Pretty much all concept cars land somewhere on the ridiculousness spectrum, whether it’s dubious styling cues, overly fantastical speculative technologies, or, I dunno, a lack of cupholders. As it should be, of course, because concept machines are all about “The car of tomorrow, today!” Nobody cares about “The car of today, today!”
Some concept cars, however, are truly ridiculous. Vehicles so absurd, it’s as if the possibility of future production in some form, in part or in whole, isn’t even a consideration. Heck, some concepts make me wonder if the designer even cared whether people liked them or not, and maybe if I interviewed the designer I would get something like, “The idea behind this design is ‘I just found I’m getting fired at the end of the year, so screw this stupid car company, I made this thing dumb on purpose to sink them.’ Also, I was inspired by natural forms.”


I’m sure there are at least a few concept cars that have lodged themselves in your data bank as designs that belong somewhere between whimsical and ridonculous, and we’re Autopian-asking you to share them with us now. Here are some that have stayed with me:

This manned missile is also in the topshot. It’s the General Motors XP-21 Firebird, “GM’s Newest Experiment on Wheels” as of 1954 and “the first gas turbine automobile ever to be built and tested in the United States,” per GM’s promotional story of the car. I first encountered the XP-21 in an extremely worn-out book that I frequently checked out of my elementary school library circa 1974. The other stars of the Big Three’s mid-50s show-car output were featured as well, but the XP-21 captured my imagination the most, as silly as the idea of a single-seater jet car was even to a first grader. I particularly enjoy the tail-mounted pitot tube. You know, for airspeed, because taking MPH readings via the wheels just wouldn’t do.

Ah, the Lancia Stratos HF Zero, a classic. It’s as outlandish as it is beautiful, and twice as impractical. Looking at the profile view above, it’s difficult to discern exactly how one enters and exits the thing, or positions themselves inside of it – and that’s before you even consider how tiny it is! Here it is in 1970’s Milan traffic:

Look at those two fellows in there, under glass like a museum display. I gotta believe the only visibility is straight out the steeply raked windshield, with absolutely nothing to be seen more than a few degrees off dead-ahead due to A-pillars so massive they are not pillars at all but are simply the sides of the body. What a silly and wonderful car.

And now, consider the Citroën Karin, the French carmaker’s glimpse into the future as envisioned from the then-present of 1980. Surely no design has ever had more tumblehome than this pyramid-shaped, six-eyed three-seater. With a properly sized roof, I’m confident this concept would have been quite handsome and completely believable as a production car in the near future of, say, 1990. But as presented, capped by a roof that likely has the same area as a pizza box, the Karin achieves a laugh-out-loud level of WTF. I only wish Citroën had really gone for it and given the Karin an iPad-sized sunroof.

One more, the Nissan Pivo. If the Cinderella’s coachness of it all isn’t ridiculous enough for you, consider that the Pivo pivots, like so:
I could go on, but it’s your turn: What Is The Most Ridiculous Concept Car?
M-505 Adams Brothers Probe 16 aka the Durango 95. It’s so ridiculous its passengers can’t even fit inside!
https://englishroam.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/CO_car.gif
Jeep Mighty FC ConceptAND I STILL WANT ONE!
Easy. The Homer
https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/The_Homer
Isn’t it obvious? One concept car was so ridiculously impractical it could never possibly be made in the form originally described.
https://www.theautopian.com/gm-sent-us-never-before-seen-sketches-of-the-pontiac-aztek-from-before-it-all-went-so-wrong/
To this day I still don’t understand why we can’t purchase replica kits of the Stratos Zero. I would totally daily that. Instead there are 158,000 versions of the Shelby Cobra *yawn*.
Not a Zero, but there is at least one Lancia Stratos kit, reportedly so accurate that the panels are sometimes used to repair the real deal. I don’t get why there are so many Cobras, either. Sure, they’re cheap to make and build—no roof with glass, no wind up windows, weatherstripping, no integrated windshield, dead simple, can fit nearly any drivetrain (though you’ll only ever see the same few), is fast even by today’s standards, is an iconic shape everyone knows (and knows is fake!), and can often be registered as a car from the years of the original cars, but that still doesn’t explain why there are so many providers nor why there’s so little variation, like they’re almost all 427s with their wider bodies. It’s too bad the Aceca has a very different shoulder line as it could otherwise use more of the same body molds and maybe we’d see some variation. A “what if” Aceca Cobra might be interesting and maybe even usable as a daily.
Tesla Roadster
Chrysler Turbine cars.
Yes a turbine engine that spins to 60,000 rpm and has 180-degree exhaust is the perfect choice for a family car.
And these maniacs actually put a few in the hands of the public!
1958 Ford X-2000
Weird for the sake of it… but I’ll say this, the windshield has to be the first of its kind. It’s a design of windshield that we wouldnt see for another 40 years…
That’s not an original show car, it’s a far more modern build inspired by the original concept that was only a scale model.
good to know
Luigi Colani on both volume and weird. https://www.colani.org/luigi_colani_Product_design_museum/Cars.html
I love how the Lancia on the street has a rear-view mirror stuck on the outside of the car.
Which car company is most likely to actually put an outlandish concept vehicle into production?
I’d say Nissan. I can see them selling the Pivo, at least during the Cube era.
Lunar Rover
Anything claiming to drive itself.
All of the autonomous pods. “With the wonders of self-driving, we’ve totally rethought what a car interior can be!” No you haven’t, it’s just a shaggin’ wagon with worse headroom. There’s nothing special about designing a living room on wheels, and the one standout feature–the autonomy–doesn’t actually exist, so what’s the point?
Do the Waymos driving around SF, LA, Austin, and Phoenix not count as autonomy? Or are you reflecting that the “pod designs” haven’t yet had the technology integrated?
The Karin reminds me a lot of the F-117. Stealth technology?
The 1957 Studebaker Astral has to be up there – gyroscopically balanced on one wheel, able to hover over water, powered by a miniaturized nuclear reactor, and equipped with an invisible force field to prevent collisions and protect against radiation
Except, of course, none of that technology existed (well, gyroscopes did, but it didn’t actually have one) – it was just a boat-like fiberglass shell with a display board propped up next to it
Runner-up, the Chrysler Halcyon, because it was pitched to dealers and investors as the replacement for the cancelled production-ready Airflow, and was supposed to show a replacement, production-intent model that would be worth the delay, except, it didn’t actually exist at all, it was just a serious of computer generated renderings of a car that was obviously totally impractical to produce in volume. So, they shit canned something viable and replaced it with a big nothing, despite the hype to to contrary
So many, but most things from Sbarro. The Ford Gyron was pretty wild, and shout out to my old friend’s concept, the Cadillac WTF
Alot of the 50s concept cars were pretty nuts followed by the 60s, all zany out there stuff
Like the wildcat cars
The firebirds
The lil universelle
The mustang concept
Then the next round id say was the late 80s to mid 90s
Waay to many to name
The 50s and early 60s were a time. Witness the Ford Gyron:
https://carstyling.ru/en/car/1961_ford_gyron/
I was going to say Stratos HF Zero after reading the headline but you beat me to it.
I’ve actually seen it live. It’s crazy but gorgeous. Ditto Ferrari Modulo.
Seeing the Zero live at the NY autoshow is the reason I became a car guy. The Countach that was there was amazing. But the Lancia literally blew my mind. I wanted more …
I may be 70, but I lived through the magnificent era of Italian exuberance of the 1960s and 1970s.
1958 Sir Vival, at Lane Motor Museum
https://www.lanemotormuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/sir_vival_1958_web1a-3b3.png
Ah yes, got to see this one in person recently. Seems that they’re still fixing it up.
I’m excited to see it finished. I used to see it a lot in Massachusetts.
Pretty much every Honda “concept” since the year 2000 has been nothing but the upcoming production vehicle with blacked out windows and nicer wheels than the production car would eventually get. Super Lazy, as far as Concepts go!
I’m going with the one that Amber Von Tussle drove at the Baltimore Auto Show in the original “Hairspray”
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_60806-Made-for-Movie.html
https://scontent-ord5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/464904279_8990861844281073_3280593739731897447_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=cf85f3&_nc_ohc=-xSRwkiiI68Q7kNvgGyFxvi&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-ord5-2.xx&_nc_gid=A1PYIsXMuZj6pqWaqPRy0tr&oh=00_AYDqeOOrdE4A4sZJK4HKuOc5wVcLHKppJX7qjQnXdCH2QA&oe=67A71366
I mean, if we’re going there, there’s the Coyote Bus Lines “Cyclops”, aka The Big Bus;
IMCDb.org: Made for Movie ‘Cyclops’ in “The Big Bus, 1976”
https://youtu.be/D5TSXmu525Y
Well, for that matter – Lets go back to Bob Hope and his Special Roadster:
https://www.pjsautoworld.com/vehicles/277/1948-mercury-templeton-saturn-bob-hope-special-roadster
The Rinspeed Splash was an amphibious sports car whose spoiler folded 180 degrees into the rear hydrofoil. It really worked too: Rinspeed AG – Splash
Rinspeed later made a truly submersible Lotus Elise in homage to the James Bond Lotus Espirit with a very aughts-era gauge cluster: Rinspeed AG – sQuba
It was also fully functional.
I’ve always liked the way the Ford Nucleon brought the crazy. 5,000 miles between fill-ups. Talk about range anxiety.
This is definitely my choice. It’s hard to beat “powered by a nuclear reactor” when it comes to being an outlandish concept car.
It’s so wonderfully mid century – household nuclear devices, but likely no seatbelts.
Don’t forget the ashtrays and cigarette lighters!
“Smoking while refueling is no longer a concern! What an age we live in!”
Not a concept CAR, but I’d put ‘The Nukeseidon Airdventure right up there!
https://nypost.com/2022/06/27/inside-giant-flying-luxury-hotel-that-can-stay-in-the-air-for-years/?fbclid=IwY2xjawIOMOFleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHQBN3Z0i_9JmgR1EingXFqjW2Lu3PMcfTkPLL678BDR-fdYt0IcfLaz4yg_aem_FI9fLWVq8j-zv_65EUJy7w
And, when asked how many people it would take to fly this gigantic plane, he said: “All this technology and you still want pilots?”
Ummm none of that technology actually exists, so why not say it’s piloted by trained hamsters?