Home » What Supposedly Super-Reliable Car Was A Lemon For You (And Vice Versa)?

What Supposedly Super-Reliable Car Was A Lemon For You (And Vice Versa)?

Aa Reliable Lemons
ADVERTISEMENT

Of all the things we want our cars to be, “reliable” is always way up at the top of the list. No matter how narrowly focused a car may otherwise be as an off-roader or street carver or luxurious cruiser or something else, the one thing we’d all like the machine to do is start, run, and return us home (or to the finish line or trailhead) without breaking down or failing to start in the first place.

And when it comes to daily drivers and work vehicles, nothing trumps reliability. No one can afford to be late or miss a job with any regularity. Everyone needs reliable transportation, and a reputation for reliability can only be earned. No amount of marketing can spin a car that lets customers down into one they can count on.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

For a lot of buyers, that means Honda and Toyota top their preferred brands list, though they aren’t the only reliability stars. Getting more granular, specific models like Civic, Corolla, Accord, and Camry are singled out for bulletproofness. More knowledgeable car buyers might advise budget-conscious shoppers to look for anything with a Buick 3800 V6 for day-in, day-out infallible transpo.

No matter what advice you’ve gotten or like to give about which cars can be counted on and which to avoid, there are always surprises. A low-mile Corolla that somehow becomes the bane of your motoring existence. The high-mileage luxury European car everyone told you not to buy has, incredibly, never let you down. And so, today we’re asking What Supposedly Super-Reliable Car Was A Lemon For You (And Vice Versa)? 

Says Matt,

ADVERTISEMENT

People always complain about old German luxury cars, but my 240k-mile BMW is great. I treat it like a Honda Civic and, other than a flare up here or there, it acts like a Honda Civic. I realize by saying this I’m dooming myself.

Bmw E39 Steal
Click the graphic to read Matt’s story, “I Spent $3,000 On A BMW With 234,000 Miles And It’s The Best Car I’ve Ever Purchased”

I fully expect that Matt’s BMW, now jinxed, will strand him within a fortnight. (Yeah, I say “fortnight” now.)

David, meanwhile, had a terrible experience with what shoulda been a no-worries ride:

I bought a 1995 Honda Accord; it was, to this day, the biggest piece of shit I’ve ever owned. Everything broke at once, and it wasn’t that easy to fix. I loathed it. And the fifth gear synchro didn’t work. Could it have been abused? Sure. But that doesn’t excuse it abusing me.

1995 Honda Accord
A 1995 Honda Accord (a reliable one, probably) via Rhomega Motors

Matt piped in:

Screenshot 2025 01 31 At 1.14.52 pm

Between a Honda Accord and Saturn Vue, I would not have picked the Vue as the reliable daily. Who would?

ADVERTISEMENT

Stephen also hated an Accord. Am I taking crazy pills?

One of my most-difficult to own/fix was one that ha sa reputation for not breaking. ’08 Honda Accord Sedan, I bought it off of a local door guy that had just gotten in a RF fender-bender (with accompanying DUI) and hit the local Pick n Pull to piece it back together. Fender, headlight, bumper cover, fender skirt, brackets, etc. Once it was back together and painted, I kept getting an transmission shifting issue that pointed towards the speed sensor. Popped a new one in, same issue. The part I purchased had the same dimensions and connections as the one it replaced, so I figured there must be some other internal issue with that transmission. Sold the car for cheap with the concern. Later, I learned that Honda uses both an input and output speed sensor on that transmission that both use the exact-same pigtail connector and are identical! Of course the sensor that I had swapped out was The Good One (Input) and all the next owner had to do was swap out the Output sensor. A solid learning experience.

Your turn! What Supposedly Super-Reliable Car Was A Lemon For You (And Vice Versa)?

Top graphic: Toyota

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tbird
Tbird
21 minutes ago

I face this dichotomy when comparing my old 1999 Grand Cherokee 4.0L and current 2005 Acura MDX.

The Jeep needed 1 transmission rebuild, significant front end work (ball joints, wheel bearings, tie rod ends), AC compressor, it ate cooling fan relays, multiple electrical components and rusted like the devil.

The MCX has needed a timing belt (water pump), a radiator (installed trans cooler), AC compressor, and much less rust repair. It’s due for front struts.

I’m not counting brakes, shocks and consumables in my tally. I almost feel I’ve done more work on the Honda, yet has seemed less intense.

Once again, there is more confidence the Acura will start and run every time.

Last edited 15 minutes ago by Tbird
Eggsalad
Eggsalad
26 minutes ago

As the saying goes, “Miata is always the answer”. Mine was an electrical nightmare. I had to replace virtually every electrical component one-by-one. Battery, e-fans, blower motor, just about every light bulb, alternator, and even the horn!

The Pigeon
The Pigeon
26 minutes ago

Not mine, but I saw a Yugo in Trinidad, CO at a grocery store ~25 years ago. As I was admiring it, the owner (~60ish woman) arrived and she said it was the most reliable car she ever owned. Just basic maintenance and oil changes.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
34 minutes ago

As far as reliable cars, our family had terrible luck – our Caprice Classic Brougham, Horizon, and Tempo were all pieces of garbage, spent more time on tow trucks than on the road

As far as unreliable – GM’s dustbuster vans were supposed to be terrible in that regard, but the worst our Lumina APV ever had was that the windshield wipers would sometimes randomly stop working. Which, yeah, they shouldn’t do that, but at least it didn’t leave you stranded, we just kept the windshield coated in Rain-X

I also had a Volvo 940 Turbo that would refuse to start when hot about 25-50% of the time, and a Cadillac Fleetwood that was just one failure after another at 10 years old

On the other hand, I now also have a 61 year old Chevy that, over the past 4 years, has only needed oil changes and routine maintenance. Granted, I’ve driven it less than 20,000 miles in that time, but that’s included a couple of 1,000+ mile weekend road trips and heavy use on weekends outside of salt season, honestly expected a lot more nickle and diming than I’ve had, sort of surprising for the age.

Matt Sexton
Matt Sexton
38 minutes ago

Oh no you don’t. It’s running fine at the moment, I don’t dare.

Fuzzyweis
Fuzzyweis
41 minutes ago

I guess I’ll say our Forester, whole family on both sides has Subarus, they all love them, we get a 2014, got it used but southern car with low miles and having a similar experience as Matt had, headlight bulbs, battery, front control arms, rear bushings, the led 3rd brake light??? how tf does that fail? Nothing even related to the boxer 4 or cvt, just weird crap, and still not even 100k on it!

Fjord
Fjord
43 minutes ago

My ’84 Cherokee had to take the ride of shame three times in a year thanks to overheating issues that could not be exorcised, and got fired by the family. Conversely, I’ve had two LeCars and they were rock solid including multiple long road trips.

Bruno Ealo
Bruno Ealo
45 minutes ago

The first was a 1987 Chevy Nova “Toyota Corolla “ that blew a head gasket at 16k,ate tires like they were free,and was rusty within 3 years.The second was a 1999 Sentra that loved new wheel bearings,control arm bushings,and all the air bag sensors were replaced 2x under warranty because the dealer couldn’t pinpoint which one kept setting the warning off,then Nissan sends an extended warranty card for the CVT and yes,both were purchased new.

Tbird
Tbird
46 minutes ago

I had a used first year ’88 W-body Regal during college with a MPFI 2.8L. That much maligned engine was bulletproof for me, unfortunately rest of the car broke around it. Needed a transmission rebuild, the rear disk brakes lasted a year at most before freezing, coils, electrical issues… the list goes on. There was always a problem, that needed attention NOW. Changing spark plugs involved rotating the engine forward, the alternator was a nightmare to replace due to access. The body was solid, these were well rustproofed. I swore off GM after that disaster, in part due the maintainability issues; everything was twice as hard as it should have been.

A few years later had a ’94 Taurus SHO 5 speed and a ’96 Thunderbird, 4.6L. Both of those were near dead nuts reliable. Neither broke down, left me stranded or needed much beyond routine maintenance. I never needed a clutch or other expensive, possibly shop repair. I performed the SHO timing belt and valve lash adjustment myself over a weekend, as well as replacing a radiator at some point. I did most repairs myself when I could and neither car seemed to suffer.

I think the difference is doing maintenance on my schedule, not the cars. I will gladly schedule or perform anything required with notice. Being stranded pisses me off.

Last edited 38 minutes ago by Tbird
RalliartWagon
RalliartWagon
48 minutes ago

Vice Versa: 2003 Dodge Dakota V6. Conventional wisdom of Chrysler quality meant it should have been a nightmare. That thing was truly bulletproof, absolutely nothing outside of regular maintenance. I put about 150k miles on it, donated to my brother, who put on another 100k. Remains the gold standard in my family for problem-free driving, above some Japanese cars. I just assume I used up all my luck though, as I haven’t bought an American brand since!

Theblackdog
Theblackdog
50 minutes ago

For the surprisingly reliable side, my 1997 Hyundai Elantra wagon with a manual transmission. This was when Hyundai was thought of as being a cheap car that broke if you so much as looked at them wrong, but it was also the time when they were finally pulling their act together and producing better engines and cars.

My parents got it used in 2000 with 50,000 miles and I bought it from them in 2004 during college. That thing went through a lot with us. Lots of long road trips in AZ and NM and we never had a breakdown. I did have to replace the clutch in 2009 mostly due to my then BF being an absolute shit driver with one. Only twice did I have something happen that left me stranded. Once the positive battery cable had broken inside the insulation so it wasn’t obvious so it would not start. Another time the alternator died while I was driving through Pittsburgh so I had to get a tow, but once that was fixed I was golden. Otherwise it was all basically maintenance to keep that car going.

The one extra weird repair was in 2016 the plastic disc that was on the back of the clutch pedal that pushed in the switch on the floor to let the starter motor run cracked in half, but I was able to source a similar one and fix it within a day.

I finally sent it to the scrapyard in 2019 with 228000 miles on it and a clutch that was starting to slip, and that was only because I inherited my late FIL’s Jeep Wrangler and we didn’t have the space for 3 cars.

Luxx
Luxx
50 minutes ago

2014 Toyota Camry. Only good thing on that car was the engine, it was a strong running, clean burning engine. The rest of the car was crap.

-torque converter was going out at the time I sold it
-paint would chip if you looked at it funny
-came out one morning to find that the bumper broke itself
-various squeaks and rattles through the dash and headliner, depending on temperature

Sold the car with 141k on it, bought a Jeep Renegade. Which was completely reliable, oddly enough.

Tbird
Tbird
40 minutes ago
Reply to  Luxx

Huh, my daily is a 2014 Camry hybrid with 241,000k. The paint still looks good (ungaraged) aside from stone chips. It is rattle free and solid as new, most surfaces look as new too. These are durable, not necessarily luxurious.

57
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x