When you think of a modern-day law enforcement patrol vehicle, you probably picture a Ford Explorer or a Chevrolet Tahoe — a barge on wheels that can serve as a mobile office and storage locker for any gear an officer might need. But at least one sheriff is saying no to the SUV-ification that has been gripping America. Instead, his daily driver is a 1981 Chevrolet Camaro Z28, powered by a good old-fashioned small-block V8.
CHIPS, But Make It Michigan.
Saginaw County Sheriff Bill Federspiel is a character through and through. He performs in two bands (Shakedown – The Bob Seger Experience and The Kenny Rogers Band, to be specific) and makes sure to stop and talk to anyone who passes by and says hi. Multiple times during our conversation about the Camaro, he took time to break away to check in with his constituents, who also wanted to talk to him about the classic muscle car.
[Editor’s Note: The Camaro is extremely badass, and I don’t doubt that the sheriff is a nice guy. But, after being prompted by a few comments to dig into this issue a bit more, I’m now seeing how big of a shitshow civil asset forfeiture can be. It’s such a big problem that I totally understand why, to some, our short “The Argument Against” just didn’t feel like enough, even if this particular situation isn’t the most egregious example. I mean, just read this part of the Mackinaw Center for Public Policy’s article “Federal court severely curtails civil asset forfeiture in Michigan”:
Wayne County law enforcement officers seize vehicles based on probable cause, often related to people driving or parking in areas where illicit drug use and prostitution is suspected. After having their vehicle seized, people are offered a deal: Pay a fine of around $1,000 and get their car back immediately or risk having it forfeited to the county government. The county can then sell the vehicle and pocket the proceeds.
People can challenge a forfeiture in court, but it is expensive and time consuming. Most make the rational decision to just pay the fine or abandon their property, rather than spending thousands on an attorney and waiting months to get in front of a judge.
That was the subject of a lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice. It takes people up to a year even to get a hearing on a challenge to a seizure. The court ruled that this period was too long, and the hearing needs to happen within two weeks (one judge argued that it should be within 48 hours).
That’s pretty terrible. As some commenters have pointed out, John Oliver — host of the show Last Week Tonight — has discussed the issues associated with Civil Asset Forfeiture in this video:
Great discussion by commenters here, and a while not everyone is in agreement on where to stand on the issue, it’s clear this practice has some issues and those issues should be put right out front at the beginning of this article. Hence this editor’s note. Again, thank you, dear readers, for the input! -DT]
Federspiel says his practice of non-standard patrol vehicles dates back to 2009. He says he used Michigan’s forfeiture law to seize a drug dealer’s 2005 Ford Mustang and repurposed it as a patrol car.
“He was a big drug dealer. So I’m like, you know what? You don’t pay taxes …you’ve never filed a W2 ever, probably. So I’m going to give back to the public, and I’m going to let you pay for my [police] vehicle and my gas instead of the taxpayer … I marked it all up and I put on both doors ‘taken from a local drug dealer.'”
Sending A Message
While that Mustang was the first seized in a drug case, it certainly wouldn’t be the last. The sheriff says he later acquired a Cadillac CTS, which he put ‘taken from a cocaine dealer’ on the doors, a Lincoln Continental Executive Series, and a Honda Element.
“The idea was to let the public know that if you are a big drug dealer, people don’t like people dealing drugs. It’ll cause a lot of issues on the streets. So Saginaw County, the voters told me that they wanted me to do something about it and make a statement. Well, there was my statement.”
However, the Honda turned out to be the wrong choice for his county. Federspiel says people told him they didn’t like him going around town in a Japanese car. Saginaw is GM country through and through. The formerly GM-owned Nexteer can be traced back to 1906 as Jackson, Church & Wilcox Co. It was acquired by Buick three years later, and it became part of General Motors (many folks still call it “Saginaw Steering”). Long story short, if you want to lose a local election, driving what some perceive as an unAmerican car is one way to do it. The Element was later given to the detective bureau for use as an unmarked vehicle.
A New Strategy
After a while, cars from drug seizures were no longer viable. “Drug dealers started getting smarter about how they do things. They understand the forfeiture law. So they go rent a car. They know I can’t seize a rental car unless the rental company knew they were dealing drugs in it, which they don’t.”
In 2016, he said he was able to sell two seized vehicles to a dealer to acquire a black and white 1967 Ford Galaxy 500. I’m told it was reminiscent of a police car from The Andy Griffith Show. While unique, after seven years of use, it wasn’t quite practical for the needs of a part-time patrol vehicle.
“That car was a bit of a death trap. It was a ’67, and it wasn’t nearly as good of a shape as this (Camaro). It had a three on the tree; try doing that in a police car. It’s a boat. It had some issues we discovered, and I didn’t want to keep spending the kind of money that it needed to get it upgraded. Just it just wasn’t worth it. So I sold it at an auction, and a mayor out in New Jersey bought it.”
Why A 1981 Camaro?
Come 2024, the sheriff says his office was awarded part of a seizure fund that came after working with the DEA on a 17-month investigation. He says kilos of cocaine were coming up into the area from Texas by individuals with ties to a Mexican cartel. During the suspects’ third trip to Michigan, they were arrested. The U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Michigan, says officers seized 13 kilograms of cocaine, two kilograms of fentanyl, more than a dozen guns, and over $200,000 from the home of the man they say was behind the operation. He was sentenced in November to 60 years in federal prison. In all, Sheriff Federspiel says $289,000 was seized.
The money awarded went to purchasing a 1981 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 for $25,000. He says an additional few thousand dollars were spent on the graphics to create a tribute to the California Highway Patrol pursuit vehicle. Instead of “highway patrol,” the Star on the car’s doors reads “sheriff patrol,” and instead of a red spotlight, a red light was attached to the inside fender. Federspiel also says it pays tribute to his commute, as he believes the steering was built at the former Saginaw Steering plant, not far from where he grew up. [Ed Note: I can take one look at that column and tell you that, indeed, that’s a Saginaw column. -DT].
Unfortunately, I didn’t get to look at a spec sheet, but he said this specific Z28 had 50,000 miles, a new 350 V8 engine with 1,000 miles, and a four-barrel carburetor good for approximately 400 horsepower. Per Hagerty’s valuation tool, a Z28 in “Good condition” is currently valued at $24,500. It sounds like his department got market value. However, the stock power at the crank is 175 ponies, so either there have been major modifications, or the sheriff was given bad numbers. Federspiel also claims that a certified appraiser has since valued it at $42,700. He says this means the car is an asset to the office and will make a profit for the county when it is eventually sold.
A Rolling Billboard To Build Bridges
As you might know, sheriffs are unique in law enforcement in that they serve in an elected position, compared to a police chief who is hired or appointed by a governing body. This means they are, by nature, political operators that answer directly to voters.
“This is a conversation starter, as you can see the two guys who just walked up,” said Federspiel. “White, black, rich, or poor, they want to ask me about this car, which is exactly what law enforcement is about: communication. I work for you… How do I start a conversation with the people of Saginaw County? Well, first, they got to know it’s me. I had three people honk their horns and wave to me this morning on my way to get my coffee… it means they feel comfortable enough to talk to me and tell me what they think is important.”
What Happens During An Arrest?
While the Camaro was modified with lights and decals, it’s still a rather barebones vehicle. There’s no roll cage, airbags, or partition to keep a suspect in the back seat. He says if he needs to respond to a call, which happens on occasion, he has two options during an arrest.
A) If the suspect is out of control, he will call a deputy to pick up the suspect in their SUV.
B) If the suspect is cooperative, they get to go for a ride in the front seat.
“I’m going to put you in handcuffs, pat you down, and I’m going to sit you in the front seat. I’m going to double lock your handcuffs so that they don’t close down on your wrist, and I’m going to put the seat belt on you. Explain to you that we’re going to go to the jail like that because if I stuff you in the backseat, it’s not going to work, and I don’t want you behind me. I want you where I can see you, so they’re going to sit in the front seat.”
The sheriff said it was a practice he became familiar with when he drove a Ford Mustang as a patrol vehicle in Florida.
(Note: It was likely the Ford Mustang SSP. He said it looked like my SN-95 that I drove to the interview, but as far as I can tell, that generation did not have a police package. However, Fox Body had the Special Service Package Mustang, which was used in Florida. In fairness, the SN-95 has a lot of similarities with its predecessor, as it was born out of necessity at the 11th hour after the purists rejected the design that became the Ford Probe.)
“They had more questions about the car. We talked about cars all the way to the jail.
The Argument Against
Not everyone agrees with the sheriff’s tactics. Retired sheriff’s department Lt. Kevin Stevens spoke out against the move. He told ABC12’s Terry Camp that money seized during a drug raid was taxpayers’ money and that “wasting it on toys when our deputies need tools is a disservice to our safety and community.”
When I pressed Federspiel, he argued that his department already has new equipment that the county has budgeted for. “Somebody said recently he should have used that money to buy his deputies a brand new car? He’s got a brand new car right there,” he said, gesturing to a nearby Chevrolet Tahoe.
“I have a budget for all of that. I could have bought that car for him and taken that one. But then I’m driving a car paid for by the taxpayers. I’d prefer to drive a car that’s paid for by the drug dealers.”
The sheriff also pointed to a recent budgeting decision as an example of his commitment to saving money. He said the Chevrolet Tahoe Police vehicles have jumped so much in price the department was able to order seven Dodge Durango Special Service Vehicles for the price of six Chevrolet Tahoes. A bold move for patroling a GM town.
During the course of my hour-long conversation with Sheriff Federspiel, I reached two conclusions. First, he takes a hands-on approach to fostering relationships with his neighbors. A common frustration any reporter who’s tried to talk with law enforcement has experienced is “coach speak.” Like most college and professional coaches, police chiefs and sheriffs have learned to say a whole lot while not saying anything. Federspiel seems to buck that trend. Still, while this Z28 and other similar drug bust-financed vehicles are controversial, who doesn’t like to drive down a country highway while blaring ZZ Top or Lynyrd Skynyrd? Well, I guess Federspiel because he noted he took the AM/FM out of it. He has his own police radio to listen to, and, of course, that mighty V8.
All photos by John Gustin except where noted.
This article is bad and reads as propaganda for police. Glamorizing civil forfeiture (police stealing from citizens) is a bad look.
“He says he used Michigan’s forfeiture law to seize a drug dealer’s 2005 Ford Mustang and repurposed it as a patrol car.”
No, he didn’t get the drug dealer to ‘pay for it’. The STOLE someone’s property by using and ABUSING civil forfeiture laws.
” He told ABC12’s Terry Camp that money seized during a drug raid was taxpayers’ money and that “wasting it on toys when our deputies need tools is a disservice to our safety and community.”
NOOOO… it’s actually money that belongs to the person they arrested and the cops stole that money by again ABUSING forfeiture laws.
I suggest you guys watch some of Steve Lehto’s videos on how the police abuse these laws and how this needs to change:
https://www.youtube.com/@stevelehto/search?query=forfeiture
Police abusing civil forfeiture laws is NOT something we should be celebrating.
When I read this article, I don’t think “hey that’s a cool story and a cool police car”
I’m thinking things that are more like “the Police need to be reigned in and have more checks and balances”
Hi Manwich, thank you for reading. As for the Mustang, here’s further context from MLive’s 2010 interview with the original owner. While growing marijuana is now legal in Michigan, the current limit is 12 plants.
“Bridgeport Township man not happy with Saginaw County sheriff’s new car”
https://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/2010/02/bridgeport_township_man_not_ha.html
As for the assets seized in addition to the Mustang.
As for the money that went towards purchasing this vehicle, from the article above.
I am all for checks and balances, and I agree there are many reported instances of civil forfeiture laws being abused. But in this instance, money being seized from individuals tied to cartels, carrying several kilos of cocaine and $290k, does not seem like abuse or theft.
Your official reply is basically that “the end justifies the means”?
I’m sorry, John, but this is a terribly disappointing response. Arguing that asset seizure is okay when it’s done to really bad people and trusting law enforcement’s judgment to make that determination are problematic positions at best. Obviously you’re entitled to feel that way, but I hope you see why so many of us have an issue with it.
Yep. If you’re the neighborhood drug dealer, the cops will take anything and everything and say it was because you got it through your crimes. But if you are the Sacklers, you’ll just pay a (relatively) small fine.
I appreciated you taking the time to write a nuanced response. As for this situation, the sheriff says he is for criminal asset forfeiture. The man at the center of this case was found guilty by a jury on multiple felony counts related to large quantities of cocaine and fentanyl, and according to legal documents, investigators found possible evidence he was floating to murder people who had robbed him of a shipment.
As for other instances that happened nationally that people say are abuse, I agree there needs to be transparency and accountability. I think we would want that for all of our elected officials and law enforcement officers. For those who feel that way, I highly suggest talking with your local elected representatives on about measures you could help move forward and voting with your conscience.
Law enforcement unions have made it very difficult for even elected officials to hold them accountable. The only appropriate avenue for civil asset forfeiture is a separate judicial process. And the proceeds from civil asset forfeiture should be used toward preventive measures, such as drug treatment programs, housing assistance, and other programs that can rebuild our tattered social safety nets.
But because it’s easy to get elected for looking tough on crime instead of actually preventing it, talking to elected officials doesn’t bear much fruit.
How dare he grow an unconstitutionally ban plant and earn a living from it without being a corporation.
He’s supposed to go work for the corporation and make minimum wage. Doesn’t he understand how fascism & corporatism work?
Where I live the police will show up at your door with no search warrant, forced their way in, assault you, and rob you if they smell a plant. Then they just forge your name on a consent to search form, lie in court, and let the corrupt DA’s protect them. Meanwhile 10 miles up the road there is an entire warehouse legally growing THCA weed which is in fact regular illegal weed being grown in an illegal state.
The entire system is corrupt and you’re an idiot for believing in it.
The Bandit is Smokey! I’m having Einhorn is Finkle Deja vu all over again!
Tulsa used to have a decked out SUV….Escalade I think….that they used basically only to patrol the downtown bar scene at night. Similar story, seized from drug dealer and/or gang leader. Can’t say it was effective, but probably more useful than the MRAP they also had….
The idea that taxpayers aren’t paying for this is wrong. Money is fungible. Every dollar spent on this is a dollar that otherwise could have been used elsewhere in the department, or decreased a dollar collected in taxes.
Sure, it’s pretty small amounts, but the idea it’s funded by drug dealers is disingenuous as best.
Plus, as someone else commented else where, civil asset forfeiture is wack.
This strikes me more as copaganda more than anything else.
And also how much money did the department spend on out bullshit ‘war on drugs’ putting people in jail for minor drug offences compared to what came in from that bust?
100%. The logic being used here is like my wife saying that she got a “free” $200 lip gloss because she used reward points. Sorry honey, but you still spent $200 on it, because you otherwise could have used those reward points on things we actually need (and will be paying for with our paychecks).
The argument is so terrible that I’m surprised it was even published here, even if the author didn’t feel like pushing back during the interview.
With S-rated tires, I hope he’s not planning on doing any high-speed pursuits in that thing.
S-rated tires, that should be mounted white letters out!
I knew Derek Bieri was in our readership. 🙂
S rated is 112 MPH, right? I don’t see that camaro doing much more than that unless he has a tall rear end and a lot of horsepower.
Plus, this is not necessarily intended to be a high-speed pursuit vehicle. I’d imagine that if he happened to be out and saw someone speeding, most would pull over. If they don’t, he would likely call for backup. If it escalates, they would need to bring in additional assets or consider disengaging if it poses an unnecessary risk to the public.
Good point. Not that I’m a fan of gratuitous high-speed pursuits, but I am sure they would be more safely executed in a police-spec Explorer. One thing that always puzzled me when in Texas is how the DPS (their highway patrol) mostly drove beefed-up Tahoes. I haven’t read much about them, but I have to believe the Explorers would be more economical and more agile. Not that Texas as a whole really worries about fuel economy. “Don’t worry. We’ll pump more.”
“Unfortunately, I didn’t get to look at a spec sheet, but he said this specific Z28 had 50,000 miles, a new 350 V8 engine with 1,000 miles, and a four-barrel carburetor good for approximately 400 horsepower.”
Really? a 400 HP Camaro would struggle to hit much above 112?
In stock form, that camaro would have had about 185 HP, so yes, 3 times the horsepower than stock would qualify as “a lot of horsepower” in comparison.
Regardless, in stock form, a 2nd gen F body would have either a 3.73 or 3.42 rear end, which redline in high gear at 105 and 115 MPH respectively.
I had no idea they were geared that short. I would have thought, especially back then, they would have geared it taller for fuel efficiency. Perhaps I missed it, by I didn’t see how many gears the automatic has, yada yada.
It probably doesn’t have “cop shocks, cop brakes” etc, so I am guessing it would be pretty hairy anywhere near Vmax anyway.
My 67 Chevelle still had the Powerglide rear end under it with a TH350 transmission and a 350hp 350 engine. It would do about 160mph flat out down the interstate. It would do 70 in first gear.
Back in the late-80/early-90s, my local police department had a Fox-body Mustang SSP that they purchased and a Camaro IROC-Z that they seized from a drug dealer. The Fox actually got used as a regular police car, while the IROC-Z mostly did D.A.R.E. duty. Both got drag raced routinely by their respective police officers on the road behind my house – of all the races I saw, the Fox never lost.
Also, several Texas municipalities used SN-95 Mustangs for police cars in the late 90s, though most got replaced by the Chevy Impala in the early 2000s.
When the police here got their new Dodge Chargers with police packages they thought they were the baddest thing on the road. They went to the drag strip running their mouth. They got their asses handed to them by a bunch of Ford f-350s and Dodge 3500 diesels. They were literally laughed out of the place. There’s actually some videos of it on YouTube. Search police Charger versus F-350.
Forfeiture laws are a joke and are often used to unjustly take money from people who are never convicted of a crime, so it may not be a good idea to celebrate the practice.
They’re literally fucking unconstitutional, yet somehow still exist.
As long as SCOTUS is unwilling to make a decision on it, nothing will change. Cops are too powerful for lawmakers to standup to them.
Came here to say this, thank you.
One asset forfeiture story that comes to mind is the guy who tried to buy a semi-tractor, but got accused of being involved in criminal activity because he was carrying a ton of cash on hand. It’s funny, some people say to pay cash for everything, but the cops might think you’re a criminal if you’re traveling with a bunch of stacks on you.
Anyway, the poor guy had $39,500 seized from him despite never actually being charged with anything. Then he had to spend 31 months fighting to get it back.
This story is the reason I never pull money out for a car purchase until I’m basically right there where the vehicle is. “I flew from Illinois to Florida to buy a Smart car, I swear!” Nobody is going to believe that!
Keep in mind there is a difference between criminal asset forfeiture and civil asset forfeiture.
I don’t have a big problem with criminal, but civil asset forfeiture is literally highway robbery. It sounds like this case was criminal. However, I have no idea if that department engages in civil forfeiture.
That’s a fair question! I’ll see if I can get a follow-up statement from the Saginaw County Sheriff’s Office on their policies regarding civil asset forfeiture purses criminal asset forfeiture.
Cops can even take your house with ‘civil forfeiture’ and usually there’s absolutely nothing you can do about it.
Here’s John Oliver’s old video on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks
It’s not uncommon for the police elsewhere in the world to use non-standard vehicles in a public outreach roles.
https://www.motor1.com/news/702297/turkish-police-sports-cars-fleet/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/25/czech-police-turn-seized-ferrari-into-patrol-car
https://www.derbyshire.police.uk/news/derbyshire/news/campaigns/2024/july/watch-out-for-derbyshire-police-tractor-cropping-up-at-summer-events/
https://www.lamborghini.com/en-en/news/lamborghini-urus-performante-for-the-italian-state-police
The sheriff spent $25k on a Camaro that is not going to be used for PIT maneuvers or as a shield in a shoot-out and will be maintained at their own garage, so chances are it will be worth as much or more when they get around to selling it. Taking depreciation into account this is most likely a lot cheaper than having him tool around in a real police cruiser.
Police departments spend big bucks on all sorts of military level gear that, in reality, has no justifiable case use in a civilian environment. This is what they should spend their funds on instead. Kickass cars.
But cops need all of that military gear to protect the most fragile thing in existence. Their egos.
It’s sponsored by Pfizer?
Using taxpayer dollars for self promotion is bs. So Illinois…
RTFA
AM/FM deleted? Obviously to make room for SCMODS*
*yes, I know…Illinois vs. Michigan – just work with me here, OK?
deleted..
probably slower than a Camry
Faster than walking.
This dude seems pretty cool, keep it up, let the dealers pay!
He’s in Michigan.
Doh!! dang! Can’t edit now, thx for calling me out lol
I gotchu 🙂
TY mercedes! happy new year!
It is kind of the Florida of the north! We’re out on a peninsula, surrounded by giant bodies of water, and have a bunch of beautiful beaches. However, it gets a little cold up here, and the water is fresh, not salt. The”Michigan Man” stories also seem to be less crazy compared to “Florida Man,” along with our wildlife.
As a Florida Man, you may be right…but I’d say that the perception may depend on differences in public records laws. While Floridians ARE weird, we also have very open public records, which makes it easy for journalists to find examples of us being weird. Not sure if Michigan is the same… but if so, you all need to step it up. 😉
Public records are a little hit and miss. We can FOIA but that can become costly, depending on how much the department responding wants to charge for “labor” in accessing the records. As for the legislature and governor, Michigan is one of two states where both are fully exempt from public records requests. There was a bill to finally reform that, but it died in a lame-duck marathon session after too few lawmakers were in attendance amid two different protests. https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/michigan-transparency-plans-die-again-keeping-public-dark
Our government sometimes tries to carve out public records exemptions for themselves, and sometimes tries to skirt them entirely…with mixed results. We recently had a little controversy where our governor Li’l Ronnie Go-Go Boots…I mean, Ron DeSantis got in a little hot water this past year for trying to stuff golf courses and pickleball courts into our national parks without anyone trying to know about it (https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4852741-florida-ron-desantis-plan-golf-courses-state-parks/), and we had a small town mayor a few years back who had all their dirty laundry aired in public (https://watermarkonline.com/2009/06/17/mulberry-mayor-may-step-down-after-domestic-dispute-goes-public/), but I figure that’s the price of public life.
But I’m mainly talking about the classic Florida Man stories, which often involve regular citizens (if any of us are really regular)…stuff like the Bubba the Love Sponge controversies, or…well, pretty much everything on floridaman dot com, such as “Florida Man Robs Same Dollar General Twice, Blames Voices in Head.” I GUARANTEE there are stories like that in every state and commonwealth in the Union. Ours are just a little more sun-bleached, that’s all.
I think the important lesson here is that we need to get more people out on the streets dealing drugs so that more of our hardworking police officers can be equipped with third-gen Camaros.
…Sid Bridge, SAT reading comprehension score: 100%.
3rd gen started in 1982
Safety equipment is much different in 2025 than it was in 1981. As a public official it’s negligent to use this 1981 Camaro for official use. Personal use, paid for by his election campaign would be fine.
Ah yes, overlap crash test ratings are this mans highest priority as he arrests armed drug dealers.
Depending on how he tries to force a car off the road, they might just be. Sure, a PIT maneuver is performed in the same direction, but this guy strikes me (not literally) as the kind who might try to force an oncoming suspect off the road. In a Camaro, that could be dangerous for him.
If cops cared about safety they wouldn’t be pitting people in the first place.
A couple of comments just because we’re car people, in that Camaro it’s a Saginaw box not a Saginaw rack, and the engine is pretty-obviously modified with parts that depending on internal mods to go with them are often good for 400hp gross. (Don’t try that in CA.)
Any of his critics griping about waste might note that there’s no A/C, evidently it was once ordered as a “lightweight” stripper, so no just-hanging-out alongside the highway idling in air-conditioned comfort.
Oh, and too bad about those tires, the Mustangs had Gatorback VRs but good rubber sized for 15″ 60-70 series is a tough find these days.
Beat me to it about the steering box, and it looks like they’ve already corrected the article. I was in the automotive steering business for 15 years. I actually installed a Saginaw pump in my Ford.
My great grandfather worked at Saginaw Steering Gear during the second World War building M1 Garands. GM history is deep in that town.
Used for steering the enemy towards death or injury I guess
I fully support more departments doing this. My city has a vintage police car they roll out for parades and such, but it’s certainly not as cool. It’s just a Dodge Diplomat. https://www.flickr.com/photos/rickm15/3840392589
Every Z28 of this era I’ve seen has always had T-tops so I just assumed it was standard on the Z28 package. I guess they made some with real roof too. Either way I approve, I’d much rather the sheriff spend seized money on classic cars than quasimilitary equipment.
Totally cool dude, I dig this. I’m sure it’s garaged during salty Michigan winters.
The overwhelming urge to pester him in a Bandit tribute Trans Am…
I am East bound and down with this.
Filing this one under “Hell Yeah.”