Home » The Forgotten Audi A3 3.2 Quattro Is A Golf R32 In Disguise For Thousands Of Dollars Less

The Forgotten Audi A3 3.2 Quattro Is A Golf R32 In Disguise For Thousands Of Dollars Less

Audi A3 Ts2
ADVERTISEMENT

Time has been kind to the Mk5 Volkswagen Golf R32. Initially a divisive car due to its DSG dual-clutch automatic gearbox and middling price-to-performance ratio compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and Subaru WRX STI, Volkswagen’s last VR6-powered all-wheel-drive hot hatchback is now seen as the icon it always was, a next level up from the icon that is the GTI. As a result, nice ones are somewhat expensive, breaking well past the $10,000 mark. However, there is a cheaper alternative that we actually got in America — the often-forgotten Audi A3 3.2 Quattro.

Alright, so it might be a bit softer than the top-dog Golf of the aughts, but the A3 3.2 Quattro got a 3.2-liter VR6 engine, Haldex all-wheel-drive, and a dual-clutch automatic gearbox. Oh, and it goes further. This fancy hatchback is built on the same bones as the Mk5 R32, making it a tempting, sneaky way to get something similar to hot hatch royalty for regular used-car money.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Welcome back to Beige Cars You’re Sleeping On, a weekly series in which we raise the profile of some quiet greats. We’re talking vehicles that are secretly awesome, but go unsung because of either a boring image or the lack of an image altogether.

Cast your mind back to the mid-2000s, and you’ll likely remember that “downsizing” was not in the vocabulary of any automaker’s engine department. Bigger really was better, with BMW stuffing a V10 into the M5, Mercedes-Benz popping a V8 into the SLK roadster, and Dodge shoving the 8.3-liter V10 from a Viper into a Ram 1500. However, the trend of multi-cylinder monsters wasn’t just confined to the upper echelons of the automotive kingdom.

Volkswagen Golf R32 2005 1600 02

ADVERTISEMENT

Not content with the 2.8-liter VR6 engine available in the Golf GTI, Volkswagen decided to turn up the wick even further by putting a 3.2-liter version of the VR6 engine in the nose of its compact hatchback. With traction aided by Haldex all-wheel-drive, the Mk4 Golf R32 was a weapon successful enough to be brought back for a second act — the Mk5 R32 pictured above.

Audi A3 Us Version 2008 1600 02

However, it also created a bit of an opportunity for Audi. See, it had its own Golf-based hatchback called the A3, and on paper, it was fabulous. Instead of using the old Volkswagen A4 platform (not to be confused with the Audi A4, the car), the second-generation A3 rode on the A5 platform that would go on to underpin the Mk5 Golf. With significant improvements in ride and handling, not to mention a litany of modern amenities, it was a true 21st-century German hatchback.

Audi A3 2005 Pictures 14

Oh, and did I mention it was available with all manner of toys? We’re talking a 10-speaker Bose audio system, a panoramic moonroof, GPS navigation, rear door sunshades, a 12-way driver’s seat, rear side window sunshades, stuff that was absolutely unthinkable in a hatchback at the time. With stout two-liter turbocharged four-cylinder power as standard, it made a great first impression, but it needed something more.

ADVERTISEMENT

Audi A3 3.2 quattro

See, Volkswagen wasn’t about to be outdone by its mass-market sibling, Volkswagen. It turned up the wick on the 3.2-liter VR6 engine to 250 horsepower, mated it to a dual-clutch automatic transmission, and then powered all four wheels as an alternative to the BMW 130i. However, unlike the 130i, the A3 3.2 Quattro actually made it to America in 2006. The result was expensive, but as Motor Trend found out, it had performance in spades. As per the mag:

The 3.2 S-line Quattro takes all that is good about the 2.0T and kicks it up another couple notches: fifty more horsepower and considerably more grip. After a spin up and down our local hill, I came away wondering who, exactly, was still pining for a new GTI when this car was available six weeks ahead and ready to rock.

That’s zero-to-60 in 5.9 seconds, which, when combined with all the other attributes of the A3 3.2 Quattro, was enough to get some serious acclaim. Here’s Motor Trend‘s verdict:

the 3.2-liter A3 offered a pretty sublime driving experience. It’s got more than enough power on tap, it’s tight, comfortable, and the DSG transmission, as always, rocks. As entry-level models go-and I’m hesitant to call this car an entry-level model, because really it’s not precisely what the 3.2 A3 is when you consider other cars in its segment-this could be the best one out there. The only thing that could deter its supreme domination is the MSRP. Thirty-four grand may seem a lot to ask for a compact car, but if you have the will and the means I doubt you’ll do better.

So, if this really was a contender for the best hatchback on the market, even if just for a bit, you’d expect used examples to run you an arm and a leg. Nope. While R32s are already minted, the substantially similar A3 3.2 Quattro is much closer to sensible used car money. Sure, it’s a high-output German hatchback so it’ll eventually go wrong and not be quite so sensible, but the buy-in could be just right.

B05d0c62cc2f4f08b2815117a40fd875

ADVERTISEMENT

For instance, here’s a 2006 Audi A3 3.2 Quattro up for sale in Pennsylvania for $6,998. Even with 132,000 miles on the clock, that’s still less money than a comparable R32, and it comes loaded with equipment. This particular example could use a little cosmetic work as it’s missing its tow hook cover and front licence plate bracket, but the interior looks pretty clean, and trim bits should be reasonably easy to source.

Audi A3 3.2 quattro

This silver model isn’t the only one out there on a budget. Here’s a black 2007 A3 3.2 Quattro up for sale in Washington for $6,991. While it has a hit on its Carfax, and a whopping 151,086 miles on its odometer it’s spent its entire life in Washington state, so there’s a solid chance the underbody is properly clean.

Audi A3 3.2 Quattro

Looking for one with less mileage under its belt? No problem. Even relative creampuffs are often cheaper than equivalent Mk5 R32s. Here’s a tantalizingly beige one up for sale in Chicago for $9,998, and while that may be a lot of money for an 18-year-old hatchback, it’s a fairly rare car with a reasonable 106,044 miles on the clock. Then again, this one appears to have a particularly questionable paint match on the passenger side, which suggests previous rust repair. It’s a Chicago car, after all.

ADVERTISEMENT

Photos Audi A3 2005 9

Sadly, Audi only sold the A3 3.2 Quattro in North America from 2006 until 2009, likely because the number of people willing to fork over BMW 3 Series money for a six-cylinder hatchback was probably quite small. However, if you manage to get your hands on one of these gems, you’re getting the next-best thing to VW hot hatch royalty for thousands of dollars less. The posh Audi is now cheaper than the Volkswagen equivalent? Funny how that goes.

(Photo credits: Audi, Volkswagen, Autotrader Sellers)

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Relatedbar

ADVERTISEMENT

Got a hot tip? Send it to us here. Or check out the stories on our homepage.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Micah Cameron
Micah Cameron
1 month ago

When I was struggling and failing to find an E46 wagon for a reasonable price, I looked at one of these A3s with a manual transmission, although I think it had the 2.0T engine. I couldn’t get over the interior. It was very un-Audi like and everything felt cheap. The seats were uncomfortable and hard and NVH while driving was high. It really felt like a cheap VW with an Audi badge slapped on.

I eventually gave up my search for an E46 wagon and bought my E46 sedan, which I absolutely adore. The interior is on a totally different planet compared to the A3 despite being significantly older.

ADDvanced
ADDvanced
1 month ago

No manual, no care

RalliartWagon
RalliartWagon
1 month ago

I’m afraid you’d have to pay me $7k to take an almost 20 year old Audi with 130k+ on the clock, and I like Audi.

TheDrunkenWrench
TheDrunkenWrench
1 month ago
Reply to  RalliartWagon

To be fair, the VR6 is a rock solid engine. Plus, since it’s parts-binned with the VW sibling, it’s probably pretty reasonable on parts cost.

Shooting Brake
Shooting Brake
1 month ago

Seems great, but then the German complexity hits…

Alex Ayzenberg
Alex Ayzenberg
1 month ago

I had a 2007 one that I put 90,000 mi on in the 3 years I owned it. Still one of my favorite cars ever, only beaten by my MK6 Golf R. Weird electrical gremlins here and there, but the most bullet proof of all the VWs I’ve owned.

Lincoln Clown CaR
Lincoln Clown CaR
1 month ago

“See, it had its own Golf-based hatchback called the A3, and on paper, it was fabulous. Instead of using the old Volkswagen A4 platform (not to be confused with the Audi A4, the car), the second-generation A3 rode on the A5 platform that would go on to underpin the Mk5 Golf.”

*Head explodes*

VanGuy
VanGuy
1 month ago

Oh thank goodness I wasn’t the only one who could not comprehend. This could be avoided if car companies didn’t use alphanumeric code model names, but alas…

AlterId
AlterId
1 month ago

See, Volkswagen wasn’t about to be outdone by its mass-market sibling, Volkswagen.

Certainly not. And if that were to come to pass, the model would have been called the VW-Auto Union A3 3.2 Quattro DID.

With significant improvements in ride and handling, not to mention a litany of modern amenities, it was a true 21st-century German hatchback.

If VW-Auto Union’s luxury nameplate reached back into history for a model name from its first years in the US, would this have been a 21st-cen-tur-y Fox?

Squirrelmaster
Squirrelmaster
1 month ago

I’ll admit that when these were new, I thought the A3 was sort of goofy looking, but now I think the design has aged well. Were I not terrified of VW products of this era, I might consider one. Unfortunately, I had friends with an A3 and A4 from these years and it sure seemed like owning one was an experience in masochism.

Drive By Commenter
Drive By Commenter
1 month ago

The economy went belly up in 2009 so that likely played a role in canceling it. All of a sudden prosaic things like “depreciation” and “bang for the buck” came back into the collective consciousness. This car just didn’t fit into the post 2009 automotive landscape. Too expensive, depreciation like a lead balloon and likely too bad on fuel to be used as a commuter.

Acid Tonic
Acid Tonic
1 month ago

The gti vr6 could be had with a manual. Sad the vr6 dropped out. I feel the golf R should have been a turbo vr6 awd at 450hp. The later non turbo vr6 was up to around 320hp so it should have been an easy path.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
1 month ago

Do German cars even come from the factory with tow hook covers?

Trust Doesn't Rust
Trust Doesn't Rust
1 month ago

I had a 2007 A3 with a manual transmission. Unfortunately, that meant I could only configure it with the 2.0T and FWD – no quattro. I loved that car and I think the design has held up well over the years. That said, if I could have gotten my hands on a 3.2 quattro with a manual, there’s a good chance I would still have it.

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x