Chevy just published a press release showing off an 1,100 horsepower Chevy Silverado EV ZR2 race truck concept meant to get the world excited for the 2026 Chevy Silverado EV Trail Boss — Chevy’s very first off-road-focused electric vehicle. But I’m not excited because I know that the new, more capable Silverado EV is going to be yet another reminder that electric off-roaders are just not ready for primetime in 2025.
I’m not trying to be a Debbie Downer, here. As an off-road diehard, I think the more capable vehicles hit the market the merrier. And in fact, when I reviewed the Rivian R1T, I had almost entirely nice things to say. I also liked driving the Cybertruck.


But those machines were cool because they were novel, and by 2026 when the new Silverado EV Trail Boss hits the market, the glitz and the glamour associated with new electric pickup trucks will have worn off. In fact, it already has, and now that I’m looking at new electric vehicles through clear lenses with no rose tint, it becomes obvious that they just aren’t suited to be great off-roaders. At least, not right now.
I don’t mean that electric vehicles aren’t good off-roaders from a technical standpoint. No, the torque delivery of an EV, and the granularity with which it can be delivered, are sensational. There’s no doubt about that. No, when I say EVs aren’t suited to be “great off-roaders,” I mean off-road capable vehicles for the masses.
Think about it: It’s 2025, and there’s not a single off-road electric car that even borders on “affordable.” Not one. And the reason for that is simple: off-road vehicles just require too much energy to go down the road, which is something we all intuitively know — it’s a key reason why a Ford Escape gets better fuel economy than, say, a Ford Bronco. And the more energy needed, the bigger the battery needed.
So when I saw Chevy’s press release for the new Silverado EV ZR2 and Trail Boss, I couldn’t help but think about how compromised it’s going to be, especially when it comes to pricing.
Here’s what Chevy has to say about the Trail Boss in the aforementioned press release:
The Silverado ZR2 race truck concept’s reveal comes as Chevy prepares to launch this summer the 2026 Silverado EV Trail Boss, its first off-road oriented EV variant. Trail Boss is a more off-road capable Silverado EV with a factory-installed lift, 18-inch wheels, 35-inch all-terrain tires and red tow hooks. New Terrain Mode gives the truck increased maneuverability in tight spaces.
If this were a gasoline truck, like, say, the Chevy Colorado ZR2, I’d be amped to see this. 35s! A lift kit! Lockers! That’s fantastic. Sure, it’ll hurt fuel economy and ride quality and handling, but those are compromises I’m willing to make. In an EV, though, that first compromise makes the off-road hardware far from worth it in my eyes.
My article last May about how EVs just aren’t suited for serious towing is quite similar to this one in that my main point has to do with Vehicle Demand Energy: The energy needed to propel a vehicle down the road.
With a heavy load hooked to a trailer hitch, getting a reasonable range requires a massive amount of energy onboard the tow vehicle. On a gas or diesel vehicle, you just install a big blow-molded fuel tank for a few bucks more and be done with it. On an EV, you have to pay tens of thousands of dollars and thousands of pounds worth of curb weight to store the extra energy needed to yield a similar range as an ICE truck.

The good thing about a pickup truck tow vehicle, though, is that it can be fairly efficient when it’s not pulling a trailer. So, an EV pickup could still be an OK daily driver even if it’s not great when the energy demand goes up during towing. But what if that pickup truck has an increased energy demand when not towing?
That’s essentially what Chevy is doing by off-road-ifying its Silverado EV. By installing 35-inch tires and a factory lift kit, it’s going to compromise the vehicle’s range by increasing aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance. The only way to even slightly mitigate that is to use air suspension, which allows one to raise the vehicle for off-roading and lower it for highway driving. Even with air suspension (which, by the way, isn’t cheap) 35-inch all-terrain tires alone will significantly reduce range.

The current crop of Chevy Silverado EVs offers ranges between 282 miles and 492 miles, and while that latter figure may sound impressive, it’s just a product of a humongous 205 kWh battery. The vehicle’s efficiency of 50 kWh/100 mi is significantly less than that of, say, a Rivian R1T (which, to be fair, is a bit smaller). The 282-mile vehicle uses a 119 kWh battery, while the 400-ish mile truck has a 170 kWh battery, if you’re curious.
The result of these bigger batteries is a high cost and high weight. Unless you’re a fleet operator who can buy a WT “Work Truck,” buying a Silverado EV will cost you over $75,000. I get that an off-road variant will look cool and be fun, but like an off-road version of a gas truck, this is just going to be a more expensive truck with less range. And when you’re already expensive and range-conscious like the Silverado EV is, I’m not sure those are two areas worth compromising for a bit more off-road capability.
I’m saying “a bit,” because just looking at that picture above tells me this thing is going to be far from an off-road beast. That belly looks big, the front overhang looks low, and at about 9,000 pounds it’s likely going to bury itself in loose terrain and be an absolute bear to recover once it’s stuck.
Back in August Lucid’s then-CEO Peter Rawlinson told me it’s not possible to make an affordable EV pickup truck without a gas motor. If you want to be competitive in terms of towing range, you just have to install an absurdly heavy and expensive battery pack.
The same holds true when it comes to off-road capability. To build an off-roader with the right geometry (short overhangs, a short belly), underbody protection (which adds weight), and tires (big all-terrains or mud-terrains), you’ve got to make major compromises to Vehicle Demand Energy. That means you need a big battery to give you a reasonable range.
The Rivian R1S will go 410 miles on a charge, but it does it thanks to a 141.5 kWh battery. And that vehicle doesn’t even have aggressive all-terrain tires. It also costs over $90 grand.
EVs just aren’t ready to be good, affordable off-roaders in 2025. But there is an obvious solution: The range extender.
Adding a small gasoline range extender allows you to install big 35-inch tires and all the skid plates you could want without significantly compromising edge-case driving situations like road trips (this is important because people, whether logically or illogically, buy vehicles based on edge cases). Instead of installing a 200 kWh battery to get 350 miles of range (for example) out of your off-road vehicle, you can just have an 80 kWh battery, get 140 miles of electric range to handle the majority of your daily-driving needs, and when you need to go on your annual road trip, you just fill up.
You’ve now saved $17,000 worth of batteries (but added maybe $7000 back with the range extender, for a net savings of $10,000 to be conservative), and you’ve dropped your curb weight by at least 1,000 pounds.
Range extenders truly are the only way to make electric off-roaders remotely accessible to the masses in 2025. This new Silverado EV Trail Boss doesn’t have one, and the result is almost certainly going to be an expensive, heavy vehicle with only so-so range and off-road capability. I’m sure it’ll be fun to drive, but certainly not fun to pay for or charge up.
The irony of a more enviromentally-friendly EV being used for a non-enviromentally friendly activity is amusing.
I’m not sure I’d want to be on loose, uneven ground with a 5tonne EV and trying to stop it from doing things I don’t want it to. And then trying to recover said vehicle from whatever predicament that resulted.
It’s one thing, say, to have a Wrangler or old Suzuki SUV sliding into a rock with it’s full weight than to think of what one of these would accomplish doing so – and then imagine the damage, repair costs, and attempts at recovery.
Now, admittedly I’m not an offroader, so I may not be in the know, but do people even take expensive vehicles (ICE, BEV, whatever) offroading? The times I have seen people tackling serious trails, the vehicles more closely resemble something from Mad Max than a $90K pickup.
As someone who offroaded my Jeeps for years, I can say that, yes, some people buy a $75k-$100k vehicle and take it out and thrash on it. But it’s like 5% of buyers (made up, obviously), though and you can always spot the guy who took their fancy new truck out and flips out when it gets some dents or pin striping from tree branches on the side of the trail. But of that tiny percent, there are a few who stick with it after those first dents because they are into it regardless of cost and damage.
I’m sure there are a few, but like you say, a tiny percentage. I wouldn’t have the testicular fortitude to spend that money and trash it and I don’t think many others would either, especially when you can build a more capable rig for less.
Yeah, for me it was a slow evolution. I started pooring more energy into making the Jeep comfortable so it was a decent drive to the trail. By the time I stopped, the Jeep was spartan and money had gone into a decent tow rig and trailer instead. Plus, when I broke the Jeep, I didn’t have a problem getting to work as I had a cheap Saturn to drive instead. I have long maintained that getting that Saturn was the best Jeep mod I ever did.
There’s also another subset starting with a $50-100k rig that add another $50k into it – before they’ve ever taken it out onto a trail. (as well as those who spend that, but never take to a trail)
I am really torn and may not totally agree with what I am about to type:
Ev pickup trucks are fine in that not everyone with a truck tows 10,000 pounds 1000 miles every day up hill both ways. Trucks are family sedans with fabric covered big trunks for rural identifying suburbanites that may need a truck to hauls stuff “someday”. So making them EVs for their daily commutes is fine. Just make ICE or Diesel-Electric series hybirds for towing and actual work.
People buy trucks for the possibilities they represent. So you need to build for that.
No notes. No one is actually going to off road the thing anyway, but they want to want to and that’s fine. I mean, it’s overall probably not fine and we’re a bit too much “me and my needs are all that matter and damn the consequences” but that ain’t changin’, so it’s fine! I would never buy this to off road it, but if that’s the image a buyer wants, good for them.
I agree (ish); pickup trucks can be slippery (ish)! Just look at how many 30 MPG trucks Ram and Ford and Chevy have.
It’s when you task them with pickup-truck things like towing and off-roading that they become less suitable as EVs. Of course, some people buy trucks for their capabilities, so this could be an issue, but hey, we’ll see if people buy these things.
EREVs are such a no-brainer for this segment it’s ridiculous there hasn’t been one yet.
This is for the soft roader crowd that thinks EVs are good for virtu signalling. 99% of these won’t see real off road use. Fire roads are not real off roading. Driving in your yard is not real off roading. This is cosplay for cars.
This is the my simple understanding of it. The best tow rigs are heavy. 3/4 and one ton trucks. They have heavier frames, engines, and running gear. This is completely the opposite of what you need to get decent range on an electric vehicle. And when you look at it these EV trucks are still just 1/4 ton trucks that can only tow 10k lbs. max. That’s not even what the gas versions can tow. I really don’t see this changing anytime soon unless we can figure out a way to break the laws of physics. A range extender would help but I also would really like to know who is actually purchasing these things. I’ve seen a couple of lightening’s on the road but no EV silverado’s yet.
well, if it has red tow hooks, count me in.
Diesel Electric hybrids are the way to go. Eagerly waiting for them to be 20 years old so I can afford one.
Of all the vehicles to electrify the truck is the dumbest one to do. What do people buy them to do?
Long road trips. Tow. Remote adventures. All things an EV is not good at.
Is the truck market even ASKING for EV trucks?
My snarky, source-less answer is that car companies only make money on trucks, they want or need to make EVs, so the EV truck is born. All the while ignoring the fact that the Venn diagram of people who want trucks and people who want EVs barely overlaps and is mostly captured by Rivian anyway.
Delivery vans and shuttle buses, on the other hand, are nearly ideal to electrify since so many ot them follow fixed routes with multiple drop-off stops in city traffic.
We procured one more round of ICE powered vans for our Handicap on-demand transit vehicles, as the current EV offerings couldn’t quite make the day.
Once you add that coach-built body, the efficiency plummets.
I buy trucks as a daily cause I regularly haul all manners of stuff that doesn’t belong in a hatchback (unless you want to completely wreck your interior) and occasionally tow a project home or a camper trailer.
I can tell you I ABSOLUTELY want an EV truck with a range extender. 100miles of range would suit my monday-to-friday gig and the extender would take care of my weekend needs.
Agreed!
Two supporting points:
Bbbbuuuut – They make pretty tire tracks when they go sideways in the snow!
Isn’t that why you buy an $80,000 truck?
*facepalm*
Seriously. That alone tell me EV trucks are just a mans version of a fancy purse.
All of the fancy pickups on the market are just a mans version of a purse.
“Look at that brown leather!” “Yeah and check out the silver badging”
Shoes, purse, pickup truck interior? Who knows?
Shut up and take my money already.
Going electric always seemed like the perfect reason to bring back the high performance street truck. Lowered ride heights and less rolling resistance from road focused tires would benefit an EV greatly.
An electric Ariel Nomad is where electric off roading needs to start.
I’d say electric off roading should have started with Alta Motors. Their dirt bikes were great, but the company went bankrupt.
Sure, an electric dirt bike isn’t going to replace all gas powered ones, but their are plenty of scenarios where they did fantastically.
The few other electric dirt bikes offered now aren’t bad, but I still mourn Alta.
This is why I just don’t see any reason for these massive EVs to exist. They’re deeply compromised and use a tremendous amount of energy and battery resources for hardly any benefit other than making the vehicle heavy, expensive, and difficult to refuel. Neat.
I want these limited battery resources to be used for the commuters that have a chance of actually reducing consumption. Not these mega fat trucks that I’m not sure anyone really wants.
Seriously hope GM has been working furiously to make an EREV version of these things. Also, I really thought we’d be looking at EV Tahoe/Suburban/Yukon by now. The Escalade is out, the pickups have been out for years, where are the regular SUVs?
Hmm, what if you put one of those 205 kWh battery in a Golf-sized hatchback? 800 miles of range?
Four flat tires.
I’d be more interested in seeing GM build a Bolt that can fast-charge at the same rate as the Hummer EV. It would add 200 miles in the time it takes for the driver to take a leak.
The good thing no one is paying sticker price for these ones. I had a loaner for one month and the thing is insane, the amount of power and towing capacity while using super cruise. People online love these trucks, even if you have a higher electricity bill because of the power demand but you basically can power your house for days, the truck is ready for it.
Work in R&D for a semi-truck manufacturer and can confirm that the EV’s range for something so big and heavy is not great and to top that off with constantly failing e-axles tis not a fun time.
These feel like the Hummer EV so GM is probably thinking that they’ll get some more of that pie.
Yeah, too lazy to look up the specs myself, but, these sound an awful lot like they’re just putting the Hummer stuff on the Silverado. And, wouldn’t the Hummer be GMs first off-road EV?
I don’t think it’s a very big pie, and I think it’s already been eaten by Hummer EV and Cybertruck owners.
Can confirm EV’s use a lot more energy when towing. My Model Y LR uses about 450-500 watt-hours per mile to tow a 2000 lb Aliner popup. That’s double its EPA rated 250 watt-hours per mile. Towing means lots of stops. Which is fine for me since it’s recreational and allows for lots of family time exploring the different charging stops. Location also helps. Being in the Northeast US, there are fast chargers littering the major highways. Other people’s experience will be very different.
Oh yeah David, then why is the lunar rover electric!?!?! Can’t get any more off-road than that! Checkmate… checkmate.
*insert on snap gif here*
Didn’t that have a range of like 57 miles?
Which far exceeds that of all other moon-based cars.
That is true
Plus, some may say this is disingenuous, but I’m going to credit it an additional 238,900 miles.
I feel like I’m nearly ready to be CEO of some
shadytotally viable EV truck start up. Put me in coach.With 1969 technology and lead-acid batteries.
Oh, sure, MSRP $38,000,000. In 1969 dollars.
They just failed to ramp up production. I’m sure prices would have dropped to that of a Chevy C10 if they had made as many…
Yeah, you ain’t gettin those tires from TireRack!
I know a guy…
It’s so early that I haven’t even logged in to work Slack and there’s already a strong COTD contender! 😀