Home » Toronto’s Talking Cop Car Is An Absolute Abomination Of Automotive Anthropomorphization

Toronto’s Talking Cop Car Is An Absolute Abomination Of Automotive Anthropomorphization

Blinky Top2
ADVERTISEMENT

As you may be aware, I have been the globe’s leading authority on vehicular anthropomorphization ever since the University of Me at The Inside of My Skull gave me a honorary Associate’s Degree in Vehicular Anthropomorphization, the highest honor in that field recorded to date. When it comes to giving car human traits like eyes and mouths and expressions and souls, I have declared myself the foremost authority. That’s why I feel I’m qualified to issue this important and timely warning: the Metropolitan Toronto Police Department’s child safety-teaching police car, Blinky, is one of the worst examples of vehicular anthropomorphization known to humankind. It’s a terrifying nightmare, and everyone needs to be made aware of it, for their own safety.

Our own Thomas Hundal, a Toronto resident and alleged Canadian himself, spotted Blinky at the Honda Indy Toronto race and took some photos of the 1982-ish Plymouth Gran Fury in all of its strangely sort-of-humanized non-glory. Blinky is awkward, misguided, and freakish. There are many good ways to give an inanimate car a recognizable, relatable face that can convey emotion and communicate complex ideas; Blinky accomplishes none of these things, and can only truly communicate a sense of deep-seated, unsettling fear. Let’s examine why!

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

First, and I feel like I should apologize to you here, but you really do need to see what Blinky looks like. You may want to be sure you’re sitting, and if you’re pregnant, let’s not take any chances. Why not step away from the computer? All good? Okay, here we go:

Blinky 3 4front

Oh jeez. As much as one may prepare, I don’t think anyone is truly ready for Blinky.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before we start to really analyze Blinky, let’s go into a bit of history about the car and its role with the Toronto Metropolitan Police. The goal of teaching kids about traffic safety has long been a concern for police departments, and the idea of conveying this information via a car that is sentient and able to communicate in some way has been around a while. In 1957, British Petroleum created a character named Mr. Beep, an anthropomorphized car that taught kids about traffic safety.

Mr. Beep – which was built out of a highly modified Ford Zephyr – had a much more effective anthropomorphizing scheme. You can see what Mr.Beep was like in this old film:

Mr.Beep’s face was remarkably simple, and replaced all visual elements on the front of the car entirely. Headlight-like large eyes, a small nose/badge triangle, and a grille/bumper mouth were the only elements, and while perhaps a bit oversimplified, they worked. Mr.Beep was cute and approachable. Sure, the essence of “car” was a bit lost on the front end, but here the simplicity worked in the mascot’s favor.

While Mr.Beep was helping Canadian children avoid being smacked around by cars, the Toronto Metropolitan Police in the mid-1960s decided they needed a talking safety car of their own; why should BP have all the talking safety car glory? Metro Toronto Police Sergeant Roy Wilson reached out to a local radio station to help sponsor his vision, and with their assistance was able to convert one of the department’s Plymouth Furies into a strange fever dream of an anthropomorphized car.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s the first version of Blinky, based on what I believe is a 1978 Plymouth Fury:

Here’s what a ’78 Fury looked like, just to confirm:

Cs Losfeliztrainstation

Even though the Fury has a fairly bold “face” with lights that could become eyes and a grille that could become a mouth, Wilson’s design ignored all that and effectively just piled eyes, eyebrows, and a large nose atop the windshield and hood of the car. It’s inelegant and completely disregards the design of the car itself.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s another early Blinky:

The strange design rendered the car undrivable, too, hence the tow.

When the design was updated in the early 1980s, moving to a 1982-ish Plymouth Gran Fury Toronto police car, now in white, the same principles applied: just slap a bunch of oversized facial features onto the car.

ADVERTISEMENT

The result, I think you’ll agree, is hideous. I cannot fathom why some of these decisions were made. Why was it so important that Blinky have that massive nose, with those two huge, strangely prominent nostrils being one of the dominant features of the front end? It was the 80s, perhaps the goal was to make it easy to really hoover up some nose candy from the evidence lockers, but somehow I suspect that wasn’t the plan.

Blinky Fromt

And what’s with those weird eyes? To house the blinking, creepily rolling eyes, a huge mass of material had to be installed atop the windshield, rendering the car, as I mentioned, impossible to drive, hence the need to tow it everywhere. It’s so deeply clunky and thoughtless, I can’t believe it ever got built like this. Here, look at the profile of this thing:

Blinky Side

Why was this considered okay? Look how much mass is between the A-pillar and those strange, long-lashed eyes, sleepily watching you from underneath the twin leeches of those eyebrows? Look at the length of that nose, and the bulbous, cartilaginous mass of nostril and nose tip at the end? What sort of beast does this suggest? A llama? A hippo? Some kind of ibex thing? It has nothing to do with the look of the car, of course, and renders the whole vehicle useless.

ADVERTISEMENT

I mean, look at this:

Blinky Close1

Can you imagine any kid finding this appealing? It’s terrifying! It’s some kind of massive beast, and those huge dead eyes with their heavy lids and long lashes just suggest some sort of casual amorality that would let this thing roll its eyes while it crushes you to blood!

I’m not even entirely kidding; there’s references to how, for older student (think 8th graders) demonstrations, Blinky’s operators would have

“Blinky slowly backing over a doll filled with red paint, graphically illustrating the end result of what happens to children who don’t properly observe their surroundings – red asphalt.”

They had it roll over a doll filled with fake blood? Did the guy who did the Saw movies come up with this idea? Was everyone involved with this project some manner of maple sap-drunk sicko?

ADVERTISEMENT

Even other variants of the Blinky character seemed to understand how misguided this anthropomorphizing attempt was; in 1975, a Blinky animation was commissioned, and as you can see, it takes a wildly different approach:

Headlights become eyes, grille becomes mouth, and all is right in the world once again. Granted, this is just a cartoon, and you can get away with anything, but, significantly, it’s still a simpler arrangement than the overdone huge nose/eyes/eyebrows setup of the physical Blinky.

Normally, I’d be worried about crushing some Canadian child’s precious memories of interacting with Blinky with my cold, hard criticism, but in this case I’m all but positive no human child could look at the monstrosity that is Blinky and feel anything but abject terror. There’s no need to be nostalgic about the disaster that is Blinky; I think the Toronto Police should commission a new, more appealing, less nightmarish Blinky, then through a parade where the old Blinky is crushed, in full view of the children, so that they know it can no longer hurt them.

I’m all for idiosyncratic anthropomorphizations and character, but that’s not what Blinky is. Blinky is a series of odious missteps in along the path of vehicle anthropomorphizing, and only has value as a warning to future generations to never make these mistakes again.

ADVERTISEMENT

Is that harsh? Good. It needs to be. Get away from me, Blinky.

 

Relatedbar

This Swedish Kid’s-Show Has The Most Terrifying Anthropomorphized Vehicles I’ve Ever Seen

Help Me Decide If This Fiat 500 With A Face Transplant Is So Bad It’s Good

The First Car To Be Called A Lotus Had A Great Shocked Spider Face: Cold Start

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
80 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Saunders
David Saunders
5 months ago

To be pedantic in a totally different direction I think you will find that this Plymouth Fury is most likely a Plymouth Caravelle since its a Canadian car.

Related – someone actually re-created Mr Beep a few years back hacking up a mint condition Ford Zepyhr convertible. Hopefully no one tries the same thing in 40 years to re-create this travesty if we are lucky enough to have the original lost/destroyed.

Clusker Du
Clusker Du
5 months ago

In an alternate universe, Gritty is the mascot for the Leafs and this is his car.

Totally not a robot
Totally not a robot
5 months ago

Shades of Chuck-E-Cheese animatronic band nightmare fuel here. “Eat your nasty pizza or else.”

1984 Dodge Daytona Turbo
1984 Dodge Daytona Turbo
5 months ago

The face reminds me of the cart titan from AOT.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
5 months ago

This was not intended to teach children safety. It was to teach them to question the intelligence of their police force.

Harvey Park Bench
Harvey Park Bench
5 months ago

Mission accomplished, eh

Sklooner
Sklooner
5 months ago

I want a house hippo

Erik Solie
Erik Solie
5 months ago

Would have looked better if those hosers had just slapped some 12″ googly eyes on it, called it done, and gone off for some wobblies!

Is Travis
Is Travis
5 months ago

Gah I hate it, I guess thanks for the new hatred.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
5 months ago

Oh, that‘s a nose?

DadBod
DadBod
5 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

more like a snout, given the context

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
5 months ago

“An Absolute Abomination Of Automotive Anthropomorphization”

Hey, you get an AAAAaAAaaAAA!

(Anglo American Association Advancing and Advocating Alliteration and all Afilliated Arts Approval)

Chally_Sheedy
Chally_Sheedy
5 months ago

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MXhhXXsxSfE

The correct way to anthropomorphize a vehicle is not high, moist eyeballs and gumlines, but good vibes and strong characterization.

You don’t even need a set of nightmare eyeballs to give an excavator a soul if you’ve got an S tier banger like this on the soundtrack.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
5 months ago

I feel like this is something that only could have been designed in the ’70s, and no other decade in human history.

EvilFacelessTurtle
EvilFacelessTurtle
5 months ago
Reply to  Ranwhenparked

The guy who came up with the idea was definitely snorting something out of the evidence locker…

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
5 months ago

This makes me “Fury”ous…yeah, this is an ugly abomination and useless. The eyes look high, like they just smoked w/ Snoop doggy Dogg or Willie Nelson…which is ironic since it has the nose to snort up like Motley Crue or John Delorean did, so this should have been a Delorean which should have been used to go back in time and prevent this thing from existing…if that doesn’t work, this piece of trash should be driven off a cliff and blown up

Shooting Brake
Shooting Brake
5 months ago

I can’t imagine how you get the hood open to service the thing…I guess you just don’t since you can’t really drive it anyway?

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
5 months ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

I just skimmed through the link; it actually doesn’t even have an engine

Mark Hughes
Mark Hughes
5 months ago

Looks like a prop from the film Maximum Overdrive.

Jatco Xtronic CVT
Jatco Xtronic CVT
5 months ago

Now, I might be high from vaping Jatco lifetime CVT fluid, but even I can’t see how this nightmarish design was ever approved.

Timbales
Timbales
5 months ago

it looks like the Fisher-Price Chatter Phone

Cool Dave
Cool Dave
5 months ago

Kids if you don’t follow the law then Blinky is going to peer in your windows at night and watch you!

Fear is a great motivator.

Vee
Vee
5 months ago
Reply to  Cool Dave

His eyes can see you jaywalk through time.
He can smell your fear. He knows.
Do not break the law.
He knows.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
5 months ago
Reply to  Vee

I’m from the UK, I had to have jaywalking explained to my by the staff of the restaurant opposite the hotel in the US I was living in after they saw me walk across the road.

I didn’t believe them, so I asked at the hotel, and they said I’d have to drive across the road.

The US is such a weird combination of freedom and whatever the opposite of freedom is.

i3 Driving Indicator Fetishist
i3 Driving Indicator Fetishist
5 months ago

Love the reference to Mr Beep! I have a hanging masonite sign of him in my garage and have seen the real one in person! As a Toronto child of the 80s i had forgotten/blocked out Blinky until now, thanks Jason! :/

ADDvanced
ADDvanced
5 months ago

“perhaps the goal was to make it easy to really hoover up some nose candy from the evidence lockers”

I feel like this thing is a result of all the nose candy finding it’s way out of evidence lockers. It was the 1980s, so even the cops were coked up.

One question; do you think they made TWO of these face things? Or do you think they peeled the face off from the old car, and put it on this one, like in FaceOff?

I could eat a peach for hours

MikeInTheWoods
MikeInTheWoods
5 months ago

Now we know where the modern BMW design team came from. They were children from Toronto, all grown up and creating their own monsters now.

Chronometric
Chronometric
5 months ago

I just showed my wife this photo and told her the story of Jason visiting Pixar to convince them that Cars was an abomination of anthropomorphism. After recoiling at the sight of Blinky, she asked, “Is this that website you pay for?” Oops.

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
5 months ago
Reply to  Chronometric

Well, it’s worth it since it’s the best site on the net

Tagarito
Tagarito
5 months ago
Reply to  Chronometric

Felt your spine tingle at the sight of that abominable cop car? Part of the multi-sensory multimedia this site provides, for a reasonable fee

Totally not a robot
Totally not a robot
5 months ago
Reply to  Chronometric

Do you happen to be paying enough for that Pixar hater to be sending you weird drawings of strange cars that she’s never heard of?

Chronometric
Chronometric
5 months ago

I need to step up a level to get robots and car drawings. Maybe when my wife isn’t looking.

Drew
Drew
5 months ago
Reply to  Chronometric

If not for this site, I never would have known this existed. Which sounds like a pitch for not coming here, but we need to be aware such abominations exist. We need to be cautious. This car could crop up anyw

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
5 months ago

This thing would even give Sid and Marty Krofft childhood nightmares.

Thomas The Tank Engine
Thomas The Tank Engine
5 months ago

Look how much mass is between the A-pillar and those strange, long-lashed eyes, sleepily watching you from underneath the twin leeches of those eyebrows?”

Presumably that space contains the mechanism to make the eyes move and blink?

Jb996
Jb996
5 months ago

Yes, but what are they using? A steam engine?
The space is huge!
Regardless of how large the mechanism, why didn’t they remove the windshield, and put it inside?

Black Peter
Black Peter
5 months ago
Reply to  Jb996

You’re applying logic to something that makes no sense; logically, artistically, biologically, even, I bet, legally.

Dodsworth
Dodsworth
5 months ago

I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue. Blinky looks hungry-hungry.

The Mark
The Mark
5 months ago
Reply to  Dodsworth

Looks like I picked the wrong day to quit amphetamines

Dodsworth
Dodsworth
5 months ago
Reply to  The Mark

It’s coming right at us!

80
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x