Let’s say it’s 1980, and you want to buy a car that takes a different approach from the mainstream brands. Something that shows everyone you think independently. You’re actually rather spoiled for choice of iconoclastic rides during this time; imagine being able to walk into a dealership and purchasing a brand-new Saab, Fiat, Lancia, Peugeot, Subaru, Renault, or even a Rover SD1 3500 (which lasted on the market literally less time than Another One Bites The Dust was on the charts). Today, essentially all of these quirky cars are gone from the American market.
Wait, what about Subaru? Doesn’t that brand still sell here, and relatively well? Sure, but sadly they survived by ditching the quirkiness that had been so much of the brand’s identity (and charm, to those who got it). You can see the progression over the last thirty years. The cool-as-hell XT Coupe and SVX tanked on the market, yet the Camry-fighting mid-sized Legacy gained traction and saw real success when Subaru threw on an off-road-looking costume. The funky B9 Tribeca SUV was rejected by the market until it was quickly assimilated into what eventually became the current Ascent, a vehicle so generic that you don’t even need to de-brand it for one of those bank car financing advertisements.
Our own Matt Hardigee recently sold his 2016 Subaru; the complaints he had were echoed by a number of commenters about cars of this brand over the last few decades. “The boredom of a Toyota without the reliability” is one quip I’ve heard. Hell, Matt didn’t even have a head gasket failure as was once the rule and not the exception so he should be happy.
I still think the issue lies deeper than quibbles like serial headlamp failures and lower control arm failures. Subaru needs to turn the tide with a statement piece that will reintroduce people to what made the cars with the weird-ass constellation logo appealing in years past. They’ve proved that they know how to not die like Saab, but can they really and truly live once again?
Weird, And Built To Stay That Way
Imagine a car with the spare tire sitting proudly atop a water-cooled flat engine up front. The proportions are a bit goofy, and controls on later models stick out of the steering column like antlers. Cursive script “front wheel drive” badges adorn the sides. Some offered interesting features like a single “cyclops” fog light hidden behind an electrically opening door in the center of the grille.
That sounds like something only Jason Torchinsky would love. Is this a French vehicle we’re talking about? No, it’s the Japanese Subaru.
That’s just the beginning. They made various strange versions of this already strange car like a pillarless hardtop coupe with an incongruous roof that rivaled the shape of the equally-odd Volvo 262C for awkwardness:
The real party trick, however, was the fact that you could get Subarus (wagons only at first) with four-wheel drive in a time when only Jeep-like vehicles offered it. The center-differential-equipped AMC Eagle can technically be called the first real crossover, but the Soobie wagon makes a strong case for the title despite a full-time-only drive system that you manually switched off and on:
Ah, but Subaru was not afraid to move that “goofy” lever really up into the red. In 1978, the Japanese firm took a bit of the down-under idea of a “ute” and the stylish approach of the “cowboy Cadillac” El Camino to make the Bi-Drive Recreational All Terrain Subaru, or BRAT for short.
Essentially it was the wagon converted to a pickup, but it circumvented the stringent taxes imposed on these imported trucks since it still seated four people. How? Well, two of them had to sit in the bed – backwards – in the so-called “fun seats.” Admittedly, seeing it in action below, if that doesn’t look like fun you must be clinically dead. Who says you need five hundred horsepower to have a good time?
A second-generation model based on the sleeker (for Subaru, at least) new-for-1980 Leone added things like a “halo roof” double sunroof, but still kept the basic formula unchanged. Sales in America continued through 1987, yet the BRAT was sold in places like Australia (where it was sold as the Brumby) until 1994.
Subaru did try something similar with a spiritual successor in the form of the 2002 Baja. Based on a Legacy, the four-door had a small extended bed in back where an Outback wagon would have had a cargo area. You could open the mid-gate pass-thru to use some interior space for long items or add a cage around the open tailgate to increase cargo capacity, but overall the thing looked a lot more fun and usable than it really was. Production ended in 2006, but supposedly the remaining stock didn’t sell off until 2008.
With the market’s current infatuation with things like Jeep Wranglers and open Ford Broncos, it’s a crime for Subaru not to revisit this beloved BRAT. Still, how can we make a vehicle that was barely acceptable from a mainstream marketing and safety standpoint nearly fifty years ago work today?
You Want To Be Everything, You Spoiled Little BRAT?
The BRAT showed the world that a fun and exciting car could still exist amidst the backdrop of rising inflation, high fuel prices, and choking emission controls. We can face the challenges of today’s safety restrictions with the same creativity by modifying a current Outback Wilderness wagon. “Bishop”, you ask. “You know that there’s a new Outback coming, right?” There’s always a new Outback on the horizon, and I don’t really care. If you remember, the BRAT based on the second-generation Leone continued to be built long after the later generations of the sedan and wagon were launched. Honestly, the older and dorkier the Soobie, the better BRAT it makes in my book.
Up front, a mock push bar simulating the popular and tough-looking period BRAT accessory is added to the Wilderness nose, leaving a void for a winch that you’d need a lot less than you might think with these funky wagons. With today’s projector units, there’s no need for big auxiliary lights but if don’t want driving lamps the size of large Panera Bread soup bowls then why would want a retro BRAT in the first place? Same thing with the recreated white spoker steel or coated aluminum wheels.
God, I’d love to put outdoor, rear-facing seats in a pickup bed of a new BRAT, but even if we turned them forward we’d have the issues of where to put things like shoulder belts. Once I got to the part where I was putting side airbags in the truck-bed walls, I knew a different approach was needed. Besides, it does rain and snow, and I’m told that some people find that less than desirable to sit in at seventy miles an hour.
Let’s go back to the Outback Wilderness side view:
Now, a number of the BRAT redux renderings I’ve seen just keep the four-door passenger compartment like on the old Baja; an enclosed cabin is no fun and easily one reason why buyers soundly rejected that half-revival. I might have another solution. Look at the cut lines on the cant rail: there are removable roof panels (left and right) over the front and rear passengers.
There’s a back seat as in the Outback wagon but the new BRAT is two-door now; front doors are lengthened slightly and now feature pillarless, frameless side glass so you’ll have a convertible when the roof panels are removed and put in the bed. Now, instead of people outside in the “fun seats” and tiny “halo roof” holes over the driver and front passenger, everyone will be together in the open and not yelling at each other to be heard through a sliding rear window.
The iconic striped “roll bar” of the BRAT (structurally quite necessary here) would hold a removable/folding open rear window to enhance the convertible feel (the defroster grid connects when in place).
Overall, the thing is starting to be similar in concept to the new Hummer EV that can be open with roof panels out. Like the classic Chevy Avalanche, I’m sure that the Hummer has the mid-gate behind the rear seat to expand the small bed.
Wait a minute. What? The Hummer HAS NO MIDGATE? Are you kidding? Supposedly there were packaging issues that made it impossible, but to me, if you couldn’t get that feature in you might as well have shitcanned the whole thing. I’d hate to say that this is yet another example of GM creating a great feature, perfecting it, and then dropping it, but, well, I just said it.
Our new BRAT will not make this omission. With the tailgate down and an add-on surrounding cage, you could get extremely long items in the bed.
Naturally, you couldn’t fit a Jet-Ski, a four-wheeler, or a motorcycle, but what if you did want to? You’ll need a bigger butt: the BRAT-ASS.
Wait! It’s Gonna Even Stranger
Recently, Matt was asked by an Autopian member about the validity of a crazy idea he had for a rather odd vehicle. As is often the case, instead of telling the reader to sober up before sending any more emails like this, Mr. Hardigee did the wrong thing and forwarded the message on to me:
That’s an interesting thought, but I realize that these personal watercraft (PWC) are big: around ten freaking feet actually. You’ll likely end up with a rather large vehicle that’s too purpose-built for one task, not unlike those strange van/fifth-wheel towing machines that were around in the eighties:
This was a tough one, but if it was easy where would the fun be?
Honestly, I don’t want a vehicle big enough to carry a large recreational toy all of the time. The solution might be an add-on BRAT Additional Stowage System, or BRAT-ASS for short.
In the simplest terms, it’s a bolt-on fit-in-receptacles trailer that sits close to the body (with a very small amount of flex allowed on the sides) with black trim pieces that extend forward to visually blend in with the BRAT’s primary rear wheels. You could relocate the tailgate from the main car onto the BRAT-ASS for a long cargo bed or remove it and use the ramp feature.
The ramp feature is the trick for making loading as simple as Taco Shackleford wants. As an influence, I looked at a failed venture called the Kelpie Kargo where a pickup truck was given a U-shaped frame and thin suspension arms to allow the bed to drop to the ground.
The BRAT-ASS uses a similarly shaped frame and an electric motor can lift the ramp and your cargo up once loaded. The cradle (with a winch at the end) pivots with the ramp and locks in place. Strap down the PWC and you’re gone.
The cradle frame for the PWC can slide out of the bed and stretcher-like wheels extend to let you roll it around your garage or yard. Naturally, things like four-wheelers, motorcycles, and lawn tractors would just go up the ramp on their own.
Despite what it might look like, the overall length is still similar to an F-150 pickup. The difference is that you can disconnect the BRAT-ASS and leave it in the backyard when not needed and have a much smaller and manageable car to do your everyday driving.
Admittedly, the BRAT-ASS in this form would likely be too costly for production. Still, even a functioning concept vehicle would end up as featured posts on ill-publicized websites like this one all over the world, sending everyone a long-anticipated message that the weird is back at Subaru. It’s about effing time.
My Love Is Bigger Than A Honda, Yeah It’s Bigger Than A Subaru
Many owners of old-school Soobies will rave about them, so one might assume that they were more reliable and durable than the current crop of that brand’s cars. Maybe that’s true, but there are other factors to keep in mind.
Fellow Autopian contributor Carlos Ferriera laughs when he tells me about how the driver’s seat in his Alfa Romeo 164S will inexplicably power backward when the car accelerates without him touching the switch. Other things work in the morning but might not work on his drive home later. On a Camry, you refuse to put up with this shit. If, like the Alfa, your car sounds like it’s qualifying for Le Mans when you rev the Busso V6 up to redline in each of the manual gears, you don’t care.
Blown head gaskets are something you don’t tolerate on a dull, grey crossover, but you might let it slide if it happened on something with a removable roof, orange stripes, and Swiss Army-knife versatility. Oh, and available six-wheel drive where four were driven.
Come back, funky Subaru. We miss you.
Our Daydreaming Designer Imagines A Special Subaru From The Japanese Bubble Era – The Autopian
Same Idea, 26 Years Apart: 1980 Subaru Brat vs 2006 Subaru Baja – The Autopian
How I Fixed An Old Subaru With A Shotgun Shell And A Little Backyard Wisdom – The Autopian
I Finally Sold The Subaru I Regret Buying New – The Autopian
I remember the AMC Eagle was super popular in the mountain towns in Colorado when I was young. Over time, they mostly got replaced by Subaru wagons, you’d see the odd Brat. But the Baja did really, really well there for the years it was around. I could see this working in that same niche.
I’d love to buy a new Subaru truck, but I think the smarter move might be to base it on the Forester with its more boxy aesthetics. It would be more in line with what many Americans think of when they envision a truck, which is part of the reason the Maverick has seen so much success compared to the Ridgeline and Santa Cruz. I don’t know what the odds are that Subaru actually jumps back into the truck market, but I really hope they’re working on something behind the scenes.
This design project definitely got my attention. The Brat has always fascinated me ever since I took a ride around the block in the back of one when I was a kid. The graphics are a must and the concept of the brat-ass is very intriguing. Could definitely picture one of these rigs in my garage…now how do I convince the wife that we need to get on the waiting list for a non-existent vehicle?
Keep the existing 4-door layout for manufacturability, cost, and market appeal, add T-tops for crashworthiness, and this could actually happen…
Agreed on the t-tops, and move the light bar to the front of the roof or integrate into the bumper/bull bar. I would vote for rear suicide doorlets (maybe just a single one) over a full four door.
How about a mounting rail system for the rear seats that extends through the bed? I suppose this would mean no fold flat floor – but imagine being able to drop or remove a midgate and slide the rear seats back in to bed, or flip them around, or pull them out altogether and drop tie-downs into the rails.
Fucking ouch, Bishop.
Up until the mid-90s (or so) I thought of Subaru as “the Japanese SAAB” – weird, quirky, and unusual, for reasons that were both good and right. And we saw what became of SAAB by following that path. I bet Subaru noticed, too, which is why they went more mainstream.
The Baja doesn’t look cargo capable, but it is.
It has the great fold flat Subaru rear seats so yes, really long items, as long as they fit through the passageway load easily. However, it can also manage 4X8 sheets of plywood, with the tailgate up* I have also brought home an 8 foot sofa in it.
It also has that clever fold down license plate bracket. I’m always the one loading building material into my Baja, in a parking lot full of trucks.
*The bed inside dimension is 4 feet, but the tailgate width is less, So one sets the 4X8 sheet onto the tailgate and you just push it up over the bed, along the “roll bar” until the back end drops into the bed, where the ledge holds it in place. I have brought home 4 or 5 sheets at once.
You are incorrect. Subaru already has it right…everything they offer except for those rebadged Toyotas are wagons. This is the correct form of vehicle. They just need to be better at designing and building their vehicles.
You are 100% correct, sir, about a wagon being the correct form of vehicle. I currently own my second Outback and it is referred to as the “Subatruck” in our household. Need to carry a couple sheets of plywood and 2×4’s? It has roof rails that easily store above the doors and swing into action when needed. Add a couple ratchet straps and the roof becomes more than a storage spot for an empty Thule roof torpedo. Need to carry thirty bags of mulch? Fold down the rear seats and pile away. Need to tow a utility trailer for larger jobs that either the roof rack or rear cabin can handle? That’s what a tow hitch is for. Wagons are the best and it surprises me that more people don’t demand them instead of grocery getter SUV’s.
Subaru’s, using their current version 2.4l and 2.5l, are VERY reliable, although they do take a bit more maintenance than your basic Camry or Accord. For the cost difference, MPG, and AWD compared to any other wagon or SUV, Subaru has it nailed. Now, if we can just get Matt back on the side of Symmetrical AWD righteousness and questionable CVT’s all will be right with the world!
LOL, “questionable CVTs” Although 100% full time AWD 50/50 split is amazing…back in my day, we called that “four wheel drive” and asymmetric/part time was called “all wheel drive,” but that just ages me thoroughly…
Funny that you mention a Thule…what a great purchase! Found one for $150 (It’s an older code but it checks out) for a 2017 Ford Explorer road trip (Sport, natch..I consider that to be a Taurus SHO wagon, because it is, just like it’s brother, a Flex, but taller), and MAN, what a good thing to have when cramming people INSIDE, and luggage and stuff OUTSIDE. What a thing!
Are you not from the US or something? The traditional US definitions of 4wd vs AWD are:
4wd is part time only. The center diff is locked, so you have to be able to disengage 4wd for pavement driving or sharp turns. There is no torque splitting mechanism, the locked “center diff” allows for up to 100% of torque to go to either the front or rear at any time.
AWD has a center diff, and so it can be used on pavement and through turns. If there is an open center diff, then there is a 50/50 torque split(which is a bad thing), or if there is some kind of limited slip diff then it is not necessarily any specific torque split.
Almost all “AWD” systems on the market in 2024 fit neither of these descriptions and are clutch-based with a computer-controlled variable torque split and often very limited power delivery.
The fake downshifting in my current Outback drives me nuts. It feels like a warped brake rotor.
Each time I think The Bishop has outdone himself and there is no way to top his latest creation, he somehow manages to not only do so, but do so in a glorious fashion!
Oh, I’ve definitely had some stinkers in there but glad that you’ve overlooked them. I appreciate the compliments!
Just remember that things are relative – I can’t do what you do, so even your stinkers are appreciated and enjoyed by me and others.
One major difference between brilliance and mediocrity is having the courage to fail sometimes in the pursuit of something bold and worthy. Whereas those who constantly play it safe seem to fail as often or even more, and never reach the heights. Keep on taking the big swings, sir!
My wife recoils in disgust every time I point out Subaru Bajas so if I could troll her with parking a new one in the driveway, I think that alone would be worth it.
Hey, Ronald freaking Reagan owned one! How strange can it be?
I think Ronald Reagan would make her recoil even more lol
Well yea, the smell alone of his decaying corpse should make anyone with a nose recoil.
Unless he is a zombie, then you should run.
Reagan had a Brat, he wasn’t able to drive by the time the Baja came around
I would like to see this and glad the rear ejector seats were left out. It is like what the Baja should of been. Just make a 6 spd option as the screams small wagon/truck thing.
Yes, but it needs to be immortalized in a movie:
https://youtu.be/xDaPc0dPEdM?t=5
Looks great
BRAT-ASS, I nearly ruined my keyboard in Dr. Pepper over that one.
THIS. IS. MAGNIFICENT!
Agreed! I was on a call and had to check my mic was muted before I could let the laughter out.
Some time ago I was on a jury that include a bit part played by a Subaru Brat. The perp attempting to flee from the law was driving a stolen Brat. The perp crashed through a locked chain link fence gate at high speed and proceeded to keep going until the manzanita got too dense for anyone to drive. The perp then evaded the chasers on foot. During the trial the chasing officer remarked that the Brat was a sturdy and capable vehicle to use to evade capture. High praise indeed!
I have only one note here and it says “no notes”. Another golden idea.
With the Ford Maverick selling so well, Subaru needs to get on this! The ASS concept is best left in the books, though.
Especially if they drop in the hybrid power train too.
Could always officially call it a BRAT TAIL, we’d know it was an ASS.
This might be the most achievable Bishop design I’ve seen. Maybe not the removable top, but the rest is awesome
Glad to see I’m not the only one constantly thinking of this car because of all the publicity over that Charli XCX album
You mean Gen Z doesn’t long for a BRAT summer?
With a new BRAT and the BRAT ASS, ideally, the spokesman would be the Bumpasaurus himself, Sir Mix-a-lot.
“Baby’s got BRAT!”
Awesome work, and somehow you took a request, and merged it with one of my guilty pleasures (BRAT)! This is top level Bishop, and glad to see it all came together far more then I could have imagined!
BRAT-ASS also sounds like a singer that is going have the Billboard #1 pop song next summer.
Thank you for the ideas! Always look forward to seeing them.
This looks great! Not sure how I feel about the second row of seats, but given all the other concepts I’ve seen over the years, this is definitely not BRAT worst.
Two seats would really limit the market. Of course, at least the back two can still be ‘outside’!
Yeah, I tend to think as a market of one.
I wish I was rich enough to make some of the Bishops ideas a reality. I would drive the crap out of this without the light bar
I love the idea of a new Subaru Brat. I hate the idea of Subaru building it. Because let’s be real, it would look great as a concept, have people all hopeful and then get delivered with a weak non-turbo boxer, a CVT and too much weirdly designed cladding.
I want to root for Subaru but by god do they make it hard..
Obligatory Achewood-
https://achewood.com/2003/12/01/title.html
Another Subaru Brat/Baja? Yes please!
The Maverick proved that if you build it right, it’ll sell.
The Maverick proved that people are so starved for anything under 5000lb with a pickup bed, you don’t even have to build it right. You can totally phone it in by taking a sawzall to a Bronco Sport, resulting in something fairly bad at hauling with a three cylinder nobody wants, and they’ll still sell like hotcakes because there is 0 competition, not even from the used market since no small pickups have been made since 2011.
These would print money in the PNW