Of all the great sports cars of the 1960s, few have been as evocative and inspired as many replicas and tributes as the Shelby Cobra. The formula of a big engine in a small sports car is as simple as a charcoal barbecue, but it yields massively fun results. As you’d expect, many automakers have since tried to emulate the Cobra, some with success like Dodge with the Viper, and some without much, or any, of a production run. The Ford Kelly Python falls in that latter category, and while it might look a bit like an American TVR, it’s as rare as rocking horse droppings.
See, only a dozen were made before an extremely short production run ended for good, and fewer than that remain today. Don’t just think of the Python as an upstart dream, however. For what was largely an outside effort, the Python was about as official as it got. In fact, it drew substantial inspiration from a Cobra replacement that very nearly happened.
Back in 1965, Ford designers Eugene Bordinat and McKinley Thompson were busy working on the design for a Cobra successor, one that would use an all-new, all-American body made out of something called Royalex. It was an ABS and vinyl composite dreamt up by Uniroyal, and one that would align Ford’s next sports car closely in construction with the Chevrolet Corvette. Unfortunately, the Bordinat Cobra never ended up entering production, but Motor Trend reported that a man named Alvin Kelly managed to get his hands on a prototype body, and got approval to use it as a starting block.
From there, a few things like the wedgy hoodline and kicked-up quarter panel treatments were kept, but the rest of the vehicle had to be modernized for the NHTSA age, not to mention re-sized to fit over cut-down Mustang bones. As a result, metal bumpers were ditched for plastic fasciae, wheel arches were flared, the wheelbase was stretched, Thunderbird taillights and Probe headlights were fitted, and everything was played with until the resemblance is only there if you squinted.
It’s funny; given the low-res, parts-bin exterior appearance of the Python, you’d expect the interior to be closer to that of a boat than any production car. Well, it actually got a full Mustang dashboard, meaning from the driver’s seat, everything genuinely looks like it could’ve rolled out of a Ford factory.
Since the Python used Fox Mustang underpinnings, that means it got a five-liter Windsor V8 making 225 horsepower and 300 lb.-ft. of torque, hitched to a five-speed manual transmission. Thanks to 55:45 weight distribution and relatively light construction, one can only imagine that it absolutely flew for the era, and that it could be a handful in the wrong hands.
Kelly planned on selling the Python as a turn-key car through existing Ford dealerships, and while a handful were actually built and sold, only a dozen made it out of Kelly’s production facility in Colorado before the plug was pulled on the entire project. While an official reason as to why Python production ended so suddenly proves elusive, the turn of the 1990s wasn’t the best economic climate to launch a sports car in, and that time roughly coincided with the final years of third-generation Mustang production.
As a result, it’s exceptionally rare to see a Python up for sale, but it happens every so often, and one hammered on Cars & Bids just this week. While the high bid of $15,000 failed to meet reserve, Cars & Bids discloses that a deal was reached after the auction closed, which means that one lucky person is going to be cruising around in a seriously obscure tangent of Ford history.
The car itself looks to be in fairly alright shape for a plastic-bodied car of its age. Sure, the fiberglass isn’t perfect, the soft top is a bit worn, and the driver’s seat has seen plenty of entrances and exits for a vehicle with just 47,700 miles on the clock, this really is a case of such low availability that such flaws don’t really matter. They don’t affect the drivability of the car, and the package still looks like a hoot and a half.
So, bravo to the one brave individual who’s just won the opportunity to confuse just about everyone who sees this two-seater out in the wild or at shows. Of course, having read this article, you’ll know exactly what it is if you ever come across it, and you’ll be able to gleefully announce its rarity to everyone who’ll listen. Learning really can be fun sometimes, right?
(Photo credits: Cars & Bids)
Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.
-
Why A Basic 25 Year Old Honda Civic With An Automatic Transmission Sold For $10,800
-
A James Bond-Associated Aston Martin Vanquish Is Going Up For Auction And It Should Only Cost As Much As A New Corvette
-
I Was Entirely Unprepared To See A Version Of My Childhood Minivan On Bring A Trailer
-
You Can Buy A V8-Powered Mercedes C63 AMG For The Price Of America’s Cheapest New Car
-
What’s This Regular-Ass Volkswagen Jetta Doing On Bring A Trailer?
Got a hot tip? Send it to us here. Or check out the stories on our homepage.
Does this just have a Mustang interior and Mustang drivetrain; or is this actually just a Mustang with a wheelbase stretch and some ugly fiberglass piled on it? It looks an awful lot like the latter and would explain why nobody was interested when it came out (not that Qvale got much interest a decade later when they tried the former).
I mean, five years after this Factory 5 started making fox based cobras so they could have gone that route. I know it would take quite a lot to re-engineer them to meet safety standards but it sounds to me like they just missed the point at that stage. By then the cobra was an icon so making a “new” one just wouldn’t cut it for the nuts that wanted something brutal. AC tried in the 60’s with the 428 Frua and that was a beautiful machine, but it wasn’t a cobra. So basing a new cobra on a fox could be made to work as evidenced by Factory 5, but it would have needed to look the part and this just doesn’t. Also I kind of feel like it just looks like a generic kit car, like something a 12 year old thought up and doodled on their notebook. There’s just nothing about this that makes you go, “That’s a Python!” It could easilly just blend into the background.
I’d prescribe some aftermarket heads and Paxton supercharger to semi-match the vintage and definitely to offset the oddity. Maybe a Latham to keep the freak-factor if the owner wanted to.
Well, um, he tried . . .
The design just doesn’t work. The rear is not muscular at all, so any comparison to the Cobra means this car just doesn’t cut it. It’s neat though, mostly from the front.
Do yourself a favour and look up the Bordinat Cobra. Much better design. The problem is that by trying to modernise it and use parts bin lighting front and rear, they diluted almost everything good about the car.
Thanks for that, looked it up and enjoyed reading up on it. The design is beautiful, especially the red hard top version with those wire wheels, pretty stunning.
Or don’t, the Bordinat Cobra is so much nicer looking it hurts. Granted the original design wouldn’t have worked in the 90s, but still. This just looks like someone took the Bordinat Cobra, and turned the turned all the interesting design sliders down to zero.
The Cobra was an amazing looking body and great handling chassis from one manufacturer, tweaked by Shelby, and then fitted with a Ford V8. It’s a mashup.
This is just a Fox body beaten with the ugly stick.
I want a TR7.
No, we have a TR7 at home.
This is the TR7 at home.
Not quite, but if you took the bones of the Python and made a hardtop version with even swoopier fenders, T-tops and a plush interior with swivel buckets and powered it with a heated up Chevy small block, well. then you’d have something completely different.
let it percolate for a second…
maybe a couple more…
I think if you could somehow drop a 90s Probe body onto Mustang underpinnings, you’d have what this was supposed to be.
Gives me a Zimmer Quicksilver vibe. No, that’s not a good thing!
I think the side, rear and rear 3/4 views look pretty good. 300 lbs of foot torque isn’t shabby, even now. It’s extremely unique. That front end though…. Yipes. That really kills it.
Put a bag over it’s front end and drive it for your country.
I really like the front end!
Because if I wanted a Fox-body based roadster, I’d buy a ASC McLaren with superior build quality.
My uncle had one of those for forever. It was actually pretty neat.
At least the Cobra was based on the AC Ace, which was a beautiful starting point. This is butt-ugly. The front 3/4 with the top down is passable, and the profile isn’t too bad, but the ass end of this car just isn’t connected to the front, visually or otherwise. I’m curious to hear what Adrian has to say about this one.
The fact that it’s the worst possible color combo doesn’t help.
Edit; here’s a pic of a red one 99373628.jpg (1920×1275) (motortrend.com)
and a white one 1-of-7: 1991 Kelly (Ford) Python | Barn Finds
Both with silver wheels that are much more period-correct than the black ones on this.
I think it’s got nice proportions and the back looks great, although the nose is a bit of a letdown.
I’m guessing you’re not a fan of the TR7?
I like the TR7; it’s a proper wedge shape. Look at that last 3/4 rear shot above. It looks like an elephant sat on the trunk: it sags downwards instead of sitting upright. The wheel arches don’t translate to the wheels at all; the character line has that jog upwards to make wider fenders but they didn’t alter the wheels to fill out the arches. At least the Ace’s fender proportions were designed around the tires (and modified for the Cobra); this looks like a kit car. And the convertible top looks like someone blew up a bouncy castle and stuck it on the seats.
I agree. Things seem to go wrong aft of the door handles. From there on it reminds me of a Cutlass or some 70’s PLC that I can’t name.
I don’t mind it, but it looks about 10-15 years out of date for a car that hit the market in 1990, that sort of thing doesn’t usually bother me, but I could see the kinds of people willing to pay what this cost new caring about that. Also, I don’t know that carrying over the Mustang’s interior is really a selling point, at least 1980s Zimmers did something to hide that, by covering all the Ford plastic with wood and leather
Not ugly, but is far from good looking. I’m guessing that is the reason they only made 12. It has bad kit car proportions.
It’s interesting for the price, if not quite a looker and the T-bird tail lights complete with embossed emblems looks kit-car cheesy. Should be decent to drive and easy to maintain, but if anything happens to the body, good luck—AFAIK, you can’t even get Royalex anymore, never mind actual replacement parts. I suppose if it’s something fairly simple (but not simple enough to pop out with a heat gun), the outside layers of ABS could probably be patched with new sheet and a plastic welder, maybe some ABS melted in acetone as a filler. Not sure how they did the PVC layer or if it matters if you paint it, anyway.
I wouldn’t kick it out of my bed for eating cookies.
What if they’re oatmeal raisin?
Or worse, Pecan Sandies?
They crumbled into the cookie crumbs of doom for me once… and it was MY bed!
Does anyone from the Denver are know if these are still around the area?
I was in Golden 3 weeks ago and think I saw one of these driving. it was too far to get a pic of. Tt looked like a custom body, but definitely had a fox body mustang top. Now that I know these existed, I think that’s what I saw.
Strong Foxbody genes there, but I don’t hate it
“So Why Were Only 12 Ever Built?”
Because it looks like that.
This is the correct answer here. Butt ugly.
“Let’s take a Mustang and make it look like a TR7/8 and a Jensen Healey – but worse!”
Those were exactly the parents I came up with
Don’t forget that some VW Beetle convertible got in the mix – dat top!
https://cdn.dealeraccelerate.com/ideal/1/815/26071/1920×1440/1977-volkswagen-super-beetle-convertible