I feel like I’ve been talking a lot lately about the madness of AI, especially its use for generating car images which are, charitably, garbage. They’re garbage because one thing AI images can’t do is be truly accurate, because they have no idea what the hell they’re making, because they’re not actually aware of anything. Sometimes, though, that lack of accuracy and awareness can actually wrap around from annoying to fun, depending on, you know, how much you give a shit. And, I think this case may be the perfect one to just enjoy, because it’s all in this odd car parts website, which seems to be exclusively illustrated with AI-generated purple cars.
The site is called Metro Moulded Parts, and it seems to be a site that sells molded – or, I suppose, moulded, though for whatever reason the addition of that “u” makes everything seem sort of gross – parts, like rubber shift boots and pedal pads and weatherstripping and rubber bump stops – that sort of thing.
They seem to have parts for a genuinely staggering array of brands, too:
Look at that! 91 marques, and they include stuff like Hupmobile and Jordan and Riley. These are deep cuts, but I guess everyone needs some molded plastic and rubber bits, right? It would be a massive undertaking to source images for cars of all these brands and models, which is why I suspect that the people who run Metro Moulded Parts did what they did, which seems to be letting some AI algorithm do pretty much everything.
For the images for all these categories, they have a design theme they want to stick to, which I respect. Theirs is all purple cars, in a style that’s sort of like a vectorized photo-type illustration. Some of the results they get seem pretty good, like this AMX:
That seems pretty close to a real AMX, not exact, but fairly close. Then you notice the disclaimer under the image: “These illustrations use artistic license and may differ from actual historical models.” That’s partially true, though I think what’s being used is AI image-generating code over artistic license, but perhaps that’s splitting hairs.
Most of the time, though, the cars don’t seem to be very accurate, though I can’t deny they aren’t fun. Look at this “Fiat Strada” for example:
That’s not what a Strada looked like. It’s maybe a little like a Lancia Scorpion, or something? I’m not sure, but I kind of like it.
I also love this “Renault Caravelle”:
It’s not even the same category of car as the Caravelle, which was a little rear-engined roadster, and this looks like some sort of French Multipla/small people mover.
And look at this interpretation of a Volvo Amazon!
It’s sort of half-Amazon, half-P1800, and I’ll be honest, I don’t hate it. At all. I’m not sure what the deal is with that almost-wing back there, though?
This is kind of addicting! I can’t stop looking at these strange, alternate-reality cars. Like this one, that answers the question about what if Datsun made a car that was a transition between the old Datsun 2000 roadster and the Z-cars:
Again, not remotely accurate to anything in our reality, but… it’s cool! I’m so conflicted. It also only appears to have one front turn indicator. See if you can guess what this one is supposed to be:
A Studebaker Avanti! It’s nothing like an Avanti, of course, but it’s oddly cool, in a sort of Iso Grifo kind of way. Maybe with a little ’70s Mustang at the rear? And, what’s going on with those wipers?
That antenna has halfway decided to become an extra wiper. Make up your mind, antenna!
Sometimes it ends up with images have definitely never been looked upon by human eyes, because, well, just look:
That’s supposed to be a Willys Jeepster, and yeah, it looks basically like a Jeepster, except I’m pretty sure Jeepster tops closed in such a way that made sense to human beings, and wasn’t some Escher-like insanity, as pictured here.
Again, this is why AI without any humans involved is madness.
As a Volkswagen obsessive, I had to check out what sort of excitement was happening in that category, and boy was I not disappointed. For cars like the Beetle, those are generally quite close, which makes sense, as there are a massive amount of Beetle reference images out there.
But ask it for, say, something a bit less common, like a VW Thing:
It’s almost a Thing, but the corrugations are all wrong, those bumpers look like they’re from a Rabbit, and what is going on out back? Is that wood? Is it like a truck bed? Again, I don’t hate the pickup variant of the Thing.
And check out this Scirocco:
I mean, that looks pretty hot, and there is definitely some Scirocco in there, especially around the B-pillar, but it’s no Scirocco.
Look what it thinks a VW Type 4 is like:
That’s like halfway between an air-cooled and a liquid-cooled VW! Or like a VW version of a Fiat 126? But it gets better! Way, way better. Look at what it calls a “VW Type 2”:
Oh hell yeah, this is prime AI hallucinatory madness! This one has four-and-a-half wheels, a split windshield, and the rare-but-coveted telephone-booth-style passenger door.
What is this? And, yes, part of me is disgusted that a site seems to be all AI-generated garbage, but at the same time I’m luridly fascinated! Some of these machine-hallucinated cars are actually kind of fantastic. But they’re useless, too. I’m very conflicted.
I suggest you waste lots and lots of your Friday looking at all these bonkers cars, and posting your favorites right here in the comments, because it’s the right thing to do, dammit.
They did seem to get the Crown Vic pretty good at least: https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-rnmf5r1skr/images/stencil/1000×649/VehicleGuideImages/2002FordCrownVictoriaClassicCar.jpg
Except they apparently went back in time in 2011 https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-rnmf5r1skr/images/stencil/1000×649/VehicleGuideImages/2011FordCrownVictoriaClassicCar.jpg
Apparently, AI does not understand windshield wipers I like the ones on the Renault Caravelle
This is bizarre and fun to look through, but no mention yet that they also have individual ratings, like performance metrics and emotional appeal? Looks and historical significance, it’s like a Pokémon collector guide ????
1987 Ford Tempo, kind of a cross between Escort and Foxbody with a skosh of Aussie Falcon thrown in around the grille. Arguably better than reality;
1987 Ford Tempo Catalog and Classic Car Guide, Ratings and Features – Metro Moulded Parts Inc
Jason must not have clicked on every year of VW Rabbit. Most are about as good as AI cars get but for 1975 only there’s a Simca 1000/Zastava 101-style rear end. Swallowtail and then some!
1975 Volkswagen Rabbit Catalog and Classic Car Guide, Ratings and Features – Metro Moulded Parts Inc
All those obscure brands, and they don’t have plastic fantastic Saturn?
Okay, I have a new member perk idea. How about Jason inputs different random prompts composed of some of his usual unique looniness and the member gets the results?
Something like: A five wheeled mid-engine Nigerian barchetta incorporating elements of both anteaters and zithers.
Sure enough, AI put 6 wheels on it. I said 5 wheeled
I was almost interested in that Studebaker Avanti, but 2 1/2 wipers is not the same as 3.
And I have to say, I’m not sure Giugiaro or Pininfarina would’ve done that much better than this AI if Fiat had commissioned a Ritmo/Strada coupe.
So the 2019 Ford F150 looks pretty good;
2019 Ford F-150 Catalog and Classic Car Guide, Ratings and Features – Metro Moulded Parts Inc
And so does the 2021. Maybe not the *most* accurate grille but still…
2021 Ford F-150 Catalog and Classic Car Guide, Ratings and Features – Metro Moulded Parts Inc
Gotta wonder what happened to the 2020 model though!
2020 Ford F-150 Catalog and Classic Car Guide, Ratings and Features – Metro Moulded Parts Inc
Jensen-Austin-Healey
https://metrommp.com/Classic-Car-Guides-Ratings-Features/Jensen/1975-Jensen-Healey-Catalog/
I don’t hate it, but climbing out of the front of this Isetta could be a little tricky.
https://metrommp.com/Classic-Car-Guides-Ratings-Features/Bmw/1957-Bmw-Isetta-Catalog/
Don’t you just love what the modern internet has become?
I could had all of these as 3D models, exported as .SVGs, .TGAs, and .WEBPs via Blender in like, five minutes each. Aside from the cost of finding the rarer 3D models that won’t have free versions I could’ve done this for $300 per batch.
Apparently the loss in site traffic from this obvious red flag is less of a concern than $300 for an afternoon of rendering.
Possibly fear of lawsuits and cease and desist orders from automakers if they use images that are too close to reality? Volvo and Ferrari in particular are notorious for this. It does seem very odd.
99.9% of the public is not going to care less about this though, only wierdos like us. And frankly, most of these really are “close enough”, with the obvious exceptions like the beetle.
Y’know how we get around the lawsuits? Don’t use the badging. The site is already using brand signifiers and trademarks, which are a bigger liability than using a picture. From my experience cease and desists only come when you associate yourself as part of the brand or brand partnership, like saying Volkswagen directly acknowledges you. Using trademarks in a passive context is usually fine because otherwise it’s impossible to identify anything, but saying you’re officially making items or providing services under that trademark gets the lawyers to look up so fast they smash their skulls against the headrests of their desk chairs. Saying “We produce parts that fit all Volkswagen Corrados” is one thing, but saying “We produce Volkswagen Corrado parts” gets the ties straightened and the URL for Fastcase typed in as quickly as human hands can manage.
Ah, yes, I love Pouzed Tolidies tires up front, and Noinskou Cilifies in the back of my Jeep Willep or my VW 47 1/4… Is this where all the dropshippers on Amazon get their brand name inspiration from?
A real version of the 4×6 looks good. Doubt a beatle has power to the front axle.
I’ll bet mouldering car parts . com, or whatever it is called, is wondering why they are getting so many clicks on a Friday afternoon.
God, nobody tell Adrian. I love the sheriff/David star wheel combo.
Six points in the front, seven in the rear, as the Eye-Talians intended.
AI is ruining the internet.
Breaking news: the 58 Edsel Citation is actually a 58 Impala-ish
https://metrommp.com/product_images/VehicleGuideImages/1958EdselCitationClassicCar.jpg
Oh man, the 86 Chevrolet Celebrity(which I know Torch LoVeS) Looks like a nice 70s Impala
https://metrommp.com/Classic-Car-Guides-Ratings-Features/Chevrolet/1986-Chevrolet-Celebrity-Catalog/
And the Dodge Rampage got a beefy upgrade! It’s now a full-on truck!
https://metrommp.com/Classic-Car-Guides-Ratings-Features/Dodge/1984-Dodge-Rampage-Catalog/
And that Rampage even has the badging from the super-rare ‘Raps’ edition!
I thought the Avanti was supposed to be a wildly wrong 280sx so I appreciate it for subverting expectations.
This is what they think a 1986 Ford Taurus looks like. I’m gobsmacked.
https://metrommp.com/Classic-Car-Guides-Ratings-Features/Ford/1986-Ford-Taurus-Catalog/
Stretched Tempo!
I’m seeing a Fox-body Mustang with an Australian Falcon nose.
Could you post an image? Apparently the outsourced Wix contractors who made the site didn’t test to see if it works on Firefox and none of the images are loading.
I’m on Firefox as well and not having issues. I’m going to start saving my favorites here: https://imgur.com/a/iKyv2K9
So we’ve got a Nissan Gazelle with RX-8 style halfdoors, a Fox body Mustang with the front of an ’88 Cutlass Ciera, and a Lancia Thema chopped into a coupe that had an ass transplant from an ’88 Ford Sierra sedan.
Purple rAIn
My sister had a Chevy Sprint when I was a kid. This is not a Chevy Sprint. Holy shit, I thought you cherry-picked weirdness, but this was my first random click.
https://metrommp.com/Classic-Car-Guides-Ratings-Features/Chevrolet/1985-Chevrolet-Sprint-Catalog/
Since soft rubber parts can be 3d-printed now and AI can generate 3d models, maybe all their product selections just imagine a part, send it to a printer, and ship it to the customer?