This morning I drove my kid to the bus stop, like I do every morning. It’s not because he can’t walk the however many blocks there – he walks back from the stop after school – but more that getting him to get there on time on foot has proven to be an impossibility on par with perpetual motion. So I drive him there. This morning, the bus didn’t show up, so I had to drive him to school, knowing that I hadn’t written a Cold Start the night before, and I had no idea what I was going to write today. But then inspiration came, as always, from the back of a Ford Bronco.
The inspiration from the rear of that Bronco came from the taillights, because as we all know, taillights are a constant source of inspiration. Specifically, the rear indicators on the current-gen Bronco – which are thankfully amber – appear to be in the shape of curly brackets.


You know, these things:
{ }
Seriously, look at them:
I mean, that absolutely looks like a curly bracket. They’re sort of oddly ornate for the Bronco’s overall aesthetic (I’d have assumed if Bronco rear indicators looked like any type of bracket, it’d be the square ones [ ]) but I do appreciate that bit of directionality in there, with that little hyphen-shaped middle bit pointing the direction. But there’s no question these indicators look like { }.
So, let’s talk a bit about curly brackets! I think for most people, they’re just kind of weird and rarely used, just hanging out there on the keyboard, seeming like a pair of parentheses that are just trying too hard. But curly brackets have all sorts of really specific uses!
Curly brackets likely exist on your computer keyboard at all because of the work of one man, Bob Bemer, who incorporated them into the character set of the IBM 7030 of 1961, also known as “Stretch,” which was the first transistorized supercomputer and the fastest computer in the world in 1961. This was the first machine to have an 8-bit byte which freed up room in the character set for more characters, including the curly brackets.
According to the Chicago Manual of Style and the AP stylebook, here’s how curly brackets are used:
“Braces ({}), also called curly brackets, provide yet another option for enclosing data and are used in various ways in ceratin programming languages. They are also used in mathematical and other specialized writing (see, e.g., 12.28). Braces are not interchangeable with parentheses or brackets.”
As you can see, these are also called “braces,” usually in British Commonwealth English-speaking places, like the inside of Matt Berry’s head. We’ll save the programming language part for a bit later, but in normal, prose English, it seems curly brackets are most often used to differentiate an example of something from the rest of the body text. An example might be
“There is one well-established and proven way to double the resale value of a Yugo {fill it up with gas}.”
There are, of course, other ways to cite examples in texts, but it looks like curly brackets can definitely fill that role.
In mathematics, curly brackets denote sets, which are just any collection of mathematical objects that form a group:
{1,2,x,11,42,8,6,7,5,3,0,9…}
As noted before, curly brackets are used in many programming languages, and there’s even a whole category of programming languages that use curly brackets called “curly bracket (or curly brace) languages.” Some very common languages like Java and C++ fit in this category, because their code uses curly brackets extensively to denote beginnings and ends of code blocks:
public void flagTest() { boolean flag = true; int i = 10; if (flag == true) { for( int i=0; i<10; i++ ) { System.out.print("flag sure seems true"); } } flag = false; }
Sticking to computer stuff, we may as well note that the Unicode for { is U+007B and } is U+007D, while the old ASCII values for them are:
In music, they’re used to group two clefs on a musical staff should be connected and played together, sometimes specifying what instrument should play them together:
There was also an archaic chemistry use of the curly brackets to show molecules, but we now just use a subscript number. For example look at these two ways to show the molecule that makes up water, with two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen:
Sometimes you see oversized curly brackets used to connect lines of text together or, informally in handwritten contexts, just group any set of vertically-stacked things into one category; the unique shape of the curly bracket, which includes a collecting element and a pointing element, makes them unusually well-suited to this task:
I’m sure there’s more to curly brackets and their history and use, but for the moment, I’m just happy to see them celebrated on the rears of Broncos all over the place, encouraging people to consider these hardworking and largely under-appreciated bits of punctuation.
Jeez, am I going to be the first one to note the phone number in the curly bracketed/braced set of characters?
{1,2,x,11,42,8,6,7,5,3,0,9…}
Get the feeling Torch would’ve pulled in the margins and increased line height if he could get away with it on this one. “Font size 12.5” type vibe.
I usually call the three types of commonly used enclosing pairs “curly brackets”, “square brackets” and “parentheses”. My native language is not English (it’s German), and I often speak to both US-, UK- and non-English native speakers, and this mostly avoids confusion.
They were meant to resemble a B.
I have a distaste for amber blinkers and have considered changing mine out, Oracle makes a set for the Bronco that are all red.
You WHAT? :-O
So, you don’t care about the excellent safety records of amber turn signal indicators, do you? What a moron…
Look at the last picture with the turn signal and the brake lights on, you can’t tell it’s amber for shit. If you showed me that picture without the other side I’d believe it’s running and brake.
Amber isn’t a magical solution for visible turn signals. Placement and style matters too.
Perhaps it’s the angle the photo you reference was shot from, but the RH brake light looks dimmer than the LH side. Anyway, the flashing of the turn signal is what catches my eye more than its color.
I particularly like LED turn signals as the on and off is so “crisp” compared to incandescent bulbs. I am totally mystified why Mazda would go to the engineering expense to make LED bulbs mimic the ramp up and down of incandescent filaments on some (all?) of their vehicles.
I’ll grant you that amber isn’t a magical, perfect, or complete solution all on its own… but I think it’s always an improvement.
Even with the worst placement and style, amber is going to be better than red for helping differentiate turn signals from brakes and running lights (even if it’s only a minor improvement in some cases)
I understand that we all have different aesthetic preferences, but personally I’d love to have mandated amber turn signals here. I’d happily sacrifice a tiny bit of looking cool sometimes for the safety benefits.
Although back to your point, there may be other aspects of signal design that would benefit from a *little* more regulation too. The color isn’t the only critical factor, just one of many. I don’t want to choke all the style out of every design, but I also don’t want designers who are hopped up on LED-driven insanity to start making infinitely small point-source indicators for everything, which I guarantee some people would do if we let them!
Oh sure, overall amber is better.
But I mean here specifically, the amber isn’t doing anything
No, I absolutely do not care in the slightest.
I swear, I see 11 and 42 together everywhere, and you just made my brain explode seeing them together started by Torch looking at taighlights. Imagine being obsessed with those numbers as much as Torch obsesses over amber rear signals. Torch, I think I get you a little better now.
Italic your parenthesis style, but I would put more work into getting the kid to walk. I suppose you are just set in your morning sequence, and punctuation is an important part of arriving at school.