Home » The Biggest Debate We Had All Week – Tales From The Slack

The Biggest Debate We Had All Week – Tales From The Slack

Debate Slack Tales
ADVERTISEMENT

You wanna see us argue? You sicko! You’re sick. (Become a member here so you can support us and read the post).

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
41 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew Bugenis
Andrew Bugenis
1 hour ago

Congratulations Peter! Word balloon was correct.

SaabaruDude
SaabaruDude
1 hour ago

I also received a promotion in a meeting I initially assumed was heading the other direction. It’s a weird feeling.

Amberturnsignalsarebetter
Amberturnsignalsarebetter
1 hour ago
Reply to  SaabaruDude

Likewise- walked in fully expecting to be laid off, but instead was asked to set up a new office in another country (so technically still laid off by one company, but rehired by its sister entity across the sea)

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 hour ago

Go, Peter!
So, do you have room for a cool but absolutely beat POS that’ll make your life miserable and give us the content we crave? That’s kinda obligatory, no?

Peter d
Peter d
58 minutes ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

I can’t believe that this is the second time in a week my usually mild-mannered self has had to say this: “Fuck Peter T….” but goddamn that guy is morally bankrupt and put multiple businesses I like/use out of business just because he can.

Peter d
Peter d
56 minutes ago
Reply to  Peter d

Oops, you are talking about another Peter… sorry

CRX89
CRX89
56 minutes ago
Reply to  Peter d

Arguably did a solid for the Hulkmeister though, leading to this website somehow.

Peter d
Peter d
55 minutes ago
Reply to  CRX89

I guess that is true, we would likely not have The Autopian if it were not for that asshole. And the Hulk was done wrong, but not that wrong…

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
1 hour ago

Oh that Peter.

Mike Harrell
Mike Harrell
1 hour ago

…it absolutely has to be in quotes so as to make abundantly clear that it was this man who said it.

quotes is most important for attribution

The default option in the comment box for quoting someone is a blockquote which, despite being selected via a quotation mark, doesn’t actually put the quoted material itself within quotation marks. Are you trying to get us sued?

Also, congratulations on the promotion!

Tim Beamer
Tim Beamer
1 hour ago

Go git’em, Pete!

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
1 hour ago

Congratulations Pete! Finally someone in charge who knows what the fuck they’re doing!

😉

Parsko
Parsko
2 hours ago

Congrats, Peter. This would imply that there is now an open position you once occupied. This is a great sign of growth for the Autopian! What will the new employee do???

AlfaWhiz
AlfaWhiz
2 hours ago

This comment has been redacted not to violate David’s Code of the Autopian (allegedly).

AlfaWhiz
AlfaWhiz
2 hours ago
Reply to  AlfaWhiz

On a serious note, congrats Peter! And I think David has a point on this one, although I personally wouldn’t mind quotation marks within a bubble.

Chronometric
Chronometric
2 hours ago

I thought the speech bubble was more clear because it showed the attribution to the Canadian guy. Just putting the statement in quotations didn’t attribute it to anyone.

And this is why life has taught me to hire attorneys instead of going with common sense.

Brandon Forbes
Brandon Forbes
2 hours ago

(“Congratulations Peter”) – Brandon

MATTinMKE
MATTinMKE
2 hours ago

Your work is solid Pete. Have some confidence in yourself, you deserve it.

VanGuy
VanGuy
2 hours ago

(“(Congratulations Peter!) – VanGuy” -VanGuy) – VanGuy

A. Barth
A. Barth
2 hours ago
Reply to  VanGuy

checking syntax… ok

Mechjaz
Mechjaz
2 hours ago
Reply to  VanGuy

Please Excuse Meddlesome Dithering Autopian Staffers

VanGuy
VanGuy
2 hours ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

This is much better than the one I made when I was younger, Please Eviscerate My Deranged, Annoying Sasquatch.

A. Barth
A. Barth
2 hours ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

Peter’s Editing Made David All Sad

Parsko
Parsko
2 hours ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

PEMDAS???

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 hour ago
Reply to  Parsko

Parenthesis, exponents, multiplication, division, addition, subtraction
‘Please Excuse My Dear Sally’ was how I learned order of operations last century -unless it’s something completely different in publishing.

Parsko
Parsko
1 hour ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

LOL, that’s it. I always said Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally too. Never PEMDAS.

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 hour ago
Reply to  Parsko

It’s been decades: had to google—followed by forehead smack 😉

A. Barth
A. Barth
2 hours ago

A speech bubble is, de facto, a visualization of quotation marks. It’s literally an image showing someone speaking. Of course, people will understand that to be a quote.

Hi – part-time magazine editor here: no, it isn’t; perhaps; and no, they won’t. 🙂 At least not to any measure that would bear legal scrutiny. I see three reasons for this.

One, it would be trivial to find any number of similar images with people and cartoon-like speech bubbles that do not represent actual quotes.

Two, the “visualization” statement uses a logical fallacy: “everyone knows that”. How would one go about demonstrating even that most people know [something]?

Three, the lack of actual quotes creates significant ambiguity. One should not rely on the reader to assume they are there.

tl;dr – DT had the right approach here.

PS Congratulations, Peter! Well done!

Bleeder
Bleeder
2 hours ago
Reply to  A. Barth

“Which magazine, and where can I subscribe?”
– Bleeder

Bruinhoo
Bruinhoo
2 hours ago
Reply to  A. Barth

Former blogger and current lawyer (with the obligatory ’not your lawyer’) who was about to make a very similar comment regarding the bubble before you beat me to it.

At best, the idea of the bubble as a quotation mark substitute relies on context which is far from universal. If it came down to BMW raising a fuss, regardless of outcome, nobody would end up happy or come out ahead except for whichever law firm Galpin has on retainer.

Bruinhoo
Bruinhoo
2 hours ago
Reply to  Bruinhoo

Also, congrats to Peter!

David Tracy
David Tracy
1 hour ago
Reply to  Bruinhoo

Folks, I’m not full of shit here. The number of lawsuits I’ve probably kept us out of is significant. (But that’s basically half my job as EIC).

Parsko
Parsko
2 hours ago
Reply to  A. Barth

I agree, even as a Mechanical Engineer. Lawyers are good at finding those loopholes.

Tbird
Tbird
1 hour ago
Reply to  Parsko

Fellow engineer – I think I comprehend legalese ’till I don’t

Mechjaz
Mechjaz
2 hours ago

(Congratulations, Peter!)> Mechjaz

Buzz
Buzz
2 hours ago

Congrats, Pete!

-buzz*

*Actual quote

Tbird
Tbird
2 hours ago

As a reader, we clearly do not always comprehend the internal (and legal) dynamic of headlines, etc… Thank you for this glimpse into how this sausage is made (as unpalatable as it may be at times). I do not envy your responsibilities but do envy your opportunities. Godspeed to David and ‘Elise’.

3WiperB
3WiperB
3 hours ago

“Congratulations Peter!” – 3WiperB

Mechjaz
Mechjaz
2 hours ago
Reply to  3WiperB

Credit where it’s due, you’ve kicked off some solid orthography gags

Alexk98
Alexk98
2 hours ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

-Mechjaz

Just in case

3WiperB
3WiperB
2 hours ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

“I appreciate that people caught it and continued it” – 3WiperB

41
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x