Home » What Lost Styling Cues Would You Like To Make A Comeback? Autopian Asks

What Lost Styling Cues Would You Like To Make A Comeback? Autopian Asks

Aa Styling Ts Copy
ADVERTISEMENT

Car design evolves alongside the technology that’s under the metal. Each era of car design can usually be defined by a type of style. The cars of today are often angry blobs while trucks, crossovers, and SUVs have lots of sharp edges, bulging bodywork, and hoods taller than the Sears Tower. As styling evolves, many cues get lost along the way. What styling cues would you love to see make a comeback?

If you haven’t noticed, I’m a huge fan of past car design. Sure, all of my cars are modern rides, but I drool over what used to be. I love classic British motorcycle design and I live for the aircraft carrier deck-length metal and the sharp fins of the 1950s. I adore how the country was so obsessed with the jet age that cars got afterburner-style taillights and the model names made references to rockets, jets, and space.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I mean, just take a look at what a modern Chevrolet Impala looks like:

Chevrolet Impala 2013 Images 3

And what you used to be able to get:

ADVERTISEMENT

Chevrolet Impala 1958 Photos 3

You know what? I’ll take that cute dress, too. It’s amazing how far some nameplates have come from their origins. It’s also really neat how the modern car tries to nod to the past, just look at the beltline in the rear there. But, I bet they could have gone a step further; add a bit of space.

The 1950s traits of huge fins, dazzling lights, miles of chrome, and bold colors capture every bit of my heart. Some of this stuff, like massive fins, might not work well in the modern day. But I’d love to see that space-age enthusiasm again. Give us cars that look like they were formed at Mach 1 and with lights that look ready to blast you off into space. Oh, and please give us bold colors without ripping us off for them!

Another era I love is the 1930s and early 1940s, when automakers experimented with streamlining and touches we would call Art Deco today.

1935 Chrysler Imperial Airflow 1
Gooding & Company

Cars looked like teardrops flowing through the wind and they were adorned with elaborate, but classy brightwork. Automakers even put in a huge effort in the cab with relatively intricate door panels and dashboards that were as functional as they were beautiful.

ADVERTISEMENT

I have no idea how any of this stuff could be implemented in the modern day. I suppose the Hyundai Ioniq 6 is a good example of a modern streamliner. I’d love to see Art Deco with a modern twist.

How about you? What’s a design era or some styling cues that you’d love to see on a modern car?

(Topshot: GM)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
182 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lew Schiller
Lew Schiller
5 months ago

Happy faces. So over “Looks aggressive” (as Man Bun Boy said in one of those Chevrolet commercials Mahk mocked back a while) styling.

Ncbrit
Ncbrit
5 months ago

Slant nose/no grill. Like a Rover SD1 or Opel/Vauxhall Carlton

Church
Church
5 months ago

I definitely want to bring back taillights that look like the engines from a rocket ship. Like the kind of rocket ship you saw in bad serials. Let me pretend to be Flash Gordon!

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
5 months ago
Reply to  Church

I liked those too, growing up. But they always seemed counterintuitive as they got brighter when “firing the retrorockets”/braking.

Merl Lewis
Merl Lewis
5 months ago

Bumpers that are distinct styling elements that also provided protection to the lights and such from minor hits. How much does it cost to replace an active matrix headlight? Why is it hanging out in the wind waiting for Sumdood with his borrowed trailer to smash misjudging a turn at a gas station?

Hangover Grenade
Hangover Grenade
5 months ago

Tires with a decent sidewall. I went from 18″ wheels to 16″ wheels on my BMW and the ride is so much better.

Bob the Hobo
Bob the Hobo
5 months ago

Larger sidewall also means you don’t have to worry about scratching your wheels on a curb in a tight drive thru or parallel parking situation.

Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
5 months ago
Reply to  Bob the Hobo

And means you’re not going to need new tires and rims for hitting a pothole too fast. The one thing I hated about my old vehicle was that in order to get heated seats it also came with upsized wheels. It was a factor that pushed me towards a Wrangler.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
5 months ago

I just dropped from 18s to 15, while keeping same outer diameter. Plus my 18’s were obscenely heavy for some reason and my 15s are on the light side of 15s. So between sidewall and unsprung weight changes, my car feels like I just put it on all new suspension the contrast is so significant.

Tbird
Tbird
5 months ago

I miss color most – particularly interior colors. All the GM A-bodies my friends moms drove had blue, red or green velour interiors. Chrome was passé when I started to drive (early ’90s) but I still like it if tasteful. I think the backlash was mostly against the ’70s barges that had chrome and nothing else to offer (although if money was no object I’d own a Godzilla powered Lincoln MarkV)

Alan Christensen
Alan Christensen
5 months ago

Chromelessness, 2-door coupes, and real colors

Last edited 5 months ago by Alan Christensen
Tbird
Tbird
5 months ago

The early ’80s Jack Telnack Fords were a revelation and made most other American competitors look obsolete overnight. Compare the ’83 Thunderbird to the ’83 Cutlass. The original Taurus was ground breaking in design (if not the mechanicals). Even the lowly Tempo at least LOOKED slippery and new.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
5 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

And if you come across a first-gen Taurus today, they STILL manage to look pleasingly futuristic. Which I find funny given that the third gen (ovoid) one looks terribly dated.

Tbird
Tbird
5 months ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

Owned an Gen2, ’94 SHO 5 speed. Still kicking myself for selling it (would not fit a circa 2005 rear facing car seat). The design of these still looks modern. Same with the ’91 Gen1 Sable I had prior as a winter/work beater. That car had features the later gen lacked, plus red interior on white body. It had adjustable rear seat head rests and a small rear parcel storage cubby (that fit a Kenwood 6disk CD changer). Very comfy car although the 3.0 Vulcan was short on power. The SHO had great front seats though and the Yamahammer motor.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
5 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

The second gen may be the most modern-looking one of them all; the front end treatment really did it I think. I still love the spaceship look of the first gen, but the second gen is the long-term choice.

Last edited 5 months ago by Jack Trade
Cleverusername
Cleverusername
5 months ago

Pop-up headlights!
Chrome!
Whitewalls!
Vinyl tops!

Alan Christensen
Alan Christensen
5 months ago
Reply to  Cleverusername

You’re just saying this to annoy me, right? ;D

Cleverusername
Cleverusername
5 months ago

Okay, instead of whitewalls, raised white letters!

Boy, I’m showing my age!

Alan Christensen
Alan Christensen
5 months ago
Reply to  Cleverusername

You know, there was a time when car tires were all white. Maybe what we need now is white tires with black sidewalls.

Merl Lewis
Merl Lewis
5 months ago
Reply to  Cleverusername

You know a Maverick with baby moons and medium width whitewalls might look good.

Austin Vail
Austin Vail
5 months ago
Reply to  Cleverusername

I for one agree with all but the vinyl tops. Vinyl tops age like milk and rust the crap out of your roof when they do. I don’t even like vinyl convertible tops (canvas is the way to go), vinyl is just a bad choice of exterior material in cars.

Goose
Goose
5 months ago

Squared off designs, mainly for 2 box designs. So wagons, hatchbacks, SUVs, etc that actually have a roof that fully extends over the cargo area. Not some weird sloping rear end that eats into storage space while also looking horrible just to get a few hundredths of a mpg. I bought a 2 box for space, not to hypermile. Somehow things like the G Wagon, Bronco, Wrangler, and most full size SUVs can manage it.

Last edited 5 months ago by Goose
Bearddevil
Bearddevil
5 months ago

Bright colors and carrying the body color into the interior.

Viking Longcar
Viking Longcar
5 months ago
Reply to  Bearddevil

^^So Much This^^

Library of Context
Library of Context
5 months ago

Frameless doors and no B pillar on sedans.

Last edited 5 months ago by Library of Context
VanGuy
VanGuy
5 months ago

I feel like removing the B pillars means the A and (new B/old C) pillars would have to be insanely thick to meet rollover/crash standards.

Austin Vail
Austin Vail
5 months ago
Reply to  VanGuy

Also the place where the rear doors are mounted is basically a vertical post with no reinforcement coming from the roof. Not exactly good for side impact safety.

I agree pillarless sedans are sexy, but they are very problematic to design.

Hondaimpbmw 12
Hondaimpbmw 12
5 months ago
Reply to  Austin Vail

But pillarless 2 doors don’t lose as much as 4 doors. Of course one could go the 4 door continental convertible route. It would flex like a wet noodle, but damn, they sure look good!

MikeInTheWoods
MikeInTheWoods
5 months ago

Those vent windows behind the A pillar. Then interesting colors, finally wagons or hatches that are useful and not angled, low window nonsense.

Harvey Firebirdman
Harvey Firebirdman
5 months ago
Reply to  MikeInTheWoods

+1 for vent windows not biased here at all (my 92 d250 has them, had a k5 that had them, my dad has a 57 bel air)

Merl Lewis
Merl Lewis
5 months ago
Reply to  MikeInTheWoods

I really want the pop open way back windows. There is so much less wind noise with them open.

Hondaimpbmw 12
Hondaimpbmw 12
5 months ago
Reply to  Merl Lewis

2 door hot hatches w/ flip open back windows like my 89 Civic SI had. Remote operation would be desirable.

Inthemikelane
Inthemikelane
5 months ago
Reply to  Hondaimpbmw 12

Yes! Had two different 2 door sedans with manuals, and a Dodge minivan with the power pop outs. At low speeds, it reduced the need for A/C just with the airflow. If we can’t have A pillar vents at least bring these back.

Root Beer
Root Beer
5 months ago
Reply to  Hondaimpbmw 12

Hell yeah, that’s what I had too. The Plymouth Voyager I grew up with had those, with the remote operation aspect, now that I think about it.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
5 months ago

Quarter windows

Also, tail fins might be fun to try out again, maybe not to the late ’50s extremes, but something more subtle like where they started

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
5 months ago

If there’s ever a peak era for car design, it’s after the excesses of the 50’s. The Coke-bottle 60’s had the best-looking cars.
2nd Gen Corvair 4-door
1st Gen Chevelle
2nd Gen Cutlass
Just about any 60’s Mopar

Coke Bottle!

Tbird
Tbird
5 months ago

It’s before my time but I think American car design reached its absolute peak in the ’60s. Many of these designs still look clean and modern to my eyes, without the later battering ram ’70s bumpers. The early jellybean cars (Taurus, etc) from the 80s are a high point too. They ushered in the modern era.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
5 months ago

First gen Charger. 66 Newport/NewYorker/300, especially in wagon form. yeah 60s mopar has some hits for sure.

Hondaimpbmw 12
Hondaimpbmw 12
5 months ago

I liked the 1st gen compact Fairlane (big Falcon),
2nd gen Corvair coupé,
2nd gen Malibu
1st gen Grand Prix w/ the optional finned Aluminum brakes. (2nd gen close runner up along w/ the Chevy 2 Dr coupé of the same years)
1st gen Cameros
1st gen Nova 2 door hardtop.

Sure, they were big and didn’t handle well (except for the Fairlane and the Corvair), but they sure looked swoopy. Real bumpers, big trunks, stout engines (sadly, today’s Camary could out run them all and get better mileage while doing it).none of them had a B pillar.

Last edited 5 months ago by Hondaimpbmw 12
MrLM002
MrLM002
5 months ago

External bumpers, and with that make them 5-MPH bumpers.

Alan Christensen
Alan Christensen
5 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

I suspect the auto insurance industry, who pushed for 5mph bumpers because most of their claims were for low speed collisions, backed off their stance after they realized anything over 5mph cost them more.

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
5 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

Make them all-chrome and ban black rubber strips and you have a deal.

Cerberus
Cerberus
5 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

Especially on low end cars that are likely to end up in learner’s hands. Porsche had a good way of doing them in the ’80s where they were body colored with rub strips that blended in with the body lines decently well. How much environmental waste is there in replacing covers that are treated as sacrificial as well as aggravation? And from experience, those 5mph bumpers were good for well more than that and even when they did sustain some minor damage, it wasn’t so obvious like the papier mache covers they put on now.

VanGuy
VanGuy
5 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

I feel like there’s no winning with this, though. I’m sure they would have bad effects on aerodynamics and fuel economy for the front, and if you can’t put the backup camera or (for example) adaptive cruise control sensors on them or behind them, making them be put higher up…kinda defeats themselves.

MrLM002
MrLM002
5 months ago
Reply to  VanGuy

There’s nothing stopping automakers from making the front facia rubber instead of hard plastic and in doing so have it serve the purpose of a 5 MPH bumper. They just make it out of shitty brittle plastic.

Austin Vail
Austin Vail
5 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

If I can hit the bumper of a ’69 GTO with a hammer and it bounces back to its correct shape in an instant, then why can’t modern cars have Endura noses that do the same?

Tbird
Tbird
5 months ago

Modern cars are so much better built, but GOD are they boring looking. We get a new car and expect to do little more than oil changes for 100,000 miles. I remember when cars were near worn out at 60,000. Starters, alternators, water pumps were normal replacement items. Spark plugs, distributor caps and rotors were replaced every few 3000 mile oil changes. Carbs constantly needing adjustment, vapor lock or cold start issues. Vacuum leaks. Twenty year old cars now have less rust than 5 year old cars from my youth. Why do they all look boring or angry? Where is the color?

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
5 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

They’re angry because they know they’re gonna be driven into the dirt- average US car is 14 years old.

Tbird
Tbird
5 months ago

I’m guilty, my fleet is 19, 17 and 10 years old. All still running like near new.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
5 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

20, 20, 32. Not quite running like new.

Tbird
Tbird
5 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

It’s before my time but I think American car design reached its absolute peak in the ’60s. Many of these designs still look clean and modern to my eyes, without the later battering ram ’70s bumpers. The early jellybean cars (Taurus, etc) from the 80s are a high point too. They ushered in the modern era.

Tricky Motorsports
Tricky Motorsports
5 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

It’s my favorite decade, all 3 of my project cars are from that decade: Bronco, Fairlady, and Travelcrew.

Harvey Firebirdman
Harvey Firebirdman
5 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

It is modern commercialization for you. Everything is boring look at companies logos or changes to buildings like McDonalds everything used to be much more colorful and fun now nope boring colors, fonts, styles and so on. I feel like the neutral people from Futurama have taken over all the design teams for everything nowadays.

VanGuy
VanGuy
5 months ago

I mean, if you ask me, I have no strong feelings one way or the other.

Dalton
Dalton
5 months ago

Im not sure what the design language is called, but whatever the hell was going on with 80’s Citroens, i want that back.

Joke #119!
Joke #119!
5 months ago

Wagons that carry large items easily, like a flatbed truck with a cover. Used to be that tons of cars had a wagon design. Vega, Pinto, Ford LTD. I don’t need the extra passenger space, but others might.
So, just make a Corolla or Prius Wagon, and I’ll buy it. Preferably manual, with a sportier engine.

Wait, I already own a Toyota Matrix XRS (actually a Toyota Corolla Matrix XRS, according to the owners manual).

Abdominal Snoman
Abdominal Snoman
5 months ago

I’m waiting for someone to say curb feelers…

Honestly though I miss swoopy fenders that go around the wheel then tapers down while the car widens as it gets to the passenger compartment.

And colors too

Austin Vail
Austin Vail
5 months ago

I think all curb feelers were aftermarket, you can still get them and install them on modern cars if you want. Very practical if you have low profile tires and huge rims you don’t want to scratch.

Scott Wangler
Scott Wangler
5 months ago

The monotony of white, black silver/grey and all the cars even among different manufacturers look very similar, primarily driven by the master we call mpg and government rules. I want diversity back.

Nate Stanley
Nate Stanley
5 months ago

Split rear window A La boat tail Riviera on a 2 door coupe.

Lew Schiller
Lew Schiller
5 months ago
Reply to  Nate Stanley

Lovely to look at but annoying to live with

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
5 months ago

I miss actual, separate fenders. This plastic crap splashed on at random (lookin at you, Subaru) just…blech.

And pop-up headlights: they’re funky & cheerful.

Harvey Firebirdman
Harvey Firebirdman
5 months ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

+1 for pop ups no I am not biased or anything

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
5 months ago

+2 on pop ups.

I’m excited though about the potential for headlights with electronically-changing opacity, so they could turn to body color in a section-staggered way that mimics pop ups.

Austin Vail
Austin Vail
5 months ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

My NA Miata is the only car I get excited to drive at night. There’s something about seeing the lights in the up position while driving that never gets old.

VanGuy
VanGuy
5 months ago
Reply to  Austin Vail

I just can’t get over the idea of the aerodynamic effect…plus I’m a safety nut who drives my headlights on all the time.

Alexk98
Alexk98
5 months ago

Just make cars look friendly and happy again. I’m so sick of angry cars.

Harvey Firebirdman
Harvey Firebirdman
5 months ago

80s wedge mobiles (not you cybertruck) Hopefully the Hyundai n vision 74 becomes a thing but without the hydrogen that is.

Last edited 5 months ago by Harvey Firebirdman
TOSSABL
TOSSABL
5 months ago

Yeah! X1/9, Subaru XT (pistol-grip shifter ftw!)

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
5 months ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

Buick Somerset! Chevy Beretta! Dodge 600!

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
5 months ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

Triumph TR7 – The Shape of Things That Came and Went.

Joke #119!
Joke #119!
5 months ago

Lancia Scorpion. Used to work next to a dealer, and before I knew about their shitty construction. Owned a 1983 Starion.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
5 months ago

The current Elantra isn’t far from this. I really dig its low, sloping wedge hood treatment.

Nlpnt
Nlpnt
5 months ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

If only Hyundai had the guts to make it a liftback.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
5 months ago
Reply to  Nlpnt

I can see it happening, maybe. The Korean firms get that with the domestics having exited the car business to build big SUVs/trucks + niche stuff, the pure car market is theirs.

I could see Hyundai offering a hatch version at some point to easily peel off a few otherwise crossover buyers.

1 2 3 4
182
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x