When you daydream about French cars, as connoisseurs like us are wont to do, what comes to mind? Teardrop shaped hydro pneumatically suspended spaceships? Chic Parisien bash abouts with asymmetrical wheelbases? Snail shaped peasant cars with umbrella handle gearshifts and twin cylinder engines? It’s a veritable onion bag full of oddball engineering with the slightest sense of the French stubbornly doing things their own damn way. A sports car from France may sound like oxymoron, but the home of the revolution has a long history of doing just that.
Jean Redele was a wealthy Renault dealer in Dieppe who began rallying a souped up 4CV after the war, finding success at the Coupe Des Alpes (giving Alpine its name). Working with local coachbuilder Chappe et Gessalin, and the prodigious Italian designer Giovanni Michelotti, he shoved the 4CV mechanicals into a tiny, pioneering glass fiber coupe to create the very first Alpine, the A106 in 1955. Light weight and rear engine agility was key to these sylph like little cars outstanding performance in French rallies, although initially they were never meant for public consumption. Nevertheless the A106 was eventually turned into a road car with an ever evolving specification, until it was replaced in 1958 with the A108. In 1963 it was replaced with a slightly larger, more aggressive model that would cement the Alpine legend and become the beating heart of the brand – the A110.
Initially with 95bhp from it’s rear mounted 1.3 liter engine, continuous development and bigger engines turned the A110 into a formidable rally weapon. It won the inaugural World Rally Championship in 1973, but it was rendered obsolete overnight by the arrival of the purpose built Lancia Stratos a year later. Then, in an ironic twist of fate for a manufacturer of efficient, lightweight sports cars, the oil crisis tanked sales so Renault ended up buying Alpine outright. With the resources of the state owned mothership now behind them, the A110 was followed by the larger A310, which by the eighties morphed into the V6 turbo powered Renault Alpine GTA, a sort of plastic 911. The last of these rolled out of the famous Dieppe factory in 1995 and that was that for the storied French sports car maker. Until the release of the new A110 in 2017.
It’s Sort Of A French Lotus But Better
If all this talk of lightweight sports cars and doing more with less makes Alpine sound like a sort of French Lotus, when it comes to this new A110 you’re not exactly a million miles off. The original business case for this rebirth was centered on it being a partnership with another small volume sports car manufacturer. Way back in 2013 Alpine jumped under the duvet in a 50/50 join venture with Caterham, which at the time was stuffed with ex-Lotus engineers. Unfortunately for Alpine, Caterham in true Colin Chapman fashion had not been entirely honest about the state of their finances, leaving Alpine to pick up the pieces when the whole arrangement went ass over tit. Still the fundamental engineering for a modern, super lightweight, modestly powered sports car was well underway, so CEO (and ruthless cost cutter) Carlos Ghosn allowed the project to go ahead on the condition it paid for itself and didn’t lose any money.
Making cars lighter has long since moved beyond the stinky, creaky and slightly approximate construction of the fiberglass cars of the sixties. This new A110 has a folded and bonded aluminum frame, which means it doesn’t require the expensive press tools of a traditional stamped and welded one and is much cheaper and less labor intensive to manufacture than carbon fiber. Hanging from each corner is bespoke double wishbone suspension with identically sized (more cost saving) front and rear brakes. Sitting in the middle of the chassis is the 1.8 turbo four from the Megane RS making 252 bhp and 236 lbs. ft. And it is tiny: at 164” (4181mm) long, and 78” (1980 mm) wide, it’s 6” (200 mm) shorter and half an inch (14 mm) narrower than a Cayman. With the curvaceous body also being aluminum, all up this little sports car weighs 2430 lbs. (1103kg), over 500lbs (260 kg) lighter than the Porsche. You could probably bugger up the power to weight ratio by driving it after a hearty lunch.
I try to be a conscientious writer and not knock this stuff out when I’ve been on the sherry all evening, so I watched and read a few reviews to understand what everybody else thought. Then I could write exactly the opposite, to be my usual mercurial self (just kidding). The overriding thing that came across was how well this car rode, which shouldn’t be that surprising because if there is one characteristic French cars are known for, it’s the ability to float across any road surface without knocking the ash from your Gauloises. However my first few days behind the wheel that didn’t prove to be the case at all. I thought it rode like shit, thumping into potholes and joggling over speed bumps.
I found the steering too light and not exactly talkative either. Huh. This was not what I was expecting, so the Alpine and I were not off to a good start. Compounding the annoyance was the almost total lack of storage space inside, the glitchy wireless CarPlay connection unless I took my phone out of my pocket and put it in the slot on the center console and a view from the rearview mirror that was like spying on your hot neighbor through their mail slot. It must be said though apart from that outward visibility is excellent.
Ok Now I Get It
To see what all the fuss was really about, I spent most of last weekend on the bendy roads between villages near my house driving like a complete and utter helmet. In keeping with the Alpine’s lightweight mantra, there are no adaptive dampers. I imagine the French suspension engineers arrogantly decided they know what’s best and you’ll like it. You need to get some load through the suspension and steering to make it come alive, as if the car being lightweight on its own isn’t enough to get it all working properly. Start leaning on it, really leaning on it, and it will talk to you. The steering, inert if accurate around town, is suddenly transmitting every crease in the tarmac and white line up through the rim. Weirdly the ride seems to soften up, but it remains incredibly composed and communicative when pushing, remaining utterly unflustered despite my cack-handed helmsmanship. The body starts moving around – not to warn you but to help you. Sport mode, simply accessed by a button on the steering wheel, sharpens up the throttle and gearbox, backs off the traction control, gives you complete manual control of the changes and makes the exhaust nosier. You can crack down the box on the way in with the engine popping, stand the Alpine on its nose while you turn, and as you clog it on the way out of a corner, the rear squats like a shitting dog and off you go.
And you do go – 252 bhp might not sound like a lot, but the gossamer Alpine takes off like a Rafale M hitting the burners off the deck of the Charles De Gaulle. 0-60 can be achieved in a launch control assisted 4.5 seconds, and top speed is limited to 155 mph (other fruitier versions can crack 170). I’ve driven cars that are probably faster (Civic Type R, M240i) but I didn’t drive them as fast as I drove the Alpine, because it was so capable and confidence-inspiring, helped by its diminutive size which is spot on. Honestly, I kept going quicker, braking later (and then sometimes not braking at all) until I became acutely aware I was one errant tractor away from sitting in a pile of smoldering blue wreckage in the middle of a field.
Throughout all this tomfoolery you’re held in place by excellent standard Sabelt seats. Unlike the earlier versions of the A110, they’re no longer fixed buckets, being tweakable for height and backrest angle. It’s plenty roomy, easy to access, and ergonomically where this car shines is its simplicity and clarity of purpose. There is nothing you don’t need. Standard equipment runs to single zone climate (with knobs), electric windows and mirrors, cruise control, CarPlay and Android Auto, and that’s about your lot. Most of what you can touch is nicely finished, but the dashboard upper and lower, along with the main door panels won’t be worrying Lexus anytime soon. There are some lovely touches of French pride though – small Tricolores on the insides of the doors and outside on the C pillar, the (optional) reversing camera superimposes red, white, and blue guidelines on the screen, and the gear selection buttons also illuminate in the colors of the French flag depending on what mode you are in.
About that gearbox. It’s a seven-speed DCT, and no doubt some of you will be howling a car like this should be a manual. In his book ‘Inside the Machine’, the project director and chief engineer of this car David Twohig says this:
Another contentious choice, and one that many of the more hardcore motoring journalists would later bemoan – the lack of a manual gearbox seen by some as a compromise for a focused ‘driver’s car. It was a choice that I would patiently defend later in a hundred discussions with journalists and enthusiasts – explaining that a modern double-clutch gearbox is actually lighter than a manual equivalent, when looked at as an entire system of gearbox, clutch, controls, and even the mounting brackets for the clutch pedal and gearlever. Equally importantly, the double-clutch gearbox with paddle-shift gear controls behind the steering wheel was well adapted to ‘less expert’ drivers. This was always a difficult point to explain – most drivers certainly most enthusiast drivers, and even some professional automotive journalists, tend to overestimate their capabilities behind the wheel. I, or the other hand, had been lucky enough to sit beside enough professional test drivers by now to understand that most normal people (like me) have very limited skills…
This is very much an engineer’s point of view – in measurable, empirical metrics a DCT is objectively better. But as designer, I also think in terms of things that cannot easily be quantified: feel, emotional engagement, and a smug sense of superiority. But to be honest, the fact this car isn’t a manual didn’t bother me personally one bit. In fact it was a boon commuting into Coventry every day. In Auto mode, the changes are nice and slurry, and modern engines have such a good spread of power you’re never left floundering when booting it. We’re not talking about an old GM400 three-speed treaclematic for God’s sake.
Understanding Why It’s Such A Good Design
One of the reasons I wanted to borrow the Alpine was not because I wanted to ponce about showing off for a week (there used to be at least two A110s living in my town, so I’m a day late and a dollar short as usual) but because I wanted to talk about its design, which I consider to be an exceptional piece of work. Something that comes up regularly is that we shouldn’t judge older cars by the standards of today, and design is subjective. The A110 gives me the perfect opportunity to demonstrate in one way why that is not the case: that we can objectively understand whether a car has correct proportions or not.
What do I mean by proportions? Volumes is a fancy designer way of talking about the silhouette of a car. It means the various parts like the hood, trunk and passenger compartment. The proportions are how these things interact with each other. If you’ve ever watched a designer starting sketch on YouTube, they nearly always start with the wheels. Why do this? Because using the wheels as a guide allows you to ballpark the overall proportions of a car. Here take a look:
You can see, despite the 54-year gap between them, the overall proportions of the old and new A110s are essentially identical. The overhangs are a bit tighter on the new model, and obviously the pillars have to be thicker for crash regulations, but it’s remarkable how well the new car captures the essence of the old one without descending into pastiche. The surfacing is clean and simple, and the detailing is bang up to date – I particularly like how well the auxiliary lighting is integrated into what we designers call the down-the-road graphics (DRG), the car’s signature front-end appearance that makes it recognizable and identifiable to observers of the car. One of the main design objectives was for the A110 to generate its rear downforce without need of a bolt-on spoiler, and enormous effort was spent on surfacing the complex rear fenders to include the merest hint of a lip while making sure they could be stamped without tearing the aluminum – a feat that Twohig says wouldn’t have been possible were Alpine not a small skunkworks team operating outside the conservative design and engineering departments of Renault proper.
And this car could never have existed had it been conceived and created within Renault itself. Large OEMs are too unwieldy and too dogmatic in their processes to push through such a single-minded car past all the design gateways and engineering hurdles it would encounter.
It’s A Pint Sized Supercar Without The Supercar Compromises
For all the admirable dietary rigor, don’t be thinking this is a compromised machine. It’s not a stripped-out bathtub like a Lotus, or a high-maintenance carbon fiber coffin like an Alfa Romeo 4C. The Alpine is a much more rounded, everyday experience than that. It occurred to me that at the start of my week with the A110 I had it all wrong. Sure, the urban ride is a bit stiff but in nearly all other respects this is a car you can happily daily – I know because I did. I even took it to get groceries, although because neither the front nor rear trunk are especially capacious one of my shopping bags had to travel in the passenger footwell. But then, when you’re in the mood it becomes a pint-sized supercar. It’s roomy, refined, comfortable, supremely easy to use and see out of, and because of that low curb weight incredibly economical. Over a week and 300 or so miles of urban trundling, fast dual carriageways, and a couple of afternoons driving like Esteban Ocon with the raging hump, I got 40 mpg (34 imp mpg). Forty. Due to the A110’s compact size the fuel tank, mounted behind the front axle is on the small side at 9 (US) gallons (45 liters) but still, bloody hell. For a car of this performance that gas mileage is insane.
There’s even more good news. As tested the car Alpine lent me lists for $76,678 (£59,515) including $1082 (£840) for the dark metallic Abyss Blue. The hero color Alpine blue is $2357 (£1830) which feels a bit cheeky, as does $605 (£470) for the triangular-shaped storage pack that sits on the bulkhead between the seats, as this is the only way you’re getting anywhere to put anything in the cabin. There are a few other upgrades available including an active exhaust, and an upgraded Focal stereo, but mostly it’s cosmetic stuff you really don’t need. Bog standard in washing machine white (the only standard color) the A110 will require a check for $70,515 (£54,490) a price that includes taxes and delivery. Considering it’s possible to spec a Cayman/Boxster up to nearly six figures, that’s a complete bargain. And you won’t have to put up with seeing these everywhere like a bloody Porsche either. It truly is the connoisseur’s choice.
Alpine have promised that future models may be coming to the US. Let’s hope that turns out to be the case. Otherwise, it’s a shame you have to wait another 18 years to import one.
- The Alpine A290 Electric Hot Hatch Is Reasonably Light And Has Its Own Driving Minigames
- The Alpine A110 San Remo 73 Is A 300-Horsepower Love Letter To Rally Domination
- Alpine Is Coming To The United States And Appears To Already Be Screwing It Up
- Here’s All The Details About The New Renault 5 E-Tech And Yes It Has A Baguette Holder
Exquisite write up. Bravo. Can someone take care of one for 18 years please so I gan then import it?
17 years and 3 months and counting? 😛
A fantastic article Adrian, thank you.
I love how you managed to piss off both the French and your fellow Britons in just one sentence: “It’s Sort Of A French Lotus But Better”.
It’s a seriously appealing car, this Alpine.
I guess I can quash my qualms with it not being a manual by reckoning that I, as suggested, may not be as good a driver as I figured myself to be.
It is true though. It’s basically a Lotus but more comfortable and easier to live with.
Having spoken to James Martin at length about Lotuses, there isn’t a barge pole long enough.
The dual clutch, although less involving than a manual, works very well.
Brilliant write up. Thank you Adrian
Now this is how you design a new version of an old nameplate. It’s totally modern but you instantly know what it is when you see it.
I don’t really like many new cars.
I love this one. And the original A110 is one of my all time favorites
Id love one of these, but the most important question is would a taller Clarkson shaped old man fit? The next question is, are they going to bring them to Coldistan?
I’m 6’2” and didn’t have the seat all the way back.
I’m 6’5″ 250 lbs with 54″ chest. Worst case, I could put in some side mount low profile seats. The next challenge is getting one in Canada.
That it is not a manual lessens the want.
Definitely. There is no question that a modern DCT is much better than me rowing my own and clutching.
but I *like* doing that.
It does.
But eveything else (dynamically) is so brilliant. Perhaps the best handling sportscar currently on sale at any price…
And I don’t get the excuse about people thinking they’re better drivers than they are. Yeah, so? Just say they couldn’t afford to develop it and leave it at that. Otherwise, I care very little about speed (feeling fast > being fast), I care about feel—what most sports car have traditionally been about—which means engagement. If I cared more about being fast against some other driver, then I’d want the DCT, but I couldn’t give less of a shit, I just want to enjoy myself. Moot point anyway as I’m in the US and that’s just too little storage for me for it to be anything but a toy and a toy for me and at that price would be an old car, but with all that typed out, I’m sure it’s still a great drive with the DCT and I would love to take one out on a run.
Precisely. I know exactly how bad I am at driving, and drive a manual because I want to improve, among other reasons. Every imperfect rev-match is a lesson learned and a reminder that I have room to grow. Fun comes from challenge.
Even while gingerly approaching a stoplight, you can challenge yourself to down-shift more smoothly, engine-brake such that you use the brakes less, or double-clutch into 1st before coming to a stop. The areas in which you can improve are endless.
With a good automatic, you’ll find your first challenge “one errant tractor away from sitting in a pile of smoldering blue wreckage in the middle of a field”.
I didn’t think of it until now, but I see it being possibly slower as a feature. To get any kind of excitement from an automatic “sports” car, you have to drive it harder—great if you live somewhere you can do that, but I don’t in sociopath fantasy land and have to think about cyclists, dog walkers, joggers, cops, shit falling off of trucks, fallen tree branches, more cops, looking like an asshole and giving all of us a bad name so that people vote in draconian dickheads to pass laws for things like speed limiters, or any other manner of stuff. Being occupied by more things I have to do makes driving in the real world that little bit more entertaining and I’d gladly go back to even more manual controls (and less safety, but that’s off the topic). One of my designs is for a car that would have a crank inertia reel starter like an old aircraft (it would have a radial engine, so it fits). And, yeah, when I have the time and they’re not hard to find or there are alarm systems preventing using them for anything but emergency, I take the stairs if it’s under 10 floors, too.
I’ve owned a few French cars (two Citroëns and two Renaults) and wished the A110 would come to the States. No luck.
We had these in Oz until a couple of years ago when the Australian Design Rules changed with regards to intrusion bars in the doors or some such that the A110 doesn’t have and won’t have till the next iteration.
Same rules also took out the Mitsubishi Mirage and some sort of Lexus blob.
This is the only car I want more than a Holden Ute.
There’s quite the gulf between the two. Especially since the ute is not exactly a driver’s car.
The heart wants what it wants.
The auto play videos and pop-up ads are going to force me to leave this site. No big loss, I know. But what a load of annoying shit you’ve done.
What is super frustrating is that the video isn’t even related to the story you click on.
I guess maybe I need to find an Autopian-specific browser to use.
If you aren’t using an ad blocker by now, you’re doing the Internet wrong.
I use them, but so many websites grumble about that, it is almost not worth it.
The FBI recommends using ad blockers whenever possible. Don’t browse the internet without protection.
I have Adblock and uBlock Origin and still get this crap.
Ghostery and Privacy Badger do the job.
You could use noscript.
Or download Brave browser.
If a Brit touches the tricolors, does it burn the fingers?
But my actual question: how does one access the engine? Is there a hatch of some sort, or through the trunk, or ??
You don’t. Sorry I should have mentioned that. There are bolts underneath that black trim piece, the glass hitches up, and then the cover unbolts.
And you never even try to do it on your own…
Tricolours are not a problem for Brits. That’s the same red, white and blue as the British flag, we’re just better at patterns.
The only Alpine I’ve ever seen in real life was a mid 80s GTA. On holiday, I’d driven my RX-7 from Germany to France try and catch a stage of the Tour de France. Greg LeMond and Bernard Hinault were battling for the win that year.
Managed to catch up with the race between Briançon and Alpe d’Huez. Had to park reasonably far from the course and hike up to the road which was packed with spectators. In the field where I parked, I’d slotted the Mazda into a narrow space between a hedge and a bright blue coupe. It was an Alpine. I admired the lines for a minute then hustled up to the road, arriving barely five minutes before the lead riders passed.
After the peloton had passed, I hiked back down to the field with some others including a kfellow named Georges who struck up a conversation when he realized I was an American. When we got to the lot, Georges proved to be the owner of the Alpine. The traffic was horrible and Georges suggested I follow him to a cafe where we could take some lunch.
I’d like to say that we engaged in a little friendly dash through the hills, but there were too many cars and pedestrians for that to happen. We did get seats at the cafe where we learned that Hinault and LeMond had finished arm-in-arm in Alpe d’Huez.
After lunch and some car talk we departed in different directions and that’s the last time I’ve ever seen an Alpine.I’ve admired them from afar ever since.
Thanks for the entertaining review of Alpine’s latest. It took me back.
*cries in freedom*
Definitely missing out
If this car were actually available in the USA, I’d consider buying one. It looks amazing, and its platform efficiency is not that bad(the original A110 is far superior on this metric, but I digress).
There are no new cars in the USA at this time that come close too appealing to me. The two closest fits would be the Mazda Miata(underpowered and aerodynamically mediocre), and the Tesla Model 3 Performance(way too much tech bloat, too much mass, too much spyware, and requires a Tesla service center to repair). At a distant third would be the Mitsubishi Mirage(ugly, front wheel drive, underpowered, has the worst aero of the three, and no longer comes with a manual).
You could always import a Changli.
I already have a “bicycle” that is superior to it in most metrics, not only including operating cost, but especially acceleration/cornering/top speed performance.
Pretty sure the Changli has better crash safety.
I doubt that. While made of plastic, I did have a rudimentary safety cell on my trike with side and rear bulkheads. The rear bulkhead prevented me from injury when it got rear-ended by a truck while I was stopped at a red light. The tail section was sacrificed as a crumple zone, but the rest of the trike was fine and I was able to ride it back home, after spending an hour and a half removing the tail.
I suspect the truck hit me at about 10-15 mph while I was stopped. The driver slammed on the brakes at the last possible second, as any later, and I might not be here right now.
I built a new tail section over a weekend out of pilfered coroplast election signs and it fit right up to the mounting points.
Fair.
The Tesla is far too fat to compete with the A110.
The A110 is not about outright speed, that it has the speed is an added bonus.
The A110 is all about driving dynamics. And boy does it deliver there. Think of it as a comfy Lotus or lightweight Cayman.
And there is also another difference. The softness and approachable performance. I al not going to say it rides like a Citroën, but compared to the Germans it is superb.
The Tesla has the A110 beat by far when it comes to CdA value, and I prefer electric to ICE. But everything Tesla sells is indeed a fat pig. Which is a shame, since the original Roadster was about 2,600 lbs, proving that they are capable of making a lightweight car with decent range.
But…
Can it baby?
Costco Toilet Paper- yea or nay?
Like I would have either of those things in my life.
That’s not the teardrop shaped hydro pneumatically suspended spaceship you were looking for,
https://farm1.static.flickr.com/130/350195063_64ad43072c_o.jpg
I have questions about the nun.
I wasn’t going to click the link till you mentioned the nun. Way to go, Mr. Subliminal.
Nuns are always sinister.
Catholic school in the seventies, yep.
If god didn’t want nuns to have sex, why did he give them the most erotic outfit known to man?
What’s a priest’s favorite kind of meat?
Nun.
Concur.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhK2ev_O-pc
Damn. What a cool car. Everything about it sounds absolutely on point.
Why do I fear “future Alpine for the US market” means pulling a Lotus and slapping the ‘tricolore’ on a 6000lb CUV?
As a current A110 owner, I fear that too.
A sporty 3-ton CUV! It’ll have everything enthusiasts want: launch control and 24-inch wheels. Painted calipers optional. Maybe we’ll get 2 square inches of Alcantara if we behave.
I’d rather have one of these than a Lamborghini, Ferrari or Corvette.
Vive la France!
And you could be closer to its limit more of the time.
Isn’t the imperial gallon bigger than the US gallon? Did this really get 40 mpg US, or 34? Impressive either way, honestly.
Yeah my maths went wrong there. 34 imperial miles per gallon. So 28 US.
For a proper sports car 28 freedom units per gallon is still very impressive.
Ironically over the last 3,500 miles or so I am averaging just that. Its weak point there is that 7th is a bit on the short side around 30mph per 1,000rpm), so at higher speeds engine is turning higher and using more fuel than it could be.
We’ll have you working successfully in £sd yet. And if not us, maybe Jacob Rees-Mogg will slither his way into some position of power and make you use it.
Yea, the fuel capacity later was also off, I don’t know what it actually is but there are 3.8 liters to a US gallon, not 5
*34 miles per imperial gallon*
I saw one on my commute twice last week… Took a minute to click since I’m in CA, but damn does it look good in person.
Another OEM evaluating it probably.
I hope not. Usually that means the unit is crushed when the evaluation is complete.
More likely stripped and costed.
If the cars were brought in by a US manufacturer, the feds allow entry of a non-compliant foreign vehicle for testing and evaluation as long as the vehicle is destroyed after evaluation. In exchange, said manufacturer is allowed a tax write-off for all costs incurred in purchase and evaluation of the non-compliant unit.
The tell on a vehicle in this situation is usually a license plate displaying the letter “M”. At least here in Michigan… it’s common to see a unit with “M” tags and camo and sometimes a full burka.
I’m loathe to read about cars we don’t get but Adrian always delivers. Between “cack-handed helmsmanship,” Galoises, the “errant tractor” (great band or pub name), the power-to-lunch ratio, and “treaclematic,” this was great fun. And the “promise” at the end even cleanses the lingering resentment!
I told my Miata how small and light this was and she was like, “that’s nice”.
Then I told her how much power it made and she just kind of turned away in a huff. I think I’m gonna have to buy her flowers or a turbo or something.
This thing is twice the cost of a new Miata and it has that silly solid roof.
I still lust after one.
I’m a big fan of the looks of the ND but this is even better. And that blue.
I agree with you. But don’t tell her I said that. I’m in enough trouble already.
Your Miata is find. I told my A110 about the manual in my old MX-5 and became a bit sad…
When I got my Lotus I had to buy my MX5 a turbo so it wouldn’t feel fat and slow.
No, not that exactly…
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52763070823_2cfb092975_c.jpg
Yes, now we’re on common ground. Charles de Gaulle is involved:
https://live.staticflickr.com/5219/5387317565_78cff91327_o.jpg
*70.8 inches wide. I saw 78 and was trying to wrap my head around how wide this freaking thing could be
It’s 78” including the mirrors.
I had to go back to the picture and holy shit man those are some wide mirrors. I guess it’s necessary for visibility but damn it’s like 10 inches wider than anything I’m used to
In European streets and road it is perfectly manageable.