold on getting one of these. As I stated in one of the other articles I am now debating between one the Travelers and the R3X to replace my aging FJ Cruiser but leaning more towards the scout but I am not bot really the biggest fan of bigger 4dr SUV’s and the R3X is supposed to be cheaper.

Silent But Deadly
Silent But Deadly
14 hours ago

I’d be curious about what sort of production numbers their factory is capable of and what sort of sale numbers they’d have to do of the Traveller (let alone the Terra) to justify a third iteration.

Personally, I’d prefer a Terra EREV with a flatbed. But then…who am I kidding cause no Scout is going to be available outside North America and certainly not in RHD. VW doesn’t even make commercial vehicles anymore…unless one counts the Buzz Load EV or whatever it is.

Space
Space
18 hours ago

Somehow they will do to this what they did to the new bus. It will come out years late and cost too much.
I hope I’m wrong.

Dest
Dest
1 day ago

Please don’t. I couldn’t care less that my Wrangler has a removable top but I do want a 2 door.

Last edited 1 day ago by Dest
TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 day ago

Hmmm
By the time it might actually be available, I might only have to deal potentially with one booster seat —if the bench is still available in the two-door.

Aaron C
Aaron C
1 day ago

I’ve never reserved a vehicle before, but I reserved for the Traveller EV. I’ve owned and driven Jeeps for 40 years and intended to nurse my 2012 JK 2-door 6-speed (with 140K miles) along until the Magneto arrived. But with Stellantis botching the Jeep brand and giving the finger to all us long-time Jeep folks, I’m ready to jump brands. My grandfather and my dad each had Scouts, and I love the heritage. Was looking at the R3X, but would prefer another short wheelbase 2-door in the Wrangler form factor. If Scout releases a 2-door with removable top? I’m in. 100%.

Rabob Rabob
Rabob Rabob
3 hours ago
Reply to  Aaron C

Can you really call 1 model over 2 generations “heritage”? This whole brand is going to flop.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
1 day ago

“Our core customers are saying”

Who? What? They have customers?

The ghost of Cyrus Hall McCormick?

A Scout 80 size scout would be great!

But who who are these core customers?

Utherjorge
Utherjorge
1 day ago

I would spend all the money

MrLM002
MrLM002
1 day ago

A 2 door Scout would be great, though I’d want it to be a 3 seat 2 door with the front bench seat.

We definitely need more convertible BEVs, and proper convertibles, not electric sliding soft top ones.

John Metcalf
John Metcalf
1 day ago

I grew up riding around in a little red 1960s Scout and then in a bigger blue Scout II—both pickups, both with removable roofs.

I would love to see a two-door removable top version. ????

AlterId
AlterId
1 day ago

If that two-door comes with the range-extender option, I’d be tempted to choose it over the Traveler I just preordered.

You won’t need a four-door if Scout announces a two-door convertible variant anyway, because your entire lifetime supply of potential offspring will gush out of you as soon as they do.

Utherjorge
Utherjorge
1 day ago
Reply to  AlterId

I see what you did here

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
1 day ago

That would almost be my unicorn. The Terra and the Traveler are still a bit bigger and wider than I’d prefer. So maybe at some point we have a family of Scout vehicles including a true compact truck or SUV of the Jimny class. But, whatever, keep on keepin’ on Scout. I might be persuaded to go bigger.

Aaron C
Aaron C
1 day ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

Same. My dad and grandfather each had a Scout 800. That and my family’s ’68 VW Type III Squareback were my earliest vehicle memories. Dad later got a CJ-5 and after that, a YJ. 2-door Wrangler- type vehicles are still feel like the proper proportion to me. I thought the replacement for my 2012 2-door 6-speed JK would be the Magneto, but I just reserved a Traveller, which I will happily switch to whatever 2-door they release if that’s offered. I love what the execs said at the rollout – buttons, body-on-frame, no sharing customer info, etc… They’re saying all the right things. Can’t wait to see how the company executes.

Last edited 1 day ago by Aaron C
Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
1 day ago
Reply to  Aaron C

I’d like Scout to be so successful people stop appending VW to its name. I know Wolfsburg holds the purse strings, but I’m encouraged Scout is it’s own entity, was designed here, and will be built here and you don’t have to hit a VW dealer to buy one. A little curious as to how they’ll build out their service, but imagine it’ll be akin to the Tesla model.

MGA
MGA
9 hours ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

Agreed. My interest in Scout is contingent VW stay as far from it as possible. Selling at a VW dealer? No go. VW can inject capital and reap backend rewards. Ironically, I’m sure the Harvester engine will be some VW mill, and as it’s the most compelling aspect of the Scout (to me), that’s unfortunate.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
8 hours ago
Reply to  MGA

I wonder if REX motors have to meet emissions requirements if they function as nothing but a generator? If not, maybe old air cooled Beetle engines will make a comeback as REXs. Not really hoping for that, but it’d be funny to hear a Scout go by clattering like something out of the sixties.

MGA
MGA
8 hours ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

If we’re going that route, why not an old Benz TD?

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
8 hours ago
Reply to  MGA

Greenies would go nuts.

MGA
MGA
8 hours ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

Fuck em.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
2 days ago

It would be a hoot but I think there are problems. You have only so many car people. By that people who have/will spend the money on a boutique car. Now of those there is a subset of what kind of vehicle they want. Now you have a small number but they are only going to buy 1 vehicle maybe two. Now you have another subset off road two door convertible 4×4 no room for family. Now you have three vehicles to choose from. Now you are the third out of the gates. That market is tiny. Think Miata and how they were first still sell great but just about every other Johnny come lately is or has failed even the one that was a Miata with a better looking body. I think to make the small sales numbers vehicle market successful we need to go back in time. Remember Healey’s? They used to make a small number of unique car bodies designed for higher sales volume vehicles. We need to go back to coach building, maybe kit cars using 3D printers to put radical designs on every day cars and maybe even upgrade them like a few of the companies that boost Mercedes and BMWs for increased performance. Use ceramic molds that are cheaper because they don’t last but lower volumes they don’t need to. It is guaranteed lower volume like Isuzu did with the Vehicross. A good computer design team could program any body style you want and print out from 1 to 1 million of them. I’m surprised Musk hasn’t done this already.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
2 days ago

And yet, we have the Murano CrossCabriolet.
And the Evoque Convertible.
And the T-Roq Cabriolet.
And the Bronco 2 door.
And the Wrangler 2 door.

Last edited 2 days ago by Urban Runabout
V10omous
V10omous
1 day ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Only 2 of those are currently sold here in the US.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
1 day ago
Reply to  V10omous

The US isn’t the center of the universe.

A Man from Florida
A Man from Florida
21 hours ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

I’ve been told by physicists that everywhere is the center of the universe. Ipso facto post hoc semper ubi sub ubi.

V10omous
V10omous
20 hours ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Ok, even granting your opinion, the Murano and Evoque have still been discontinued for years.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
1 day ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Suzuki X-90

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 day ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Not relevant, but I saw a CrossCabriolet Friday —first time ever with the top down

Kleinlowe
Kleinlowe
2 days ago

I think you’ve hit the nail on the head with the 2-door being a halo car. Most people buy SUVs on image; it makes them feel like they’re not sinking ten years of payments into a soulless commuting appliance, but something FUN! or at least capable of FUN! maybe someday. A four-door station wagon, no matter how lifted, does not say that to most people; a two seater convertible does.

To the average person, a Scout just looks like any other SUV. Most people can’t tell the difference between something that has skeuomorphic visual offroading flourishes, an automotive Viceroy butterfly, and couldn’t care at all about the difference between EREV and PHEV. PHEV softroaders with 10% more mpg and 80% of the cost will eat the Scout alive in the Normal People Market.

I don’t think the Bronco would have taken off at all if it had launched without a two-door variant or a fixed top, and the Bronco has more name recognition by far. The Scout brand isn’t hugely known to non-enthusiasts, and both EREV architecture and offroad chops aren’t something that have any visual appeal. People can’t see offroading prowess or a EREV drivetrain. (Unless we start doing big graphic letting down the side, like the turbo 80s. Can we? Please? Big old ‘EREV’ down the side cut out from a contrasting diagonal stripe.) So the brand’s going to need to survive on a fanbase of offroad nerds until it gets lucky.

Hopefully Volkswagen’s leadership understands that the strategy of starting with an enthusiast base and building credibility is very slow to get started and they’ll have to nurture a tiny but rabid community for years before they break into the mainstream.

Last edited 2 days ago by Kleinlowe
1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
2 days ago
Reply to  Kleinlowe

True but non enthusiasts are not buying these types of vehicles. Maybe the genx I am different crowd who all dress, talk, think, and dress alike, can we ditch the manbun already, but you might appeal to them as the ultimate stand out from the crowd group but risk alienating the true enthusiast because manbun.

MGA
MGA
9 hours ago
Reply to  Kleinlowe

This might be true in that the brands of Wrangler and Bronco were built on classic 2 door models, but Jeep people have been begging for a 4-door Wrangler for decades, and nobody is buying 2-door Wranglers or Broncos. A 2- door Scout, IMO, would only be a novelty. They’ll sell far, far more 4-doors. Not to mention, offroading today isn’t really the same as it was 30 years ago. Overlanders aren’t going to fit all their crap in a 2-door. Few folks are buying the less practical version of generally practical cars. Why would dad get a sedan for family AND a 2-door SUV for fun when he can get a 4-door SUV for family and fun? Honestly, I don’t see a 2-door Scout selling well at all (compared to 4-door) unless it offers something different than just 2 less doors. Being a convertible isn’t it.

Kleinlowe
Kleinlowe
18 minutes ago
Reply to  MGA

All that is very true, but it’s not about what sells, it’s about image. It’s about getting people into the (figurative) dealership. Like Tracy said: Halo Car. And not in the Puma Warthog sense.
Again, I insist:
Normal people buy cars based on emotion first, and then practicality.
Do most people take home a 4-door and never take the roof off? Absolutely. But the emotional connection to the fun, exciting, impractical model is already made. This is why I said skeuomorphic softroaders will eat the Scout’s lunch. Without something that says ‘Yes, we are cool as a Jeep!’ on the (metaphorical) front lawn, most people will will get the same emotion from something that has black plastic cladding, a tall ride height, and chunky styling, and that something will be cheaper to purchase and operate because it only needs to pretend to offroadery things.
I noticed something interesting doing some extremely cursory research: For Jeeps and Broncos, the advertising tends to show the 2-door, or a 4-door with the top off.
Overlanders are enthusiasts. Enthusiasts can’t float a brand alone. My worry is that Volkswagen will want immediate profitability and kill the brand before it can build the same cachet that Land Rover and the Land Cruiser have that allow them to succeed without the `Fun!’ factor.

Last edited 12 minutes ago by Kleinlowe
Mr E
Mr E
2 days ago

“On a two row vehicle of this size, to deliver on all the other customer needs, the removable panels would be large, heavy, and challenging to provide a high quality experience without creating a higher customer price or an impacted vehicle experience.”

(/confused face)

Whilst road/wind noise is a potential downside to removable roofs, I’ve never felt the panels on either the Bronco or Wrangler were too heavy or large.

V10omous
V10omous
1 day ago
Reply to  Mr E

This is quite a bit larger than either a Bronco or Wrangler though.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
6 hours ago
Reply to  Mr E

v10mous is right. This thing is about the size of a modern Tahoe. Its larger than the classic Travelall that was the 4 door big brother to the Scout.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
2 days ago

Congratulations on reserving a Scout Traveler SUV!
Below are the details of your reservation. We’ll be in touch as we get closer to production.

Reservation Number #4154*****
Payment (refundable)
$ 100 USD
Discover Card
Vehicle Model
Traveler SUV
Energy System
Electric + Gas

Last edited 2 days ago by Crank Shaft
Aaron C
Aaron C
1 day ago
Reply to  Crank Shaft

Reservation Number #43566*****
Payment (refundable) $ 100 USD
American_express
Vehicle Model: Traveler SUV
Energy System: Electric             

My first time reserving a vehicle!

Last edited 1 day ago by Aaron C
Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
1 day ago
Reply to  Aaron C

Mine too! Congrats on your brilliant choice. 🙂

Drive By Commenter
Drive By Commenter
2 days ago

There are dozens of us! Dozens!

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
1 day ago

And they’re baker’s dozens, too.

Shooting Brake
Shooting Brake
2 days ago

Take a few breaths David, gonna be a few years before any chance of a 2 door cause they regular market would need to be in production and successful first I suspect, haha.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
2 days ago
Reply to  David Tracy

Don’t lose hope if Ford and Jeep bail out there may be a market big enough for just the Scout.
It could happen ????.

52
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x