Home » This Plane Was Supposed To Usher In The Future, But It Was Such A Failure Its Builder Burned Every Example It Could Find

This Plane Was Supposed To Usher In The Future, But It Was Such A Failure Its Builder Burned Every Example It Could Find

Star Struck Beechcraft
ADVERTISEMENT

One of the most striking civil aviation aircraft to ever take to the skies is also one of aviation history’s saddest. The Beechcraft Starship was far ahead of its time with its all-composite construction, canard wing, computer-filled flight deck, and futuristic design. Yet, it was arguably too much, too soon, and few bothered to buy into the future. Its builder was so averse to keeping them around that it incinerated all examples it could get its hands on. Yet, even today, the Starship is still a shocker everywhere it goes, like a Bugatti going down the Interstate.

This year’s EAA AirVenture Oshkosh was largely themed around how the Allies turned the tides of World War II with the help of so many historic vehicles. Lots of military equipment was on display and I’ll never forget standing under the broad wings of a B-52. If there was one thing that averted my gaze, it was the work of the eccentric Burt Rutan, one of the few aircraft engineers alive today who could probably be described as a rockstar.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Nothing Rutan designs could be described as “normal” and one of his most ambitious designs had the potential to change the future of business aircraft. That’s this wonder, Beechcraft Starship serial NC-51.

20240722 174144
Mercedes Streeter

One of these aircraft landed at AirVenture this year and gathered a crowd larger than some of the air show performers do when they park. I can’t blame these people. This might have been the first and the last time they will ever see a flying Starship. And my, these planes live up to their name.

From A Legend

This aircraft wouldn’t have been a reality without the work of Burt Rutan and his team, and man, his name has been associated with some real beauties.

ADVERTISEMENT
6a603278c9d848b383da42dbf55b7c5f
Experimental Aircraft Association

Rutan is one of those figures who found himself enveloped in aviation at an early age. He was born in 1943 near Portland, Oregon. As a kid, his closest familial connections to aviation were through his sister, who was a flight attendant, and his father, who reportedly gave up golf to fly around a small plane. Rutan took an interest in aviation early on, building models as a kid before one day performing his first solo flight in a real plane at the age of 16.

Those models are part of where Rutan got to experiment with the sorts of mad designs he’s known for today. As Plane & Pilot writes, Rutan took part in model-building competitions where he’d make some of the wildest models that still followed strict rules. Reportedly, Rutan once took part in a competition where model airplanes had to demonstrate how fast and how slow they could go using a tiny aircraft carrier. Rutan went above and beyond, designing a model VTOL jet before the Harrier Jump Jet was even a thing.

Web11725 2010h
Rutan Voyager – Gift of Dick Rutan and Jeanna Yeager – National Air And Space Museum

Like any obsessed avgeek, Rutan sought to take his dreams further and he graduated from California Polytechnic State University in 1965 with a degree in aeronautical engineering. Later that year, he put his education to work as a civilian flight test engineer at Edwards Air Force Base. While there, Rutan worked on the LTV XC-142 VSTOL transport as well as performed spin testing on the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II. In total, he performed about 12 projects on aircraft out there, and then Rutan left to eventually land himself as the Director of Development of the infamous Bede BD-5 homebuilt.

Finally, in 1974, Rutan started to go his own way and opened the Rutan Aircraft Factory. There, Rutan designed such aircraft as the VariViggen, the VariEze (below) and the Long-EZ, some of the most innovative general aviation aircraft to ever take to the skies.

Mercedes Streeter

Rutan’s work with these homebuilts helped popularize canard configurations and helped advance composite construction in the homebuilt arena. Not only that but these futuristic planes were designed to reduce the chances of a spin. That’s an aggravated aerodynamic stall where one wing may still be producing lift but the other’s lift is insufficient. The aircraft begins an un-commanded roll and from the ground, it looks like the plane is spinning as it’s losing altitude. Sadly, pilots have still found ways to crash Rutan’s iconic designs.

ADVERTISEMENT

I think I’ll let Rutan describe his own life from here, from his website:

In 2004 Rutan made international headlines as the designer of SpaceShipOne, the world’s first privately-built manned spacecraft to reach space. Financed by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, SpaceShipOne won the $10 million Ansari X-Prize, the competition created to spur the development of affordable space tourism.

Rutan designed the legendary Voyager, the first aircraft to circle the world non-stop, without refueling. He also developed the GM Ultralite, an all-composite 100 mpg show car for General Motors, and the Proteus “affordable U-2” aircraft. His Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer broke the Voyager’s record time, becoming the first non-stop, solo flight around the world.

Burt Rutan Spaceshipone
Scaled Composites

The success of SCALED Composites owes itself to Rutan’s philosophy that the best ideas come from the collaborative efforts of small, closely-knit project teams and an environment unlimited by adversity to risk. According to Aviation Week, Rutan is “a capable manager who has been able to attract technicians, pilots and workers who revel in the entrepreneurial and creative spirit existing at SCALED Composites.”

If I kept telling you about Rutan’s resume I would be here all day. Over his life, Rutan punched out at least 367 different aircraft designs, of which 45 have actually flown. All of them are a bit unorthodox in some way. I think the best way to illustrate this is by taking a look at what Rutan’s firm tried to do with business travel.

The Starship

Starship Header
Scaled Composites

Let’s go back to the late 1979s. Beechcraft was flying at high altitude on its highly successful King Air turboprop. The manufacturer controlled a full 50 percent of the business turboprop market and like any dominant company, Beechcraft wanted to stay in the lead. However, the King Air was aging at 15 years old. Beechcraft wanted something fresh to keep soaring above the competition.

At the time, Bill Brown was an advanced projects engineer over at Beechcraft. Brown already had experience working with composites from building his own planes, and began to sketch up what a Burt Rutan design could look like scaled-up. Rutan’s homebuilts were small personal aircraft, but what could those planes be like sized up as business aircraft? Beechcraft would reach out to Rutan to design, build, and test the company’s Next Generation Business Aircraft idea.

Starship Carousel6
Scaled Composites

Reportedly, development on the Starship didn’t begin in earnest until 1979, when Raytheon became interested in Beechcraft. The company would be acquired by Raytheon in early 1980.

ADVERTISEMENT

Beechcraft knew what it was looking for. A King Air 350 was good for a 360 mph cruise and eight passengers with an empty weight of 9,500. The company wanted its successor for the King Air to seat 10 passengers, cruise at 400 mph, and come in under 12,500 pounds takeoff weight. As the Smithsonian Magazine writes, Beechcraft was looking for a business aircraft with some of the performance of a jet and the operating costs of a turboprop.

Ka360 Header.ashx
Beechcraft King Air 360 – Textron Aviation

Every option was on the table to get it done. The design team considered everything from a traditional turboprop to radical designs involving twins, pusher configurations, to designs similar to what the competition was brewing.

Oh yeah, Beechcraft wasn’t the only manufacturer trying to create the future of business travel. Remember that this happened at the tail end of the 1970s and the early 1980s. This was a time when Americans were concerned about emissions and fuel economy, and not just on the ground in cars. Multiple oil crises made flying thirsty aircraft expensive.

Learfan Landing At Reno Stead 48
Bill Larkins

In the 1970s, Bill Lear was working on the Lear Fan (above), a novel lawn dart-shaped business aircraft powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6B turboshaft engines driving gearboxes to reach a large propeller in the rear in a pusher configuration. In addition to the aircraft’s aggressive profile, it saved weight with its composite construction. Unfortunately, Lear passed before he could finish the aircraft. His widow attempted to get the aircraft into production and while it did fly–on a day the British government recorded as “December 32, 1980” so Lear could get funding that expired at the end of 1980–the aircraft never went into production.

There’s also the Piaggio P.180, a twin-prop with a pusher configuration, a canard, and designed in collaboration with Learjet.

ADVERTISEMENT
Avanti Evo 6
Piaggio Aerospace

However, financial problems caused Learjet’s then-parent, the Gates Rubber Company, to bail on the project. Piaggio pushed forward with the aircraft anyway, eventually launching the P.180 Avanti in 1990. The aircraft is still in production today and is still selling! As it turned out, manufacturers didn’t even need to get weird with it as other manufacturers found success selling traditional business aircraft in the 1970s.

In 1980, the now Raytheon subsidiary Beechcraft saw its fortunes in the business aircraft market slipping to its competition. Yet, the company paused development of the new plane and didn’t start it again until 1982. The restart was ambitious, too, as Beech wanted the new aircraft, then called the 300A, to be ready to rock in just two years. The new plane would be developed in secret, too.

20240722 173037
Mercedes Streeter

Early in the development, the engineers landed on a design with two engines mounted in the rear and driving pusher props. The wings would have vertical surfaces at their tips and most importantly, the aircraft would have a large cabin just as Beech ordered. But there was a problem. A sizable aircraft like this was too heavy, so the team decided to go all-in on composites to chop the weight down. Internal research at Beech revealed that carbon fiber was basically a magical material that weighed less than aircraft aluminum but was three times stronger. In theory, the pusher configuration also meant the cabin would be quieter than the typical turboprop.

These decisions were radical all on their own. The aviation world is known more for its incremental evolutions. Just the shape of the Starship 1’s fuselage alone was a big middle finger to convention, but these engineers were then going to build that fuselage entirely out of composites.

20240722 174315
Mercedes Streeter

Later that year, Rutan’s team at the newly-founded Scaled Composites added variable geometry to the aircraft’s canard and built an 85 percent scale proof-of-concept aircraft with a fiberglass fuselage that wasn’t pressurized. Scaled Composites was founded only just that year by Rutan and Beechcraft scooped it up along the way.

ADVERTISEMENT

The proof-of-concept aircraft built by Scaled Composites made its first flight in 1983. The development team continued to build prototypes as development continued. Another prototype, NC-1, which was designed to test aerodynamics, made its first flight in 1986. Prototype NC-2 tested the Starship’s avionics while NC-3 tested the plane’s engines and flight management computers.

27651245548 Eff19ba52f K
Johnny Comstedt

All of the advancements thus far would be noteworthy for any manufacturer, but this was Beechcraft’s moonshot project and the Starship wasn’t just a new business plane, but maybe the blueprint for the future of business aviation. The Smithsonian Magazine points out how Beech assembled some of the best minds in the business:

The program brought together some of the finest minds in aviation. They included D. Brainerd Holmes, a driving force behind NASA’s Apollo program and now president of Raytheon. Linden Blue and composites guru Ric Abbott came aboard from Learfan; Blue is credited with selecting Rutan’s design. Others involved included Rutan and a handful of brilliant aerodynamicists, including John Roncz, an airfoil expert, David Bernstorf, who led the Beech aerodynamics and loads group, Roy LoPresti, a speed merchant who had wrung the drag out of half a dozen airplane types, and Brown. At its apex, 1,000 employees were assigned to the Starship, 450 of them engineers.

Beech’s parent company, Raytheon, would spend a million man-hours and $350 million (early 1980s dollars) bringing the airplane to market and hundreds of millions more marketing and supporting it. Some estimate that Raytheon sank as much as $1 billion into the program. (Raytheon will not provide an exact number and may not even know what it is.) “The cost was a very nebulous figure to come up with,” says former Beech and Raytheon president Max Bleck. “None of our financial people tried to put a pencil to it.” But almost everyone knew that the numbers didn’t add up. An internal economic analysis by Beech in 1979 concluded that if it sold 400 Starships a year at an after-tax profit of $250,000 per unit, for a total profit of $100 million a year for 30 years, it would generate an internal rate of return of 16 percent at a time when the prime rate was almost 20 percent.

Beech Interior
Beechcraft

Beechcraft’s money resulted in a number of firsts. The Starship Model 2000, as it was called at launch, was the first business aircraft with an all digital “glass” flight deck, using 14 cathode-ray tubes for its Rockwell Collins Proline 4 AMS-850 instrument panel. It was also the first certified civilian aircraft with a pressurized carbon-fiber fuselage, the first modern aircraft with a canard, without a tail, and among the first passenger aircraft with pusher turboprops.

Now, if you’re beginning to see why this aircraft failed, don’t worry because Beech’s CEO did, too. Then Beech CEO Max Bleck tried to kill the Starship twice, but Raytheon demanded the project move forward.

So, Beechcraft had to try to make some lemonade from the lemons it was delivered. The Starship was announced to have a target price of $2,742,500, which shocked the aviation world. If the Starship hit as promised, it was going to change the world of flying.

ADVERTISEMENT

Swing And Miss

339657866 1600464303767893 23996
Beechcraft

The Starship’s development program dragged through the 1980s as its many technological advancements presented roadblocks and speedbumps for engineers to overcome. After all, Beech was trying to do something that hadn’t been done before.

The aircraft that gained FAA certification in 1988 wasn’t exactly what Beech ordered. The Starship was 2,400 pounds heavier than desired, had a gross weight of 14,900 pounds, and it somehow lost a few seats along the way. The heavier weight meant the engineers couldn’t go with the desired 750 HP engines and instead, they had to spec the aircraft with more powerful 1,200 HP Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A67As. Cruising speed was also slightly lower than desired at 385 mph. Just 11 examples were sold in the three years after the aircraft was introduced after certification.

20240722 173514

Oh, right, then there was the price. In 1989, Beechcraft wanted $3.9 million for a Starship. By the early 1990s, the price crept up to a whopping $5.3 million, double what it said it said the Starshift was going to cost during development.

The Smithsonian Magazine continues, pointing out that development took so long that company brass just wanted to get the darn things for sale already. This led to Beechcraft getting the aircraft certified before all of the kinks were worked out. The aircraft had pitch sensitivity that was far too light and roll sensitivity that was far too heavy. Beech figured it would fix this stuff as it went on. Unfortunately, while Beech got the fundamentals right, early Starships were plagued with issues, from Smithsonian Magazine:

ADVERTISEMENT

The results were disastrous for the aircraft’s early reputation. While Beech had gotten most of the difficult new technology right—from the avionics to the composite structure to the variable-sweep canard—it had let a lot of mundane, old-technology things fall through the cracks. The first production Starship, NC-4, was delivered to a Florida-based beer distributor at the summer 1989 Paris Air Show. The air conditioning on the airplane failed repeatedly. Other common problems included door seal failures, defects in bleed air valves supplying pressurized air, and bad brakes. Starships were tarred as “hangar queens,” and one exasperated operator took a Beech executive to lunch and ordered a special centerpiece—a bowl of lemons. Beech eventually fixed these problems, and airplanes with later serial numbers had few if any problems, but in the death-by-whisper world of business aviation, the damage was done.

Starship Carousel4
Scaled Composites

“What killed that airplane was the reliability issue,” says Tom Carr, who flew 30 of the 53 units produced and logged hundreds of hours training customers. “Once it got that reputation, it was hard to sell airplanes.”

If none of what you read above was enough to convince you the plane was a failure, Beech also had another problem. The Starship’s biggest competitor was the King Air it was meant to replace. The King Air was a proven airframe known for reliability. Sure, it wasn’t a fancy composite beauty, but a King Air owner knew their air-conditioner was going to work. Oh, and you could have configured a King Air to carry more people, too.

20240722 173231
Mercedes Streeter
20240722 173042
Mercedes Streeter
20240722 172949
Mercedes Streeter

Upgrading the Starship to 2000A specification, which slightly reduced cabin noise and increased short-field performance, didn’t help. Sales were so bad that in 1992, Beech said it would kill the Starship if sales didn’t pick up by the time the 50th production example left the line. Sure enough, sales never picked up and the last Starship, serial NC-53 was built in 1995. Beech didn’t even sell all 50 of the production examples.

If you need another example of how much the Starship was an albatross on the neck of Beech and Raytheon, the latter company learned that supporting the handful of people who bought the planes was too much. In 2003, the company began scrapping and incinerating any Starship it could get its hands on. In 2004, Raytheon wanted to be done with the Starship so much that it sold 12 semi-trailers worth of parts to Robert Scherer, the owner of N514RS, for a fraction of their $38 million worth. So while there aren’t many Starships out there, there are still parts out there to keep them flying.

Ksc 06pd0250orig
NASA

It’s a shame because reportedly, the Starship was a remarkably stable plane to fly. However, it wasn’t as quiet as it should have been, wasn’t as light as it should have been, wasn’t as cheap as it should have been, and overall missed basically all of the targets set by Beechcraft. Reportedly, the funky wing configuration didn’t deliver the proposed efficiency benefits, either. Remember, the whole reason behind going with composite construction was for lighter weight!

Yet, despite all of that, it’s hard to deny the star power of a Starship. Nobody cares what the plane was or was not able to do when it rolls up the taxiway. Starship pilots have stories of being paced by fighter jets just so the jet’s pilot can get a picture. Starship pilots have stories of landing to crowds and the kinds of fascination from people of all ages like when someone shows up to a car show in a supercar you never knew existed in real life.

ADVERTISEMENT
20240722 174631
Mercedes Streeter

Owning a Beechcraft Starship must be like owning a Vector. Sure, it may not be the best performer in any measurable way, but people are definitely going to remember your ride more than the McLaren of the week. I know I was pretty much starstruck at the sight of the Starship at AirVenture.

It’s believed that just six Beechcraft Starships remain airworthy. The rest were either burned up, scrapped, are preserved in museums, or sit somewhere being cannibalized for parts to keep the others flying. That means if you see a Starship flying, it may be the first or the last time you ever see one flying again. And while the Starship may have been a failure, it still goes down in history as another example of one of the craziest civil aviation planes ever put into production. Hopefully, they’ll continue to gather crowds for years to come.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
48 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Patrick
Patrick
2 months ago

Could we say that the Beechcraft Starship was…

RuTan’s race for less drag ?

SNL-LOL Jr
SNL-LOL Jr
2 months ago
Reply to  Patrick

In contrast, Adrian Newey loves drag… When it serves his purpose.

Cheap Bastard
Cheap Bastard
2 months ago

“Nobody cares what the plane was or was not able to do when it rolls up the taxiway. Starship pilots have stories of being paced by fighter jets just so the jet’s pilot can get a picture. Starship pilots have stories of landing to crowds and the kinds of fascination from people of all ages like when someone shows up to a car show in a supercar you never knew existed in real life.”

So why aren’t attention famished celebrities rocking these thing on tour? Why show up in just another Gulf stream when these Canards are a thing?

Mike F.
Mike F.
2 months ago

Really enjoyed this article, Mercedes. I’ve been a very casual follower of Rutan’s work for a long, so it was fun to get a little more info on the man and his projects.

MrLM002
MrLM002
2 months ago

Personally I’m of the opinion that most twin engine propeller aircraft should be of the push-pull design. No dodgy single engine flying characteristics that way.

Slower Louder
Slower Louder
2 months ago

Super fun article, Mercedes. Stories about engineering are one of the best things about The Autopian.

Gary Lynch
Gary Lynch
2 months ago

Rutan was to far advanced for certified corporate aircraft production. He is very sharp on the design, and has some great planes. I have four friends with Long EZs, two built theirs and one worked with Rutan decades ago. Super planes, fun fly. But the labor involved to build them is not to be underestimated.

i can only imagine a Rutan design being interpreted by corporate bean counters and bent to fit their imaginations. Too heavy, slow, expensive to manufacture is to be expected.

Jeff Jordan
Jeff Jordan
2 months ago

Great article, Mercedes

Sucktastico!
Sucktastico!
2 months ago

Everything about the Starship was totally fantastic. Been a huge fan of the Rutans’ work since I was a kid in the 70s reading about the BD and the VeriEazy. Just awesome. I am so happy some still exist and are airworthy. From what I understand, the owners are of the “you can pry it from my cold, dead fingers” mindset, but at some point those parts are gonna run out. While you can keep a DC3/C47 flying for the next 50 years, not sure the Starship owners are gonna be so lucky.

Cheap Bastard
Cheap Bastard
2 months ago
Reply to  Sucktastico!

“While you can keep a DC3/C47 flying for the next 50 years, not sure the Starship owners are gonna be so lucky.”

Well there’s always Alibaba.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
2 months ago

Wow. It really doesn’t matter what you write about, you find rabbit holes to go down that I never have on my own.

Your reference of the BD-5 in this article, and the link to the article you had written previously, dusted off some long dormant memory cells and provided me with an hour of entertaining reading and links to follow.

I thought the BD-5 was cool. Intriguing, even. A long time ago, I actually thought about buying and trying to build (and fly) a Revolution Mini-500 helicopter. Revolution Mini-500 – Wikipedia

That I didn’t go down either of those paths are probably why I am still here today to read your work.

Please be careful. Wear your helmet on your bikes. I really don’t want to read the boilerplate “she died, doing what she loved,” EVER.

Elduchey
Elduchey
2 months ago

Awesome article!

I use to work at a Raytheon FBO in Van Nuys CA where Roberts Starship was regularly serviced and man what a cool plane. If memory recalls, he was using it to take highly detailed terrain photos. He had cut a hole in the lower fuselage and had a fancy gimbled camera installed in the belly.
I think this was about the same time that he purchased all the parts and said he could keep it flying indefinitely.
Raytheon even had him fly it out for a photo op with the doomed Premier.

Mikey
Mikey
2 months ago

No composite design has proven to be significantly lighter than an equivalent conventional design. The Hawker Beech 4000 was a similar economic disaster.

SageWestyTulsa
SageWestyTulsa
2 months ago

Great article, Mercedes! I’ve been fascinated by these aircraft since they were launched, while I was in high school. I’m lucky enough to live a few miles from RL Jones airport in south Tulsa, where N45FL—owned and operated by Renaissance Energy—is based, and have seen it in flight a number of times. Nothing else sounds (or looks!) like a Starship!

CivoLee
CivoLee
2 months ago

When I was a kid I had this thing called Wheels and Wings. It was a set of large cards sized for a binder with information on aircraft and exotic cars of that time. It was subscription-based, so as long as you kept the subscription up, they’d send you more cards every month. Unfortunately, my parents couldn’t afford a new subscription, so I only got about a year’s worth (or I lost interest and they asked me if I wanted to renew it and I said no; I can’t remember). I thought I had lost it in a move, but it turned out my sibling had it. They gave it back to me recently and I was paging through it.

One of the aircraft featured was the Beechcraft Starship. I wondered what had happened to it because I couldn’t recall seeing one anywhere else. Thanks for writing this article. It goes to show just how much any attempt to reinvent the wheel needs to hit it out of the park in terms of reliability or people will dismiss it as some gimmick trying to fix what isn’t broken (even if in reality there is room for improvement).

Hamish48
Hamish48
2 months ago

Your Canadian (Thomas) will be celebrating Labor Day too, except we in both Oz and CDN spell it the same way – Labour Day as in the auld brit way – just like colour and honour, eh?

J.O.
J.O.
2 months ago

I was probably about 9 or 10 when I saw one flying low while visiting Culiacan, Mexico, to this day the sight and noise is still engrained in my mind, spent years without knowing what it was, it just looked so out of place in the setting I was, it’s been over 25 years, and that’s probably one of the reasons I like planes so much.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
2 months ago

I haven’t seen one of these in person, but have seen (and heard) a Piaggio fly overhead. I can’t describe its noise signature, but it is unique. Any idea what the dark object supported by five pylons along the spine of the fuselage is? Some sort of low frequency radio antenna? It really detracts from what is otherwise a beautiful plane.

Torque
Torque
2 months ago

Huh that Has to be a custom antenna I only see it on the pics of the Starship that Mercedes photographed at Oshkosh this year.

Patrick
Patrick
2 months ago

Thanks for the good and informative article Mercedes. I like and know cars, but if I’ve always been fascinated by airplanes, I don’t know that much (but I absolutely love the Concorde), so I love to read an article like this about an awesome funky different plane. That it’s written so a layman can understand makes it even better.

Striking plane the Starliner is indeed!

Patrick
Patrick
2 months ago
Reply to  Patrick

Starship* !

Starliner is the “stranded” Boeing space vessel constantly in the news… Bad luck seems to be striking that one…

Clear_prop
Clear_prop
2 months ago

Part of the issue with the Starship was that it was one of the first large composite civilian planes so the engineers didn’t have good data on how exactly to design it to get the most benefit of the composites. A little extra strength/weight added just in case adds up quickly.

Beech took what they learned with the Starship and built the Premiere composite bizjet, which was very successful.

Torque
Torque
2 months ago
Reply to  Clear_prop

It is totally understandable And too bad Beech went back to a traditional tube and wing design with the Premiere

ADDvanced
ADDvanced
2 months ago

Amazing article, I have no idea how you write about something so obscure. I saw a couple of the EZ things flying out of an airport in Pagosa Springs and had no idea what they were until I bugged some of my avionic nerd friends. So cool!

Bob
Bob
2 months ago

Scaled Composites is owned by Northrup Grumman now. One of its most recent projects is the 437 Vanguard. Manned at the moment, which simplifies testing, it’s likley being developed as an autonomous “Loyal Wingman” vehicle that can be employed in support of other manned combat aircraft.

I very much wanted to work for Scaled right up until I found that they begin the day ridiculously early in the morning to get around the intense heat of their Mojave, CA facility.

https://www.instagram.com/p/C_Q4TmotrSe/?locale=zh-hans

https://scaled.com/portfolio/

Knowonelse
Knowonelse
2 months ago

Rutan was a genius who defined what out-of-the-box could really mean. Great article. It was almost impossible to keep up with Rutan during the decades.

Lokki
Lokki
2 months ago

Enjoyed this article very much Mercedes..Really well written and thoughtful. I’ve always been Rutan Fanboi…more please

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
2 months ago

Makes you wonder what might result if someone restomodded a Starship with current computers and displays that are light years ahead in performance, size and weight. Not to mention the latest turboprops that are likewise lighter, more powerful, and efficient. Might even be able to bring it in under the original design specs and improve speed and range. If there’s an unfinished airframe lurking in a hanger warehouse somewhere, it’d be a great project to explore.

Last edited 2 months ago by Canopysaurus
Torque
Torque
2 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

100% agree, simply need deep, deep pockets enough that you wont loose any sleep about spending +$5-10M on a single (large(ish)) flying toy

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
2 months ago
Reply to  Torque

That could be a problem.

Phuzz
Phuzz
2 months ago

If you really want to drive home Rutan’s individual approach to aircraft design, take a look at the Rutan Boomerang. One wing is bigger than the other, one engine is in the main fuselage and the other (slightly less powerful) one is in the wing. Oh, and both wings are forward-swept (by slightly different angles).
It looks like it should never get off the ground, but was faster and more efficient than similar small twin-engined aircraft, whilst having more room inside.

Last edited 2 months ago by Phuzz
Rippstik
Rippstik
2 months ago

Great article! I hope to see one flying someday, as even the noise these things make are unforgettable. I was lucky enough to see one on display at the Pima Air and Space museum in Tucson, AZ. Hot take, but I thought the Star Ship was cooler than the Blackbird they had on display.

Last edited 2 months ago by Rippstik
Torque
Torque
2 months ago
Reply to  Rippstik

That would be like saying Byonce is better than the Beattles, sure they both made music, they’re just so completely different.

Same here the Starship and the Blackbird are totally different animals and IMO both innovative and incredible in their own ways, I love them both.

To think the blackbird is still the fastest jet (not including prototype scramjets) to have ever been manufactured (that is public i.e. not still classified) +50 years ago is astounding

Last edited 2 months ago by Torque
Rippstik
Rippstik
2 months ago
Reply to  Torque

I’d agree… The Blackbird is certainly one of the coolest aircraft ever made, and I still get excited when I see them in-person or hear the many stories of the folks who worked around them. That being said, seeing the Starship was unexpected and wild.

Torque
Torque
2 months ago
Reply to  Rippstik

Ha agreed, I remember seeing a blackbird at the Air & Space museum in D.C. when I was a kid and being in awe.
I’d likewise Love to see a Starship one day too!

48
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x