Home » Which Cars Are Most Guilty Of Looking Way More Powerful, Fast, Or Capable Than They Actually Are?

Which Cars Are Most Guilty Of Looking Way More Powerful, Fast, Or Capable Than They Actually Are?

Aa Looks Fast Is Slow Copy
ADVERTISEMENT

“Don’t let your mouth write a check your ass can’t cash!” is a taunt you’ve hopefully never heard outside of television (it originated with Flip Wilson, what?), and it always struck me as weird. It means “don’t say fighting words you can’t back up with fighting skill,” but in that case shouldn’t the saying be, “Don’t let your mouth write a check your fists can’t cash”? I can’t say I’ve ever seen a fight that involved battling buttocks, but maybe it’s a regional thing. As for check-writing and ass-cashing with cars, it’s styling that scribbles out the checks and performance that does the cashing–be it in the form of sublime handling, prodigious power, terrain-taming capability, or superior luxury swaddling. Some cars and trucks live up to the expectations set by their sheetmetal quite admirably. See virtually every supercar and most scooped and spoiler’d hot-rod versions of solid-performing sport sedans and coupes from the big brands. And Jeeps of the Wrangler persuasion, and Broncos of the not-Sport variety–with those, what you see actually is what you get. However … 
Dmc Bricklin

There are plenty of cars currently for sale and many, many machines of the past that wrote some downright extravagant checks and absolutely did not deliver the cold, hard cash of a suitably exciting/capable/luxurious driving experience. Suspects that immediately spring to mind are the hobbled C3 Corvettes that were foisted onto mustachioed men and disco ladies of the mid-70s; the very sexy Bricklin SV-1 that was so slow Time‘s Dan Neil proclaimed, “This thing couldn’t outrun the Rose Bowl Parade;” and the wonderful, terrible DeLorean DMC-12. Seriously, John Z, a Peugeot/Renault/Volvo-sourced 130 horsepower SOHC V6? Sure, we know you had much bigger dreams for the DMC-12 and we get why that lump landed in there, but still–blech.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Now you tell us: which cars are most guilty of looking way more powerful, fast, or capable than they actually are?

To the comments!

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
125 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10001010
10001010
1 year ago

<Insert photo of my BRZ here>

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 year ago
Reply to  10001010

Twins! I’ve got a GT86.

That car does not need two 3” tail pipes as standard.

We do all our road trips in it and my other half still can’t get past it looking impractical while having more luggage space than her sensible Suzuki Swift and getting 47mpg (UK).

I’m sick of explaining to non car people that it’s famously slow and to Google it.

Wonderful car for throwing around twisty roads though.

10001010
10001010
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Muppet

My betterhalf drives a Crosstrek so she wins the practicality challenge. She’s got it in her head that we can’t go grocery shopping in the BRZ despite us doing it numerous times and the groceries all fitting in the trunk and occasionally the back seat as well. That trunk opening is really small though, I’d kill to have a rear hatch on that car, and t-tops, and a turbo 😉

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 year ago
Reply to  10001010

It’s a hatch and a turbo away from perfect, and of the two I’d rather have a hatch.

MAX FRESH OFF
MAX FRESH OFF
1 year ago

First-gen US Honda CRX. 60 HP from the “HF” high fuel efficiency model, 91 HP for the Si. Autoweek said it was “outgunned by various jet skis or John Deere products.”

https://www.autoweek.com/drives/a1926591/1987-honda-crx-si-drive-review/#:~:text=Even%20the%20CRX%20Si%20and,skis%20or%20John%20Deere%20products.

Dan Pritts
Dan Pritts
1 year ago
Reply to  MAX FRESH OFF

HF backed up its claims … tremendous fuel efficiency.

MAX FRESH OFF
MAX FRESH OFF
1 year ago
Reply to  Dan Pritts

My HF got the highest fuel mileage of any car I have driven but I needed to redline the engine to get up to freeway speed. Still, (slow car fast = fun) and it was a hoot to drive in the twisties.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 year ago
Reply to  MAX FRESH OFF

My 1986 CRX 16i16 had 125bhp.

I loved that car.

Toecutter
Toecutter
1 year ago

1st and 2nd gen Toyota MR2.

10001010
10001010
1 year ago
Reply to  Toecutter

The 2nd gen turbos were respectably quick.

Jakob K's Garage
Jakob K's Garage
1 year ago
Reply to  10001010

Yes but the 2ng gen looked a lot faster than the first, so… 😉

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 year ago
Reply to  Toecutter

I’ve had both, and the mk1 had the performance of a tiny sportscar, which is just what it looked like.

The mk2 was faster, even the NA one.

This might be a UKvsUS thing because over here we didn’t have cheap cars with big engines to make speed accessible.

OnceInAMillenia
OnceInAMillenia
1 year ago

100% the Honda CRZ. Looks like it should be a GTI rivaling hot hatch, or at least a modern, tuner-friendly Civic DX replacement. Instead it was a less practical, half the doors, half the seats version of the Fit with barely 130HP

Last edited 1 year ago by OnceInAMillenia
Acrimonious Mofo
Acrimonious Mofo
1 year ago

It makes a great first car for a teenager because it looks the business, but it’s slow AF and they can’t pile a bunch of their peers inside. It also gets decent gas mileage, and the hatch makes it very practical for sports stuff, and/or moving to college.

Lew Schiller
Lew Schiller
1 year ago

I’ve long thought it would be jolly fun to buy a nice example of the worst malaise era Corvette then show up at all the Corvette Club events and be all up about being “One of the Guys”. “Hi..uh..Lew..yeah ..uh..nice…car”

Scoutdude
Scoutdude
1 year ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

I briefly considered getting a disco Vette for a toy recently but picked up something else instead. Sure they are bog slow by today’s standards but being powered by a SBC means it is super easy and relatively cheap to crank up the power to reasonable or unreasonable levels. I had found a pretty decent price on a car with a perfect red interior and just the right amount of exterior patina, but it was a few hour drive away and ultimately didn’t go take a look at it before it dropped off of craigslist.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 year ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

Still be cooler than showing up in a C5.

Lincoln Clown CaR
Lincoln Clown CaR
1 year ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

Based on the cars from the Corvette Club that show up at my local parades, you’d fit right in. Assuming your spouse is waving at the crowd with giant Mickey Mouse gloves, that is.

Idiotking
Idiotking
1 year ago

1968-1973 Opel GT. Oh, the sexy good looks; ugh the performance.

Griznant
Griznant
1 year ago
Reply to  Idiotking

Have one, it’s a beautiful little car. Performance be damned, it’s just so well sculpted I forgive it for writing checks it can’t cash.

Idiotking
Idiotking
1 year ago
Reply to  Griznant

i am insanely jealous.

Matt Wishart
Matt Wishart
1 year ago

My ’77 Monza Spyder has spoilers and graphics and makes (made?) all of 145hp from the 305. I’m not sure how many horses are still in there, but the 4 barrel and aluminium manifold don’t appear to have wrangled any extra.

Old Busted Hotness
Old Busted Hotness
1 year ago
Reply to  Matt Wishart

You need leaf blowers or a supercharger trailer.

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 year ago
Reply to  Matt Wishart

Don’t care: still want one

Joe The Drummer
Joe The Drummer
1 year ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

Best looking US small car ever. I’ve wanted to drop a warmed-over Buick Turbo V6 and a T-5 in one for years… if I can ever find one that’s not rusted in half, smashed up, made into an 1/8th-mile car, or all three.

Thomas Ogle
Thomas Ogle
1 year ago
Reply to  Matt Wishart

If it is a Mirage you are my hero. My teenage self was in love with those cars.

Aron9000
Aron9000
1 year ago

Also 1980’s Cadillacs got me thinking of a new catergory:

What cars are quicker when towed on a wrecker or flatbed? Off the top of my head

HT4100 Cadillacs
240D Mercedes
Diesel rabbit
Diesel Chevette
6.2 diesel Chevy pickups and Hummers(if not being towed by another hummer)
Maybe 350 Olds diesel Buicks/Olds/Caddies.

Gotta remember a wrecker in the 1980’s was a c3500 dually Chevy truck. With 250hp/400lb ft of torque, 454 cubic inches of big block goodness. Probably had something like a 4.10 rear gear in the back. Unloaded probably one of the faster rigs on the road back in the late 70’s/80’s

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 year ago
Reply to  Aron9000

How about Dodge Omnis/Plymouth Horizons?

Dan Pritts
Dan Pritts
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

How about not? 🙂

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
1 year ago
Reply to  Dan Pritts

People on this site keep bringing that car back from the tar pits of hell where it belongs and it’s triggering my PTSD.

AlienProbe
AlienProbe
1 year ago

1985 Subaru xt. Preteen me thought those were the coolest looking space wedge cars ever. Later in life I got to ride in one and it was the saddest slowest 97hp I ever witnessed. Not sure if the turbo version was hecka better (112 hp). But still gets my vote due to soul crushing disappointment…

Last edited 1 year ago by AlienProbe
TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 year ago
Reply to  AlienProbe

I bought an 87 XT ( 4 cylinder 5mt) from a guy who couldn’t quite get the dual timing belts done correctly. My first OHC boxer, first fuel-injected. It looked fast—but my sister’s carbureted OHV 84 GL was consistently faster at auto crosses.
Can’t believe I didn’t mention that one

TriangleRAD
TriangleRAD
1 year ago
Reply to  AlienProbe

Don’t forget the later XT6 with the H6. I happen to know of one that benefitted from an SVX driveline swap, but with a manual.

Aron9000
Aron9000
1 year ago

1980s Monte Carlo SS. 305 cubic inches, computer controlled four barrel carburator, 180 rip roaring horsepower.

What makes this all the more maddening is you could get the 230hp “TPI” fuel injected engine in a Camaro or Corvette but not a Monte Carlo. Those were fast cars for their times, low 14 second quarter mile et’s.

Also maddening that GM didnt stuff that engine under the hood of the Cadillac Brougham(or the Regal turbo six) Cadillac is supposed to be your top of the line offering and man you had probably the worst engine lineup in the entire automotive industry in the 80’s Cadillacs

Joe The Drummer
Joe The Drummer
1 year ago
Reply to  Aron9000

The TPI 305 or 350 never being available in the Monte Carlo SS was one of the greatest crimes of 1980s American motordom.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
1 year ago

Plymouth Prowler.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 year ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

Bingo. I think you and I had this conversation at one point, but to also pre-emptively address the yeah but point that eventually comes up, the looks promised a hotrod blast off the line, not a road racer wind-up.

Last edited 1 year ago by Jack Trade
Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

No Go Showboat.

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 year ago

The Autozam AZ-1.
The retro T-Bird.
The Karmann Ghia.

Scoutdude
Scoutdude
1 year ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

I definitely agree on the AZ-1 serious (micro) supercar vibes from that one.

I Heart Japanese Cars
I Heart Japanese Cars
1 year ago
Reply to  Scoutdude

It’s a Kei car. It was limited to 63hp by law. You knew what you were getting.

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 year ago

My reply to Scoutdude above was meant to be down here

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
1 year ago
Reply to  Scoutdude

Agreed: your logical brain knows. But, when you see rows of them at Duncan, they call to something in your hindbrain-something primitive. Hackles rise.
I do not want to drive one and have that illusion viscerally shattered.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 year ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

I drove a Honda Beat and it didn’t feel slow, it felt frantic. The speed scales down to the size of the car, so the trick is to not drive them in traffic or on wide straight roads.

4jim
4jim
1 year ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

I hit 90mph in a modified Karmann Ghia and that damn thing started lifting off the ground. Its slowness is the #1 safety feature on the car.

Ben Titus
Ben Titus
1 year ago

2nd Gen Honda Prelude. Loved that car, handled really well, practical, but not enough balls to back up the profile.

87 Nissan Pulsar. Looked the business, slowwwwww. Made even worse with the air conditioning.

Fiat 124 Spider (circa 1978 or so).

Base engined HHR. Cool looks, and its siblings could get out of their own way at least. Base engine? 3rd gear, floored going uphill at 38 miles per hour.

Another Engineer
Another Engineer
1 year ago
Reply to  Ben Titus

We had a Pulsar in the late 90’s right before I could drive. Sold it to a school buddy as his first dirt track racer. Almost 30 years later, he is still racing as a semi-pro late model.

PresterJohn
PresterJohn
1 year ago

Hyundai Tiburon for sure

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 year ago
Reply to  PresterJohn

How about the SCoupe too for good measure?

FuzzyPlushroom
FuzzyPlushroom
1 year ago
Reply to  PresterJohn

A friend had a ’98 (first generation, before the Great Value Celica refresh) – 140 HP two-liter, five-speed – and it was actually kinda quick for what it was. The same engine in a second-gen would likely be more disappointing, and the second-gens certainly looked more like serious sporty cars.

Opa Carriker
Opa Carriker
1 year ago
Reply to  FuzzyPlushroom

See above!

Automotiveflux
Automotiveflux
1 year ago
Reply to  PresterJohn

As a Tiburon owner I feel this one too much, mine is the 2.0L 4cyl Beta II and it leaves a lot to be desired in the performance department. Pretty reliable though

Opa Carriker
Opa Carriker
1 year ago
Reply to  PresterJohn

But loads of fun on curvy back roads!

Cam.man67
Cam.man67
1 year ago

Modern pickups. Even lower models are all big and aggro and macho and look like they’d be capable off-road, but then you see that the ground clearance is laughable, visibility is terrible, and the “looks” are writing a check the truck can’t cash. You can’t take a modern stock truck off-road unless you option it with an expensive off-road package, which only barely nets ground clearance close to what base model 4x4s were achieving 25 years ago.

And get off my yard.

Gubbin
Gubbin
1 year ago
Reply to  Cam.man67

The low-profile tires with offroad treads just make me cock my head and go “huh?”

Jonathan Hendry
Jonathan Hendry
1 year ago

The 4 cylinder non-Turbo Lotus Esprit S1.

But it is lovely and probably fun to drive.

Last edited 1 year ago by Jonathan Hendry
Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 year ago

6.8 seconds 0-60. Was that slow in 1976?

Jonathan Hendry
Jonathan Hendry
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Muppet

” actual road tests revealed a 0-60 mph acceleration time of 8 seconds “

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 year ago

Oh.

That’s a bit shit.

Geekycop .
Geekycop .
1 year ago

Having driven one, it didn’t feel particularly slow but you also knew it could have used just a tick more oomph.

Grimy Ghost
Grimy Ghost
1 year ago

Any Gen 3 Camaro/Firebird with the Iron Duke. UGH!

ThatGuyWithaFiero
ThatGuyWithaFiero
1 year ago
Reply to  Grimy Ghost

Was going to say Iron Duke Fiero, but you’re right, Firebird is worse

JumboG
JumboG
1 year ago
Reply to  Grimy Ghost

How about just anything with the Iron Puke.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 year ago

Digging into the ’80s, Ford EXP.

Mercedes nailed it last week with her “styling that looked like you described a Mustang over the phone to someone” assessment, but I’ll add…it was even an honest-to-god two-seater, from Ford of all people. Talk about false advertising.

Grimy Ghost
Grimy Ghost
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

Hah – I almost bought one of those with a 4 speed. It was slow, but faster than my Plymouth Champ.

JumboG
JumboG
1 year ago
Reply to  Grimy Ghost

I dated several women in high school and college that had one of these.

Sensual Bugling Elk
Sensual Bugling Elk
1 year ago

“No, its 0-60 time is slower than any minivan for sale today.”

“No, I don’t take it racing.”

“No, just a 4-cylinder in here. Less displacement than some motorcycles, too”

“No, keeping it fueled isn’t expensive. 87 octane and I get 32mpg.”

-Me, explaining my NA6 Miata to non-car-folk who assume Red Sports Car = Fast.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 year ago

If it makes you feel better, I often tell those kinda people that my Focus has a Miata engine…

Sensual Bugling Elk
Sensual Bugling Elk
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

Shhhhhh. If you say it too loud, rootwyrm materializes in a big puff of purple smoke with 3,000 words about how the engine designations are slightly different, leading to massive but nuanced differences in performance, reliability, and tunability.

Zeppelopod
Zeppelopod
1 year ago

I like the idea that Autopian has its own cryptids who materialize for very specific topics. Toecutter for weight/drag coefficient/energy consumption, v10omous to defend the honor of giant pickups, etc etc

Chronometric
Chronometric
1 year ago

I tell people my NA6 is very fast… through a roundabout.

Carter Young
Carter Young
1 year ago

Opel GT, Saab Sonett. But both are adorable!

Dodsworth
Dodsworth
1 year ago

1986 Ford Taurus. It was a sensation when introduced. Style wise, it looked ten years ahead of other sedans. Car magazines were disappointed when the performance didn’t match the looks but for a few years it seemed that every other car on the road was a Taurus.

Goof
Goof
1 year ago

Ford Mustang II King Cobra has to be up there. 5.0L V8, but 140HP. Woof.

3rd generation Camaro with the Iron Duke. Super yikes.

I think the original Pontiac Fiero was 93HP? 0-60 in the 10+ range?

There was a 1.6L Hyundai Veloster with a 0-60 of near 11 seconds.

AssMatt
AssMatt
1 year ago

Thank you for blessedly omitting the Mondial from your own short list, unlike the endlessly recycled clickbait slideshows (even when they offer caveats like “they got better”).

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
1 year ago
Reply to  AssMatt

I don’t think the Mondial really meets the criteria, at least for me.

It never actually seemed to look that fast, I mean relative to other Ferraris; it always looked like Ferrari’s attempt at a boulevard, er, strada cruiser.

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
1 year ago
Reply to  AssMatt

Where’s Adrian been? In the shop?

Citrus
Citrus
1 year ago

The VW SP2 has to be the top of the list. The thing looks absolutely fantastic and like it should have significantly more than 75 HP.

David Tracy
David Tracy
1 year ago
Reply to  Citrus

Woh, a Brazilian-market contender. What a great recommendation!

Maymar
Maymar
1 year ago
Reply to  Citrus

I was looking for the Karmann Ghia to be nominated (VW really leaned into it being not as quick as it looked for advertising), but the SP2 is even better.

125
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x