I spent the better part of my working time last week researching and writing a considered long form piece about the tumultuous history of Jaguar and how the Coventry car maker found itself in the unenviable position of having to totally redefine its brand in a last gasp attempt to stay in business. This was all in preparation of the reveal of the new Jaguar EV concept reveal tonight at Art Basel in Miami (my VIP invite got lost in the post).
As I blearily awoke this morning the portrait of Matt I keep hanging in my wall was angrily flashing its eyes at me, Thunderbirds style. “Bag Open. Cats everywhere. Get on it” He growled. He wasn’t wrong. Overnight the internet has done its thing and the new Jaguar Type 00 has leaked.
It appears British newspaper The Independent had received official images ahead of the reveal tonight under embargo. That post now appears to have been removed but the internet does not forget and here at the Autopian we were not under embargo anyway. Now I’ve had enough coffee to sink a battleship let’s have a look and see what we think.
The usual caveats apply: I’m going off limited information here – I have managed to glean a few extra details from various sources (I met a shady-looking guy in an underground car park in central Coventry) but specifics remain lacking. We don’t know the dimensions, and we’re going off studio images so can only talk about what they show us. And as usual, to really understand you need to see a car in the metal.
Here’s What We Could Have Won
A couple of weeks ago, the cancelled X351 Jaguar XJ leaked onto the internet. During my time at Land Rover, I saw this car back in 2018 and can confirm this is indeed, or rather was the EV XJ. Back when Mr. Tata was still alive every six months or so there would be a big board level presentation for him on upcoming products. At the time the Jaguar and Land Rover studios were still separate – Land Rover was at the main campus in Gaydon and Jaguar was tucked away on an industrial estate in Whitley. So it made sense to bring all the Jaguar stuff over to Gaydon. Some were finished hard models, some were clays. So I was privy to all the future production Jaguars and concepts. There was a J-Pace SUV to sit above the F-Pace (no problem in revealing this as it’s common knowledge) and everything else was as you’d expect. These cars were then cancelled as part of the revamp and one absolutely incredibly beautiful and exceptional proposal aside, nothing of value was lost.
The Side Profile
First, this is a heavy-looking car. We know it’s going to be physically heavy because it’s a big luxury EV. But Jaguar Type 00 looks visually very heavy – it has big wheels (I’m guessing 24”) for two reasons. First, big heavy cars need big brake rotors to stop them, even though regen does counter this to a degree. Secondly, as a car goes up in size you need to nudge other dimensions up including the wheels to make sure everything stays in proportion. As you go up in wheel size, on a road car this means the wheel arch opening is pushed further and further up relative to the bodyside. Consequently, the wheel arch openings start wrapping further around the wheel as the body side gets closer to the ground plane. On an SUV this isn’t a problem because the bottom of the bodyside (the rockers) should be higher up and more in line with the wheel centers. But on a road car, it can give the impression of the whole car sagging towards the road making it look heavy. Compare it next to a Rolls Royce Spectre, a car the production Type 00 will be a competitor for, and see how successfully it hides its bulk in profile.
Also in the side view, particularly in the bottom half, I’m seeing some Range Rover. The crisp shoulder line, the kick-up of the tail behind the rear wheel, and the feature line along the bottom of the bodyside all scream Range Rover. This is exacerbated by the verticality of the front and rear of the car – the new full-size Range Rover and Sport have sharply docked tails. I heard that the initial sketch of this car was done by Massimo Frascella before he departed for Audi. Frascella was McGovern’s right-hand man at Land Rover for decades before Ian Callum retired and McGovern used the opportunity to bring both the Jaguar and Land Rover studios together. So maybe that’s where this Range Rover influence comes from.
From The Top
Straight top-down views are normally a bit boring and not used for media shots because they don’t show an awful lot other than the roof and hood. Here we can see some longitudinal strakes over the passenger compartment. What purpose do they serve? Behind that is what looks to be the trunk. Judging by how much the opening is inset from the edge of the C pilar the intention must have been to keep the shut lines away from the edge, lest they end up with two panels messily meeting at ninety degrees like a Cybertruck.
You can see the rear track is significantly wider than the front – lesser commentators will give you some bullshit about how this makes the car look squat and muscular and like an animal ready to pounce. It’s a bunch of crap because you can achieve much the same visual trickery with clever surfacing. For me what’s slightly more concerning is it looks like the front and rear of the car are from two completely different vehicles. Once the back half gets past the wheels has a lot of what we design wankers call ‘plan shape.’ That is the bodywork tapers in towards the center of the car, like the hull of a boat. This means you don’t have bulky corners and helps give an impression of speed and sleekness. But in real life, you never look at a car from the top – it would have been better to try and dovetail the side a bit.
Compared to the back of the car the front appears to stop abruptly – again in front of the front axle it looks like they were so determined to get the wheels as far forward as possible they didn’t leave enough room for the bodywork to flow smoothly. Look at how quickly the hood/funk shut lines change direction. They’re forced into this awkward transition because they have limited space to turn and meet the inner part of the front lights. There’s a very visible ‘corner’ running across the width of the car just ahead of the front wheel arches which is at odds with the vast expanses of uninterrupted sheet metal at the back.
Rectangles. Rectangles Everywhere
The front and rear graphics are both made up completely of rectilinear elements. The small horizontal lighting graphics are simple and out of proportion meaning there are vast expanses of nothing below and between them. It all just feels so stark and rigid – nothing is radiused and there’s barely any curvature visible. This is partly a trick of looking at an image that is necessarily reduced in scale. I know on the actual car there will be a degree of curve present because horizontal dead straight lines appear to sag – something James Dyson found out the hard way because when he was attempting to build his own car he thought he knew better than professional car designers and didn’t hire any. But I’m digressing.
The straight lines continue inside. The hard-edged seats look like a bench that’s been yanked out of a Coventry bus station. The slats and strakes theme from the outside are replicated on the instrument panel upper. There are no visible screens or gauges, or indeed any controls whatsoever. I wouldn’t be putting my faith in a mind-control helmet designed by JLR so I assume there’s some concept car surprise and delight bullshit going on that we’ll find out more about later. It’s certainly not a leather and wood-lined comfort cocoon-like Jaguars of old. Like the exterior the interior is very sparse and spare – it feels like a high-tech medical waiting room in a sci-fi computer game. Except not all the visual assets have loaded in properly.
One of the great myths about EVs that I’ve done my best to dispel is that because there’s no bulky ICE engine and gearbox designers and engineers will have a lot more freedom to start getting wild with proportions and acres of interior space will be liberated.
This overlooks two things – firstly EVs still have a lot of crap to package. Motors can go on axles sure, but you still have control modules, onboard chargers, battery management systems, and all manner of black boxes to find room for. This is why smaller EVs don’t have much of a frunk, even if they are RWD like the Honda e. Secondly, the market is generally pretty conservative. The Jaguar iPace was about as revolutionary as it was possible to go in terms of volumes – and purchase price issues aside look how that faired. Judging by the cab rearward shape of the Type 00 I can only hope this thing has a huge frunk – because they’ve almost pushed the shape into caricature. There’s so much dash-to-axle and the roof line is so low. It’s a bit like when auto design students discover these characteristics for the first time and decide pushing them beyond the limits automatically makes a better-looking car.
We must remember this is only a concept. The actual production car will be a four-door GT. This is only a preview of the visual style of future Jaguar models. It’s certainly striking, but you’d struggle to call it beautiful. It’s also monolithic and slabby.
Next to a Rolls Royce Spectre it feels like an ill-considered sixties concrete tower block next to the Seagram building. Similar ideas and ethos but one is much more successful in terms of execution. Gerry McGovern got his love of Modernism from the rebuilding of Coventry after it was bombed flat in the war, but visiting the city now you’d be hard-pressed to recognize the optimism and hope that drove those concrete ideals. Let’s hope this brutal revamp is more successful, because there are a lot of jobs depending on it.
All Photos Jaguar, Probably
Ah, I wondered what the designers of the 2011 Mediocrity were up to lately!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GL1T-JVpgQ
That’s awesome.
The Mediocrity looks 10X more real than the cartoon images above.
That’s because it was real! It was a Kia Optima covered in fiberglass. 🙂
If the Mediocrity was streamlined to a sub-0.20 Cd value and kept the same frontal area, it wouldn’t look mediocre anymore, and would actually be quite extraordinary in many metrics as a result without much added expense. Give it the rear wheel skirt, a grill no larger than necessary for cooling, and NACA ducts where appropriate. Go full retard on Cd reduction(at least within the context of the car being usable and easily serviced), damned be styling. Nothing else on the market would look like it.
Then you can get rid of the 4-cylinder front drive layout, and make it a RWD V8, and still get excellent fuel economy, and segue that into an affordable EV sedan along side it.
I love how your solution to all of the world’s problems is more streamlining. Never change! ♥
Sadly, I have friends who’d love that thing.
I wonder if Massimo was already daydreaming about his new job… the front end view looks very much like a concept hi po A7 to me.
From what I understand his departure was quite sudden and slightly unexpected.
I’m not exactly bullish about the future of Jaguar at the moment but I don’t exactly expect them to disappear either. I cant even pretend to know what is happening at JLR but I wonder if folks are looking for better employment opportunities.
I don’t hate the side profile. I don’t even hate the rear shot, although give me a fucking break with that no rear window thing. That front end though, yeesh! That side of a barn is going to look great splattered with millions of bugs.
Look at that suspension travel! At least a 1/4″!
This is the kind of exaggerated junk I used to draw as a kind of joking screwing around ideas (and one had two V8s in front), except I also used some curves. It’s like they used the same 1990 home PC software Tesla used for the CT. Maybe they pass that computer around like the Stygian witches’ eye and tooth.
The design may be awkward but I really like the DUB Edition 80s Pontiac wheels and that pink.
Wheels are good I agree.
So Copy Nothing was just an insult to throw shade at Rolls Royce? Calling their car nothing?
This reminds me of “SMEG” appliances. A generic shape in a bright colour, that inexplicably costs 10x more for no reason I’ve ever been able to discern.
Maybe Jaguar is trying to pull bad taste customers from the current BMW demographic?
I liked SMEG appliances twenty years ago before every fucker had one. Now they’re just basic.
Maybe I’m too much of a pleb to understand the appeal to them. The design didn’t stand out enough to justify the $280 price tag
It has no features I can’t find on a $30 toaster, which I can find in the same colour palette.
The toasters are a bit much, but the fridges for a while were a good statement design piece.
At very least the fridges can preserve the smegma of those beating themselves off over designer appliances (designers not included).
As a Red Dwarf fan I can’t take the SMEG brand name seriously!
Well played.
Me: Matt, how are we going to credit these images?
Matt, adjusting cowboy hat and lighting a cheroot: You jus’ leave that Ol’Hardigree pardner
I posted this to a modified jaguar group I’m on, where everyone is acting like the sky is falling:
FIXED CONCEPT IMAGES
Here, I fixed it for you guys so you can stop clutching your pearls. For people who accuse others of being snowflakes, some of you a giant babies who get triggered over everything.
Yes, the front end needs work; I fixed the proportions of the front grill, made it wider and lower looking with body colored surround.
In the rear, I blacked out rear grille (which is a nod to the XJ220 imho) and gave it some taillights.
The side profile is great, the top view shows how wide it is in the rear, sort of like a 911, and it has interesting surfacing. End of the day, it’s just a car. Like every other car.
Still triggered and offended? Go touch grass. JFC.
Who do you think is triggered an offended? People are mostly saying they don’t like it, and that it’s a lazy ass cartoon drawing of an ugly car. I haven’t seen anyone getting hysterical in this forum.
Nobody is “triggered and offended.” It’s a cartoon image of an ugly car that was possibly done in MS Paint. It’s utterly ridiculous, not worth going to put pearls on to clutch.
A lot of people, not of this parish admittedly, were extremely triggered and offended the other week.
Oh, SO much better!
*snicker*
The blacked out rear looks like one of those roll-up doors you see at a warehouse.
FWIW I don’t think it looks bad, but I also like Brutalist architecture so my judgement probably isn’t typical.
I kinda dig the side profile, but the rest? Woof.
Jag has created the perfect car for pimps who only accept crypto currency and surgeons who sell organ transplants with payment plans. This is the car of a villain in a dystopian YA novel. If Liberace is re-animated and becomes a dictator, it’s good to know he has something appropriate to drive.
This is nowhere near ostentatious enough for Liberace. He’d be in a Pagani or a Maybach.
Liberace would be in a pink-mirrored Phantom.
With Ermine-trimmed Unicorn upholstery.
I suppose his ghost will need to wait for a custom Zimmer version to add the required candelabra, fur trim, disco ball exterior and white leather convertible top.
In all seriousness, this sent me down a rabbit hole looking at Liberace’s car collection. That man certainly had a point of view when it came to car customization.
That rear 3/4 view is just a plain fucking joke. How in the world did this make it past a sketch? Cord understood how to do horizontal lines ages ago. These idiots do not. If this is supposed to save Jag, then it’s time to start planning the funeral.
Compare this to the Celestiq. Not good.
Well the Celestiq isn’t great either.
The side view of the bonnet is OK, actually looks like an old XJ from the 1980s — all it needs are double round headlights instead of the stupid slit things in the photo.
And it will have serious problems the first time it comes across a speed bump — if these computer renderings are anything like the running prototype (they do have one?) it will be scrape city.
Interior — well I suppose some one, somewhere gets a tingle when their teeth are Xrayed…
Yeah, it’s a horror.
But it’s just a CGI concept rendering.
This bit of Vaporware is so obviously not the car that’s been sighted in camo – and the proportions are nowhere near what’s going into production.
However if the details are similar – Jaguar is better off dead.
As far as the one that was canceled – It’s a darned good thing, because that one looks as if someone took a Model S and inflicted a pre-Ioniq/pre-Genesis Hyundai restyling upon it.
Just put the poor leaper out of it’s misery and make a nice coat from it.
But you know who did a far-far better job with their similarly packaged EV GT concepts?
Genesis.
I am betting $1 that this “release” is a side ploy. I give them that much. Anyone willing to make a buck? (likely an easy win)
Model S in profile with Mercedes W212 headlights basically sums it up. It wasn’t great.
Ah, yes: a license to be killed. As rapidly as possible.
Cute, JaGUar, so clever. So very clever. Tee hee!
> The actual production car will be a four-door GT.
I will die on the hill that a four-door GT is not a thing.
Also: in the middle of a frantic redesign/rebrand, and this is what we get? The most concept-y of concept cars? I guess it makes sense given the half-assed instagram-pop material we’ve seen so far, but this just really feels panicky.
A four-door GT is a totally sensible designation. It’s for touring, grandly. More doors don’t hinder that.
Now four-door coupe, that’s another story entirely.
Nope, sorry, not a thing. If you’ve got four people in the car for a long trip, it’s not a grand tour, it’s a family vacation.
It is the definition of the thing. Slick and sporty travel car, focusing on being more posh, comfortable and stylish than outright speed. The mission isn’t incompatible with being a four door.
A few 4 door GTs that are not things:
Aston Martin Rapide
Aston Martin Taraf
Bristol 405 4 door
BMW 6 Series GranCoupe
BMW 8 Series GranCoupe
Kia Stinger
1960’s Jaguar S-Type
Mercedes-Benz AMG-GT 4 door Coupe
1960’s Rolls Royce Silver Cloud/Bentley Continental Flying Spurs (by HJ Mulliner Park Ward)
Rover P5B V8 4 door coupe
That’s a great many fine four door vehicles – some luxury sedans, some sports sedans, some luxury sports sedans – but I don’t see a GT on that list. You can tell, because they’ve all got too many doors.
It looks like a ham. And by that I mean a pig’s butt.
…or the can that the ham came in.
The side profile is excellent. Why fuck it so badly with the front and back?
I don’t love the “squareness” of the front. That profile view, however, gives me goosebumps. I love the low slung look and don’t think it makes it looks “heavy”.
That interior is just silly, but probably not representative of the final product anyway.
Makes me think AUDI than jaGUar.
Everyone is going to go butalist (blame Cybertruck). They should have doubled down on organic cat and give it the speed and reflexes of one.
Adrian, I fear that you’re at risk of losing your British citizenship and a personal dressing-down from His Majesty (or John Cleese depending on availability).
Not because of criticizing Jaguar, that’s the new national sport, but because you wrote a whole design thinkpiece on a car with a squared-off steering wheel and failed to mention the Austin Allegro.
I would gladly give up my British citizenship in a heartbeat if I had anywhere else I could go.
I think Madagascar actively takes immigrants- and there is ample fruit available on the island. Plus great weather which any Londoner should appreciate. What’s to think about it?
What on God’s green earth, in everything I have revealed about myself here, makes you think I would consider that as an option?
You Brits love Spain.
Go work for Cupra.
They’re doing Goth these days.
There’s never any visa sponsorship for overseas positions. If you weren’t in pre-Brexit, forget it.
As a prospective buyer I have so many questions. Like, what size furnace filter does that giant HVAC vent on the back require? Do I need a filter subscription from the dealer or can I just pick up a 20x30x1 from Home Depot?
I will, after all, need to make sure the poors behind me can’t smell my money.
How else are the hookers supposed to do find you?
So many questions!
Follow the money!
Like beautiful women, beautiful cars need curves. Not rectangles.
Jaguar: Minecraft edition.
Exactly.
Ferrari 250 GTO. Jaguar E-type. Shelby Daytona Coupe. Citroen DS.
None of them have this aggressive angular bullshit. They’re also thin(by today’s standards), agile machines, with dainty openings and dainty wheels. They look fine and delicate.
Extremely hard disagree.
The NSX has nice curves.
I’m assuming you refer to women being preferable with hard angles. Therefore peak womanhood is Playstation one Tomb Raider Laura Croft?
I refer to cars, since the whole “CARS SHOULD LOOK LIKE WOMEMN HNNNGGGG” shit is bizarre.