Home » The ‘Worst’ Exotic Italian Sports Car You Can Buy Is Basically A Cool Ford Mustang

The ‘Worst’ Exotic Italian Sports Car You Can Buy Is Basically A Cool Ford Mustang

2000 Qvale Mangusta 2000 Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

In 2022 a movie called Amsterdam came out on the big screen and it had a star-studded cast. Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, and John David Washington came together with supporting cast members like Mike Myers, Chris Rock, and Taylor Swift. On paper, it had everything it needed to be a huge hit but as of this writing, it has a rotten 31% score on Rotten Tomatoes.

A similar story happened back in the late 1990s and early 2000s with a car now known as the Qvale Mangusta. It features a history that includes huge automotive names, it comes from Italy, and it leverages a big V8 under the hood for power. Despite all of that, no more than 284 examples ever left the factory. Today, they trade hands for less than a brand-new Chrysler Pacifica.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Before we dig too deeply into what the Qvale Mangusta is today, let’s roll back through time and take a look at how it came to be at all.

This car is partially the brainchild of Alejandro de Tomaso, that’s right, the same guy who brought us the de Tomaso Pantera. The same man who came to fame as a race car driver. That makes sense considering that he also built the original Mangusta back in 1966. It, on its own, was a laudable car that happened to have the bad fortune of coming out a few months after the Lamborghini Miura.

ADVERTISEMENT

It leveraged a stock Ford Mustang 302 cubic inch V8 and made 230 horsepower which it sent to the rear wheels only. A five-speed manual transmitted power from source to street. The body design had a true artist behind it in Giorgetto Giugiaro, too. Still, de Tomaso only made and sold a little over 400 examples. Clearly, his company didn’t take off like that of Ferruccio Lamborghini’s.

Fast forward several decades to 1993, and we find de Tomaso the man in less than perfect health and wondering what to do with his car company. In talks with Maserati Chief Engineer Giordano Casarini, the two dreamt up a new Mangusta. It wouldn’t have that name though. Instead, they’d call it the Bigua, a medium-sized Cormorant found in all of the Americas.

Inspired by the TVR Griffith, Casarini developed the car as a FR layout two-door sports car. He went back to the Ford well for a modular V8, and just like back in the 60s, the company used the engine from the Mustang. Who would do the styling on this bold new car from de Tomaso though? None other than Marcello Gandini. Who better to make sure that the Bigua wouldn’t get upstaged by a Gandini design than the man himself? The same one who designed the Miura, the Countach, and the Diablo.

What the trio of men would come up with for its debut in 1996 was truly unique. That’s a nice way of saying that it wasn’t particularly gorgeous, in my view. What it did have were several interesting design decisions that make it stand out even today. The wing mirrors are in their typical position, but attached to the fenders. The nose features a tiny grille not too far afield from an Aston Martin. Large vents sit just behind the front wheels and a kink in the side skirt adds visual complexity.

ADVERTISEMENT

The name Bigua only held on for the concept car shown in 1996 though. De Tomaso didn’t have the funds to actually produce the car, but in 1998, Kjell Qvale agreed to pick up the tab and the production version would get the name Mangusta. Qvale was a Norwegian-American businessman who became a car dealer in the 1940s. He had already partnered with de Tomaso in the past. Car and Driver describes their relationship as one that started off with mutual respect as both pursued joint and separate automotive goals. 

These two patriarchs go way back. Qvale was a Mangusta distributor in the 1960s and later imported Maserati Biturbos and Quattroportes during the dark years when de Tomaso owned the factory. Qvale also owned Jensen for a time and created the 1972-76 Jensen-Healey.

Ultimately though, de Tomaso and Qvale fell out of favor with one another, and the former removed his name from the project. Now, the car would go by the name Qvale Mangusta. Now that the funding was in place, the car would move forward toward production and the result was, according to journalists who drove it, a mixed bag.

The 4.6-liter V8 made 320 horsepower, the same as it did in the Mustang Cobra of the time. A Borg Warner five-speed gearbox sent power to the rear wheels, and Qvale borrowed a few other bits and pieces from Ford for the switchgear, the key, and the rest of the drivetrain.

Beyond that, the Mangusta was and is truly unique. The seats, dash, center console, and door cards all feature rich leather. Some of the trim was real metal and we haven’t even talked about the three-way top yet either. Yes, it looks like a hard top but it’s also a Targa top… and it’s a full-on convertible too!

ADVERTISEMENT
Screenshot 2024 09 11 124839
Left Coast Classics

Of course, like some of the other seemingly half-baked ideas here, the top follows that format. Should one desire to go from hard top to convertible they’ll need to complete a few steps. First, they have to get out and remove the main center panel of the roof.

Then, they’ll need to store it in the trunk. If they have stored anything else in the trunk it’ll need to go elsewhere because the top itself barely fits. At this stage, the driver can push a button in the cabin, and the remaining rear section of the top swivels down into the body to complete the transformation. Our pal Doug DeMuro goes into it all in the video below.

All of that complexity led to a heav-ish curb weight of 3,196 pounds (1,450 kg) and performance that wasn’t exactly up to the standard of other $85,000 cars of the age. Running from 0-60 mph took right about six seconds and top speed peaked around 155 mph.

Notably, the car did feature double-wishbones at every corner and a 50/50 weight distribution, but those assets didn’t benefit it enough to make it an excellent driver’s car; here is what some reviewers at Car and Driver said at the time.

ADVERTISEMENT

BRAD NEVIN
Why would anyone pay $50,000 more than the price of an SVT Mustang for this Qvale? The answer is simple: exclusivity. Buy a Mangusta, and you will meet more people at gas stations and answer more questions than you would in almost any other car. But that’s about all you get. From the moment you sit in the driver’s seat to the second you get home from a 20-minute drive, you clearly feel that this is a repackaged Ford. The engine note, the transmission, the gauges, and the radio and climate controls all scream, “I’m a Mustang!” To which you have to ask: Is the funky styling worth it? For me, no. For $85,000, I’d buy a Porsche 911 over a Mangusta in a heartbeat.

FRANK MARKUS
A rose is a rose? This car looked ugly to me when it debuted as a show car named, perhaps aptly, Bigua. But the promise of open-air motoring and a sort-of retractable hardtop with bulletproof blue-oval V-8 power and the magic words “De Tomaso Mangusta” attached had a definite appeal. Who would care that the rear window is plastic, that everything squeaks, that it steers like a cop car, that parts drop off on every trip — mamma mia, that’s Italian! Foibles are what Italophiles kibitz about at car shows. But with a weird dragon badge and an unpronounceable Scandinavian name, it’s suddenly just a bad car. I guess a rose by any other name might smell like last season’s lutefisk.

LARRY WEBSTER
I’ll never say that every car has to make sense, but the Mangusta passes over my head. Maybe it has to do with the styling, which doesn’t match its exotic birthplace. Or perhaps the silly targa top that promises hardtop comfort and droptop pleasure but squeaks like a rusty door hinge and selfishly hogs the entire trunk when stowed. The $86,510 price is way north of the better Porsche Boxster S. And then there’s the thick driver’s door, which snagged my foot every time I tried to exit. Anything good? The seats are supportive and comfy, the ride is compliant, and the handling secure. But that’s not nearly enough to make me part with 85 grand.

 

That’s not exactly what de Tomaso, Qvale, MG (I’ll explain why I mention them in a second), or anyone else wants to hear about their creation. After all of the trials and tribulations that this car faced it just never truly caught on. Interestingly, Qvale basically pulled the plug as soon as it could. In 2000, it sold the assets that included the Mangusta to MG Rover.

The Grail

In essence, MG Rover skipped the development phase of building its own V8 sports car. It hired Peter Stevens to restyle the Mangusta, and at first, what came out was dubbed the X80. A far cry from the super-busy Mangusta design, the X80 was cleaner but still quite odd-looking. History wasn’t kind to this car, though, and it didn’t help that it launched on September 11, 2001.

Stevens went back to the drawing board (possibly quite literally) and revamped the design once more into something dubbed the MG XPower SV. In its final form, the car that started life as the Bigua finally seemed to tick all of the big boxes, even Jeremy Clarkson said it looked “fantastic.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The design was bold and mostly cohesive, the running gear was still out of the Mustang but now it made 326 horsepower in base trim. MG would offer more power to those who wanted it, too.

An SV-R version made 385 horsepower and had a top speed of 175 mph. It replaced the plastic body panels with carbon fiber. It weighed less, was quicker, and looked better. Still, it wasn’t enough for sales to flourish.

By 2005, MG went into receivership and was subsequently snatched up by Chinese manufacturer Nanjing Automobile Group. The XPower SV didn’t continue in production.

Where We Are Now

Today, the Mangusta version regularly trades hands for under $40,000.

ADVERTISEMENT
Screenshot 2024 09 11 121256
Bring A Trailer

Interestingly, and perhaps due to the styling and power on offer, the MG XPower SV costs quite a lot more here in the USA. Only one has ever graced Bring A Trailer and it traded hands for $85,000 only a few months ago. Overseas they’re not as pricey, though, with one featured on Top Gear selling for just £16k two years ago. MG only built 42 of them, so that could have something to do with pricing as well.

All of this brings us right back to where we started… Amsterdam. The critics at Rotten Tomatoes could’ve also summed up the Mangusta with the same review of the film: “[It] has a bunch of big stars and a very busy plot, all of which amounts to painfully less than the sum of its dazzling parts.” Though I’ve never driven them, it’s clear the Mangusta and the XPower SV will go down in history as busy cars that just couldn’t live up to the hype surrounding them.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The World of Vee
The World of Vee
2 months ago

Man if you were a car nerd in the early 2000s (and of course you were) these things were advertised like CRAZY in the Dupont Registry. Every Dupont I have from that time period has a full page ad for a Mangusta. Good memories indeed.

Fatallightning
Fatallightning
2 months ago

Qvale Mangusta vs Panoz Esperante steel cage fight, go!

Anoos
Anoos
2 months ago

It is obvious why this thing didn’t sell.

It is horribly ugly, and the MG version looks like it’s wearing a Dodge costume.

Pajamasquid
Pajamasquid
2 months ago

God help me, I actually don’t mind it in black. The less you can see of it, the better.

Cheap Bastard
Cheap Bastard
2 months ago

“Buy a Mangusta, and you will meet more people at gas stations and answer more questions than you would in almost any other car. But that’s about all you get.”

And the most often asked questions?

“Why would anyone pay $50,000 more than the price of an SVT Mustang for this…thing?”

“Is the funky styling worth $85,000?”

“Did you lose a bet or something?”

“Are you blind?”

“Why? Just..why?”

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
2 months ago

That’s the ugliest car not made by Ssangyong ever made.

Squirrelmaster
Squirrelmaster
2 months ago

There was a Mangusta at the Houston Auto Show in ’99 or 2000. I had only seen magazine photos of one, and had hopes it wouldn’t look so bad in person. Unfortunately, it was uglier in the flesh, and didn’t look particularly well built. They had it roped off so nobody would touch it, but the panel gaps, panel alignment, and just general fit and finish looked pretty bad. I wanted to like the car, but I just couldn’t – like the idea, but not the result.

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
2 months ago

I’d love to see a writeup on the deTomaso Guara and it’s older sibling the Maserati Barchetta. Now that’s a rare pair and I’m sure rate as adjacent to worst.

Tim Cougar
Tim Cougar
2 months ago

I know it’s irrational, but I still really want one.

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
2 months ago

Like Christian Bale.

Don’t like this. Take a Mustang and turn it into MTG?
Has the world gone completely mad?

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
2 months ago
Reply to  Col Lingus

Are you sure you want a MTG?

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
2 months ago
Reply to  LMCorvairFan

No I don’t…lol.

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
2 months ago
Reply to  Col Lingus

I didn’t think so, but couldn’t resist.

Last edited 2 months ago by LMCorvairFan
Cerberus
Cerberus
2 months ago

Build quality was embarrassing, too. The one displayed at Pebble was misaligned like it had been the crash test vehicle they hurriedly reassembled hours before the show started. I walked away shaking my head wondering how they were going to sell an uglier Mustang that was even more poorly built with some leather slapped on top of the very obvious source interior for a lot more money and, at that point, without even a name with at least some pull.

Dudeoutwest
Dudeoutwest
2 months ago

I live here in NorCal and worked in San Francisco when these were new. They were pretty common to see, in all honesty.

FWIW, “Mangusta” is an anagram of “Mustang” with an extra “a”.

Angular Banjoes
Angular Banjoes
2 months ago
Reply to  Dudeoutwest

Mangusta is also the Italian word for mongoose. If I remember correctly, it was originally intended as some kind of swipe at the Shelby Cobra, given that mongooses (mongeese?) are known to take down cobras.

TriangleRAD
TriangleRAD
2 months ago

Coincidentally, I saw a Mangusta at last Saturday’s Cars & Coffee Morrisville here in North Carolina. It was the second one I’ve ever seen, the first was also at that event a year or so ago.

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
2 months ago
Reply to  TriangleRAD

Saw an original 60’s Mangusta in an open air car park in downtown Ottawa in the late 80s. Stunningly beautiful car! I must have spent a half an hour ogling the thing.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
2 months ago

MG Rover had such a complex production process for the XPower SV, too, it’s no wonder they lost money on them even at such exorbitant prices.

The carbon fiber body parts were made in the UK by one subcontractor, shipped to Italy for assembly into complete body shells by another subcontractor, then shipped back to the UK for final assembly by MG Sport & Racing Ltd, which then wholesales the finished cars to MG Rover Group for distribution to retail (MG Sport and Racing was a subsidiary of Phoenix Venture Holdings, the same parent company as MG Rover, but they operated separately).

It was supposed to have been MG’s entrance back to the US market, since it used the entire internal body structure of the Mangusta, which had already been crash tested and certified as FMVSS compliant, and it used the Ford drivetrains that were already EPA compliant, but they just never had the money to set up even a very low volume sales operation here without a partner

Logan King
Logan King
2 months ago

I know the development of this car was extremely protracted and full of corporate strife, but it’s absolutely insane to me that they even bothered to release this 3 years after the C5 Corvette and 996 Carrera both came out and essentially “reset” the rough market it was supposed to compete in. The car literally had a Mustang dashboard on it (the whole ass assembly from the same supplier that made it for Ford) trimmed in padded leather and aluminum tinsel over the top of the directly transplanted Mustang switchgear. It’s even worse than the loose collection of Camaro and C4 Corvette parts that the Shelby Series One used. Who did they think was going to buy it?

Last edited 2 months ago by Logan King
sentinelTk
sentinelTk
2 months ago

Rivers, how badly did you want to shoehorn “Amsterdam” into a story? That reads like the absolute most hamfisted intro I’ve seen in a long time. It could have been worse though….

“Sometimes the human body starts replicating cells, but not in the orderly fashion intended. Despite having the right parts, these cells create cancer. That is just like the Qvale Mangusta….”

Dan Parker
Dan Parker
2 months ago

I think a red one lives somewhere near my office, I’ve seen it on the road a couple of times near by. Looks no better in person than in pictures… I guess if I could get one for sn95 mustang dollars I would just to be weird, but any more than that and there are other weird things I’d rather have.

Edit: Doesn’t Bad Obsession have one of the carbon MG bodies, or am I just? I’d love to see those guys do something with it. If you like build series and have somehow missed project Binky you owe it to yourself to check it out.

Last edited 2 months ago by Dan Parker
Jatkat
Jatkat
2 months ago

This write up was sort of the opposite of “Beige Cars You’ve Been Sleeping On”. “Hot Cars You Should Sleep on?”

23
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x