Home » Somehow Modern German Warships Are Still Using 1970s 8″ Floppy Disks And Saab Is Involved

Somehow Modern German Warships Are Still Using 1970s 8″ Floppy Disks And Saab Is Involved

Diskship Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Other than cars, my other big ridiculous obsession is old and woefully obsolete computing devices. If you’re an Autopian Member, you’ve likely seen evidence of this in your second-year birthday artwork, which was generated by a team of me and an old Apple II. It’s also why my attention was grabbed so vigorously and wetly when I saw news stories about how the German Navy is just now planning on replacing the eight-inch floppy disks used in their Brandenburg-class (F123) frigates. Oh, also Saab is involved with all this, though not the part of Saab that made cars.

Now, the idea that a legacy system on something like a battleship still uses floppy disks isn’t really all that shocking: Boeing 747s, for example, still use 3.5″ disks for critical software updates, lots of professional embroidery machines use 3.5″ floppies for storing embroidery data (though it looks like many are getting converted to USB storage), and as late as 2023 critical infrastructure systems like the Chuck E. Cheese animatronic systems also used 3.5″ floppies. Sometimes, if something works, there’s just no need to bother to replace it, and in many cases, floppy disks just still work.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

That said, what really shocked me about the German Navy announcement wasn’t just that they were still using floppy disks, but that they were using 8” floppy disks. You may have noticed that all of the examples I gave above used 3.5″ disks, the most recent major iteration of floppy disk technology, small, plastic-encased disks that could store anywhere from 320K to 2.88 MB, depending on the operating system and year. These types of disks were developed by Sony in the early 1980s and first rose to popularity when they were chosen as the default disk format for the first Apple Macintosh (in 400K form) and soon thereafter were used by other major computing platforms of the era, including the Atari ST, Commodore Amiga, and then the IBM PC standard.

Bm F216
Eugenio Castillo Pert/Wikimedia Commons

Now, the F123 Brandenburg-class frigate is a warship that was first ordered in 1989 and first commissioned and built between 1994 and 1996, well within the era of the 3.5″ floppy disk’s dominance of the removable digital media space. One would think that if any systems developed for this warship were to rely on floppy disk storage, it would use 3.5″ floppies, which were by far the most common, the most advanced, and the most durable choice at the time.

Eight-inch floppy disks, on the other hand, strike me as a really, really strange choice. Eight-inch floppies were the very first type of removable disk media developed for computers, with IBM pioneering their development in 1971. Initially, these were read-only disks capable of holding 80K, but later development allowed for read/writeable disks, and by 1976 a respectable 500K was able to be stored on an 8″ floppy.

ADVERTISEMENT

1971 Floppy P3b

 

Here’s the thing, though: 8″ floppies are, as you can guess, big. They’re cumbersome. And while they were used on some early personal and business computers, it was soon determined that they were just too expensive and clunky to be really viable for mainstream home computers, and by 1976 the smaller 5.25″ disk had been developed, effectively a scaled-down 8″ design. Just so you can see an example of the difference in scale, here’s a 5.25″ floppy in front of the only 8″ floppy I have, set on my Apple //c:

Floppies

See? They’re huge. And, by the 1980s, they were definitely in deep decline, with 5.25″ floppies having taken over the general computing disk market. That’s what baffles me so much about all of this. Big 8″ floppies were extremely uncommon in the mid-’80s, and by the time these ships were being built, were almost extinct for most uses. By the time these ships were being built in the early 90s, you would think that just sourcing 8″ media and drives would have been far more expensive and difficult than sourcing 3.5″ media and drives. So, why did they make that choice?

ADVERTISEMENT

The systems that use the 8″ drives are part of the Saab-supplied data acquisition systems, which have nothing to do with weapons systems, which are also being upgraded.

The Saab systems are part of the ship’s general operating tech, and the goal seems to be to try and update these systems with as minimal disruption as possible. That’s why the request from June to the Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support (BAAINBw) reads like this:

Replacement floppy disk unit
Development and integration on board of an emulating storage system to replace the floppy disk unit for the data acquisition system on board the Class 123 frigates.

They’re looking to make an 8″disk storage emulator, so to the overall system, it looks like nothing has changed. These sort of solid-state storage systems that seamlessly replace disk storage have been a staple of the retro computing world for years; here’s one for old Apple II, Mac, and Lisa computers that you can get for $129, for example. I suspect that whatever gets developed for these battleships will be at least conceptually similar to this.

I just can’t figure out why Saab would have chosen 8″ drives back in the early ’90s, though, and it’s sort of driving me nuts. There are precisely 0.0 reasons that anyone would choose an 8″ system over a 3.5″ floppy system in 1989 – 8″ floppies are more fragile, hold less data, take up more room – none of it makes any sense. Well, it’s possible the F123’s systems were simply updated legacy technology that was developed many years before and used the 8″ floppies. That answer would make sense and would point to these warships’ control systems being based on 1970s tech, which I suppose is possible. If it ain’t broke, as they say.

ADVERTISEMENT

I find all of this fascinating. The fact that 8″ floppies have managed to find a niche to survive to 2024 is in itself incredible; the fact that this niche seems to have been created in the early 1990s just makes it even more baffling and astounding. I’m sort of sad to see these go, and while part of me wonders if this is the final death knell for the 8″ disk, I suppose I wouldn’t be shocked to find that some mining operation or maybe some ocean desalinator still runs on them. Some things just never really seem to die.

Relatedbar

The First Parking Sensor Used Parts Nabbed From Polaroid Cameras

This Is How Electronic Ignition Works And Also How To Make A Spark Plug Play Music

We’re The Only Car Site To Generate Member Perks On Genuine 40-Year Old Computers And Here’s Why That’s Cool

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
61 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert Runyon
Robert Runyon
1 month ago

Ah hell. I’m gonna go work on my car. The old one with no computers….

Black Peter
Black Peter
1 month ago

I quickly scanned the responses but had a thought: I managed a team servicing IBM Displywriters in the 80’s, theses were word processing “computers”, they used 8 inch drives and like the daisy wheel printers, they could be calibrated with simple hand tools. We got to the point of efficiency where my guys would carry a set of feeler gauges, a set or torx keys and a screwdriver. All fitting nicely in our suits (we serviced doctor’s offices and law firms) Back to this example, I could see maintaining the technology that was so simple it could be fixed with the same tools you fix a distributor with. In my time there we never had an actual part failure, just a Snail and Bolenoid (Bail and Solenoid) adjustment was needed.

If anyone is wondering we carried spare monitors, CPUs and keyboards in our cars. I felt it was much better to get the customer up fast, by swapping these out. We generally got all our service calls done by lunch and could repair these at the office later.

Red865
Red865
1 month ago

I remember my Dad had bought a Radio Shack ‘Tandy Business’ computer system for his civil engr. business back in early 80’s. Had these 8″ disks. There were two or three floppy drives in separate box about the size of a small microwave. Seems he paid something like $10-$12 thousand for that system. It didnt have the dot matrix printer, but the ‘daisy wheel’ printer. He also used to use a acoustical modem to transmit data to some company in Michigan to process civil eng data. He only threw the Tandy away in 2010 when he retired, sold their house and moved to another state. My ‘Silent’ generation Dad was always eager to adopt new tech.

YourMedic
YourMedic
1 month ago
Reply to  Red865

A Tandy business system kind of like these? https://youtu.be/VSzr2zW0pfk?feature=shared&t=63

Red865
Red865
1 month ago
Reply to  YourMedic

No, it was next gen TRS80 II, I think. This pic grabbed my attention.
TRS-80 Microcomputer System Model II – Computer – Computing History

Jmfecon
Jmfecon
1 month ago

Old technology is hard to replace. You need to ensure backward compatibility, otherwise, you need to retest everything.

They won’t really replace the floppies, they will change to something that emulates it, so they don’t need to change the back-end, which will run decades old software.

This is usual on a lot of utilities systems too. It may be old, but better than most crap we have today.

Beater_civic
Beater_civic
1 month ago

For anyone interested in this kind of stuff, may I recommend the fascinating article https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk2/1988/8837/8837.PDF (“SDI: Technology, Survivability, and Software”). For the Gen Z’ers out there, the idea was to blow up Soviet ICBMs with nuclear-powered X-ray lasers. Possibly mounted on space stations.

Mandatory reading for anyone in IT or telecommunications when the manglers start bleating about “N+1 architectures” and “disaster recovery.”

Jmfecon
Jmfecon
1 month ago
Reply to  Beater_civic

This is gold. What I like most on this kind of thing is the timelines. First phase in 10~15 years, second in 15~20 and third in around 30 years.

And usually this kind of thing is delayed by a decade. Take JWST as example.

Only if these guys knew about agile…

Sundance
Sundance
1 month ago

Back in 1985 I joined our German army. Remembering which equipment we were using then, I’m amazed that the F123 is so modern to use floppies. I expected tapes…

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
1 month ago

In the late 80’s, I had an internship at Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio. The group I was working with won a bid to replace the vacuum tubes used in the self-guidance systems of tail guns in B52s using discrete logic chips (e.g., 74LSxx chips) which were still not the highest of tech of tech at that time, being phased out by microcontrollers and other CMOS tech.

In other words, the military is (or at least was) super conservative when it comes to tech. MILSPEC tech had to be well proven to be survivable on the battlefield and included requirements to be operationable from -40C to 125C, iirc. Consumer grade, in contrast, was 0C-40C. So even today, military, as well as automotive and industrial applications, don’t use bleeding-edge tech.

Gerontius Garland
Gerontius Garland
1 month ago

Half a meg of storage? That’s like a single medium-quality photo.

Christo Arvanitis
Christo Arvanitis
1 month ago

I sold computers to contractors in the early 80s that used 8″ disks. We started to offer a new innovation called a “Winchester hard drive”. It stored FIVE MEGABYTES!!! Cost for the 5mb drive? $10,000.

Black Peter
Black Peter
1 month ago

I was there too

61
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x