Home » This British Automaker Found The Weirdest Place To Put The Spare Tire

This British Automaker Found The Weirdest Place To Put The Spare Tire

Secret Spare Tire
ADVERTISEMENT

If you get a flat tire out on the open road, you’ll soon be looking for your spare tire. If you found yourself behind the wheel of a classic Bristol, though, you could check all the traditional spots and you’d come up short. This cheeky British automaker found an entirely weird and unique place to stash the spare that no other automaker has copied since.

Given the massive wheel sizes used on modern cars, most vehicles don’t carry a full-sized spare anymore. Instead, automakers rely on tiny space—saver wheels and stash them under the trunk floor to minimize the impact on usable cargo space.  Historically, though, cars ran much smaller wheels, and it was possible for automakers to get more creative when it came to finding space for a spare. Automakers would stash spares under the trunk floor, under the hood, or under the car itself—wherever there was enough room.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Bristol got more creative than most, though. They stuck the spare inside its own special cavity inside the front fender itself.

A British Solution

If you’ve never heard of Bristol, that’s little surprise. The company was an incredibly obscure British automaker, spawned from the Bristol Aeroplane Company. The manufacturer had learned a painful lesson from World War I—when the armistice hit in 1918, aircraft orders quickly dried up and it was lumbered with a huge workforce with little to do. Eager to avoid the same situation after World War II, the company established an automotive division in 1945 and began manufacturing vehicles soon after.

ADVERTISEMENT

The company’s first product was the Bristol 400. Derived from pre-war BMW designs, it had been given a thorough reworking and a drophead body penned by Pininfarina. The 400 debuted in 1947, with hundreds of examples built. Like so many humpbacked designs from the 1930s and 1940s, it stored the spare tire on the trunk lid at the rear.

1948 Bristol 400 Flickr Exfordy
The 1948 Bristol 400 was rooted in pre-war design. Credit: Brian Snelson, CC BY 2.0
Bristol 2litre 2
The Bristol 400 stored its spare tire in a bustle on the rear. Credit: Späth Chr, public domain

The immediate post-war period was a time of rapid change in the automotive industry, however, and Bristol didn’t rest on its laurels. Where the 400 had a very classical, 1930s-style body, the company would soon move on to the more advanced 401, 402, and 403.

However, it was the 1953 Bristol 404 coupe that really made things interesting. It boasted sleek good looks, somewhat aping the lines of the contemporary Aston Martin DB2/4. With up to 125 horsepower in a chassis weighing just 2200 pounds, it was quick, too.

Siteassetimage (1)

The Bristol 404 was the first model to pioneer the fender storage solution. This example is up for sale at SLJ Hackett.

ADVERTISEMENT
Siteassetimage
The design would instantly become a Bristol staple. Credit: SLJ Hackett

Just 51 examples of the Bristol 404 were ever built. This was typical for the low-volume British automaker.

Best of all, though? The Bristol 404 pioneered a unique new feature. It stashed the spare tire in a hidden compartment in the front fender. The contemporary Bristol 405 would pull the same trick as well.

The spare tire lived on the passenger side, with the opposite fender compartment stashing the car’s battery. It’s worth noting that the tire was on the left side of the vehicle, since the driver sat on the right in the British-market Bristols.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Screenshot 2025 01 02 171413
The driver’s side fender bay held the battery and fuse box, among other components. Credit: Bristol 410 owner’s manual
Front Third Th
Note the battery in the driver’s side fender compartment. Of course, as we all know, batteries should go in the front. Credit: Bristol 

This design choice had positive effects on weight distribution, keeping these heavy components inboard of the car’s wheelbase. The spare tire and battery also roughly balanced each other out on each side of the vehicle.

Like so many other automakers, Bristol’s naming schemes were not particularly creative. As it continued to step through the 400s range to designate its fine luxury automobiles, it continued to use the same hiding place for the spare tire. The 410 and 411 continued the trend into the 1960s, with the tradition running through to the 1980s with the more angular Bristol 412 and 603.

Bristol 410 1968
The 1968 Bristol 410. Credit: Charles01, CC-BY-SA 3.0
4890224309 5d1e937d92 H
The fold-up fender hatch is a unique solution for storing the spare tire. Credit: Martin Pettitt, CC BY 2.0
Ikzhzzuqtkaz7hasv2rvdqijh8rx6smbdm7igaya
This 1980 Bristol 412 recently sold on Car & Classic.
S4lzpoxehnasn9xabutupjpex7ph2eqstlqg7llj
Note the tidy fender storage hatch for the spare wheel. Credit: Car and Classic
Up9fvbg0aeu25ylpo8v6l2csbs4ou4z4gwbvzfzs
This design feature permeated the Bristol lineup for decades. Credit: Car and Classic
Tcukwoly82lfnrsjcfrvo3dxyln5wnjypu4od3ne
The battery and fuse box live in the opposite fender hatch. Credit: Car and Classic

By the 1990s, Bristol was producing the Blenheim. It had continued to iterate on the now-somewhat-dowdy styling of earlier models, and was still largely based on the 603—but it wasn’t completely ignorant of technological change. The Blenheim launched in 1993 with a 5.9-liter Chrysler V8 with fuel injection, and enough power to do the zero to 60 mph sprint in 6.5 seconds. The company didn’t release power figures, only stating in a very British manner that the engine offered “muscular authority.”

By 2000, the company was producing the Blenheim 3. Even in its final facelift, it still featured the unique fender storage hatch for the spare tire.

Crease Fender Bristol
A 2000 Bristol Blenheim. Note the crease on the fender, which hides the battery on the driver’s side shown here. Photo: Bristol
2000 Bristol Blenheim31
Here, the passenger side is visible on an earlier Blenheim model. Again, note the crease for the fender compartment opening. Photo: Bristol

The End Is Nigh

As the decades went by, Bristol had remained a relatively obscure luxury manufacturer. Each subsequent model was built in limited numbers, hitting the low three-digit range at best. The company changed hands a few times, but managed to keep lumbering on.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sadly, though, Bristol’s unique quirk would not last forever, and neither would the company. The company’s last big hurrah was the Bristol Fighter. Debuting in 2004, it paired the Dodge Viper’s 525 horsepower V10 engine with a retro-modern gullwing couple bodyshell of Bristol’s own design.

Bristol Fighter 625x416
The Bristol Fighter was like a British Viper with gullwing doors. Just 20 were built. Photo: Bristol

Sadly, the Fighter abandoned the tradition of fender-stashed wheels to put the full-size spare in the trunk instead. The model remained in production to 2011, when Bristol went into administration.

The company’s assets were later bought out by a group known as Kamkorp. It hoped to revive the Bristol name with a BMW-powered roadster called the Bullet. The model showed up at the 2016 Goodwood Festival of Speed, sadly lacking an interesting space to stash the spare wheel. Ultimately, Bristol was wound up for good in 2020, with the Bullet never entering production.

Birstol Cars

Bristol Cars Has Unveiled Its First New Model Since Resurrection Bristol Bullet

ADVERTISEMENT
Bristol Cars Has Unveiled Its First New Model Since Resurrection 2016 Bristol Bullet Roadster
The Bristol Bullet was a fresh take on the retro British roadster, with a BMW V8 under the hood. Sadly, the more modern design lacked the classic Bristol fender hatch for the spare tire. Photo: Bristol

Bristol’s unique design choice made plenty of sense in the 1950s. It allowed for the spare wheel to be stored in an out-of-the-way location that didn’t compromise the usual cargo areas or spoil the lines of the vehicle. It also helped Bristol to achieve 50:50 weight distribution as an aid to handling.

However, Bristol was pretty much the only company out there doing this, and likely for good reason. For a start, car wheels have grown larger over the years. It would be significantly less practical to try and stash a modern 20-inch wheel—or larger—into the fender well of a modern car. Beyond that, there are issues around crash safety—it’s not ideal to have a big metal wheel sitting in an area that should probably be crumpling up to absorb energy in a crash.

Bristol’s fender wheel storage will thus remain as one of those rare automotive curios of the 20th century. Perhaps one day, someone will figure out an even stranger place to stash a spare wheel. Don’t hold your breath, though. Few automakers out there could ever outweird Bristol.

Image credits: Bristol, SLJ Hackett, Car and Classic, Charles01 – CC-BY-SA 3.0, Martin Pettitt – CC BY 2.0, Brian Snelson CC BY 2.0, Späth Chr, public domain

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Adam Rice
Adam Rice
1 day ago

The Pierce Arrow Silver Arrow had the same placement. In 1933, integrated bodywork barely existed, and it was effectively keeping the external fender-mounted spare in the same place on the car.

Jakob K's Garage
Jakob K's Garage
1 day ago

I like the Reliant Scimitar / Citroën DS solution better:
In front of the engine, with the radiator duct going under it.

EricTheViking
EricTheViking
1 day ago

The headlamps on 412 came from Opel Rekord Series D in production until 1977. So, Bristol must have stockpiled enough headlamps to last until the 2000 refresh or sourced them from the junkyards each time 412 was built.

Theotherotter
Theotherotter
1 day ago

NB: the standard 400 was not designed by Pininfarina. There was one (maybe a few?) built with a body by Pininfarina – it’s quite distinctive and very obviously a Pininfarina design, looking very much like Alfa Romeos they did around the same time.

Emma P
Emma P
1 day ago

My Rover SD1 had the spare under the boot floor, but you could remove the boot floor panels and mount the spare up on the side of the boot in order to have a deeper boot cavity. The well under the boot floor panels was a wide deep thing rather than something moulded to fit just the spare and tools. Not a weird storage system, but a relatively novel one.

Amateur-Lapsed Member
Amateur-Lapsed Member
2 days ago

Perhaps one day, someone will figure out an even stranger place to stash a spare wheel.

They may have already, but I try not to click on those “23 weird things doctors have seen in an ER” BuzzFeed clickbait lists often enough to verify.

Slow Joe Crow
Slow Joe Crow
2 days ago

That is a better deal than our new tous Fiat 500. As a poverty spec model it has no spare. The higher spec models do take the interesting route of storing the spare under the trunk floor with a little winch just like a pickup truck. I am seriously considering forking out $250 for the kit which includes a jack and wrench since those are also not present.
Back on topic, the later Bristols reached their Zenith when Oasis put one in a swimming pool. Morgan could pull off retro, Bristol jumped the shark in the 90s

Hangover Grenade
Hangover Grenade
2 days ago

The restyling exercises remind me of Marge Simpson and her $90 Chanel suit.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
2 days ago

We used to have a couple of 1920s Buicks and a Packard out in the barn, and they had 20” wheels ( made of wood mind you) and about 30” diameter tires. They all had side mount spares, located in the front fenders.

I always thought the Bristol‘s weren’t setting much of a precedent in that regard .

Baltimore Paul
Baltimore Paul
2 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Side mounts, that’s the first thing I thought of. And, if I’m not mistaking, the Excalibur cars in the 1980s were the last cars that came with side mounts in the US.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
1 day ago
Reply to  Baltimore Paul

Well, if you want to count neoclassics, Zimmer was doing conversions of Mustangs until like 2020 (although, I’m pretty sure the sidemounts were fake by then, their Town Car conversions might have had some real ones in the 2000s).

GENERIC_NAME
GENERIC_NAME
2 days ago

I always thought this was a real dash to axle ratio flex.

Gilbert Wham
Gilbert Wham
2 days ago

Hah. Even without a photo of one, that headline would make me think ‘Gotta be Bristol’.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
2 days ago

I always assumed it was a side effect of the prewar engineering, same thing that allowed exposed sidemount spares on 1920s and 30s cars, Bristol just enlarged the body work to fully enclose them. BMW wasn’t really doing sidemounts in the ’30s anymore, but their cars still had the proportions that allowed for them

Toecutter
Toecutter
2 days ago

The Bristol Fighter had a significant drag reduction over the Dodge Viper, and thus should demonstrate a fuel economy increase. 0.27 Cd value.

Last edited 2 days ago by Toecutter
Nic Periton
Nic Periton
2 days ago
Reply to  Toecutter

Just a bit, my boomerang (it keeps coming back ) averages around 30 mpgUK, It is a work of art, although 200mph is a stretch.194, and still 18mpg. Please buy it, I know you would love it. POA but six figures starting with a four would be a start!
btw, the engine might have modified a bit, the block is sort of Viperish, the rest? Mainly CRD and TWR wizadry,

Toecutter
Toecutter
2 days ago
Reply to  Nic Periton

I’m not rich enough to own that!

A TVR Cerbera, OTOH…

Nic Periton
Nic Periton
2 days ago
Reply to  Toecutter

Ah, but the really clever bit of the Fighter is the aerodynamic stuff, the Cerbera is a blunt chisel. Also a lot more sensible,

Jatkat
Jatkat
2 days ago

Better than Chryslers approach with the Sebring!

Maymar
Maymar
2 days ago

In Bristol’s defense, it’s weird, but it’s not *that* weird. It was a perfectly common mounting point on older running board-era stuff, and feels a bit like Bristol just kept that up, shocked everyone else moved on.

https://cdn.dealeraccelerate.com/cam/34/3842/233593/1920×1440/1914-ford-model-t-touring
https://media.hagerty.com/media/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Duesenberg_Side_Green_Final-e1665508151926.jpg

Fire Ball
Fire Ball
2 days ago
Reply to  Maymar

Yes this. It wasn’t a particularly new or novel location.

Tbird
Tbird
2 days ago
Reply to  Maymar

Exactly – normal spare mounting spot on any prewar car, just behind a fairing now.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
2 days ago

Somewhat apropos, but is there a name for that type of wheel seen on the 400 series models?

I’ve seen them on period Jaguars as well, and they’re quite fetching for being so basic.

The NSX Was Only in Development for 4 Years
The NSX Was Only in Development for 4 Years
2 days ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

Dunlop made alloy wheels in the 50’s and 60’s that looked similar to those, but I believe the ones on the Bristols are just steel wheels.

TheDrunkenWrench
TheDrunkenWrench
2 days ago

I contend that 80s Subaru putting them damn near on top of the engine under the hood is THE weirdest location. This can have second place.

Alexk98
Alexk98
2 days ago

Nothing quite helps a tire age more quickly than even more exaggerated and frequent heat cycles. Not to mention the chance of burning yourself on something in the engine bay trying to reach over the radiator to pull out the spare.

I’ve got to imagine the Haynes manual has some amusing repair instructions like “In order to change the intake manifold gaskets, start by removing the spare tire”

Last edited 2 days ago by Alexk98
The NSX Was Only in Development for 4 Years
The NSX Was Only in Development for 4 Years
2 days ago

Citroen also did this, and I believe Fiat, too.

TheDrunkenWrench
TheDrunkenWrench
2 days ago

Are you telling me the company who used “permanently prop the engine hatch open” on it’s Abarth model does other weird shit?

Morgan Thomas
Morgan Thomas
2 days ago

The Fiat-Abarth OT 2000 Coupe America (based on the Fiat 850 Sport Coupe) had the spare wheel laid flat in a compartment below the luggage compartment under the hood, and it protruded out between a pair of bumperettes, so it effectively became the middle section of the front bumper!
(I had a Fiat 850 Sport Coupe, and yes, they did do other weird shit – the ‘oil filter’ was the crank pulley, it had swing axle rear suspension with coil springs and a transverse leaf spring front end, the cooling fan blew air FORWARDS through the radiator, the dash had real wood veneer trim but it was stuck on a black painted dash made of compressed paper pulp, and the seats were padded with genuine horsehair!

TheDrunkenWrench
TheDrunkenWrench
1 day ago
Reply to  Morgan Thomas

First, as a w126 owner, what’s wrong with horsehair?

Secondly, I feel like the spare mounting location in Italian cars was a packaging issue as they were so tiny.

I have no comment on the crank pulley oil filter. That’s the most bizarre thing I’ve heard all year.

Morgan Thomas
Morgan Thomas
1 day ago

The horsehair was mainly an issue because it had gone crusty and brittle, and the underside of the seat wasn’t sealed, so every time you sat down it would rain a small amount of hair ‘dust’ under the seat, which would whirl up into a cloud filling the interior when at speed with a window open!

Tbird
Tbird
2 days ago

Corvair as well, beside the hot air cooled engine. I’m told most owners immediately tossed in the “frunk”.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
2 days ago
Reply to  Tbird

The frunk was the original location, it was moved to the engine compartment due to customer complaints that it ate up too much cargo space

Mine has been back there for almost 61 years now, the tread is still good, but I think you’d have to be pretty freaking desperate to try and run on it

Tbird
Tbird
2 days ago
Reply to  Ranwhenparked

Yep — doing restoration work on a ’62 for a friend (which are I hope to buy). The spare being mounted back there is still bias ply and will be purely decorative.

CTSVmkeLS6
CTSVmkeLS6
2 days ago

Haha I agree, under the hood on the engine is strange. My AMC/Renault Alliance had that. I removed it right away.

35
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x