Home » The President Of GM Just Perfectly Trolled The Ex-CEO Of Cruise With A One-Word Tweet

The President Of GM Just Perfectly Trolled The Ex-CEO Of Cruise With A One-Word Tweet

Markvvogt2
ADVERTISEMENT

General Motors President Mark Reuss is known to most as a longtime GM exec, to many as a true gearhead with a passion for performance, and to me as a truly delightful follow on Twitter/X. Today, Reuss delivered the goods in response to ex-CEO Kyle Vogt critiquing the company.

As background, Kyle Vogt is an engineer and business guy who dropped out of MIT and helped found a bunch of companies, including Twitch, which was later sold to Amazon for almost a billion dollars.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Vogt, a lover of robotics, went on to then start Cruise Automation in order to build driverless cars. The company was sold to GM in 2016 and Dan Ammann, a GM exec, was put in charge, with Vogt being moved to President/CTO. This lasted for a while until Ammann was pushed out by CEO Mary Barra over a disagreement about the future of the company.

As Bloomberg reported at the time:

The two executives didn’t agree on how to focus the breakthrough self-driving technology that the Silicon Valley unit is preparing to launch with a taxi service. Barra and GM’s board were pushing a grand vision that included transferring that knowledge to create luxury Cadillacs, self-driving cars sold at retail or delivery vehicles for GM’s new electric-van business. The opportunities, and their potential value, were immense.

Ammann — a star in his own right who once competed with Barra to run GM — was open to all of those things eventually, but he disagreed on some key points. First, he thought Cruise needed to focus on starting its taxi business before spreading its resources. Second, he wanted Barra and GM’s board to take Cruise public sooner rather than later, giving it stock to lure the rare talent that can program cars to drive themselves, said two people familiar with his thinking.

With Ammann out, Cruise brought back Vogt as CEO and the company pushed forward with its plans to roll out Bolt-based taxis across the world while developing a new driverless vehicle with no steering wheel and campfire seating, which they called the Cruise Origin.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then everything went sideways. Last year a Bolt robotaxi in San Francisco ran over a woman who had been struck by a different car and then dragged her about 20 feet to the side of the road. Cruise, according to an internal report, hid some key information from state regulators. This led to Cruise shutting down operations, getting in trouble with the State of California, and eventually to Vogt’s resignation.

While Cruise is back to offering Bolt-based robotaxi service, the company has scrapped the Origin robotaxi for now, with Barra pointing out that doing so will address “the regulatory uncertainty we faced with the Origin because of its unique design.”

Which is to say that the Bolt is a real car that NHTSA will approve and the Origin is still in a legal gray area.

Vogt, now CEO of a new startup called The Bot Company, took to the web to lambast this decision:

ADVERTISEMENT

Some of this is a fair critique. GM, certainly, loves to come up with great ideas and abandon them too quickly. That’s what it did with the EV1, as Vogt points out, and we’ve certainly written up the company’s other pioneering developments that were fumbled at the last minute.

Buuuuuut, I’m not sure Vogt is right here. He’s obviously a smart and accomplished guy, but there’s no proof yet that these cars would work at scale. And if the third-party report on the dragging incident is to be believed, Cruise under Vogt’s leadership was defined by “inadequate and uncoordinated internal processes, mistakes in judgment, an “us versus them” mentality with government officials, and a fundamental misunderstanding of regulatory requirements and expectations.”

GM was happy to go along with the pie-in-the-sky view of the company so long as it seemed like Cruise could help it achieve more revenue. Now that that bubble has burst, GM is back to doing what GM does so well: Making things that can make money.

The company spent a lot of cash buying into Vogt’s vision and Vogt’s vision, up to this point, hasn’t really worked. Therefore his lecturing of GM after being given billions of dollars is kinda rich, which Reuss demonstrates with extremely succinct, Colin Chapman-like precision:

ADVERTISEMENT

Lolololol. Put it in an IV bag and plug it directly into my veins. This is peak sarcasm. While he could have said ‘thanks for shitting on us after taking all our money and almost destroying the company you sold us’ he just knocked him down with a single word.

At a time when car executives on social media are either playing it too safe or scaring away customers by being too weird, Reuss has mastered the art of saying a lot by saying a little.

Top image: MLB/YouTube

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jdoubledub
Jdoubledub
1 month ago

All of the promotional materials for self-driving vehicles always show the disabled or elderly. If the whole market plan is to monetize this group of people, I’d imagine they don’t have the disposable income for such things with all of their crippling medical debt unless the idea is to be supported by sweet government welfare (or subsidies as the corporations would like me to call their handouts).

Daniel MacDonald
Daniel MacDonald
1 month ago
Reply to  Jdoubledub

And even if insurance does/did cover them (at least in some version of our current system) I cannot even fathom the amount of hurdles the insurance company would place on any kind of assistance with purchasing one.

Ben
Ben
1 month ago

Rule of thumb: If someone uses the EV1 to dig at GM about something, you can disregard the rest of their point because they don’t know what they’re talking about. It’s debatable whether the world is ready for EVs today, it sure as hell wasn’t when the EV1 was built. And GM then followed the EV1 up with the Volt, which is the direction the whole industry should have gone and didn’t because politics and perfectionist Greenies.

I know I repeat myself, but there are a thousand things you can validly criticize GM for. Killing the EV1 is not one of them, so if that’s the best argument someone can come up with then they probably don’t have a leg to stand on. Likely because they were run over by one of Vogt’s robotaxis. 😛

rctothefuture
rctothefuture
1 month ago

Matt, are you the kind of guy who falls over laughing like Bert Kreischer when you watch a celebrity roast?

I just feel the idea of this being “LOL” worthy leads me to believe you need a change of underwear after a few Jeff Ross barbs are made on a Comedy Central podium.

Duane Cannon
Duane Cannon
1 month ago

LOL at billionaire snark? Lost on me, bro. I’ll use my LOL’s for self driving cars. They’re many wrongful death lawsuits away from actually being a thing.

The Artist Formerly Known as the Uncouth Sloth
The Artist Formerly Known as the Uncouth Sloth
1 month ago

I’m an old. The takedown doesn’t seem to be as down as you believe it is

DadBod
DadBod
1 month ago

Frankly I don’t get it. Kids today!

Stryker_T
Stryker_T
1 month ago

I don’t get it either and I’m not an “old”, or is this the moment I realize I’ve crossed that path?

Chris D
Chris D
1 month ago

The guy in the wheelchair is saying, “This looks like a pushmepullyou with an orange tin roof glued on. I’m not getting in that thing!”
His buddy says, “Hang on, I’m getting us an Uber. I don’t trust this weird GM pile of #$%@ either!”

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
1 month ago

Sangfroid.

Space
Space
1 month ago

The tweets (X’s?) don’t show up for me. Is there a way to just post the screenshots from it or is that not allowed?
It could help save you from a future problem if X ever shuts down or if they delete the tweet.

13
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x