Rumors are starting to swirl around European outlets suggesting that the long-suspected merger of Renault and Stellantis might finally be happening, and this time there’s a new player involved: BMW. Not since the Traveling Wilburys have forces so strong been united in a common cause.
For Stellantis this might be a relief as the company is having such a crap time in Italy that CEO Carlos Tavares is being dragged before that country’s parliament to explain why things are going so poorly. This is all happening against the backdrop of potential EU tariffs against China, which may end up passing after all.
And, finally, I’m going to wrap up The Morning Dump with an alarming report about Uber and Lyft drivers using their Teslas as proto-robotaxis. That’s a little bleak, but the Astros are no longer in the post-season so I’m feeling in a dark mood.
The European Supergroup Merger Is Nigh… Maybe
Individually, European carmakers are in trouble. They’re fighting for relevance in Europe, China, and the United States and not necessarily winning in any of those markets. It was bad enough when European brands had to fight other European brands. Now Europe’s carmakers are forced to try to beat brands from Japan, Korea, the USA, and China at home.
This friction led to serious murmurings earlier this year that Renault, fresh off its Nissan divorce, could hook up with Stellantis. Ever since the combination of Peugeot and Citroën into one automaker, the French have been left with the two state-supported car companies. It’s not an ideal situation for the French government, and you can imagine why it’s so appealing to French President Emmanuel Macron to try to combine them.
Most of these rumors seem to be coming out of Italy, so let’s start with Italian business publication First Online:
The idea is this: to create a all-European colossus to face the pitfalls of US and Chinese producers, to oust the Japanese Toyota from the top of the global manufacturers’ podium and surpass Volkswagen from the top of the European ones. An idea that, already written in the notes of Sergio Marchionne, has returned with the hypothesis of a merger between Stellantis and Renault right in coincidence with the Stellantis profit warning of yesterday, with the blessing first of all of Emmanuel Macron who also sees a political advantage in it, but also of John Elkann who would prefer to disengage and move to other sectors.
There’s a lot to unpack here.
I don’t need to explain all of the external threats to European carmakers, but the strange politics of France are worth clarifying a bit. France has a parliamentary system, but one that gives the executive a lot of power and space to create a government. The country’s left-wing party won the most seats, but not enough to win outright, so centrist Macron formed an uneasy alliance with the right to stay in power. Creating a bigger and theoretically more competitive global automaker with a decent chunk owned by France could be a plume in his chapeau.
And what of Stellantis Chairman John Elkann? I’m not as steeped in Italian business rumors as others, so take everything with a grain of sale. It seems like the implication is that cars are so 20th century and a huge pain to own right now, so why not get out while the getting is good? Or, at least, why not get out before the getting gets any worse? Elkann shot down these rumors earlier this year.
Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares has, allegedly, been against a merger that would almost surely see him sidelined early (though his days at Stellantis might already be numbered). A reporter asked Tavares about this earlier today in Italy and he called the idea “Pure speculation.”
…So you’re saying there’s a chance?
If the idea of Renault and Stellantis getting together isn’t wild enough a new person has entered the chat. If you saw the opening ceremony of the Paris Summer Olympics you know the French are fine with a three-partner merger of equals, though it’s a little kinky for ze Germans.
Again, all of this is coming out of Italian newspapers and Italian business sites. Every society has its own mores around the press and I am definitely not saying you shouldn’t entirely trust Italian newspapers. I would just maybe suggest pizza dough isn’t the only thing that the Italians are good at stretching.
The idea of creating an “Airbus of Cars” that would mimic the consolidation of a bunch of Europe’s carmakers the same way Airbus combined a trove of European aviation companies is an old one that traces its roots back to the late, great Sergio Marchionne, who essentially called it when he said mergers were the only thing that made sense. Later this month Renault CEO Luca de Meo is going to meet up with BMW’s Oliver Zipse and Tavares and this seems to be fueling a lot of these rumors.
From the hometown tabloid Torino Cronaca comes the best summation of the rumor:
The reason for the alliance would be first of all to counter Chinese competition, although Stellantis has a partnership – with an investment of 1.5 billion – with Leapmotor while Renault has it with Geely which controls, among others, Volvo. Then, in the whirlwind of rumors, BMW has now also entered , due to a meeting – a round table, to be precise – in the program of the Paris Motor Show which opens on October 13 and to which Stellantis also returns: on October 15, Luca De Meo, Carlos Tavare and Oliver Zipse, CEO of BMW , will be the protagonists of a debate, which will also address the topic of this hypothetical “Airbus of the car” .
How likely is any of this to happen? I think Stellants combining with Renault at some point in the future isn’t a complete given, though it’s probably never been more likely than now. The BMW piece doesn’t seem as imminent, although a partnership of some kind that doesn’t involve significant transfers of ownership makes sense to me.
Just because it’s maybe a good idea, however, doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. I would love to see more reporting on this from the German side in the run-up to the Paris Motor Show.
The Italian Parliament Would Like Carlos Tavares To Explain Why Everything Is Terrible Right Now
Imagine having to go to the Italian parliament to explain why no one seems to want the adorable but expensive Fiat 500e? That’s basically what Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares, pictured above, is going to have to do next week.
Should we quote another Italian outlet? Sure. Here’s Euractiv.it:
Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares will appear before the Italian Chamber of Deputies’ Commission for Productive Activities, Commerce, and Tourism and is expected to deliver a comprehensive report on the company’s automotive production in Italy.
Stellantis confirmed the meeting in a statement, expressing its “spirit of collaboration” and willingness to engage in dialogue with Italian institutions.
“Stellantis’ commitment to open and constructive communication with institutions remains unwavering. This includes our ongoing relationship with the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy, led by Minister Adolfo Urso, and the Italian parliament,” the statement read.
The big concern here seems to be Stellantis telling the local unions that Europe’s electric car market is in “deep trouble” and that the result could be reductions in output at the Italian plant that’s making the Fiat 500e.
Can EU Pass Its Chinese Tariffs?
The likelihood of the European Union passing tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese automakers seemed high as recently as two weeks ago, but wavering from some EU countries like Germany and Spain made the chances feel a little more 50/50 as of late.
According to Reuters, the pro-tariff bloc of France, Greece, Italy, and Poland might have enough support to push through the measures:
Under EU rules, the Commission can impose the tariffs for the next five years unless a qualified majority of 15 EU countries representing 65% of the EU’s population votes against the plan.
France, Greece, Italy and Poland will vote in favour, officials and sources in those countries told Reuters. Together, they represent 39% of the EU population.
Germany is expected to refrain.
Uber And Lyft Drivers Are Reportedly Already Acting Like They Have Robotaxis
The future is so much fun. You might be in your driverless robotaxi and some dude who looks like he just got kicked out of a ska band might try and stop your car to dibs your digis. OR, perhaps worse, the driver of your very-much-not-self-driving Tesla might just let the car drive.
With Tesla soon to unveil its own robotaxi, Uber and Lyft drivers are allegedly already using the company’s Full-Self-Driving software extensively.
From Reuters again:
A self-driving Tesla carrying a passenger for Uber rammed into an SUV at an intersection in suburban Las Vegas in April, an accident that sparked new concerns that a growing stable of self-styled “robotaxis” is exploiting a regulatory gray area in U.S. cities, putting lives at risk.
[…]
Many say the software, which costs $99 per month, has limitations, but that they use it because it helps reduce drivers’ stress and therefore allows them to work longer hours and earn more money.
This is an interesting grey area. Of course, there’s no reason why a for-hire driver shouldn’t be able to use a car’s safety system to help with driving. But a driver using it so they can do an extra long shift? That seems like a bad idea.
What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD
The film company A24 re-released the Talking Heads concert film “Stop Making Sense” and I was able to convince my buddy to go with me even though he couldn’t remember who the Talking Heads were. It’s a great film and it was a delight to see it in a theater. As part of the A24 re-release the company got together The National, Miley Cyrus, Paramore and others to do covers of songs from the album/movie. If you like Talking Heads it’s a fun listen. I particularly like this Toro y Moi version of “Genius of Love,” which I guess is technically a Tom Tom Club song.
The Big Question
Would you like to see a Renault-Stellantis-BMW merger? Does it make sense?
The only way this makes sense is if they rename themselves to “Global Tetrahedron” and start publishing “Good Car” magazine.
I truly expect Tavares to blame his divorce from Morgan Fairchild for the current Stelantis shit show.
Just throw shit at the wall til something sticks, eh Carlos?
I don’t see what BMW would have to gain. They’d be better off licensing technology.
I’m more of an impure speculation guy, myself, which leads me to question whether the melange à trois being speculated upon would result in better cars (and car sales) or just fewer choices. And if such a merger should result in the Airbus of autos, would the Boeing of autos here be far behind, ‘cause I’m not down with that. As an aside, the Reeperbahn in Hamburg and Taunusstrasse in Frankfurt suggest one should not undersell the Germans when it comes to kinkiness with, undoubtedly, pain involved. Though that last may be just impure speculation on my part.
There is no way BMW is gonna jump in that mess.
I can only imagine what BMW said after to themselves after selling Land Rover & Rover to Ford.
Hahaha, probably something like “Never Again!”
What’s German for “HAH! Suckers…”?
Well, it’s basically Schadenfreude.
I had an Uber drive in a Tesla once tell me he had it on FSD in Downtown Dallas, with me in the car. He was saying how great it was and that its going to put every other car maker out of business.
It almost crashed 3 times in 2 blocks.
I tell every driver in a Tesla that I’m not interested in them using it with me in the car.
And nobody looking at this in an anti-trust kind of way? Especially in Europe? Stellantis needs to go the other way and trim several brands.
monopolies are bad unless the government gets to control them.
I wouldn’t trust anything these folks built, that’s for sure.
Jeep + Renault. What could go wrong?
Might get a new XJ out of it.
or, with Citroen, a Méhari
Better yet – Ram Promaster with BMW badges.
Now that would be a sight to see.
I LOVE CONSOLIDATION!
kinda bleak.
Let’s go Tom Tom Club tho
And if Stellantis is any indication, it will STAY theoretical. Making such a large conglomeration work is not really tenable.
So Euro Leyland…
I like the topshot. It shows Fiat as a kneecap, which is an important part but also a verb for hindering or hobbling something/someone.
The fancy English word for kneecap is ‘patella’. Patella in Italian means ‘limpet’, which can be either a friendly mollusk or an explosive device attached to a wall or to the hull of a ship (e.g. a limpet mine).
There’s a lot of duality captured in that image. Or I’m reading a teensy bit too much into it.
Regarding the merger of BMW, Renault, and Stellantis- William Durant called, and he wants his idea back.
Also, imagine how much worse BMWs will get with Renault on board. Didn’t do Nissan any favors, that’s for sure.
If BMW doesn’t end up in charge of the resulting conglomerate, it’ll be bankrupt within a decade.
Despite my dislike of BMW (which stems from being a former BMW dealership technician), they finally figured out how to sell cars in the USA, and unlike Stellantis and French Nissan, they actually know how to train and pay their technicians. BMW would have to completely overhaul the brands they’d acquire, but they’re incredibly efficient, even if they always find the most complicated way to do things.
BMW is also the only European company competently selling EVs.
(Volvo is not a European company)
Exactly. The BMW iX and i4 debuted right as I was leaving BMW. They weren’t just the best electric SUV and car I’d ever driven, they’re actually two of the best driving cars I’ve ever driven, period. They’re not just competent, they’re building EVs that are objectively fantastic cars that happen to be EVs.
The biggest eye-opener when I went to work for BMW after over a decade of mostly working on Japanese, Korean, and American cars for a living, was that their gasoline cars were the worst to work on, their diesels were much easier, and their electric/plug-in-hybrid were even easier (with the exception of i8 coolant system bleeding).
Maybe it’s semantics; Volvo Cars AB is owned by Geely after being sold on by Ford, but still operates an independent HQ in Sweden and is still traded under VOLCAR.B.
The Volvo Group, or Volvo AB, is the truck, bus and construction vehicle business and is a separate company in Sweden. They do make some BEVs.
I agree, Volvo Trucks is a European company. I was referring to the Geely-controlled passenger car brand.
-Method Man
Is BMW the GZA in this case? Also “Breaker, Breaker” is an underrated song.
I would say so, it’s certainly not Chrysler
Any more mergers for Stellantis would more than likely require brands to be shut down, and that may likely include any from whoever they merge with. Maybe some brands would go regional instead. Stellantis already has too many European brands who compete in the same space.
Far too much competition. I could maybe see just merging with BMW, but then Alfa Romeo and likely Maserati go away. It makes more sense than including Renault.
I think this includes killing, at the very least, Lancia.
I think Lancia could definitely find a niche that’d work perfectly well for it, like a pseudo–Italian Buick/Jeep: a more premium feel than Fiat’s and Peugeot’s, with a lean into its rally (offroad) heritage like they’re currently trying to do.
Alfa Romeo has no chance in hell to live within another merger if either or happens. Maserati can’t be supported if they merge with a company that has something like Rolls Royce.
Mini + Fiat consolidation
Fiat has a relatively decent presence around the world with their commercial products. While they talk about it being separate (Fiat Professional), they still sell everything under the same Fiat-only branding. They’d have to do the Dodge/Ram split to consolidate Fiat and Mini. Which is totally possible, but a lot of work. Plus, they still sell a lot of cars Mini would never.
So is their whole strategy “Please China, give us some cheap batteries”? That is what it sounds like. Stellantis might have a hook up. Same with Renault. Guess BMW just wants that, there can’t be anything else they’d want from those two companies.
All these companies got played. They go to China to get some short-term sales, teach the Chinese companies to build better cars as the price of admission to get those short-term sales, are now getting pushed out of the Chinese market because they cannot hope to compete on price when the Chinese manufacturers are building decent cars like they were taught, and now realize they created a monster than can push them out of their own market.
But hey, they created some “shareholder value” in 2010 for 3 quarters, so bonuses all around.
I’ve created a monster
‘Cause nobody wants to see Masers no more
They want XPeng, we’re chopped liver
Well, if you want XPeng, this is what I’ll give ya
A little battery mixed with some forced labor
the latest example of how everyone (in the West) loves cheaper stuff more than we hate slave labor, as long as that slave labor is far away.
Stellantis should just go POOF! Would anybody miss them at all?
Owners of Stellantis-mobiles under warranty, like me.
This is a horrendous idea, Stellantis is already too unwieldy to manage effectively, grafting another two automakers onto it is only going to drag those companies down into the same quagmire, this is looking like a repeat of the government-pushed mergers that combined Austin and Nuffield into BMC, BMC and Jaguar into BMH and BMH and Leyland into BL, and ultimately killed the UK auto industry by putting all its eggs in one impossible to manage basket
On the other hand, it would allow additional lay offs of “redundant” employees and enrich shareholders!
Only until the company fails, gets nationalized, and shareholders are wiped out
Okay, I guess I was looking at this from an American lens. Oops.
That is from an American lens, what do you think happened to GM shareholders in 2009? Or, frankly, Enron shareholders, if you go back that far
If you want to get right down to the heart of the matter, the Enron debacle is the source of most of the stupid, short-sighted decisions we see from automakers and most all corporate entities today.
fingers crossed!
Reminiscent of the UK auto industry in the 1960-1970s. Didn’t work out well for any of the brands.
Combining Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Citroën, Dodge, DS, Fiat, Jeep, Lancia, Maserati, Opel, Peugeot, Ram, Vauxhall, Renault, Dacia, Alpine, BMW, Mini, and Rolls Royce would be the automotive equivalent of a room full of monkeys with typewriters.
Eventually, one of them will turn out something of value.
It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times…
Good enough
-Renau-MW-lantis management
Maybe, but how deep in feces & banana peels would the room be before that actually happens?
Wait, how’d Renault & Dacia get embroiled in the mess above?
They had their fun with Tavares, Nissan, and the Japanese government (and, somehow, quietly stepped out of the sun)
This case seems more like having a room full of donkeys who collectively have one old working typewriter and several broken typewriters that used to sort of function.
Wait? I didn’t know we were talking about Torch’s basement
Yes, because what Stellantis needs is MORE brands.
Wtff.
I could imagine a tech sharing alliance, but not an actual merger. I imagine any discussions stalling out at who gets to be who’s major stake holder. Chrysler has already been through a “merger of equals” with a major German player, and it didn’t help anyone. That has likely created some gunshyness as well.
I’m not as much of an expert on Euro-market cars as some, but at first glance I wonder what Stellantis would get out of merging with Renault.
I certainly see the benefits to the French government and to Renault, but if Stellantis is well stocked with anything, it’s small European cars. Maybe Renault is ahead on hybrids/electrification?
I am laughing at the idea of BMWs and Rams being sold in the same dealership though.
I think the advantage might be that Stellantis is behaving like a company in financial distress, which could mean they actually are in financial distress. Merging or being acquired is a good way out of that.
“I am laughing at the idea of BMWs and Rams being sold in the same dealership though.”
As long as Dodge doesn’t use BMW’s cooling systems.
Hmm, imagine a gigantic modern BMW grille on a friggin’ one-ton Ram. Now that’s subtle.
Which one is Packard and which one is Studebaker?
Which vehicle manufacturer mergers in the last 60 years resulted in success over the long term?
Chrysler and AMC (Jeep) is probably the best.
Lots of smaller manufacturers have been kept alive and have record sales under big corporations now (Lamborghini, Bentley, RR).
But I wouldn’t have a lot of confidence in this merger.
Vehicle platforms that didn’t originate when
ObamaBush was in office?Traveling Wilburys! Now there’s a name I’ve not heard in a long time. A long time.
They never did explain WHY Jan was in love with the Monkey Man.
Because. Just because.
Monkey Man had a 7″ screen.