Home » Tesla Wouldn’t Exist If It Weren’t For This Man And This Car

Tesla Wouldn’t Exist If It Weren’t For This Man And This Car

Coconni Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

Alan Cocconi isn’t a household name like Elon Musk is, but to anyone involved in the early days of the modern EV revolution, he certainly is. His legendary electric roadster — the tzero — inspired the formation of Tesla as we know it. I had a chance to look at the machine, and the Petersen Automotive museum had a chance to interview the man; let’s take a look and listen.

Our friends at the Petersen Automotive Museum now have a tzero on display, but they invited me over to take a peek before it hit the floor. At the time, I didn’t fully realize the gravity of what I was standing next to; in many way, it looks unimpressive — like a bright yellow, hand-made kit-car.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Little did I know I was standing next to a legend.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by The Autopian (@theautopian)

Anyone who was working in the electric car space in the 1990s or 2000s had some connection to AC propulsion. Hell, I was doing an electric car conversion in college in 2012 — just before Tesla became a mainstream automaker — and even our team was chatting with AC Propulsion for information on the motor we were using (a motor we’d sourced from BMW’s Mini-E). The company was founded by Cocconi, and was involved in all sorts of electric vehicle powertrain development throughout the years; I already mentioned the Mini-E, but there was also the legendary GM Impact concept (which became the EV-1) and of course the Tesla Roadster. (There was also the eBox, a converted Scion xB, but it didn’t really make it into mainstream consciousness).

ADVERTISEMENT

AC propulsion didn’t develop the Tesla Roadster entirely, but it was a key part of it. More importantly, the tzero was the vehicle’s inspiration. The book Tesla Motors: How Elon Musk and Company Made Electric Cars Cool, and Sparked the Next Tech Revolution gets into the early days of the now larger-than-life, Musk-led company. From a book excerpt on Cleantechnica:

Tom Gage [who joined Cocconi at AC Propulsion and became CEO] met Martin Eberhard in 2002. “We were just getting involved in converting the tzero over to lithium-ion batteries,” Gage told me. “He put some money into AC Propulsion and we finished this conversion of the tzero. We drove it from LA up to San Francisco with only one stop, so it was obviously getting much better range with the reduced weight and increased capacity of the lithium-ion batteries, which had replaced the lead-acid batteries. Martin was pretty impressed. In November 2003, I remember going to the LA Auto Show with him and he started talking up Tesla, saying he wanted to convert a Lotus Elise, and that was sort of the start of it right then.”

AC Propulsion was in dire financial straits at that moment. Eberhard’s $100,000 investment was very welcome, and gave the team the funds they needed to develop the lithium-ion-based tzero. “Martin borrowed the tzero in 2004 for about three months,” said Gage. “He took it up to northern California and used it to woo investors, show them what he was talking about and that it could really be done. I think it was pretty key in getting the company off the ground.”

[…]

Gage and company thought the [Scion xB-based] eBox had a better chance at being commercialized, but Musk and Eberhard were interested in the sexier tzero. “Martin asked ‘Are you going to build my car? How’s the progress going?’ I told him we weren’t going to build any more tzeros. So that to some degree was the impetus for him to get into the business (if you’re not going to build it, I’ll build my own).” Eberhard and his partners decided to build their own electric sports car, and in May 2004 they signed a license agreement to use AC Propulsion’s powertrain technology.

Martin Eberhard loved fast cars, but was concerned about climate change and the country’s dependence on Middle East oil. He was one of the early adopters who leased an EV1, and he was as angry as anyone when the company took the cars back and crushed them. However, his real electrical epiphany came about on a drive through Palo Alto, where he saw stylish performance cars like BMWs and Mercedes parked next to sensible “dork-mobiles” or “punishment cars,” as he called them, such as the Toyota Prius…

In time, Tesla launched its first car, which Car and Driver describes as basically a re-skinned tzero:

Tesla Motors began production in 2008 with the Roadster, the first generation of which could be fairly described as an AC Propulsion tzero with the kit-car bits replaced by one-grade-above-kit-car Lotus Elise components. Later models (like the 2011 Roadster 2.5 shown here) use proprietary drivetrain technology developed at Tesla, but the first run depended on a licensed AC Propulsion power system and reductive charging systems.

It’s worth noting that the details of Tesla’s early days are disputed and were the subject of a lawsuit involving Musk and Eberhard, but here’s what Cocconi said in a Caltech interview:

He’s not the one who started Tesla. It was Martin Eberhard who started Tesla. Elon Musk, in my opinion, his main skill is getting other people’s money. He does that very well, so that enabled him to scale up and create what is now known as Tesla. But I don’t think he had vision other than recognizing that the technology was available, and Martin Eberhard had started doing the Tesla Roadster on his own, with his efforts, but didn’t have the financial resources to take it to the level that was required. That’s where Elon Musk came in. I don’t give Elon Musk a whole lot of credit for technological insight other than recognizing viable technologies when he sees them.

Let’s Take A Step Back

The tzero, whose name stands for the beginning of time (the term is used in engineering frequently), really is fitting now that we look back on it, as it did represent the start of arguably the very first true automotive revolution since cars became mainstream in the early 20th century.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch The Petersen Automotive Museum’s interview above, and you’ll see that Cocconi talks about how he started out as a power electronics engineer after graduating from Caltech and how he worked with defense contractor AeroVironment on the GM Sunraycer. This was a hugely important car in its own right, so we’ll pause here briefly.

6a00e553a80e1088340147e0c5d079970b 500wi
Image: National Museum of American History

The National Museum of American History has a nice writeup of the Sunraycer solar car:

In 1987, General Motors, 16 GM subsidiaries, and an AeroVironment, Inc. engineering team led by company founder and famed aeronautical engineer Paul MacCready designed the GM Sunraycer to compete in the first World Solar Challenge in Australia. The team combined lightweight materials, solar power technology, and cutting edge power management systems to create this energy efficient speedster. Sunraycer’s photovoltaic solar cells converted the sun’s radiation into electricity to power its motor and charge the battery. Gallium arsenide cells make up 80 percent of the solar arrays, and single crystal silicon cells comprise the remaining 20 percent. The chassis was constructed of aluminum tubing, and the lightweight body was made of two Kevlar layers sandwiching a layer of Numex. The race began on November 1, 1987; the route was a 1,950-mile north-to-south transcontinental course starting in Darwin and ending in Adelaide. Sunraycer won the challenge by completing the route in 5 1/4 days with a running time of 44.9 hours and an average speed of 41.6 miles per hour. Ford’s Sunchaser finished second, 2 1/2 days and over 620 miles behind Sunraycer.

What’s most important is that the Sunraycer solar-car was such a good look for GM that AeroVironment was able to sell GM on the idea of the 1990 Impact concept, a much more viable, daily-drivable EV than had ever come before — one that ultimately became the EV1, which was one of the early sparks in the EV revolution (even if it was extinguished too soon). From the National Museum of American History:

After the race, Sunraycer went on a national tour of auto shows, museums, and schools to promote interest among students in alternative energy technology and engineering careers. When the tour ended, GM donated Sunraycer to the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History. Using lessons learned from the World Solar Challenge, GM and AeroVironment collaborated on the development of the GM Impact battery-powered electric car. Sunraycer provided new insights into how driver activity, power consumption, battery life, and range interact. The Impact was the prototype for the EV1, GM’s first electric production car. AeroVironment carried the research and development from Sunraycer, Impact, and EV1 into other technologies, including rapid battery charging systems and power processing systems used to test and develop electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and batteries. Sunraycer laid the theoretical and practical foundation that made modern electric and hybrid vehicles practical for everyday transportation.

Cocconi handled the propulsion system power electronics, including the motor and gearbox design, transferring the tech from the Impact to Hughes Aircraft Company, which was doing the production development for successor, the EV1. This, Cocconi says in The Petersen’s interview, felt like the end of his role there on that GM project, so he started his own R&D company: AC Propulsion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cocconi focused on optimizing one good drivetrain, which he put into various demos vehicles, including ones for VW, Volvo, and Honda. Then, in the mid 1990s, AC Propulsion decided it wanted something a bit sexier to get the word out about the company. “We realized we’d like to have a vehicle that drew more attention than just a converted Honda Civic or a VW Bug,” Coccini says in the video.

1996 Ac Propulsion T Zero 32

So — after seeing the Piontek Sportech in an issue of Road & Track — the company bought one and converted it to electric propulsion. And thus came the tzero that inspired the Tesla Roadster.

Note that it’s probably worth doing an entire article on Piontek, becase Dave Piontek was just a guy in Canton, Michigan who wanted to build his own sports car. The idea that AC Propulsion saw an article about the homebrew car, ask Piontek for a chassis, and then use that to build an electric car that could, in its ultimate form,  do 0-60 MPH in 3.6 seconds with a range of 300 miles at 65 mph — and ultimately inspire a sea-change in the auto industry – is amazing.

1996 Ac Propulsion T Zero 22

ADVERTISEMENT

1996 Ac Propulsion T Zero 19 1996 Ac Propulsion T Zero 20 1996 Ac Propulsion T Zero 14 1996 Ac Propulsion T Zero 26

You’ll notice that the tzero has its own unique trailer. “The only way to get more range was to get a range extender,” Cocconi says in The Petersen’s video, noting that it was a 500cc Kawasaki motor that offered 30 MPG all day long at 80 mph. What another profound bit of foreshadowing, as the industry is now heading towards range extenders.

Cocconi gets into how the first versions of the tzero Optima lead-acid batteries, how his team had to modify the Piontek chassis to make it work, some of the engineering challenges it faced — it’s a fantastic bit of automotive history and an interview worth watching.

I come away amazed at how much of an impact (pun intended) this one person had on not just the auto industry, but I think ultimately on human civilization. One geeky Caltech engineer changed the world.

Yes, it’s hilarious that AC Propulsion decided it wanted to pursue an electric Scion xB instead of a sports car, especially when the company clearly understood that an attractive car was one that would get more interest (that was the point of the tzero). Still, even if Tesla came away richer and more successful after launching its sports car and putting together its own company of geeks, Cocconi, AC Propulsion, and the tzero will always be the ones who started it all.

ADVERTISEMENT

Check out the Petersen Automotive Museum to see this true automotive icon for yourself!

Images: Petersen Automotive Museum unless otherwise stated 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sean Ellery
Sean Ellery
1 month ago

Conconi in the top photo looks like Leonard Nimoy after he’s just done acid.

JDE
JDE
1 month ago

had to start as a sports car to get the smug little stars at the time to buy into it. Clooney Famously helped make the tesla a thing around hollyweird by driving the roadster. I might not like him, but I cannot take anything from Elon on his ability to market things. I mean i guess in the nd he is pretty much the jobs of the EV world, and I cannot fathom promoting anything Apple knowing how he treated others to get where he did in the end.

RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
1 month ago

Thank you for pointing out who was actually responsible for starting Tesla (Alan Cocconi and Martin Eberhard) and seem like decent people unlike you know who

PatrickVPI
PatrickVPI
1 month ago

That trailer takes me back to college with our series hybrid Ford Explorer in FutureTruck. We had a similar trailer with an old 3-cylinder natural gas-fired Metro engine from early FutureCar days as our towable Auxiliary Power Unit for additional electric-only range before we got the onboard unit running.

Zed_Patrol
Zed_Patrol
1 month ago

Well he’s right about most electric cars being too absurdly powerful.

Toecutter
Toecutter
1 month ago
Reply to  Zed_Patrol

You can do a lot with 50 kW. Imagine a tandem two-seater with a frontal area of 1 m^2, a drag coefficient of about 0.11, a laden mass with two occupants of 600 lbs, and 3 or 4 wheels with AWD.

It would be as cheap to build as a motorcycle, get 200+ miles range at highway speeds, and offer all of the basic comforts of a modern penalty box car.

Ninefeet
Ninefeet
1 month ago
Reply to  Toecutter

Peraves MonoTracer MTE150 ?

Toecutter
Toecutter
1 month ago
Reply to  Ninefeet

This vehicle is not as aerodynamically streamlined as it appears, and the fact that it is two wheels means it has no static stability without its specialized “landing gear”.

I’m thinking more “car” than “bike” with the above idea and insist on at least three wheels, preferably four(three wheeled designs are easier for small startups to produce because of less regulations involved).

If I had control over the monotracer’s design and insisted on only two wheels, it would look much more in form like a Peregrin on a Birk HPV, except scaled up to fit two and without the bicycle drivetrain:

https://youtu.be/5v6AMWUkJ6c?t=104

NEVER give up aero for looks. The efficiency of the Monotracer could easily be doubled or tripled.

Last edited 1 month ago by Toecutter
Ninefeet
Ninefeet
1 month ago
Reply to  Toecutter

Interesting, thanks ! No knowledge, that’s why i ask : why is the PoB aerodinamically superior to the Peraves ? because of the “landing gear” ?

Toecutter
Toecutter
1 month ago
Reply to  Ninefeet

I’d have to see both in a wind tunnel to fully and accurately answer that, but mainly, the PoB has very few things on the body to disrupt the airflow and add unwanted turbulent zones, whereas the Monotracer has all sorts of imperfections and creases that are going to add drag. The PoB is shaped off of an ideal 3D airfoil template, while the Monotracer is not.

The PoB can be pedalled to 45 mph on like 1/3 of a horsepower! Judging by the Monotracer’s energy consumption, it needs multiple horsepower to overcome wind resistance at the same speed.

The 3-wheeled Aptera 2e is a much heavier vehicle with a much larger cross sectional area than the Monotracer, yet it consumes significantly less energy than the Monotracer. The Aptera does as well as it does because it did not compromise the aerodynamics for looks. The Aptera only needs about 0.080 kWh/mile to hold 70 mph, about 1/3 the consumption of a Tesla Model 3.

Now imagine a mini-Aptera that weighs about 300-400 lbs and has 1/3 the cross sectional area and roughly the same drag coefficient as the Aptera, arranged in a tandem two-seat layout. You’re not going to need a whole lot of battery to go far, and a vehicle of this sort if mass produced like a car, even as a carbon fiber monocoque, is going to cost well under $10,000. You could use cheap Chinese ebike parts to reliably get supercar performance in something like this, and everything would be open source, simple, and easily repairable with proper selection of components. If you used a 49cc or smaller gasoline or diesel engine as a range extender, the potential for 4-digit MPG at highway speeds also exists.

As one datapoint, I built a one-seater vehicle that gets the electric equivalent of 4,000 mpg at 30-35 mph. It’s basically a science project, legally is a “bicycle”, is a total deathtrap, but it works and is a real-world proof of concept.

https://i.imgur.com/1KvhZN8.jpg

Trying to get some new spindles made for it so I can fit front hub motors, for AWD. Looking at 300+ lb-ft of torque and 25+ horsepower in a sub-120 lb vehicle when done.

Last edited 1 month ago by Toecutter
Ninefeet
Ninefeet
1 month ago
Reply to  Toecutter

cool project and your vehicule looks great. Thanks for the informative comment. Side note : what about gyroscopic assistance or dynamic assistance to keep the cross sectional area low on two wheels ?

JDE
JDE
1 month ago
Reply to  Toecutter

you would think, but nobody has really. Zero DSRX gets close and of course there are a few one offs, but it makes no sense for Livewires to be built with less than 200 miles range unless the cost just prohibits it.

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
1 month ago

Remember reading the Piontek Sportech article on R&T. Lost track of it until Muskrat got his slimey mitts of the company ancestors and tech.

Tarragon
Tarragon
1 month ago

AC Propulsion did a bunch of cool things.

They built a solar powered electric plane (very large RC model sized) that stayed airborne for over 48 hours. https://xpda.com/junkmail/junk173/ACP_SoLong_Solar_UAV_2005-06-05.pdf

( I know it says junk mail in the URL, but that’s the link google gave me )

As I heard it they intentionally stopped the test at 48 hours because they felt it proved they could go basically indefinitely.

Gubbin
Gubbin
1 month ago
Reply to  Tarragon

Bob’s Junkmail was a delightful email newsletter and I sure do miss it.

Tarragon
Tarragon
1 month ago
Reply to  Gubbin

Cool, thanks for clearing that up

Fuzzyweis
Fuzzyweis
1 month ago

Just watched this yesterday, so awesome to hear his knowledge dump. I love tidbits like the thought they’d used the batteries for protection when agm lead, but not such a good idea with the lithium.

Dan Roth
Dan Roth
1 month ago

AC Propulsion is like the Xerox PARC of EVs.

Ottomottopean
Ottomottopean
1 month ago
Reply to  Dan Roth

They had something great and no interest in using it?

StillNotATony
StillNotATony
1 month ago

Man, I was sure that Piontek was a Consulier!

I’m realizing now that to non-car geeks, that sentence makes me look like I’m having a stroke.

Toecutter
Toecutter
1 month ago

I requested this months ago. It’s awesome that this site responds to its commentators.

Now get ahold of Casey Putsch so he can tell you about his 100+ mpg Omega sports car that out accelerates his Dodge Viper.

Gubbin
Gubbin
1 month ago
Reply to  Toecutter

Yay! I was hoping you inspired this!

Toecutter
Toecutter
1 month ago
Reply to  Gubbin
1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

So why does petterson hide it? Why does an EV Have gear ratio I thought no EV transmission. I don’t think is a Tesla pre model so much as just another pre designed vehicle that was ignored because not working.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
1 month ago

EVs do have a transmission. Its just typically a one speed transmission. However, there are mainstream EVs that run 2 speed transmissions currently, though mostly that is Porsche.

Will Leavitt
Will Leavitt
1 month ago

The original Tesla Roadsters had two speed transmissions, but the torque of the electric motor kept destroying them. Tesla subsequently updated the Roadster to a single speed transmission. Note that no EVs (or the original Toyota Prius for that matter) have a reverse gear; they just run the motor backwards.

2 speed transmissions are needed for very high speeds to get sufficient torque across a wide range of RPMs. Porsche put a 2 speed transmission and clutch in the Taycan, because they are German and love cutting metal. Tesla puts different fixed gear ratios on the front and rear motors, runs both motors simultaneously and deals with the different RPMs in software. The Tesla Semi likewise has different fixed ratios on the two rear axles: one for acceleration and one for efficient cruise.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
1 month ago
Reply to  Will Leavitt

What I’m hearing is that it’s theoretically possible to take a Model S Plaid 0-60 backwards in roughly 2.5 seconds.

Phuzz
Phuzz
1 month ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

You might not even need to make any physical changes, it might be possible to do it all in software. I don’t know how stable it would be at high speeds in reverse, but you could probably find a Dutch person to test drive it.
(https://en.escuderia.com/daf-y-las-locas-carreras-marcha-atras/)

29
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x