Home » The Porsche Taycan Turbo GT’s Sub 2 Second 0-60 Time Is The Quickest Ever

The Porsche Taycan Turbo GT’s Sub 2 Second 0-60 Time Is The Quickest Ever

Porsche Taycan Turbo Gt Ts2
ADVERTISEMENT

How quick will cars be in the future? Well, how quickly do you want to go? It turns out we have a new benchmark, because the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT is now the quickest car from zero-to-60 mph that Car And Driver has ever tested, logging a sub-two-second time. That’s absolutely head-bending stuff, and it comes from a four-door sedan, not something shaped like a wedge.

At a Car And Driver-reported 5,203 pounds, the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT isn’t the lightest electric performance car out there. And with 1,019 horsepower on tap, it’s not the most potent electric sedan on the market either. The Lucid Air Sapphire makes a simply absurd 1,234 horsepower, and we’ve consulted with top mathematicians who’ve confirmed that’s a bigger number than the top-dog Taycan’s output.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

That doesn’t matter, however, because with its mechanical limited-slip rear differential, a two-speed gearbox inside the rear drive unit, and hypercar horsepower, the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT pulled one undeniably absurd figure in Car And Driver testing. Keep in mind, the quoted zero-to-60 mph time from Porsche is 2.2 seconds, but shit, have you seen how large the horses are in Stuttgart? Yeah, this thing laid down a zero-to-60 mph time of 1.9 seconds, and that’s beyond ludicrous. Quicker than a Ferrari SF90, quicker than a Porsche 918, quicker than a Lucid Air Sapphire, quicker than a Tesla Model S Plaid. Oh, and it’s not some ridiculous fudging of numbers either, as Car And Driver reports:

This record-setting performance was not just squeaking by, either, for example, a 1.949-second run that happens to round down to 1.9. Our results are always an average of the quickest runs in each direction to take out any effect from wind or several other factors, and the Taycan’s two passes were 1.898 seconds in one direction and 1.910 in the other. Bam.

Average those out, and you get precisely 1.904 seconds. Yeah, that’s as good as 1.9 seconds, a perfectly fair way of rounding down. And would you really notice the difference between 1.900 and 1.904 seconds?

Sky Purple Metallic Taycan Turbo Gt A1 02354 016

ADVERTISEMENT

On its way to 60 mph (deducting one foot of rollout because you’d only attempt a balls-out zero-to-60 mph run at a drag strip, right?), this Taycan Turbo GT logged an average — an average — of 1.44 g of acceleration. You could hurl yourself off the top of the Burj Khalifa with a parachute strapped to your back like you’re in a Red Bull promo video and not experience acceleration that violent.

22 Taycan Turbo Gt With Wp Interior

So, other than the fact that this family sedan has more horsepower than a Bugatti Veyron and the smooth delivery of electric torque at its disposal, what else helped the Taycan Turbo GT achieve such heroic numbers? Well, the test car that Car And Driver ran came on Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS tires, which feature an absurdly sticky treadwear rating and are exclusively designed to maximize grip on dry, reasonably warm pavement. True trackday stuff, but then, would you really expect anything else from what is arguably Porsche’s most insane current offering?

Sky Purple Metallic Taycan Turbo Gt A1 04054 044

However, this wasn’t the mental Weissach Package car that cleaves a rear seat and all related accouterments from the Taycan Turbo GT to shed an alleged 165 pounds over this two-row example. That’s roughly the same amount of weight as me and two slightly tubby, slightly clumsy cats, although it would be cruel and unusual to subject cats to such longitudinal acceleration. (Unless they’re orange, because those weird little critters are absolutely fearless and I adore them for that.)

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, the Car And Driver crew reckons they may be able to pull a 1.8-second zero-to-60 mph time out of a Weissach Package car. If you want to simulate a fraction of that violence that at home, those with no sense of mortality can absolve us of any liability, place a tire on top of several early-1990s single-stage airbags, hook up a car battery, have a friend connect the negative and hold the fuck on. Wait a second. I’m getting summoned to the legal department for that suggestion. Oh dear.

So, what’s it like to experience this level of acceleration in person? Stay tuned. I’m driving a Taycan Turbo GT later this month. Apologies to my spleen in advance.

(Photo credits: Porsche)

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Relatedbar

ADVERTISEMENT

Got a hot tip? Send it to us here. Or check out the stories on our homepage.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
46 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
3 hours ago

Speed is nice, but maybe enough is enough. I’m quite happy to have things last more than 1.9 seconds.

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
5 hours ago

this Taycan Turbo GT logged an average — an average â€” of 1.44 g of acceleration. 

Meh, there are 9 roller coasters with faster acceleration.
https://coasterpedia.net/wiki/Fastest_launch_accelerations

SLM
SLM
7 hours ago

“You could hurl yourself off the top of the Burj Khalifa with a parachute strapped to your back like you’re in a Red Bull promo video and not experience acceleration that violent”
Since the acceleration you experience during free fall is next to 0g, you could say the same about every car, bike or even shoes…

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
5 hours ago
Reply to  SLM

Huh? Are you Wile E. Coyote before he looks down? There is most definitely >0g acceleration up until you hit terminal velocity. Pretty sure it is 1g until your speed is high enough for aerodynamics to have an impact.

SLM
SLM
3 hours ago

Yes, but what you experience (feel) during the fall is near 0g, it’s only at the impact that you’ll feel the g’s.
I’ve done some free fall, and you feel weightless until you open your parachute…

James Carson
James Carson
7 hours ago

Speedy in depreciation and acceleration. What more could one want.

Chartreuse Bison
Chartreuse Bison
7 hours ago

I imagine this is because Car and Driver hasn’t gotten their hands on a Rimac Nevera to test yet

Samagon
Samagon
8 hours ago

wow, they did it, Porsche actually did it, I knew they would be able to. they put a turbo on an EV!

Iotashan
Iotashan
8 hours ago
Reply to  Samagon

You mis-read. It’s turbo-charged, meaning the charger has a turbo.

Samagon
Samagon
8 hours ago
Reply to  Iotashan

Dodge fans will never accept this.

Who Knows
Who Knows
8 hours ago

Does it have a special driver’s assistance feature to automatically stop the car safely if the driver passes out from the acceleration?

JKcycletramp
JKcycletramp
8 hours ago

I’m watching the prices of CPO Taycan wagons…

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
8 hours ago
Reply to  JKcycletramp

yes
yes
this is the way

Rollin Hand
Rollin Hand
8 hours ago

(Clarkson voice) “That makes this electric Porsche the fastest car, nought to 60…in the world.”

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
8 hours ago

Keep in mind, the quoted zero-to-60 mph time from Porsche is 2.2 seconds, but shit, have you seen how large the horses are in Stuttgart?

The city’s name literally comes from “stud farm” due to its historic use for horse, ahem, production, so yeah, that checks out.

Anyway, I haven’t wanted to hoon something this hard in a very long time. I need to hoon this Taycan.

Rollin Hand
Rollin Hand
8 hours ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

At that price, I Taycan’t.

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
8 hours ago
Reply to  Rollin Hand

I Taycan’t stand the fact that no one’s let me hoon it yet.

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
5 hours ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

Time to start sweet talking Thomas for an invite to Toronto later this month.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
8 hours ago

Wow! Faster than a Funny Car, not quite as fast as Top Fuel.
Run ’em in NHRA! Tony Stewart!

KES
KES
9 hours ago

But is it any fun to drive? Lots of new cars are fast today but lack what 90’s – 2000 sports cars have as fun to drive.

I’ll take a fun slow car over a fast boring car any day of the week.

DysLexus
DysLexus
9 hours ago
Reply to  KES

Don’t know if boring is the right word for this. 1.9 seconds to be hurtling one organs to 60+ mph is not boring. People don’t drive these so much as strap themselves aboard.

Uncomfortable, Impractical, unsafe, ridiculous, stupidly expensive would all suffice.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
8 hours ago
Reply to  DysLexus

yup, because excess is no longer good enough, you need excessive excess.

Samagon
Samagon
8 hours ago
Reply to  DysLexus

I’m sure it’s fun to go really fast in a straight line, the question is, is the smile that the the speed which this can accelerate from 0-60 enough to overcome the frown from the speed which this car depreciates?

Musicman27
Musicman27
9 hours ago
Reply to  KES

Are you sure your from Earth? Because on Earth, 0-60 in 1.9 is not boring.

Last edited 9 hours ago by Musicman27
Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
8 hours ago
Reply to  Musicman27

I think he’s probably talking about how it fares with curvy lines, which I’d expect it to be pretty good at. The dang thing has a ‘Ring record, for Pete’s sake, and while you can feel a bit of the Taycan’s extra weight on backroads, it’s no slouch at changing directions.

Heck, even the launch control on the older Turbo S caused a car full of alleged grown-ups to burst into laughter.

The only way to know for sure about this new one, though, is to let me hoon it. LET ME HOON IT.

Toecutter
Toecutter
4 hours ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

I’d love to see you thrashing one around the ‘ring.

Óscar Morales Vivó
Óscar Morales Vivó
10 hours ago

Well it’s 1.44 g of horizontal acceleration, and you’re already subjected to 1g of vertical force (Earth’s gravity) so with Pythagoras help you’re at about… 1.75g

Not something most people experience daily.

Angrycat Meowmeow
Angrycat Meowmeow
10 hours ago

And it looks like traffic.

4jim
4jim
10 hours ago

“Turbo” lost all meaning in the 1980s.

Samagon
Samagon
8 hours ago
Reply to  4jim

it’s only a model.

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
10 hours ago

accouterments

Wait, Noah Webster butchered “accoutrements” too? I missed that one.

StillNotATony
StillNotATony
7 hours ago
Reply to  Spikedlemon

Accouterments are accessories for your, um, couter.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

Jesus Chrysler drives a Dodge
Jesus Chrysler drives a Dodge
10 hours ago

Maybe someone better with the maths can check mine, but I recall reading that 0-60 in about 2.6s is equivalent to a free-fall.

In other words, this car would likely reach a target 1/4 HORIZONTAL mile away faster than an equal vertical distance. That seems to track with the 1.44g figure. Accelerates quicker than gravity.

That feels like a benchmark we didn’t really need to cross, but I suppose the next logical one is acceleration so fast that it goes backwards in time. Oh, wait, didn’t Elon say that would ship this year?

Adam Rice
Adam Rice
10 hours ago

At some point, acceleration figures are going to be such that performance-car manufacturers will proudly advertise the injuries you can expect to sustain if you’re not properly buckled in when you launch. Or maybe even if you are.

Musicman27
Musicman27
9 hours ago
Reply to  Adam Rice

*Future Ford Ad* In the 2186 F-150 SS, you can experience involuntary Total Bowel Unloading by just tapping the gas!

Last edited 9 hours ago by Musicman27
Musicman27
Musicman27
8 hours ago
Reply to  Musicman27

“Experience the thrill of filling your pants at 200 MPH!”

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
8 hours ago
Reply to  Adam Rice

hell yeah, rearrange my internal organs, Porsche

Brandon Forbes
Brandon Forbes
10 hours ago

we’ve consulted with top mathematicians who’ve confirmed that’s a bigger number

 that’s beyond ludicrous

Your wit never lets me down. I love the jokes and references. At least I hope the “beyond ludicrous” was intended as a jab at Tesla’s formerly fastest mode.

V10omous
V10omous
10 hours ago

It’s nearly a 3 way tie between what offends me most here:

1- The idea of a 5000 lb electric sedan with a weight saving package that includes no rear seat (why would it still need rear doors?).

2- Using “Turbo” to mean “fast” rather than its actual meaning.

3- Given typical EV depreciation, the idea that low 9 second quarter mile times will soon be in the hands of anyone who can rub two pennies together.

Thebloody_shitposter
Thebloody_shitposter
10 hours ago
Reply to  V10omous

I’ve decided to embrace the “there is always someone faster than you” and instead focus on enjoying what I own and drive ala The Adventures of Corvette Man comic:

https://thebacklotart.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/OCM1-scaled.jpg

Musicman27
Musicman27
9 hours ago

PREACH IT MAN!!!

Toecutter
Toecutter
8 hours ago
Reply to  V10omous

I would love to put that drive system and differential into something that ends up about half the mass, using a more power dense battery.

A converted Subaru Justy would be an excellent choice. Keep it looking decrepit on the outside with peeled paint, missing hubcaps, any rust/patina intact, maybe even have body panels from cars with mismatched paint. Would make for quite a sleeper.

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
5 hours ago
Reply to  Toecutter

Too short of a wheelbase, lesson learnt from the Festiva SHOgun.

Put it all into an old S10.

Toecutter
Toecutter
4 hours ago
Reply to  Spikedlemon

I would expect AWD to somewhat mitigate this issue. The Festiva SHOgun was RWD.

TaylorDane > TaylorSwift
TaylorDane > TaylorSwift
8 hours ago
Reply to  V10omous

I hope your point 3 doesn’t come to fruition. All we need are certain ex-Mustang/Charger/Challenger jackoffs having enough scratch to get one of these for the killing to begin.

Nvoid82
Nvoid82
10 hours ago

Yes, good, goooood. The acceleration wars continue apace >:D

Last edited 10 hours ago by Nvoid82
46
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x