Home » Tesla Cybercab: This Is It

Tesla Cybercab: This Is It

Cybercabbo
ADVERTISEMENT

Tesla went big on its Cybercab announcement event on Thursday night. It’s been a long-awaited moment, as the EV automaker has been championing autonomous taxis as the ultimate goal of its self-driving technology for years now.

The company’s well-attended livestream finally gave us a real look at the vehicle that’s supposed to herald the future of transportation—in Tesla’s vision, at least. The company revealed a sleek, futuristic-looking vehicle, as you might expect—but with ultimately less daring aesthetics than the polarizing Cybertruck.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

That’s not to say that Tesla gave us something conventional. Far from it, in fact. It’s a two-seater, a coupe, and it’s got scissor doors paired with a drastically-sloping roofline. It’s like no other cab you’ve ever hailed before.

They call it a Robotaxi in the Tweet? Sure. They called it a Cybercab everywhere else.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tesla headlines the Cybercab as “faster” and “more affordable.” Why? Well, you won’t be paying a human driver to sit in the seat to haul you around. Beyond that, it notes that the design relies solely on cameras for its self-driving ability. Tesla has long eschewed the use of more expensive radar or LIDAR sensors in its autonomous driving program.

Tesla also states you’ll be able to “call it once” and keep the vehicle “as long as needed,” whether you’re taking short trips or using it all day. Contrast that to a contemporary rideshare or taxi, which is only yours for as long as your trip lasts.

Gzlhbtrxgacr21c

Gzlhfvpweaawzdh
Two doors, two seats. Weird for a cab.

We, Robot 01 56 01

We, Robot 01 56 33
Light bars and flat profile wheels—1980s sci-fi was a good predictor of the future. Or did the designers just do what was expected of them?

We, Robot 01 55 05

ADVERTISEMENT

Once again, Tesla has flirted with bold price claims. We’re told the Cybercab will be cost less than $30,000 for purchase, and that sales will be open to private individuals, not just fleet buyers. They’re selling the concept of a cheap robot car that hauls you hither and thither, with the added appeal of the aforementioned scissor doors.

The elephant in the room, of course, is a big one. At this stage, Tesla doesn’t have the technology for self-driving taxis that operate without human supervision. The livestream addressed this, with CEO Elon Musk stating he predicts non-supervised self-driving will be available “before 2027.” This would apply not just to the Cybercab, but to the rest of the Tesla fleet as well—Musk noted that the Model 3, Model Y, Cybertruck, et al, will all get Level 4 or Level 5 self-driving capability. Basically, that’s where the car can drive itself under the vast majority of situations without any human supervision or interaction. You know, what we all think self-driving means.

Notably, the livestream mentioned that the Cybercab will have inductive charging capability. This comes as little surprise, as Tesla’s research activity in this area has been public knowledge for some time. As we reported last month, Tesla has filed four patents regarding wireless EV charging technology. Patent drawings and other graphics from the company suggest charging is achieved via a floor-mounted rectangular pad that sits beneath the vehicle. We’ve also seen that provisions appear to have been made on existing Tesla vehicle batteries for this purpose, with connectors for the technology already apparently included on some batteries.

This move makes sense. While it’s possible to build a robotic apparatus to plug in a wired charger to an EV, a wireless charger is altogether simpler to implement. One merely needs to drive the vehicle over the pad to start charging. This would be far simpler and easier for an autonomous vehicle, and require far less maintenance over time.

ADVERTISEMENT
We saw a hint at Tesla’s wireless charging tech in a 2023 Investor Day event.

Autonomous cabs promise a multitude of benefits. Namely, there’s no need for a human driver to spend their time schlepping other humans around. This eliminates labor costs if you’re hiring a cab, for example, and also avoids issues like fatigue. Alternatively, if it’s your Cybercab you’re talking about, full autonomy avoids the issue of parking. You can have your vehicle drop you off at your destination, and then it can drive away and come pick you up later. There’s no need to find convenient parking near your destination. You can also work during your commute, which theoretically could let you spend more time at home with your loved ones, plus in theory you could rent out your car to someone without worrying about them driving like crazed loons.

That’s all very fun, of course, it’s just not real. Not quite yet, anyway. But Tesla still firmly believes that it can make it happen, and the Cybercab is the vehicle apparently optimized to operate in this way.

Cc1
No rear window, because Tesla ain’t looking back.

Tesla showed approximately 50 of the autonomous vehicles at the event.

What’s weird is that Tesla’s prime autonomous cab would only have two seats and an obviously limited cargo capacity. On the one hand, a great many cab trips do carry just one or two people. On the other hand, it’s a pain enough today when you’re travelling with five friends and have to try and score yourself one of the big Ubers. It would be particularly annoying if this happened every time you were travelling as a trio. In any case, Tesla dodged around this to a degree by simultaneously announcing the Robovan, which apparently has 20 seats and far more space.

Ultimately, the Cybercab is kind of a surprise. That’s what Tesla does well, of course. A regular automaker might have showed us another pod concept with comfy chairs and lots of room inside, but that wouldn’t fit the Tesla aesthetic. What they showed us was something radical, shocking, and questionably practical. Given the way the Cybertruck lit up the discourse, both for better and worse, it seems the Cybercab is following a similar formula. Tesla is as Tesla does, that much is certain.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Tesla

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
178 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shooting Brake
Shooting Brake
1 month ago

I suspect the cybercab will go down as Teslas first true flop/jumping the shark moment. We’ll see if they can prove me wrong but I doubt it.

Speedway Sammy
Speedway Sammy
1 month ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

Hey they solved the SoCal traffic congestion problem with Boring Company, so this should be easy!

667
667
1 month ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

The cybertruck is already that.

Rob Schneider
Rob Schneider
1 month ago

I think they’re naming it wrong. This isn’t CyberCab. This is CyberCommuter. It isn’t meant to get you to the airport – it’s meant to get you to work.

The problem is we’ll need a ton of these for peak usage, and then most will sit around all day doing nothing. Planning around an “average usage” is going to give you something akin to the USS Gerald Ford’s toilet problems.

I predict a sales promotion along the lines of “buy one and the taxi fees will pay for itself”, with the fatal flaw being if you’re going to make use of it during peak, you’ll have a lot of competition during off-peak and the revenue stream won’t be so rosy.

That’s assuming the self driving part works as advertised. I’m still not convinced that will work with cameras alone.

YMT09
YMT09
1 month ago

For some reason this thing reminds me of my motorcycle helmet. An Alpinestars Supertech R10.

Mrbrown89
Mrbrown89
1 month ago

Now give it a steering wheel and I will buy it tomorrow. The electric Honda Insight I have been waiting for.

Vanillasludge
Vanillasludge
1 month ago

How do I know this will never happen? Because if he was serious about driverless taxis he wouldn’t waste effort on a new chassis…the Model Y without a steering wheel would be a better option and all that development money could be saved for the class action lawsuits.

TheDrunkenWrench
TheDrunkenWrench
1 month ago

This thing is a slightly lower roofline away from going hard asf. I’m a fan of the overall design. It’s use and purpose will be a hilarious failure, but the thing LOOKS dope.

MATTinMKE
MATTinMKE
1 month ago

Agreed.

Kleinlowe
Kleinlowe
1 month ago

It occurs to me that with the drive-by-wire tech they’re beta-testing with the Cybertruck, mounting regular driving controls inside one of these wouldn’t be a huge deal for them.

DolanDuk
DolanDuk
1 month ago
Reply to  Kleinlowe

Also, if it’s drive by wire, these could all be driven by 50 people in racing SIM setups in a Tesla factory somewhere.
I wouldn’t put it below Elon to fake something like that

Kleinlowe
Kleinlowe
1 month ago
Reply to  DolanDuk

I’m not going to lie; having a remote, live driver seems infinitely more preferable than just a google maps interface on the dashboard and a button labeled ‘good luck’.

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
1 month ago
Reply to  Kleinlowe

Then they could drive folks they don’t like off of a bridge, no thanks.

DolanDuk
DolanDuk
1 month ago
Reply to  Nick Fortes

You trust hundreds if not thousands of folks everyday day to not drive across a line of paint and hit you head on.

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
29 days ago
Reply to  DolanDuk

That’s the thing. I don’t trust them lol, you just hit on something I think about entirely too much while I’m driving.

DolanDuk
DolanDuk
1 month ago
Reply to  Kleinlowe

Taxi drivers being replaced by foreign drivers in “drive centers” in Bangladesh is not the future we were promised

Kleinlowe
Kleinlowe
1 month ago
Reply to  DolanDuk

Sorry folks, it’s cyberpunk dystopia. Corpo out front should’ve toldya.

Sean H
Sean H
1 month ago

Autonomous vehicles are just two years away!

Chronometric
Chronometric
1 month ago
Reply to  Sean H

At least they’re consistent. They’ve been 2 years away for a decade and will remain so for another.

Vanillasludge
Vanillasludge
1 month ago
Reply to  Sean H

I love ya, tomorrow!

Steve Lee
Steve Lee
1 month ago
Reply to  Sean H

And Free Beer Tomorrow!

Lizardman in a human suit
Lizardman in a human suit
1 month ago
Reply to  Sean H

And so is fusion power! Actually, I think they are making good progress on the fusion front…

667
667
1 month ago

Lewin should stop selling fsd as a functioning technology, it’s fucking dangerous.
Relying only on camera doesn’t work nowadays, see all the fsd failures from the incelcamino recently, and it’s not gonna work in the future.
Robotaxi and fsd are announced and delayed since many many many years, yet Lewin doesn’t question that and only report elon ponzi material.

I really can’t understand how Torch is letting that discourse go, on his website…

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 month ago
Reply to  667

Did you see the paragraph above the patent drawings? Lewin is not selling fsd in any way, shape, or form

667
667
1 month ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

U jocking.. right ?

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 month ago
Reply to  667

‘The elephant in the room…Tesla doesn’t have the technology for self-driving…’
Then Lewin reports what Elon is promising. I don’t see this as promoting fsd, but simply doing what a car website should by telling us what happened at the presentation

Rust Buckets
Rust Buckets
1 month ago
Reply to  667

Reading comprehension has left the chat

Anders
Anders
1 month ago

At least Tesla accurately replicated the traffic jam we’ll all be stuck in, autonomous or not. My biggest take-out from the Cybercab is the design language. Sort of a mix of the edginess of Cybertruck and the soft, sculptured language of the S,3 & Y. I actually like this direction, even though proportions on the Cybercab looks odd. Wouldn’t be surprised it the next-gen/facelifted Y looks very similar.

Chronometric
Chronometric
1 month ago
Reply to  Anders

I agree. It’s a handsome vehicle.

Rocky Roll
Rocky Roll
1 month ago
Reply to  Anders

I agree. My first encounter with a Cybertruck in the wild was with one that was wrapped in matte black, and it was in deep shade, so all I could make out was the front light bar coming at me. I liked it. Hated the rest of the truck as it passed, and then I saw the rear light bar in my mirror and liked that. So they got the lights right IMHO. After seeing this “taxi’s” styling I could see those light bars becoming Tesla’s signature look.

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
1 month ago

For individual buyers, since the vision stuff is cameras only, a regular Tesla should be able to do the same, including being summoned from anywhere to take you anywhere (e.g. you took the bus to the office but want your car in the evening, so you tell it to come get you), so why would anyone buy this instead of a full-fat Tesla?

NotSpanky
NotSpanky
1 month ago

Presumably if cheaper or space limited? Or I guess if they primarily want to use it to run a private service taxi?

Hondaimpbmw 12
Hondaimpbmw 12
1 month ago

None of that stuff is ever gonna happen. And why would you take the bus in the morning and then have your fsd car (it’ll never happen) make the same trip (empty!) so you can take your car home, presumably because you have errands to do on the way home?

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
1 month ago

It’s great! Now you get to schlep your own luggage while holding your fussing baby. And your spouse can take the next one, because two seats.

Wtf.

Nathan
Nathan
1 month ago

How are they going to stop extra people from getting in and sitting on another’s lap?

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
1 month ago
Reply to  Nathan

Sitting, or “sitting.”

Genewich
Genewich
1 month ago

First one, then the other

Mustardayonnaise
Mustardayonnaise
1 month ago

that car fucks. 100% that car is doing all the fucking

Óscar Morales Vivó
Óscar Morales Vivó
1 month ago

The main reason that inductive charging for cars hasn’t become a thing already is that it’s very wasteful unless you can be very optimal about it, like minimizing the distance between the induction coils on both sides and positioning them perfectly.

At the level of an iPhone it doesn’t matter much, but to charge a 50+ KWh battery it’s not going to be pretty.

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
1 month ago

Surely if they can make a self-driving car, they can make an automated charging cable that hooks into the car magnetically?

Chronometric
Chronometric
1 month ago

Well they can’t make a self-driving car, so…

Elanosaurous
Elanosaurous
1 month ago

Regardless, induction is at best half as efficient as plugging in with a cable directly. Meaning, you need to generate twice as much electricity in order to charge your battery. If you think the grid will struggle with charging lots of EVs the regular way, this just makes it twice as bad.

ADDvanced
ADDvanced
1 month ago
Lally Singh
Lally Singh
1 month ago

Presumably they can get the car to autonomously be in *just the right spot* over the charger to minimize losses.

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
1 month ago
Reply to  Lally Singh

Maybe the car could position itself once you drive close enough, then if it has some kind of air suspension it can set it self down on the charging pad, stancebro style!

ADDvanced
ADDvanced
1 month ago
Reply to  Nick Fortes

That’s a pretty good idea, like a roomba but with air ride, makes sense to me!

PajeroPilot
PajeroPilot
1 month ago

“Okay, we’ve got the hard bits out of the way – how we want it to look and the timeframe for release. All we need to do is make it work, and shit!”

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
1 month ago

So autonomy is just two years away huh? Sounds familiar.

Jacob B
Jacob B
1 month ago

What was the point of this announcement?
.
This thing is never going to ship this decade.

667
667
1 month ago
Reply to  Jacob B

Maintaining stock prices, maintaining the lies.

JP15
JP15
1 month ago

I’m not a Tesla fanboy, but I think the bigger story here are the advancements the Optimus robots are making in short order. They went from a dude in spandex dancing on stage in 2021 to an actual walking robot with pretty impressive dexterity in just a few years.

Still remains to be seen how useful it is, but we’re approaching iRobot / Detroit: Become Human remarkably quickly.

Óscar Morales Vivó
Óscar Morales Vivó
1 month ago
Reply to  JP15

I don’t think they are ahead of anyone there. It’s more that the rest of the folks on this field don’t get all the free press that Elon does, and they’ve mostly moved away from humanoid robots because they aren’t particularly practical or cost effective for the use cases they want to cover.

JP15
JP15
1 month ago

I actually follow the humanoid robot field pretty closely as my company’s products go into many of them. I’m well aware Tesla isn’t the only player, and I didn’t say they were ahead of anyone else, but they went from nothing to where they are today in three years. Boston Dynamics has spent 11 years on Atlas, Agility Robotics was founded in 2015, but Digit has been in development since at least 2008 during my undergrad.

Figure AI is making impressive progress.

I also know the demo Optimus robots aren’t truly autonomous, but even just a dexterous hand and walking around isn’t easy.

Humanoid robots make sense for human work environments where a factory built for a human workforce can’t easily be retooled for automation. There’s a lot of jobs just moving things around or boxing/shipping highly varied products that make sense for humanoid robots. They may not work as efficiently as a person per hour, but they can work 24/7 and have very low running costs.

Thevenin
Thevenin
1 month ago
Reply to  JP15

Boston Dynamics’ Atlas HD can leap, dance, throw things, and do flips. They’re replacing it because it’s obsolete now. BD is a $1.1b company.

James Bruton, a random Youtuber, designed and built a self-balancing robot dog with machine vision target recognition and a nerf blaster. From scratch. In one year.

The fact that Tesla — a $700b company — spent three years making a robot that timidly shuffles along is an embarrassment. It’s nearly as big of a self-own as the Cybertruck’s broken windows. Underneath the cultivated sci-fi aesthetics, there lies a machine that is so phoned-in that you could be forgiven for assuming it was built in 2014.

Of course, Tesla isn’t really trying to make a product, they’re trying to put on a show for investors who like to pretend they’re tech savvy. They only care about the aesthetics, the trappings of futurism, so that’s all Tesla bothers pursuing these days.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
1 month ago

Why am I reminded of Preston Tucker?

Vanillasludge
Vanillasludge
1 month ago
Reply to  Crank Shaft

Not fair! Tuckers actually exist and function. This will not.

Hondaimpbmw 12
Hondaimpbmw 12
1 month ago
Reply to  Crank Shaft

Tucker actually had a product and plan. The fact that Detroit (and their tame senator) torpedoed his finances and kept him from the plant that he had already acquired access to didn’t help.

Fix It Again Tony
Fix It Again Tony
1 month ago

Those are not stainless steel body panels, right?

Jesus Chrysler drives a Dodge
Jesus Chrysler drives a Dodge
1 month ago

Why does an autonomous car need headlights? Yes, you need some kind of indicators so people see it coming at night, but that’s about it.

Stealthwang
Stealthwang
1 month ago

The “night vision” infrared emitter in the Tesla is inferior to headlights. They need the headlights because they don’t have radar or lidar.

Fix It Again Tony
Fix It Again Tony
1 month ago

Besides the law requiring it, my guess is it is for the passengers. Even if self driving works I wouldn’t get in that car at night if I can’t see whether it is going the right way or not.

Last edited 1 month ago by Fix It Again Tony
Roofless
Roofless
1 month ago

This is a cute little design, but I thought you said he was announcing a taxi?

A London Cab is a taxi. An NV200 is a taxi. Hell, a Crown Vic is a taxi. This is not a taxi.

Chronometric
Chronometric
1 month ago
Reply to  Roofless

Anything is possible when you add the prefix Cyber or Giga.

Last edited 1 month ago by Chronometric
The World of Vee
The World of Vee
1 month ago

I actually like the design, but if the autonomous driving skill isn’t there yet why not sell a proper Tesla with gullwings in the meantime?

Óscar Morales Vivó
Óscar Morales Vivó
1 month ago

Well there’s the Model X, which gets all wet inside if you open the rear doors while it’s raining…

Michael Oneshed
Michael Oneshed
1 month ago

Yeah that’s just the physical manifestation of Elon’s drug habit.

1 2 3 4
178
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x